Advertisement

Submit Manuscripts
Author Information
Subscribe/Renew
Order Reprints
Email Alerts
Feedback
RSS Feed
CME

About the Journal
Editorial Board & Staff

About JACC CME
Hardware/Software Requirements
Contact Us
Policy on Privacy and Confidentiality
Copyright Information

JACC Imaging Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?
Click here
to sign up now!

ACC.org
Cardiosmart
Cardiosource
CVN
Imaging Library
JACC Imaging
JACC Interventions

Click here for more guidelines.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery
ACC 2009 Advocacy Position Statement: Principles for Comparative Effectiveness Research
ACC 2009 Survey Results and Recommendations: Addressing the Cardiology Workforce Crisis
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1655-1662, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.041 (Published online 23 March 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.01.041v1
47/8/1655    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T. J.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Noninvasive Assessment of Plaque Morphology and Composition in Culprit and Stable Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Lesions in Stable Angina by Multidetector Computed Tomography

Udo Hoffmann, MD*,*, Fabian Moselewski, BS*,{dagger}, Koen Nieman, MD*,{dagger}, Ik-Kyung Jang, MD, PhD{dagger}, Maros Ferencik, MD, PhD*, Ayaz M. Rahman, MD*, Ricardo C. Cury, MD*, Suhny Abbara, MD*, Hamid Joneidi-Jafari, BS*, Stephan Achenbach, MD*,{dagger},{ddagger} and Thomas J. Brady, MD*

* Department of Radiology
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

Manuscript received June 13, 2005; accepted November 9, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Udo Hoffmann, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Charles River Plaza, Suite 400, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (Email: uhoffmann{at}partners.org).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess morphology and composition of culprit and stable coronary lesions by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive identification of culprit lesions has the potential to improve noninvasive risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain.

METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable angina underwent coronary 16-slice MDCT and invasive selective angiography. In all significant coronary lesions two observers measured the degree of stenosis, plaque area at stenosis, and remodeling index and assessed plaque composition. Differences between culprit lesions in patients with ACS and stable lesions in patients with ACS or stable angina were determined.

RESULTS: We analyzed 40 lesions with excellent image quality in 14 patients with ACS and 9 patients with stable angina. Culprit lesions in patients with ACS (n = 14) had significantly greater plaque area and a higher remodeling index than both stable lesions in patients with ACS (n = 13) and in patients with stable angina (n = 13) (17.5 ± 5.9 mm2 vs. 9.1 ± 4.8 mm2 vs. 13.5 ± 10.7 mm2, p = 0.02; and 1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.3, p = 0.04, respectively). The prevalence of non-calcified plaque was 100%, 62%, and 77%, respectively, and the prevalence of calcified plaque was 71%, 92%, and 85%, respectively, in culprit lesions in patients with ACS and in stable lesions in patients with ACS or stable angina.

CONCLUSIONS: We introduce the concept of noninvasive detection and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with ACS by MDCT. We identified differences in lesion morphology and plaque composition between culprit lesions in ACS and stable lesions in ACS or stable angina, consistent with previous intravascular ultrasound studies.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndrome
  CT = computed tomography
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  HU = Hounsfield units
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  LAD = left anterior descending (coronary artery)
  LCX = left circumflex
  LM = left main (coronary artery)
  MDCT = multidetector computed tomography
  NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  RCA = right coronary artery
  RI = remodeling index




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
J. M. van Werkhoven, J. D. Schuijf, O. Gaemperli, J. W. Jukema, L. J. Kroft, E. Boersma, A. Pazhenkottil, I. Valenta, G. Pundziute, A. de Roos, et al.
Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2009; 30(21): 2622 - 2629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
C. M. Matter, M. Stuber, and M. Nahrendorf
Imaging of the unstable plaque: how far have we got?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2009; 30(21): 2566 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
G. Bastarrika, Y. S. Lee, W. Huda, B. Ruzsics, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 317 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Nagao, H. Matsuoka, H. Kawakami, H. Higashino, T. Mochizuki, M. Uemura, and S. Shigemi
Myocardial Ischemia in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Assessment Using 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 1097 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
R. Djaberi, J. D. Schuijf, E. Boersma, L. J.M. Kroft, A. M. Pereira, J. A. Romijn, A. J. Scholte, J. W. Jukema, and J. J. Bax
Differences in Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden and Morphology Between Type 1 and 2 Diabetes as Assessed by Multislice Computed Tomography
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2009; 32(8): 1507 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
M Marwan, D Ropers, T Pflederer, W G Daniel, and S Achenbach
Clinical characteristics of patients with obstructive coronary lesions in the absence of coronary calcification: an evaluation by coronary CT angiography
Heart, July 1, 2009; 95(13): 1056 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Motoyama, M. Sarai, H. Harigaya, H. Anno, K. Inoue, T. Hara, H. Naruse, J. Ishii, H. Hishida, N. D. Wong, et al.
Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 49 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
U. Hoffmann and F. Bamberg
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 251 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
R. C. Hendel
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department: Antagonist Viewpoint
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 264 - 275.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Sundaram, S. Patel, P. Agarwal, and E. A. Kazerooni
Anatomy and Terminology for the Interpretation and Reporting of Cardiac MDCT: Part 2, CT Angiography, Cardiac Function Assessment, and Noncoronary and Extracardiac Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 584 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
T. Kitagawa, H. Yamamoto, J. Horiguchi, N. Ohhashi, F. Tadehara, T. Shokawa, Y. Dohi, E. Kunita, H. Utsunomiya, N. Kohno, et al.
Characterization of noncalcified coronary plaques and identification of culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome by 64-slice computed tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 153 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
P. J. de Feyter, S. Achenbach, and K. Nieman
CHAPTER 6 Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Rumberger
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Our Time Has Come, But There Are Miles to Go Before We Sleep
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 18, 2008; 52(21): 1733 - 1735.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
A. Aldrovandi, F. Cademartiri, A. Menozzi, F. Ugo, D. Lina, E. Maffei, A. Palumbo, M. Fusaro, G. Crisi, and D. Ardissino
Evaluation of Coronary Atherosclerosis by Multislice Computed Tomography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Without Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Comparative Study With Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2008; 1(3): 205 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
J. K. Min and L. J. Shaw
Noninvasive Diagnostic and Prognostic Assessment of Individuals With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Perspective
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2008; 1(3): 270 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P. K. Vanhoenacker, E. Boersma, J. H.C. Reiber, M. J. Schalij, W. Wijns, et al.
Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2008; 29(19): 2373 - 2381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
A. Sarwar, J. Rieber, E. A. Q. Mooyaart, S. K. Seneviratne, S. L. Houser, F. Bamberg, O. C. Raffel, R. Gupta, M. K. Kalra, H. Pien, et al.
Calcified Plaque: Measurement of Area at Thin-Section Flat-Panel CT and 64-Section Multidetector CT and Comparison with Histopathologic Findings
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 301 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. D. Dodd, J. Rieber, E. Pomerantsev, V. Chaithiraphan, S. Achenbach, J. M. Moreiras, S. Abbara, U. Hoffmann, T. J. Brady, and R. C. Cury
Quantification of Nonculprit Coronary Lesions: Comparison of Cardiac 64-MDCT and Invasive Coronary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 432 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Duerinckx
The Nonculprit Coronary Lesion as Seen by Coronary CT Angiography: What Should We Be Looking For?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 439 - 440.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. M. Henneman, J. D. Schuijf, G. Pundziute, J. M. van Werkhoven, E. E. van der Wall, J. W. Jukema, and J. J. Bax
Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 15, 2008; 52(3): 216 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P. K. Vanhoenacker, J. H.C. Reiber, M. J. Schalij, W. Wijns, and J. J. Bax
Head-to-Head Comparison of Coronary Plaque Evaluation Between Multislice Computed Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
F. Bamberg, N. Dannemann, M. D. Shapiro, S. K. Seneviratne, M. Ferencik, J. Butler, W. Koenig, K. Nasir, R. C. Cury, A. Tawakol, et al.
Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Profiles and the Presence and Extent of Different Types of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque as Detected by Multidetector Computed Tomography
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2008; 28(3): 568 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al.
Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 531 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin Med ResHome page
G. T. Wilson, P. Gopalakrishnan, and T. Tak
Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging with Computed Tomography
Clin. Med. Res., October 1, 2007; 5(3): 165 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Motoyama, T. Kondo, M. Sarai, A. Sugiura, H. Harigaya, T. Sato, K. Inoue, M. Okumura, J. Ishii, H. Anno, et al.
Multislice Computed Tomographic Characteristics of Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 24, 2007; 50(4): 319 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. D. Schuijf, G. Pundziute, and J. J. Bax
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2071 - 2071.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. S. Lewis and D. A. Halon
Integrating Multidetector Computed Tomography Into Clinical Practice: Computed Tomography Scanning Shows its Metal
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2007; 49(9): 960 - 962.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ. Res.Home page
C. J. Pepine, W. W. Nichols, and D. F. Pauly
Estrogen and Different Aspects of Vascular Disease in Women and Men
Circ. Res., September 1, 2006; 99(5): 459 - 461.
[Full Text] [PDF]


 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement