Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:620-625, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.071 (Published online 13 January 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.08.071v1
47/3/620    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manoharan, G.
Right arrow Articles by De Bruyne, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manoharan, G.
Right arrow Articles by De Bruyne, B.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: RENAL BLOOD FLOW

Assessment of Renal Flow and Flow Reserve in Humans

Ganesh Manoharan, MBBCh, MD*, Nico H.J. Pijls, MD, PhD{dagger}, Norbert Lameire, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Katia Verhamme, MD, PhD§, Guy R. Heyndrickx, MD, PhD*, Emanuele Barbato, MD*, William Wijns, MD, PhD*, Juraj Madaric, MD*, Xanden Tielbeele, MD{dagger}, Jozef Bartunek, MD, PhD* and Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD*,*

* Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, OLV-Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Nephrology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
§ Department of Epidemiology, OLV-Clinic, Aalst, Belgium

Manuscript received June 22, 2005; accepted August 8, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bernard De Bruyne, Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV-Clinic, Moorselbaan, 164, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium (Email: bernard.de.bruyne{at}olvz-aalst.be).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to establish the normal range of maximal renal hyperemic response in humans and to identify the ideal renal vasodilatory stimuli.

BACKGROUND: Stenotic renovascular atherosclerosis is increasingly treated by percutaneous transluminal renal intervention but with an unpredictable outcome. This may be due to hemodynamically non-significant stenosis or the presence of irreversible damage to the glomerular circulation. We propose that the renovascular hyperemic response may help identify appropriate patients.

METHODS: In 28 normotensive patients, quantitative angiographic measurements of the renal artery were obtained, and renal artery pressure and flow velocity were continuously recorded after various hyperemic agents.

RESULTS: In a first group of 11 patients, a significant increase in renal artery average peak velocity (APV) was observed after intrarenal (IR) bolus injection of 600 µg isosorbide dinitrate (41 ± 19%), 30 mg papaverine (50 ± 34%), 50 µg dopamine (94 ± 54%), 0.8 µg·kg–1 fenoldopam (80 ± 25%), and during IR infusion of 1 µg·kg–1·min–1 fenoldopam (86 ± 28%). A second group of 17 patients received intravenous infusion of dopamine (3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 µg·kg–1·min–1). The 3 and 5 µg·kg–1·min–1 of dopamine modestly reduced renal resistance index (RI) (–13 ± 15% and –25 ± 20%, respectively). At higher dosages, no further decline in RI was observed. No significant change in vessel diameter was observed before and after the administration of the pharmacological stimuli suggesting that changes in APV corresponded with changes in absolute renal blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS: The normal renal flow reserve averages approximately 2 in humans with normal renal function. An IR bolus injection of 50 µg·kg–1 of dopamine is the most convenient means to elicit maximal renal hyperemia.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  APV = average peak velocity
  HR = heart rate
  IR = intrarenal
  IV = intravenous
  MBP = mean blood pressure
  PRI = percutaneous transluminal renal intervention
  RAS = renal artery stenosis
  RI = renal vascular resistance index




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
N. T. Kuipers, C. L. Sauder, M. L. Kearney, and C. A. Ray
Interactive effect of aging and local muscle heating on renal vasoconstriction during isometric handgrip
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): F327 - F332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. A. Leesar, J. Varma, A. Shapira, I. Fahsah, S. T. Raza, Z. Elghoul, A. C. Leonard, K. Meganathan, and S. Ikram
Prediction of Hypertension Improvement After Stenting of Renal Artery Stenosis: Comparative Accuracy of Translesional Pressure Gradients, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 23, 2009; 53(25): 2363 - 2371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Garwood
Measuring Renal Blood Flow with the Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1371 - 1376.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
U. Elkayam, M. W. Akhter, M. Liu, P. Hatamizadeh, and M. N. Barakat
Assessment of renal hemodynamic effects of nesiritide in patients with heart failure using intravascular Doppler and quantitative angiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., November 1, 2008; 1(6): 765 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
E. Mahmud, T. W.R. Smith, V. Palakodeti, O. Zaidi, L. Ang, C. R. Mitchell, N. Zafar, G. Bromberg-Marin, S. Keramati, and S. Tsimikas
Renal Frame Count and Renal Blush Grade: Quantitative Measures That Predict the Success of Renal Stenting in Hypertensive Patients With Renal Artery Stenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 286 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Mockel, M. Radovic, Y. Kuhnle, V. Combe, J. Waigand, S. Schroder, R. Dietz, U. Frei, and K.-U. Eckardt
Acute renal haemodynamic effects of radiocontrast media in patients undergoing left ventricular and coronary angiography
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1588 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. T. Kuipers, C. L. Sauder, M. L. Kearney, and C. A. Ray
Changes in forearm muscle temperature alter renal vascular responses to isometric handgrip
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3432 - H3439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. F. Fearon
Physiologic Assessment of Renal Artery Stenosis: Will History Repeat Itself?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1856 - 1858.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement