|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:2029-2036, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.071
(Published online 5 November 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





* Department of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York, New York
Cardiovascular Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Manuscript received February 16, 2007; revised manuscript received June 27, 2007, accepted July 2, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. J. Dawn Abbott, Rhode Island Hospital, 814 APC, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02903. (Email: jabbott{at}lifespan.org).
Objectives: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) as used in routine clinical practice.
Background: Randomized trials have shown that DES prevent target vessel revascularization in selected patients, but whether this translates into superior outcomes, compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), for the full spectrum of patients treated with DES in North America is unknown.
Methods: Patients in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry enrolled in 2004 who received at least 1 DES (n = 1,460) were compared with 1,763 patients enrolled in the recruitment period immediately preceding the approval of DES (2001 to 2002) who received at least 1 BMS.
Results: Patients receiving DES more often had diabetes mellitus and less often presented with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). At 1 year, cumulative death and MI was 7.6% in DES- and 8.7% in BMS-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 1.15; p = 0.34). The 1-year rate of target vessel revascularization was 5.0% in DES and 9.2% in BMS patients (p < 0.001), and the risk of any repeat revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass was lower in DES patients (adjusted HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.60; p < 0.001). Patients with both simple and complex lesion characteristics benefited from DES with lower risk of repeat target vessel revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention compared with BMS (any complex lesion: adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83; absence of any complex lesion: adjusted HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71). The 1-year incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.0% in DES patients.
Conclusions: The generalized use of DES resulted in better outcomes than BMS, with fewer clinically driven revascularization procedures and similar rates of death and MI at 1 year.
| ||||||||
Related Article
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007 50: 2037-2038.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Mauri, T. S. Silbaugh, P. Garg, R. E. Wolf, K. Zelevinsky, A. Lovett, M. R. Varma, Z. Zhou, and S.-L. T. Normand Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., September 25, 2008; 359(13): 1330 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Shishehbor, S. S. Goel, S. R. Kapadia, D. L. Bhatt, P. Kelly, R. E. Raymond, J. M. Galla, S. J. Brener, P. L. Whitlow, and S. G. Ellis Long-Term Impact of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents on All-Cause Mortality J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1041 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Kirtane and D. J. Cohen When Is Better Not Good Enough?: Insights From the COURAGE Economic Study Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2008; 1(1): 4 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Abbott Revealing the Silver and Red Lining in Drug-Eluting Stents With Angioscopy Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 7 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Brodie, T. Stuckey, W. Downey, A. Humphrey, B. Bradshaw, C. Metzger, J. Hermiller, F. Krainin, S. Juk, B. Cheek, et al. Outcomes and Complications With Off-Label Use of Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2008; 1(4): 405 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mauri and S.-L. T. Normand Studies of Drug-Eluting Stents: To Each His Own? Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2047 - 2050. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines, J. A. Goldstein, and R. D. Safian Should We Routinely Use Drug-Eluting Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction?: Let's Wait and See J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 136 - 138. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al. Highlights of the year in JACC 2007. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
In Clinical Practice, Drug-Eluting Stents Outperform Bare-Metal Stents Journal Watch Cardiology, December 26, 2007; 2007(1226): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Buttner and F.-J. Neumann Peeling-Off Labels: Mounting Evidence for Benefit of Drug-Eluting Stents With Off-Label Use J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2037 - 2038. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |