cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:2111-2116, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.056 (Published online 12 November 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2007.06.056v1
50/22/2111    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solinas, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Solinas, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, R.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Gender-Specific Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Emilia Solinas, MD, PhD*, Eugenia Nikolsky, MD, PhD, FACC*, Alexandra J. Lansky, MD, FACC*, Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, SM*, Marie-Claude Morice, MD, FACC{dagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Joachim Schofer, MD§, Erick Schampaert, MD||, Tereza Pucelikova, MD*, Jiro Aoki, MD*, Martin Fahy, MSc*, George D. Dangas, MD, PhD, FACC*, Jeffrey W. Moses, MD, FACC*, Donald E. Cutlip, MD, FACC, Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC* and Roxana Mehran, MD, FACC*,*

* Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
{dagger} Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France
{ddagger} Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Centre for Cardiology and Vascular Intervention, Hamburg, Germany
|| Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

Manuscript received April 5, 2007; revised manuscript received June 4, 2007, accepted June 5, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Roxana Mehran, 55 East 59th Street, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10022. (Email: rmehran{at}crf.org).

Objectives: We examined the impact of gender on outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).

Background: Although gender-specific differences in outcome after implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) have been described, there are no data assessing outcomes of women treated with SES.

Methods: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis from 4 randomized SES versus BMS trials (RAVEL [Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization], SIRIUS [SIRolImUS-coated Bx Velocity balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions], E-SIRIUS [Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries], and C-SIRIUS [Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries]) and analyzed outcomes as a function of gender.

Results: Of 1,748 patients, 1,251 were men and 497 were women. A total of 878 patients were randomized to SES (629 men and 249 women), and 870 patients were randomized to BMS (622 men and 248 women). Compared with men, women were older and more frequently had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Although overall clinical outcomes were similar in both genders, treatment with SES was associated with significant (p < 0.0001) reductions in rates of in-segment binary restenosis both in women (6.3% vs. 43.8%) and in men (6.4% vs. 35.6%), resulting in a significant reduction in 1-year major adverse cardiac events, driven by a lower incidence of target lesion revascularization/target vessel revascularization in both genders. By multivariable analysis, female gender was not an independent predictor of in-segment binary restenosis or clinical outcomes regardless of stent type.

Conclusions: In this analysis, despite less favorable baseline clinical and angiographic features in women compared with men, the angiographic and clinical benefits of SES were independent of gender.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BMS = bare metal stent(s)
  CI = confidence interval
  DS = diameter stenosis
  HR = hazard ratio
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MLD = minimal luminal diameter
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  RVD = reference vessel diameter
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s)
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Drug-Eluting Stents Benefit Women as Well as Men
Journal Watch Women's Health, February 14, 2008; 2008(214): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home