Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:933-938, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.014 (Published online 15 February 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.12.014v1
49/9/933    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, X.-Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, X.-Q.

STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER AND COMMENTARY

Is Intravascular Ultrasound the Gold Standard Surrogate for Clinically Relevant Atherosclerosis Progression?

B. Greg Brown, MD, PhD* and Xue-Qiao Zhao, MD

Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Manuscript received August 15, 2006; accepted August 26, 2006.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. B. Greg Brown, University of Washington Clinical Trials Unit, Box 358855, 146 North Canal Street, Suite 200, Seattle, Washington 98195-8855. (Email: bgbrown{at}u.washington.edu).

Are progressive changes in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived indexes of plaque size sufficiently predictive of in-trial or future cardiovascular event risk that IVUS can serve as an efficient surrogate for clinical events in coronary disease trials? This question remains unanswered by clinical trials reported to date. Indeed, the answer may well be "yes." Nevertheless, there are enough concerns about the physical limitations, the fundamental assumptions, and the interpretation of the IVUS measurements that the answer cannot be taken for granted. Here, we review the evidence to date, discuss some of the concerns, and compare IVUS results with those of quantitative arteriography.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  LDL = low-density lipoprotein
  MI = myocardial infarction
  QCA = quantitative coronary arteriography
  %S = percent stenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. G. Brown
A Direct Comparison of Intravascular Ultrasound and Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Implications for Measures of Atherosclerosis as Clinical Surrogates
Circulation, April 10, 2007; 115(14): 1824 - 1826.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement