FOCUS ISSUE: CARDIAC INTERVENTION: FOCUS ISSUE: CARDIAC INTERVENTIONSIROLIMUS-PACLITAXEL COMPARISON
Vessel Size and Outcome After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Placement
Results From a Large Cohort of Patients Treated With Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents
Shpend Elezi, MD*,
Alban Dibra, MD*,
Julinda Mehilli, MD*,
Jürgen Pache, MD*,
Rainer Wessely, MD*,
Albert Schömig, MD and
Adnan Kastrati, MD*,*
* Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität
First Medizinische Klinik rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
Manuscript received February 27, 2006;
revised manuscript received May 3, 2006,
accepted May 16, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Adnan Kastrati, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany. (Email: kastrati{at}dhm.mhn.de).
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the influence of vessel size on the outcomes of patients after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.
BACKGROUND: There are no dedicated studies on the influence of vessel size on the outcomes of patients treated with different DES.
METHODS: The study population was composed of 2,058 consecutive patients who received sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Patients were grouped into tertiles according to vessel size (<2.41 mm in the lower tertile, 2.41 to 2.84 mm in the middle tertile, and >2.84 mm in the upper tertile). The primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary end points were binary angiographic restenosis and the composite of death or myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Vessel size did not influence the composite end point of death and myocardial infarction. The TLR rates were higher among patients in the lower tertile (12.1%) as compared with the middle (8.4%) and upper (8.0%) tertiles (p = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, vessel size emerged an independent predictor of TLR (p = 0.009). The model showed also a significant interaction between DES type and vessel size regarding TLR (p = 0.008). There was a significant difference in TLR rates among patients treated with SESs (8.6%) and PESs (16.4%) in the lower tertile (p = 0.002), but not in the middle and upper tertiles.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of vessel size on restenosis is related to the specific DES used, with SESs providing better outcomes than PESs in small but not in large coronary vessels.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BMS = bare-metal stent | | DES = drug-eluting stent | | PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent | | SES = sirolimus-eluting stent | | TLR = target lesion revascularization |
|
Related Article
-
All Drug-Eluting Stents Are Equal, But Some Drug-Eluting Stents Are More Equal Than Others
- Bradley H. Strauss
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006 48: 1310-1311.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Latib, J. Cosgrave, and A. Colombo
Bimodal distribution of angiographic measures of restenosis: what does it mean?
Heart,
October 1, 2009;
95(19):
1556 - 1558.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Wykrzykowska, P. W. Serruys, Y. Onuma, T. de Vries, G.-A. van Es, P. Buszman, A. Linke, T. Ischinger, V. Klauss, R. Corti, et al.
Impact of Vessel Size on Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization With Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: The LEADERS Trial Substudy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
September 1, 2009;
2(9):
861 - 870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Effect of Length and Diameter of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents on Late Outcomes
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
February 1, 2009;
2(1):
35 - 42.
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Turco, J. A. Ormiston, J. J. Popma, J. J. Hall, T. Mann, L. A. Cannon, M. W.I. Webster, G. J. Mishkel, C. D. O'Shaughnessy, T. F. McGarry, et al.
Reduced Risk of Restenosis in Small Vessels and Reduced Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Long Lesions With the New Thin-Strut TAXUS Liberte Stent: 1-Year Results From the TAXUS ATLAS Program
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
December 1, 2008;
1(6):
699 - 709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Habara, K Mitsudo, T Goto, K Kadota, S Fujii, H Yamamoto, H Kato, S Takenaka, Y Fuku, S Hosogi, et al.
The impact of lesion length and vessel size on outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis
Heart,
September 1, 2008;
94(9):
1162 - 1165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Billinger, J. Beutler, K. R. Taghetchian, A. Remondino, P. Wenaweser, S. Cook, M. Togni, C. Seiler, C. Stettler, F. R. Eberli, et al.
Two-year clinical outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients
Eur. Heart J.,
March 2, 2008;
29(6):
718 - 725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Nuhrenberg, N. Langwieser, J. B.K. Schwarz, Y. Hou, P. Frank, F. Sorge, S. Matschurat, S. Seidl, A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, et al.
EMAP-II downregulation contributes to the beneficial effects of rapamycin after vascular injury
Cardiovasc Res,
February 1, 2008;
77(3):
580 - 589.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Togni, S. Eber, J. Widmer, M. Billinger, P. Wenaweser, S. Cook, R. Vogel, C. Seiler, F. R. Eberli, W. Maier, et al.
Impact of Vessel Size on Outcome After Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: A Subgroup Analysis of the SIRTAX Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 18, 2007;
50(12):
1123 - 1131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. O. Williams, J. D. Abbott, K. E. Kip, and for the DEScover Investigators
Outcomes of 6906 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents: Report of the DEScover Registry
Circulation,
November 14, 2006;
114(20):
2154 - 2162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Another Front in the Drug-Eluting Stent Battle
Journal Watch Cardiology,
November 1, 2006;
2006(1101):
4 - 4.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Strauss
All Drug-Eluting Stents Are Equal, But Some Drug-Eluting Stents Are More Equal Than Others
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 3, 2006;
48(7):
1310 - 1311.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|