|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:1696-1704, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.077
(Published online 3 April 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland
Department of Cardiology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Fredriksberg, Denmark
Department of Cardiology, University of Regensberg, Regensberg, Germany
Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicines Development Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, Harlow, England
|| Biomedical Data Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Oakville, Canada
¶ Clinical Sciences Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, England.
Manuscript received November 11, 2005; revised manuscript received September 6, 2006, accepted October 12, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Henry J. Dargie, Western Infirmary, CRI Department, Level 4, Glasgow, G11 6NT United Kingdom. (Email: H.Dargie{at}bio.gla.ac.uk).
Objectives: This study investigated the effects of rosiglitazone (RSG) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and pre-existing chronic heart failure (CHF) (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class I to II).
Background: Fluid retention is an important consideration in the use of thiazolidinediones in T2DM patients because it could exacerbate symptoms or precipitate decompensation in those with previously stable CHF.
Methods: A total of 224 patients with T2DM and NYHA functional class I to II CHF with LVEF
45% were randomized to a 52-week treatment with RSG (4 to 8 mg daily, n = 110) or placebo (PLB) (n = 114) in addition to background antidiabetes therapy. Treatment was uptitrated to achieve target fasting plasma glucose <126 mg/dl; CHF medications were adjusted as appropriate.
Results: The LVEF was similar in both groups at baseline (RSG 35.3 ± 6.2%, PLB 35.7 ± 7.8%) and after 52 weeks of treatment (mean difference 1.49%, p = 0.1). Glycemic control was significantly better in the RSG group (mean difference in hemoglobin A1c 0.65%, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more adjudicated events in the RSG group of new or worsening edema (RSG n = 28 [25.5%]; PLB n = 10 [8.8%]; p = 0.005) and increased CHF medication (RSG n = 36 [32.7%], PLB n = 20 [17.5%]; p = 0.037), but no significant difference between groups for other adjudicated end points. A similar proportion of patients withdrew from each treatment group because of adverse events.
Conclusions: After 52 weeks of treatment, RSG improved glycemic control but did not adversely affect LVEF in patients with T2DM and NYHA functional class I to II CHF. More fluid-related events occurred with RSG, although these generally did not lead to withdrawal from the study.
| |||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. MacDonald, M. C. Petrie, N. M. Hawkins, J. R. Petrie, M. Fisher, R. McKelvie, D. Aguilar, H. Krum, and J. J.V. McMurray Diabetes, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and chronic heart failure Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1224 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The DREAM Trial Investigators Effects of Ramipril and Rosiglitazone on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in People With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Impaired Fasting Glucose: Results of the Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial Diabetes Care, May 1, 2008; 31(5): 1007 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Lingegowda Review: evidence for major benefits and harms of antidiabetic agents for diabetes with heart failure is limited Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2008; 13(1): 9 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al. Highlights of the year in JACC 2007. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. McGuire and S. E. Inzucchi New Drugs for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Part I: Thiazolidinediones and Their Evolving Cardiovascular Implications Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 440 - 449. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Erdmann and R. G. Wilcox Weighing up the cardiovascular benefits of thiazolidinedione therapy: the impact of increased risk of heart failure Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 12 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Stroup Thiazolidinedione-induced edema in patients with heart failure Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2007; 64(23): 2426 - 2430. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lewanczuk and P. W. Armstrong Physiologic Straws in the Wind: In Which Direction Do They Bend? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2059 - 2060. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Gilbert Rosiglitazone: Opening Pandora's Black Box? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1329 - 1331. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Singh, Y. K. Loke, and C. D. Furberg Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Rosiglitazone: A Meta-analysis JAMA, September 12, 2007; 298(10): 1189 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ashrafian, M. P. Frenneaux, and L. H. Opie Metabolic Mechanisms in Heart Failure Circulation, July 24, 2007; 116(4): 434 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lindenfeld and F. A. Masoudi Fluid Retention With Thiazolidinediones: Does the Mechanism Influence the Outcome? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 24, 2007; 49(16): 1705 - 1707. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |