|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1174-1179, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.016
(Published online 31 August 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


* Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Exploraciones Radiológicas Especiales Sociedad Anónima, Valencia, Spain
Manuscript received February 27, 2007; revised manuscript received June 5, 2007, accepted June 19, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Vicente Bodi, Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, Blasco Ibanez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain. (Email: vicentbodi{at}hotmail.com).
Objectives: We evaluated the prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with chest pain and known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Background: Stress perfusion CMR has been incorporated in daily practice. Data on its prognostic value are preliminary.
Methods: Dipyridamole stress CMR was performed in 420 patients with chest pain and known or suspected coronary artery disease. The extent (number of segments according to the 17-segment model) of abnormal wall motion at rest (AWM-rest), abnormal wall motion with dipyridamole (AWM-D), perfusion deficit (at stress first-pass perfusion imaging), and delayed enhancement (at late enhancement imaging) were analyzed.
Results: During a median follow-up of 420 days, 41 major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including 9 cardiac deaths, 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 18 readmissions for unstable angina with documented abnormal angiography, were documented. The MACE were more frequent in patients with significant (>1 segment) AWM-rest (22% vs. 5%), AWM-D (21% vs. 4%), perfusion deficit (17% vs. 5%), and delayed enhancement (20% vs. 6%; p <0.0001 in all cases). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics, the extent of AWM-D was independently related to MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 1.24] per segment; p = 0.0006) and to major events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction; HR 1.15 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.26] per segment; p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Dipyridamole stress CMR is useful for predicting the outcome of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
| |||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al. Highlights of the year in JACC 2007. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |