<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org">
<title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology current issue</title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org</link>
<description>Journal of the American College of Cardiology RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>February 14, 2012</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</prism:publicationName>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/e13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/A33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/635?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/644?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/655?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/665?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/688?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/696?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/698?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/699?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/700?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/701?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/702?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/702-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://content.onlinejacc.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title>
<url>http://content.onlinejacc.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/e13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Polyarteritis Nodosa Involving Renal and Coronary Arteries]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/e13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hwang, J., Yang, J. H., Kim, D.-K., Cha, H.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/e13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Polyarteritis Nodosa Involving Renal and Coronary Arteries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>IMAGES IN CARDIOLOGY</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/A33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inside This Issue]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/A33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(12)00171-4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/A33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inside This Issue]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A33</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/635?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pre-Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome, and Cardiovascular Risk]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/635?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>Pre-diabetes represents an elevation of plasma glucose above the normal range but below that of clinical diabetes. Pre-diabetes can be identified as either impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The latter is detected by oral glucose tolerance testing. Both IFG and IGT are risk factors for type 2 diabetes, and risk is even greater when IFG and IGT occur together. Pre-diabetes commonly associates with the metabolic syndrome. Both in turn are closely associated with obesity. The mechanisms whereby obesity predisposes to pre-diabetes and metabolic syndrome are incompletely understood but likely have a common metabolic soil. Insulin resistance is a common factor; systemic inflammation engendered by obesity may be another. Pre-diabetes has only a minor impact on microvascular disease; glucose-lowering drugs can delay conversion to diabetes, but whether in the long run the drug approach will delay development of microvascular disease is in dispute. To date, the drug approach to prevention of microvascular disease starting with pre-diabetes has not been evaluated. Pre-diabetes carries some predictive power for macrovascular disease, but most of this association appears to be mediated through the metabolic syndrome. The preferred clinical approach to cardiovascular prevention is to treat all the metabolic risk factors. For both pre-diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the desirable approach is lifestyle intervention, especially weight reduction and physical activity. When drug therapy is contemplated and when the metabolic syndrome is present, the primary consideration is prevention of cardiovascular disease. The major targets are elevations of cholesterol and blood pressure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grundy, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.080</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/635</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pre-Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome, and Cardiovascular Risk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>635</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>643</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/644?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Is a Systemic Illness in Need of Systemic Treatment: Is Therapeutic Hypothermia One Possibility?]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/644?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>Early observations of cardiogenic shock as a systemic clinical syndrome were first described in 1942. Today, cardiogenic shock remains the leading cause of death among patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction (MI). Mortality rates in post-MI cardiogenic shock approach 50% despite rapid revascularization, optimal medical care, and use of mechanical support. New therapeutic strategies with global systemic effects may offer advances in treatment and outcome in post-MI cardiogenic shock. Therapeutic hypothermia for post-MI cardiogenic shock has multiple potentially beneficial physiologic effects, including the potential to improve post-ischemic cardiac function and hemodynamics, decrease myocardial damage, and reduce end-organ injury from prolonged hypoperfusion. Available data in animal models of post-MI cardiogenic shock and ischemia/reperfusion injury and small case series of human patients with cardiogenic shock suggest its promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for cardiogenic shock in the post-MI setting. We hypothesize that systemic therapeutic hypothermia could decrease morbidity and mortality in post-MI patients with cardiogenic shock and warrants study a new treatment that could be widely available at hospitals worldwide.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stegman, B. M., Newby, L. K., Hochman, J. S., Ohman, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.010</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/644</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Is a Systemic Illness in Need of Systemic Treatment: Is Therapeutic Hypothermia One Possibility?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>VIEWPOINT</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>644</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>647</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis in the United States: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to assess percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis in routine U.S. clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Percutaneous coronary intervention for ULMCA stenosis is controversial; however, current use and outcomes of ULMCA PCI in routine U.S. clinical practice have not been described.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated 5,627 patients undergoing ULMCA PCI at 693 centers within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Catheterization Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry for temporal trends in PCI use (2004 to 2008), patient characteristics, and in-hospital mortality. Thirty-month mortality and composite major adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization) with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents were compared using inverse probability weighted (IPW) hazard ratios (HRs) in a nonrandomized Medicare-linked (age &ge;65 years) patient cohort (n = 2,765).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ULMCA PCI was performed in 4.3% of patients with ULMCA stenosis. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates ranged from 2.9% for elective cases to 45.1% for emergent/salvage cases. By 30 months, 57.9% of the elderly ULMCA PCI population experienced death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization, and 42.7% died. Patients receiving drug-eluting stents (versus bare-metal stents) had a lower 30-month mortality (IPW HR: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 0.96), but the composite of major adverse events were similar (IPW HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.06).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In the United States, ULMCA PCI is performed in &lt;5% of patients with ULMCA disease and is generally reserved for those at high procedural risk. Adverse events are common in elderly patients and are related to patient and procedural characteristics, including stent type.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan, J. M., Dai, D., Patel, M. R., Rao, S. V., Armstrong, E. J., Messenger, J. C., Curtis, J. P., Shunk, K. A., Anstrom, K. J., Eisenstein, E. L., Weintraub, W. S., Peterson, E. D., Douglas, P. S., Hillegass, W. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.883</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis in the United States: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>654</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/655?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High Prevalence of a Pathological Response to Acetylcholine Testing in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries: The ACOVA Study (Abnormal COronary VAsomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries)]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/655?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed at determining the prevalence of epicardial and microvascular coronary spasm in patients with anginal symptoms, despite angiographically normal coronary arteries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Despite a typical clinical presentation with exercise-related anginal symptoms (chest pain or dyspnea) with or without occasional attacks of resting chest pain suggestive of coronary artery disease, 40% of patients undergoing diagnostic angiography have normal or "near" normal coronary arteriograms. Many of these patients are given a diagnosis of noncardiac chest pain, and some are considered to have microvascular angina. However, we speculate that abnormal coronary vasomotion (reduced vasodilatation with exercise = reduced coronary flow reserve and/or vasospasm at rest) might also represent a plausible explanation for the symptoms of the patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a prospective study in 304 consecutive patients (50% men, mean age 66 &plusmn; 10 years) with exertional anginal symptoms undergoing diagnostic angiography. A total of 139 patients (46%) had &ge;50% coronary artery disease in at least 1 coronary artery, 21 patients (7%) had luminal narrowings ranging from &gt;20% to 49%, and 144 patients (47%) had normal coronary arteries or only minimal irregularities (&lt;20% diameter reduction).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>One hundred twenty-four patients of the latter (86%) underwent intracoronary acetylcholine (ACH) testing, which elicited coronary spasm in 77 patients (62%), 35 patients (45%) with epicardial spasm (&ge;75% diameter reduction with reproduction of the symptoms of the patient) and 42 patients (55%) with microvascular spasm (reproduction of symptoms, ischemic electrocardiographic changes, and no epicardial spasm).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Nearly 50% of patients undergoing diagnostic angiography for assessment of stable angina had angiographically normal or near normal coronary arteriograms. The ACH test triggered epicardial or microvascular coronary spasm in nearly two-thirds of these patients. Our results suggest that abnormal coronary vasomotion plays a pathogenic role in this setting and that the ACH test might be useful to identify patients with cardiac symptoms, despite normal coronaries. (Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion in Patients With Suspected CAD But Normal Coronary Arteries; <A HREF="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00921856?term=NCT00921856&amp;rank=1">NCT00921856</A>)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ong, P., Athanasiadis, A., Borgulya, G., Mahrholdt, H., Kaski, J. C., Sechtem, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.015</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/655</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High Prevalence of a Pathological Response to Acetylcholine Testing in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries: The ACOVA Study (Abnormal COronary VAsomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Coronary Artery Disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>655</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>662</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coronary Vasospasm and Coronary Atherosclerosis: Do We Have to Choose?]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marzilli, M., Huqi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.014</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/663</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coronary Vasospasm and Coronary Atherosclerosis: Do We Have to Choose?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial Comment</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>664</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/665?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in Fitness and Fatness on the Development of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Hypertension, Metabolic Syndrome, and Hypercholesterolemia]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/665?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought examine the independent and combined associations of changes in fitness and fatness with the subsequent incidence of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors of hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The relative and combined contributions of fitness and fatness to health are controversial, and few studies are available on the associations of changes in fitness and fatness with the development of CVD risk factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We followed up 3,148 healthy adults who received at least 3 medical examinations. Fitness was determined by using a maximal treadmill test. Fatness was expressed by percent body fat and body mass index. Changes in fitness and fatness between the first and second examinations were categorized into loss, stable, or gain groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the 6-year follow-up after the second examination, 752, 426, and 597 adults developed hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia, respectively. Maintaining or improving fitness was associated with lower risk of developing each outcome, whereas increasing fatness was associated with higher risk of developing each outcome, after adjusting for possible confounders and fatness or fitness for each other (all p for trend &lt;0.05). In the joint analyses, the increased risks associated with fat gain appeared to be attenuated, although not completely eliminated, when fitness was maintained or improved. In addition, the increased risks associated with fitness loss were also somewhat attenuated when fatness was reduced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both maintaining or improving fitness and preventing fat gain are important to reduce the risk of developing CVD risk factors in healthy adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, D.