Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010; 56:530, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.026
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cressman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ridker, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cressman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ridker, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

CORRESPONDENCE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply

Michael D. Cressman, DO and Paul M. Ridker, MD, MPH*

* Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 (Email: pridker{at}partners.org).


We thank Drs. Roberts and Hare for their interest in our paper describing cardiovascular outcomes among JUPITER (Justification for the Use of statins in Primary prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) participants classified according to their baseline renal function status. We agree that there are limitations of the Modification of Diet and Renal Disease equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and that our analysis was based on the Modification of Diet and Renal Disease estimate of GFR using a single baseline serum creatinine level. We also acknowledge that the variability of serum creatinine can influence estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), particularly among individuals with lower serum creatinine levels. Recognizing these limitations, we confirmed that most (81%) of the JUPITER study participants who had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 on repeat assessments performed after 12 months of randomized treatment with either rosuvastatin 20 mg or placebo. Although the distribution of age, sex, and race among JUPITER participants with an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 may not be representative of chronic kidney disease patients encountered by nephrologists in clinical practice, we believe that our finding that middle-age and older adults who had high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2.0 mg/l and an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 experienced a 45% decrease in the risk of major cardiovascular events during treatment with rosuvastatin 20 mg to be clinically relevant (1).


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Ridker PM, MacFadyen J, Cressman, MD, Glynn RJ. Efficacy of rosuvastatin among men and women with chronic kidney disease and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1266-1273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article

JUPITER "Moderate CKD" Subgroup Is Not Truly "Moderate" Chronic Kidney Disease
Matthew A. Roberts and David L. Hare
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 56: 528. [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cressman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ridker, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cressman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ridker, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement