CLINICAL RESEARCH
Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting
Impact on Stent Thrombosis
Seung-Whan Lee, MD,
Seong-Wook Park, MD, PhD, FACC*,
Myeong-Ki Hong, MD, PhD,
Young-Hak Kim, MD, PhD,
Bong-Ki Lee, MD,
Jong-Min Song, MD, PhD,
Ki Hoon Han, MD, PhD,
Cheol Whan Lee, MD, PhD,
Duk-Hyun Kang, MD, PhD,
Jae-Kwan Song, MD, PhD, FACC,
Jae-Joong Kim, MD, PhD and
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, FACC
Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Manuscript received April 17, 2005;
revised manuscript received July 19, 2005,
accepted July 25, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Seong-Wook Park, Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea (Email: swpark{at}amc.seoul.kr).
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine and cilostazol after coronary stenting.
BACKGROUND: Triple antiplatelet therapy might have beneficial effect to prevent thrombotic complications in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
METHODS: Patients undergoing successful coronary stenting were divided into dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine, group I, n = 1,597) and triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine plus cilostazol, group II, n = 1,415) groups. The primary end point included death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 30 days. The secondary end point was side effects of study drugs, including major bleeding, vascular complication, hepatic dysfunction, and hematological complications.
RESULTS: Multi-vessel stenting and the use of long stents were more prevalent in group II than in group I. The primary end point was 0.8% in group I and 0.3% in group II (p = 0.085). Stent thrombosis within 30 days was significantly lower in group II (n = 1, 0.1%) than in group I (n = 9, 0.5%; p = 0.024). The independent predictors of stent thrombosis were primary stenting (odds ratio [OR] 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 30.8, p = 0.003) and triple therapy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.98, p = 0.048). The overall adverse drug effects, including major bleeding, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, were no different between two groups (1.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.104).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the dual antiplatelet regimen, triple antiplatelet therapy seemed to be more effective in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting without an increased risk of side effects. Triple antiplatelet therapy might be safely applied in patients or lesions with a high risk of stent thrombosis.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ADP = adenosine diphosphate | | AMI = acute myocardial infarction | | CI = confidence interval | | MACE = major adverse cardiac event | | OR = odds ratio |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. J. Angiolillo, P. Capranzano, S. Goto, M. Aslam, B. Desai, R. K. Charlton, Y. Suzuki, L. C. Box, S. B. Shoemaker, M. M. Zenni, et al.
A randomized study assessing the impact of cilostazol on platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the OPTIMUS-2 study
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2008;
29(18):
2202 - 2211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Chesebro
Diabetic atherothrombosis: helpful adjunctive therapy
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2008;
29(18):
2191 - 2192.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Blanc, J. Almendral, M. Brignole, M. Fatemi, K. Gjesdal, E. Gonzalez-Torrecilla, P. Kulakowski, G. Y.H. Lip, D. Shah, C. Wolpert, et al.
Consensus document on antithrombotic therapy in the setting of electrophysiological procedures
Europace,
May 1, 2008;
10(5):
513 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Kereiakes and P. A. Gurbel
Peri-Procedural Platelet Function and Platelet Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
April 1, 2008;
1(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Windecker and B. Meier
Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis
Circulation,
October 23, 2007;
116(17):
1952 - 1965.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Jaffe and B. H. Strauss
Late and Very Late Thrombosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: Evolving Concepts and Perspectives
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 10, 2007;
50(2):
119 - 127.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, W. K. Laskey, A. Colombo, S. G. Ellis, T. D. Henry, J. J. Popma, P. W.J.C. Serruys, T. Kimura, D. O. Williams, et al.
Thrombosis and Drug-Eluting Stents: An Objective Appraisal
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 10, 2007;
50(2):
109 - 118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Moliterno and C. L. Campbell
Unraveling Questions Surrounding Clopidogrel Resistance and Stent Thrombosis: One Less Snag
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 19, 2007;
49(24):
2318 - 2319.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Buonamici, R. Marcucci, A. Migliorini, G. F. Gensini, A. Santini, R. Paniccia, G. Moschi, A. M. Gori, R. Abbate, and D. Antoniucci
Impact of Platelet Reactivity After Clopidogrel Administration on Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 19, 2007;
49(24):
2312 - 2317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Topakian, K. Nussbaumer, J. Trenkler, F. T. Aichner, J.-H. Buhk, A. Wellmer, and M. Knauth
Late in-stent thrombosis following carotid angioplasty and stenting
Neurology,
January 30, 2007;
68(5):
392 - 393.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-Y. Brichon, P. Boitet, A. Dujon, J. Mouroux, C. Peillon, M. Riquet, J.-F. Velly, and H.-B. Ris
Perioperative in-stent thrombosis after lung resection performed within 3 months of coronary stenting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
November 1, 2006;
30(5):
793 - 796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 18, 2006;
47(8):
1689 - 1706.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Stenting Antiplatelet Therapy: Further Insights
Journal Watch Cardiology,
December 16, 2005;
2005(1216):
4 - 4.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
