This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: j.jacc.2007.04.067v1 50/8/738    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Unger, E. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Unger, E. F.

VIEWPOINT

All Is Not Well in the World of Translational Research

Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Food and Drug Administration

Manuscript received April 5, 2007; revised manuscript received April 18, 2007, accepted April 24, 2007.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Ellis F. Unger, HFD 110, Building 22, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993 (Email: ellis.unger{at}fda.hhs.gov).

It is not unusual for novel treatment strategies to fail in clinical trials, despite highly encouraging results in preclinical proof-of-concept studies. Typically, such "failures of translation" are blamed on the poor predictiveness of animal models. Often, however, the poor predictiveness of today's preclinical proof-of-concept studies is related not to limitations of the models but to investigator bias and a lack of scientific rigor. The resulting false-positive results only serve to mislead the field and impede medical progress. With the resurgence of translational research, it is useful to examine some of the problems that plague these studies and consider their solutions. With thoughtful planning, execution, and analysis, it is possible to generate reliable and predictive data from preclinical proof-of-concept studies, results that should more rapidly advance medical progress.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. de Silva, A. N. Raval, M. Hadi, K. M. Gildea, A. C. Bonifacino, Z.-X. Yu, Y. Y. Yau, S. F. Leitman, S. L. Bacharach, R. E. Donahue, et al. Intracoronary infusion of autologous mononuclear cells from bone marrow or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized apheresis product may not improve remodelling, contractile function, perfusion, or infarct size in a swine model of large myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2008; 29(14): 1772 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]