|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:2504-2512, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.047
(Published online 25 May 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






* Division of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, ASL RM B, Rome, Italy
Division of Cardiology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy
Department of Cardiac Diseases, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
Department of Cardiac Diseases, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
Manuscript received November 22, 2005; revised manuscript received January 20, 2006, accepted February 7, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Leonardo Calò, Division of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Buonarroti, 16, 00047 Marino, Rome, Italy (Email: leonardo.calo{at}tin.it).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to comparein patients with persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)the efficacy and safety of left atrial ablation with that of a biatrial approach.
BACKGROUND: Left atrium-based catheter ablation of AF, although very effective in the paroxysmal form of the arrhythmia, has an insufficient efficacy in patients with persistent and permanent AF.
METHODS: Eighty highly symptomatic patients (age, 58.6 ± 8.9 years) with persistent (n = 43) and permanent AF (n = 37), refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, were randomized to two different ablation approaches guided by electroanatomical mapping. A procedure including circumferential pulmonary vein, mitral isthmus, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 41 cases (left atrial ablation group). In the remaining 39 patients (biatrial ablation group), the aforementioned approach was integrated by the following lesions in the right atrium: intercaval posterior line, intercaval septal line, and electrical disconnection of the superior vena cava.
RESULTS: During follow-up (mean duration 14 ± 5 months), AF recurred in 39% of patients in the left atrial ablation group and in 15% of patients in the biatrial ablation group (p = 0.022). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that ablation technique was an independent predictor of AF recurrence during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent and permanent AF, circumferential pulmonary vein ablation, combined with linear lesions in the right atrium, is feasible, safe, and has a significantly higher success rate than left atrial and cavotricuspid ablation alone.
| |||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. McGann, E. G. Kholmovski, R. S. Oakes, J. J.E. Blauer, M. Daccarett, N. Segerson, K. J. Airey, N. Akoum, E. Fish, T. J. Badger, et al. New Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Method for Defining the Extent of Left Atrial Wall Injury After the Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 7, 2008; 52(15): 1263 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Knecht, M. Wright, and M. Haissaguerre Left atrial vagal stimulation resulting in atrial fibrillation driven from the right atrium Europace, October 1, 2008; 10(10): 1248 - 1249. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Proclemer, G. Allocca, D. Gregori, C. Bonanno, R. Ometto, A. Fontanelli, R. Mantovan, M. Crosato, V. Calzolari, D. Pavoni, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: an observational study comparing 'ablate and pace' with pulmonary vein isolation Europace, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 1085 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Castella, A. Garcia-Valentin, D. Pereda, A. Colli, A. Martinez, D. Martinez, J. Ramirez, and J. Mulet Anatomic aspects of the atrioventricular junction influencing radiofrequency Cox maze IV procedures. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 419 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Oral, A. Chugh, E. Good, T. Crawford, J. F. Sarrazin, M. Kuhne, N. Chalfoun, D. Wells, W. Boonyapisit, N. Gadeela, et al. Randomized Evaluation of Right Atrial Ablation After Left Atrial Ablation of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms for Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 6 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gillinov Choice of Surgical Lesion Set: Answers From the Data Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. O'Neill, P. Jais, M. Hocini, F. Sacher, G. J. Klein, J. Clementy, and M. Haissaguerre Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, September 25, 2007; 116(13): 1515 - 1523. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |