|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1363-1368, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.055
(Published online 14 March 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Months) Serial Intravascular Ultrasound








* Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Cardiology, Enschede, the Netherlands
Essen University, Department of Cardiology, Essen, Germany
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
Manuscript received July 28, 2005; revised manuscript received October 26, 2005, accepted November 8, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Clemens von Birgelen, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Thoraxcenter Twente, Cardiology Department, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER Enschede, the Netherlands (Email: von.birgelen{at}12move.nl).
OBJECTIVES: We present the remodeling index (RI) versus serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data.
BACKGROUND: The RI, derived by comparing lesion external elastic membrane (EEM) cross-sectional area versus the reference at one time point, is used in various IVUS studies as a substitute of true remodeling (change in EEM over time), assuming that it represents true remodeling.
METHODS: We studied 46 non-stenotic left main arteries using serial IVUS (follow-up 18 ± 8 months). Plaques were divided into subgroups according to the follow-up RI: follow-up RI >1 (n = 27) versus follow-up RI
1 (n = 19).
RESULTS: Lesions with a follow-up RI >1 had an increase in lumen despite an increase in plaque because of an increase in EEM. Conversely, lesions with a follow-up RI
1 had a reduction in lumen as a result of both a plaque increase and EEM decrease. Overall, the follow-up RI correlated directly with changes in lesion site EEM (baseline-to-follow-up). Although there was no correlation between the follow-up RI and changes in reference EEM area, changes in reference EEM area did correlate directly with changes in lesion EEM area. In nearly 90% of lesions with a follow-up RI >1, there was a previously documented increase in EEM area. Using multivariate linear regression analysis, the follow-up RI was dependent on the baseline RI, the increase in lesion EEM area, and the decrease in reference EEM area. The follow-up RI was not dependent on changes in lesion plaque area.
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of left main lesions with a remodeling index >1 had evidence of a previous increase in lesion-site EEM area.
| |||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. von Birgelen and P. M.J. Verhorst Novel ultrasonic insight into coronary arteries Eur J Echocardiogr, July 29, 2008; (2008) jen208v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz Diabetic Coronary Artery Disease: How Little We Know and How Little Intravascular Ultrasound Has Taught Us J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 22, 2008; 52(4): 263 - 265. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. von Birgelen and M. Hartmann Coronary Plaque Burden and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Single-Point Versus Serial Assessment J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1914 - 1915. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hartmann, C. von Birgelen, G. S. Mintz, P. M.J. Verhorst, and R. Erbel Relation between baseline plaque burden and subsequent remodelling of atherosclerotic left main coronary arteries: a serial intravascular ultrasound study with long-term (>=12 months) follow-up Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1778 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |