CLINICAL RESEARCH: CLINICAL TRIALS
Long-Term Results (Three to Five Years) of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Randomized Study
Fernando Alfonso, MD*,*,
José M. Augé, MD , ,
Javier Zueco, MD ,
Armando Bethencourt, MD ,
José R. López-Mínguez, MD||,
José M. Hernández, MD¶,
Juan A. Bullones, MD#,
Isabel Calvo, MD**,
Enrique Esplugas, MD ,
María J. Pérez-Vizcayno, MD*,
Raul Moreno, MD*,
Cristina Fernández, MD*,
Rosana Hernández, MD*,
Vasco Gama-Ribeiro, MD for the RIBS Investigators
* Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Santa Cruz y San Pablo, Barcelona, Spain
Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
|| Infanta-Cristina, Badajoz, Spain
¶ Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
# Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain
** Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
 Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
 Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal
 Deceased
Manuscript received January 7, 2005;
revised manuscript received April 25, 2005,
accepted May 9, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Fernando Alfonso, Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Universitario "San Carlos," Plaza de Cristo Rey, Madrid 28040, Spain
(Email: falf{at}hotmail.com).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze the very late outcomes of patients treated for in-stent restenosis (ISR) according to treatment allocation and 10 prespecified variables.
BACKGROUND: Long-term results (>2 years) of patients with ISR undergoing repeat coronary interventions are not well established.
METHODS: The Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized study compared these two strategies in 450 patients with ISR. A detailed systematic protocol was used for late clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: At one-year follow-up (100% of patients), the event-free survival was similar in the two groups (77% stent implantation [ST] arm, 71% balloon angioplasty [BA] arm, log-rank p = 0.19). Additional long-term clinical follow-up (median 4.3 years, range 3 to 5 years) was obtained in 98.6% of patients. During this time 22 additional patients died (9 ST arm, 13 BA arm), 7 suffered a myocardial infarction (3 ST arm, 4 BA arm), 23 required coronary surgery (11 ST arm, 12 BA arm), and 9 underwent repeat coronary interventions (4 ST arm, 5 BA arm) (nonexclusive events). At four years the event-free survival was 69% in the ST arm and 64% in the BA arm (log-rank p = 0.21). Among the 10 prespecified variables, vessel size 3 mm had a major influence on the clinical outcome at four years, with better results in the ST group (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.89, p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ISR undergoing repeat interventions have a significant event rate at late follow-up. Continued medical surveillance should be continued after one year. Patients with large vessels have a better outcome after repeat stenting.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BA = balloon angioplasty | | ISR = in-stent restenosis | | MI = myocardial infarction | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | RIBS = Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting randomized study | | ST = stent implantation |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Garg, D. J. Cohen, T. Gaziano, and L. Mauri
Balancing the Risks of Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis in Bare-Metal Versus Drug-Eluting Stents: Results of a Decision Analytic Model
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 13, 2008;
51(19):
1844 - 1853.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Mishkel, A. L. Moore, S. Markwell, M. C. Shelton, and M. E. Shelton
Long-Term Outcomes After Management of Restenosis or Thrombosis of Drug-Eluting Stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 16, 2007;
49(2):
181 - 184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|