-c., Sui, X., Church, T. S., Lavie, C. J., Jackson, A. S., Blair, S. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/665</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in Fitness and Fatness on the Development of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Hypertension, Metabolic Syndrome, and Hypercholesterolemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Coronary Artery Disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>665</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>672</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/673?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Left Atrial Function Predicts Heart Failure Hospitalization in Subjects With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Coronary Heart Disease: Longitudinal Data From the Heart and Soul Study]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/673?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to determine whether left atrial (LA) dysfunction predicts heart failure (HF) hospitalization in subjects with preserved baseline ejection fraction (EF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Among patients with preserved EF, factors leading to HF are not fully understood. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated LA dysfunction at the time of HF, but longitudinal data on antecedent atrial function are lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed resting transthoracic echocardiography in 855 subjects with coronary heart disease and EF &ge;50%. Left atrial functional index (LAFI) was calculated as ([LA emptying fraction <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> left ventricular outflow tract-velocity time integral] / [indexed LA end-systolic volume]), where LA emptying fraction was defined as (LA end-systolic volume &ndash; LA end-diastolic volume) / LA end-systolic volume. We used Cox models to evaluate the association between LAFI and HF hospitalization.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 106 participants (12.4%) were hospitalized for HF. Rates of HF hospitalization were inversely proportional to quartile (Q) of LAFI: Q1, 47 per 1,000 person-years; Q2, 18.3; Q3, 9.6; and Q4, 5.3 (p &lt; 0.001). Each standard deviation decrease in LAFI was associated with a 2.6-fold increased hazard of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (unadjusted hazard ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.1 to 3.3, p &lt; 0.001), and the association persisted even after adjustment for clinical risk factors, N-terminal pro&ndash;B-type natriuretic peptide, and a wide range of echocardiographic parameters (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 2.1, p = 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Left atrial dysfunction independently predicts HF hospitalization in subjects with coronary heart disease and preserved baseline EF. The LAFI may be useful for HF risk stratification, and LA dysfunction may be a potential therapeutic target.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Welles, C. C., Ku, I. A., Kwan, D. M., Whooley, M. A., Schiller, N. B., Turakhia, M. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.012</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/673</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Left Atrial Function Predicts Heart Failure Hospitalization in Subjects With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Coronary Heart Disease: Longitudinal Data From the Heart and Soul Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Heart Failure</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>673</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>680</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/681?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Timing of the Most Recent Device Procedure Influences the Clinical Outcome of Lead-Associated Endocarditis: Results of the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort)]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/681?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether the timing of the most recent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedure, either a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, influences the clinical presentation and outcome of lead-associated endocarditis (LAE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The CIED infection rate has increased at a time of increased device use. LAE is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The clinical presentation and course of LAE were evaluated by the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Cohort) registry, an international registry enrolling patients with CIED infection. Consecutive LAE patients enrolled in the Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Cohort registry between January 2009 and May 2011 were analyzed. The clinical features and outcomes of 2 groups were compared based on the time from the most recent CIED procedure (early, &lt;6 months; late, &gt;6 months).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Cohort registry entered 145 patients with LAE (early = 43, late = 102). Early LAE patients presented with signs and symptoms of local pocket infection, whereas a remote source of bacteremia was present in 38% of patients with late LAE but only 8% of early LAE (p &lt; 0.01). Staphylococcal species were the most frequent pathogens in both early and late LAE. Treatment consisted of removal of all hardware and intravenous administration of antibiotics. In-hospital mortality was low (early = 7%, late = 6%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The clinical presentation of LAE is influenced by the time from the most recent CIED procedure. Although clinical manifestations of pocket infection are present in the majority of patients with early LAE, late LAE should be considered in any CIED patient who presents with fever, bloodstream infection, or signs of sepsis, even if the device pocket appears uninfected. Prompt recognition and management may improve outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenspon, A. J., Prutkin, J. M., Sohail, M. R., Vikram, H. R., Baddour, L. M., Danik, S. B., Peacock, J., Falces, C., Miro, J. M., Blank, E., Naber, C., Carrillo, R. G., Tseng, C.-H., Uslan, D. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/681</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Timing of the Most Recent Device Procedure Influences the Clinical Outcome of Lead-Associated Endocarditis: Results of the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Heart Rhythm Disorders</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>681</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>687</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/688?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography After Stress Testing: Results From a Multicenter, Statewide Registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium)]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/688?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between stress test results and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) findings and comparative diagnostic performance of the 2 modalities in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Recent data suggest that only a third of patients undergoing ICA have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD); accurate pre-ICA risk stratification is needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>At 47 centers participating in the ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium) in Michigan, patients without known CAD who were undergoing CCTA within 3 months of a stress test were studied. Demographics, risk factors, symptoms, and stress test results were correlated with obstructive CAD (&gt;50% stenosis) on CCTA and ICA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 6,198 patients (age 56 &plusmn; 12 years, 48% men), &gt;50% stenosis was seen in 1,158 (18.7%) on CCTA. Independent predictors included male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83 to 3.06), current smoking (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.57 to 3.17), older age (OR per 10-year increment: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.89 to 2.41), hypertension (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.34), and typical angina (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.12). Stress test results were not predictive. Among patients undergoing ICA (n = 621), there was a strong correlation of ICA with CCTA findings (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.57 to 14.8, p &lt; 0.001), but not stress results (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.11, p = 0.17).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Stress test findings did not predict obstructive CAD on CCTA, observed in &lt;20% of patients in this large study group. The strong association of CCTA with ICA suggests that it may serve as an effective "gatekeeper" to invasive testing in patients needing adjudication of stress test results. (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium: A Collaborative Quality Improvement Project [ACIC]; <A HREF="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00640068?term=NCT00640068&amp;rank=1">NCT00640068</A>)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinnaiyan, K. M., Raff, G. L., Goraya, T., Ananthasubramaniam, K., Gallagher, M. J., Abidov, A., Boura, J. A., Share, D., Peyser, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.886</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/688</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography After Stress Testing: Results From a Multicenter, Statewide Registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>688</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>695</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/696?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: A Noninvasive Escape When Stress Tests Fail (Caught Between Guidelines and Gut Feeling)]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/696?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Feyter, P. J., Nieman, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.016</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/696</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: A Noninvasive Escape When Stress Tests Fail (Caught Between Guidelines and Gut Feeling)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial Comment</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>696</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>697</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/698?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Shone's Complex and Levoatriocardinal Vein: A Rare Association]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/698?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rauch, R., Grosse-Wortmann, L., Jones, J., Burrill, E., Welisch, E., Rosenberg, H. C., Norozi, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.081</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/698</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Shone's Complex and Levoatriocardinal Vein: A Rare Association]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>IMAGES IN CARDIOLOGY</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>698</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>698</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/699?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Carotid Intima-Medial Thickness in National Football League Players as an Index of Cardiovascular Disease Risk]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/699?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahrensfield, D. C., Bove, A. A., Tucker, A. M., Lincoln, A. E., Dunn, R. E., Vogel, R. A., National Football League Subcommittee on Cardiovascular Health]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.884</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/699</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Carotid Intima-Medial Thickness in National Football League Players as an Index of Cardiovascular Disease Risk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Correspondence</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>699</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>700</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/700?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Calcium Computed Tomography for Prognosis With Regard to Mortality]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/700?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roehm, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.068</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/700</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Calcium Computed Tomography for Prognosis With Regard to Mortality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>700</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>701</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/701?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/701?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Min, J. K., Dunning, A., Lin, F. Y., Achenbach, S., Al-Mallah, M., Budoff, M. J., Cademartiri, F., Callister, T. Q., Chang, H.-J., Cheng, V., Chinnaiyan, K., Chow, B. J. W., Delago, A., Hadamitzky, M., Hausleiter, J., Kaufmann, P., Maffei, E., Raff, G., Shaw, L. J., Villines, T., Berman, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.885</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/701</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>701</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>701</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/702?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/702?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.004</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/702</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>CORRECTIONS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>702</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>702</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/702-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/59/7/702-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-06T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.006</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jacc;59/7/702-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>CORRECTIONS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>59</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>702</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>702</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
