This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: j.jacc.2006.05.043v1 48/5/1001    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hemels, M. E.W. Articles by Van Gelder, I. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hemels, M. E.W. Articles by Van Gelder, I. C.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDERS

Verapamil Versus Digoxin and Acute Versus Routine Serial Cardioversion for the Improvement of Rhythm Control for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Martin E.W. Hemels, MD^_*, Trudeke Van Noord, MD^_*, Harry J.G.M. Crijns, MD, Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen, MD, FACC^_*, Nic J.G.M. Veeger, MSc, Hans A. Bosker, MD, Ans C. P. Wiesfeld, MD^_*, Maarten P. Van den Berg, MD^_*, Adelita V. Ranchor, PhD^|| and Isabelle C. Van Gelder, MD^_*,_*

^_* Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
University Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Trial Coordination Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
^|| Northern Center for Health Care Research, Groningen, the Netherlands

Manuscript received January 25, 2006; revised manuscript received April 10, 2006, accepted May 2, 2006.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Isabelle C. Van Gelder, Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands. (Email: I.C.van.Gelder{at}thorax.umcg.nl).

OBJECTIVES: The VERDICT (Verapamil Versus Digoxin and Acute Versus Routine Serial Cardioversion Trial) is a prospective, randomized study to investigate whether: 1) acutely repeated serial electrical cardioversions (ECVs) after a relapse of atrial fibrillation (AF); and 2) prevention of intracellular calcium overload by verapamil, decrease intractability of AF.

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control is desirable in patients suffering from symptomatic AF.

METHODS: A total of 144 patients with persistent AF were included. Seventy-four (51%) patients were randomized to the acute (within 24 h) and 70 (49%) patients to the routine serial ECVs, and 74 (51%) patients to verapamil and 70 (49%) patients to digoxin for rate control before ECV and continued during follow-up (2 x 2 factorial design). Class III antiarrhythmic drugs were used after a relapse of AF. Follow-up was 18 months.

RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups, except for beta-blocker use in the verapamil versus digoxin group (38% vs. 60%, respectively, p = 0.01). At follow-up, no difference in the occurrence of permanent AF between the acute and the routine cardioversion groups was observed (32% [95% confidence intervals (CI)] 22 to 44) vs. 31% [95% CI 21 to 44], respectively, p = NS), and also no difference between the verapamil- and the digoxin-randomized patients (28% [95% CI 19 to 40] vs. 36% [95% CI 25 to 48] respectively, p = NS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that lone digoxin use was the only significant predictor of failure of rhythm control treatment (hazard ratio 2.2 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.4], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: An acute serial cardioversion strategy does not improve long-term rhythm control in comparison with a routine serial cardioversion strategy. Furthermore, verapamil has no beneficial effect in a serial cardioversion strategy.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   AF = atrial fibrillation   CI = confidence interval   ECV = electrical cardioversion   INR = international normalized ratio   IRAF = immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation   LV = left ventricle/ventricular   NYHA = New York Heart Association   SR = sinus rhythm

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Ahmed, M. Rienstra, H. J. G. M. Crijns, T. P. Links, A. C. P. Wiesfeld, H. L. Hillege, H. A. Bosker, D. J. A. Lok, D. J. Van Veldhuisen, I. C. Van Gelder, et al. Continuous vs Episodic Prophylactic Treatment With Amiodarone for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Trial JAMA, October 15, 2008; 300(15): 1784 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]