CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART FAILURE
Comparison of a Radiofrequency-Based Wireless Pressure Sensor to Swan-Ganz Catheter and Echocardiography for Ambulatory Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Heart Failure
Hugo E. Verdejo, MD*,
Pablo F. Castro, MD*,*,
Roberto Concepción, MD ,
Marcela A. Ferrada, RN*,
Mario A. Alfaro, MD ,
Milton E. Alcaíno, MD ,
Carlos C. Deck, MD, FASCI and
Robert C. Bourge, MD
* Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Hospital DIPRECA, Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Manuscript received January 31, 2007;
revised manuscript received May 23, 2007,
accepted June 3, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Pablo F. Castro, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. (Email: pcastro{at}med.puc.cl).
Objectives: The goal of this work was to evaluate the accuracy of a new heart failure (HF) sensor (HFS) (Heart Failure Sensor, CardioMEMS Inc., Atlanta, Georgia) pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring compared with Swan-Ganz (SG) (Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, Illinois) catheterization and echocardiography (ECHO) in ambulatory HF patients.
Background: There is an increasing interest in the development of ambulatory monitoring devices aiming to adjust therapy and prevent hospitalizations in HF patients.
Methods: Twelve patients with HF and New York Heart Association functional class II to IV were included in this study. The HFS was deployed into the pulmonary artery under angiography, allowing wireless PAP measurement. Two independent blind operators performed 3 HFS measurements at each visit, with simultaneous ECHO at 2, 14, 30, 60, and 90 days. Swan-Ganz catheterization was performed at 0 and 60 days. Linear regression was used as a measure of agreement. Variability between methods and interobserver variability were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Mean age was 63 ± 14.6 years. Systolic PAP was 64 ± 22 mm Hg and 58 ± 22 mm Hg for HFS and SG, respectively (p < 0.01). Both methods showed a significant correlation (r2 = 0.96 baseline, r2 = 0.90 follow-up, p < 0.01), with a mean difference of 6.2 ± 4.5 mm Hg. Diastolic PAP was 23 ± 14 mm Hg and 28 ± 16 mm Hg for HFS and SG, respectively (r2 = 0.88 baseline, r2 = 0.48 follow-up, p < 0.01), with a mean difference of –1.6 ± 6.8 mm Hg. Systolic PAP was 60 ± 20 mm Hg and 62 ± 12 mm Hg for HFS and ECHO, respectively (r2 = 0.75, p < 0.01), with a mean difference of –2.6 ± 11 mm Hg. There was no significant interobserver difference.
Conclusions: The HFS provides an accurate method for PAP assessment in the intermediate follow-up of HF patients.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BNP = B-type natriuretic peptide | | ECHO = echocardiography | | HF = heart failure | | HFS = heart failure sensor | | NYHA = New York Heart Association | | PAdia = diastolic pulmonary artery pressure | | PAP = pulmonary artery pressure | | PAsys = systolic pulmonary artery pressure | | RAP = right atrial pressure | | SG = Swan-Ganz |
|
Related Article
-
New Approaches to Hemodynamic Measurement: Cool Devices But a Shaky Infrastructure
- Marc A. Silver
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007 50: 2383-2384.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Silver
New Approaches to Hemodynamic Measurement: Cool Devices But a Shaky Infrastructure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 18, 2007;
50(25):
2383 - 2384.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|