Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 53:919-928, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.029 (Published online 23 December 2008).
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2008.11.029v1
53/11/919    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brilakis, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brilakis, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Similar Bare-Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions

The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial

Emmanouil S. Brilakis, MD, PhD*,{dagger},*, Christopher Lichtenwalter, MD*,{dagger}, James A. de Lemos, MD*,{dagger}, Michele Roesle, RN*, Owen Obel, MD*,{dagger}, Donald Haagen, RCIS*, Bilal Saeed, MD{ddagger}, Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi, MD*,{dagger}, Joseph K. Bissett, MD§, Rajesh Sachdeva, MD§, Vassilios V. Voudris, MD, PhD||, Panagiotis Karyofillis, MD||, Biswajit Kar, MD, James Rossen, MD#, Panayotis Fasseas, MD**, Peter Berger, MD{dagger}{dagger} and Subhash Banerjee, MD*,{dagger}

* Veterans Affairs North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas
{dagger} University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
§ Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
|| Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
# Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa
** Wheaton Franciscan Medical Group, Racine, Wisconsin
{dagger}{dagger} Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania

Manuscript received October 2, 2008; revised manuscript received October 30, 2008, accepted November 3, 2008.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Dallas VA Medical Center (111A), 4500 South Lancaster Road, Dallas, Texas 75216 (Email: esbrilakis{at}yahoo.com).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of angiographic restenosis and clinical events between a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and a similar bare-metal stent (BMS) in saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions.

Background: There are conflicting and mostly retrospective data on outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in SVGs.

Methods: Patients requiring SVG lesion stenting were randomized to BMS or PES. The primary study end point was binary in-segment restenosis at 12-month follow-up quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary end points included death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel and lesion revascularization, and target vessel failure.

Results: Eighty patients with 112 lesions in 88 SVGs were randomized to a BMS (39 patients, 43 grafts, 55 lesions) or PES (41 patients, 45 grafts, 57 lesions). Binary angiographic restenosis occurred in 51% of the BMS-treated lesions versus 9% of the PES-treated lesions (relative risk: 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07 to 0.48, p < 0.0001). During a median follow-up of 1.5 years the PES patients had less target lesion revascularization (28% vs. 5%, hazard ratio: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.74, p = 0.003) and target vessel failure (46% vs. 22%, hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.96, p = 0.03), a trend toward less target vessel revascularization (31% vs. 15%, hazard ratio: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.05, p = 0.08) and myocardial infarction (31% vs. 15%, hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.08, p = 0.10), and similar mortality (5% vs. 12%, hazard ratio: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.72 to 4.11, p = 0.27).

Conclusions: In SVG lesions, PES are associated with lower rates of angiographic restenosis and target vessel failure than BMS. (The SOS [Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts] Randomized-Controlled Trial; NCT00247208 [ClinicalTrials.gov] )

Key Words: bare-metal stents • coronary artery bypass graft surgery • drug-eluting stents • outcomes • percutaneous coronary intervention • saphenous vein grafts

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ARC = Academic Research Consortium
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  CI = confidence interval
  CK-MB = creatine kinase-myocardial band
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  EPD = embolic protection device
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MLD = minimal lumen diameter
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent(s)
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s)
  SVG = saphenous vein graft
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization


Related Articles

Drug-Eluting Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: The Limits of Evidence
John A. Bittl
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: 929-930. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: A28. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
C. Lichtenwalter, J. A. de Lemos, M. Roesle, O. Obel, E. M. Holper, D. Haagen, B. Saeed, J. M. Iturbe, K. Shunk, J. K. Bissett, et al.
Clinical Presentation and Angiographic Characteristics of Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Stenting: Insights From the SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 855 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Paclitaxel-Eluting vs. Bare-Metal Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions
Journal Watch Cardiology, April 22, 2009; 2009(422): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Bittl
Drug-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft lesions: the limits of evidence.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2009; 53(11): 929 - 930.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement