cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1214-1222, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.019 (Published online 9 September 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2007.06.019v1
50/13/1214    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonton, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simonton, C. A.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Paclitaxel- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents

Results From a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry—STENT Group

Charles A. Simonton, MD, FACC, FSCAI*,*, Bruce Brodie, MD{dagger}, Barrett Cheek, MD{ddagger}, Fred Krainin, MD§, Chris Metzger, MD||, James Hermiller, MD#, Stanley Juk, MD**, Peter Duffy, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Angela Humphrey, MS{ddagger}{ddagger}, Marcy Nussbaum, MS{ddagger}{ddagger}, Sherry Laurent, PhD{ddagger}{ddagger} STENT Group

* Carolinas Heart Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
{dagger} LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Greensboro, North Carolina
{ddagger} High Point Regional Health System, High Point, North Carolina
§ McLeod Regional Medical Center, Florence, South Carolina
|| Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, Tennessee
# Indiana Heart Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
** Sisters of Charity Providence Hospitals, Columbia, South Carolina
{dagger}{dagger} Moore Regional Hospital, Pinehurst, North Carolina
{ddagger}{ddagger} R. Stuart Dickson Institute for Health Studies, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

Manuscript received March 20, 2007; revised manuscript received May 29, 2007, accepted June 18, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Charles A. Simonton, Sanger Clinic, 1001 Blythe Boulevard, Suite 300, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203. (Email: Charles.Simonton{at}carolinashealthcare.org).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the 9-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for coronary artery stenosis.

Background: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) registry is the first multicenter registry in the U.S. to collect long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents from "real-world" practice.

Methods: Data on all percutaneous coronary interventions in 8 U.S. hospital centers were collected in the STENT registry between 2003 and 2005. In this prospective, nonrandomized, observational study, the choice of procedures was at the physicians' discretion. Patients who only received a PES (n = 4,671) or SES (n = 4,555) and completed 9-month follow-up (93.8% of eligible) were included for analysis. Primary end points were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 9 months. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (any of the 3 primary end points) and stent thrombosis.

Results: At 9 months, death, MI, and TVR occurred in 2.2%, 2.0%, and 4.1%, respectively, of the PES group and 2.5%, 2.2%, and 4.3%, respectively, of the SES group (p = NS); MACE occurred in 7.5% of the PES group and 8.0% of the SES group (p = 0.37). After adjustments for group differences in baseline characteristics, TVR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 1.32; p = 0.26) and MACE (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12; p = 0.56) were similar for PES and SES. Stent thrombosis at 9 months occurred in 0.7% of both groups.

Conclusions: The results of this study show that clinical restenosis and MACE events after PES and SES procedures in "real-world" patients are infrequent and similar at 9 months.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent(s)
  SAT = subacute stent thrombosis
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s)
  ST = stent thrombosis
  TVR = target vessel revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
B. R. Brodie, T. Stuckey, W. Downey, A. Humphrey, B. Bradshaw, C. Metzger, J. Hermiller, F. Krainin, S. Juk, B. Cheek, et al.
Outcomes and Complications With Off-Label Use of Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2008; 1(4): 405 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al.
Highlights of the year in JACC 2007.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home