CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC RHYTHM DISORDERS
Functional Status in Rate- Versus Rhythm-Control Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation
Results of the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Functional Status Substudy
Mina K. Chung, MD, FACC*,*,
Lynn Shemanski, PhD ,
David G. Sherman, MD ,
H. Leon Greene, MD, FACC,
David B. Hogan, MD ,
Joyce C. Kellen, RN, BN, MSc||,
Soo G. Kim, MD, FACC¶,
Lisa Warsinger Martin, MD#,
Yves Rosenberg, MD, MPH**,
D. George Wyse, MD for the AFFIRM Investigators
* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio USA
Axio Research Corporation, Seattle, Washington USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas USA
Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|| Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
¶ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York USA
# Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Region, Washington, DC USA
** National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland USA
Manuscript received April 25, 2005;
revised manuscript received July 5, 2005,
accepted July 11, 2005.
* Correspondence to: Dr. Mina K. Chung, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk F-15, Cleveland, Ohio 44195. Reprint requests to: Axio Research Corporation, 2601 4th Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, Washington 98121
(Email: chungm{at}ccf.org; elainen{at}axioresearch.com).
OBJECTIVES: The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) functional status substudy aimed to test the hypothesis that functional status is similar in rate-control and rhythm-control strategies.
BACKGROUND: Randomized studies, including the AFFIRM study, have failed to demonstrate survival benefits between rate-control and rhythm-control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, AF may cause functional capacity or cognitive impairment that might justify maintenance of sinus rhythm.
METHODS: Investigators of the AFFIRM study enrolled 4,060 patients with AF who required long-term therapy and who were 65 years of age or older or who had another risk factor for stroke or death. New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification were assessed at initial and each follow-up visit. From 22 randomly chosen functional status substudy sites, 245 participants underwent 6-min walk tests and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at initial, two-month, and yearly visits. Patients were assigned randomly to rate-controlling drugs, allowing AF to persist, or rhythm-controlling antiarrhythmic drugs, to maintain sinus rhythm.
RESULTS: The NYHA-FC worsened with time in both rate-control and rhythm-control groups, with no differences between groups. Presence of AF was associated with worse NYHA-FC (p < 0.0001). No differences were observed in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification or MMSE scores. Six-minute walk distance improved over time in both study arms. On average, walk distance was 94 feet greater in the rhythm-control group (adjusted p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: Modest improvement in 6-min walk distance was noted in the rhythm-control arm. Presence of AF was associated with worse NYHA-FC. No difference in cognitive function was detected.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AF = atrial fibrillation | | AFFIRM = Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management | | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CCS-AC = Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification | | CHF = congestive heart failure | | LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction | | MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination | | NYHA-FC = New York Heart Association functional class |
|
Related Article
-
Does Rhythm Control Improve Functional Status in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?
- Edward P. Gerstenfeld
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005 46: 1900-1901.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
E. K. Heist, M. Mansour, and J. N. Ruskin
Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Targets, Methods, Resynchronization Considerations
Circulation,
December 13, 2011;
124(24):
2746 - 2755.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Ad, L. Henry, and S. Hunt
The impact of surgical ablation in patients with low ejection fraction, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,
July 1, 2011;
40(1):
70 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Bottoni, M. Tritto, R. Ricci, M. Accogli, M. Di Biase, S. Iacopino, M. Iori, S. Themistoclakis, N. Sitta, G. Spadacini, et al.
Adherence to guidelines for atrial fibrillation management of patients referred to cardiology departments: Studio Italiano multicentrico sul Trattamento della Fibrillazione Atriale (SITAF)
Europace,
August 1, 2010;
12(8):
1070 - 1077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Wyse
Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation for Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm: A Road to Nowhere
Circulation,
October 6, 2009;
120(14):
1444 - 1452.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R J Mitchell
Is rate more important than rhythm in treating atrial fibrillation? No
BMJ,
August 21, 2009;
339(aug21_1):
b3174 - b3174.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Krishnamoorthy and G. Y.H. Lip
How safe is the antiarrhythmic drug therapy in atrial fibrillation?
Europace,
July 1, 2009;
11(7):
837 - 839.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-F. Tse, K.-K. Wong, C.-W. Siu, M.-O. Tang, V. Tsang, W.-Y. Ho, and C.-P. Lau
Impacts of ventricular rate regularization pacing at right ventricular apical vs. septal sites on left ventricular function and exercise capacity in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
Europace,
May 1, 2009;
11(5):
594 - 600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Guazzi and R Arena
Endothelial dysfunction and pathophysiological correlates in atrial fibrillation
Heart,
January 15, 2009;
95(2):
102 - 106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bajpai, I. Savelieva, and A. J. Camm
Treatment of atrial fibrillation
Br. Med. Bull.,
December 5, 2008;
(2008)
ldn046v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. G. Cosio, E. Aliot, G. L. Botto, H. Heidbuchel, C. J. Geller, P. Kirchhof, J.-C. De Haro, R. Frank, J. P. Villacastin, J. Vijgen, et al.
Delayed rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be a cause of failure to prevent recurrences: reasons for change to active antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the first detected episode
Europace,
January 1, 2008;
10(1):
21 - 27.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Hall
Update in geriatrics.
Ann Intern Med,
October 3, 2006;
145(7):
538 - 543.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H. Falk
Atrial Fibrillation or Sinus Rhythm?: Controversy and Contradiction in Quality of Life Outcomes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 15, 2006;
48(4):
731 - 733.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. P. Gerstenfeld
Does Rhythm Control Improve Functional Status in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 15, 2005;
46(10):
1900 - 1901.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
