CLINICAL RESEARCH: STATINS AND TOXICITY
Effect of the Magnitude of Lipid Lowering on Risk of Elevated Liver Enzymes, Rhabdomyolysis, and CancerInsights From Large Randomized Statin Trials
Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali, MD,
Prasad V. Maddukuri, MD,
Hui Han, MD and
Richard H. Karas, MD, PhD1,*
Molecular Cardiology Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tufts-New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Manuscript received February 14, 2007;
accepted February 21, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Richard H. Karas, Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Box #80, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111. (Email: rkaras{at}tufts-nemc.org).
Objectives: We sought to assess the relationship between the magnitude of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and rates of elevated liver enzymes, rhabdomyolysis, and cancer.
Background: Although it is often assumed that statin-associated adverse events are proportional to LDL-C reduction, that assumption has not been validated.
Methods: Adverse events reported in large prospective randomized statin trials were evaluated. The relationship between LDL-C reduction and rates of elevated liver enzymes, rhabdomyolysis, and cancer per 100,000 person-years was assessed using weighted univariate regression.
Results: In 23 statin treatment arms with 309,506 person-years of follow-up, there was no significant relationship between percent LDL-C lowering and rates of elevated liver enzymes (R2 <0.001, p = 0.91) or rhabdomyolysis (R2 = 0.05, p = 0.16). Similar results were obtained when absolute LDL-C reduction or achieved LDL-C levels were considered. In contrast, for any 10% LDL-C reduction, rates of elevated liver enzymes increased significantly with higher statin doses. Additional analyses demonstrated a significant inverse association between cancer incidence and achieved LDL-C levels (R2 = 0.43, p = 0.009), whereas no such association was demonstrated with percent LDL-C reduction (R2 = 0.09, p = 0.92) or absolute LDL-C reduction (R2 = 0.05, p = 0.23).
Conclusions: Risk of statin-associated elevated liver enzymes or rhabdomyolysis is not related to the magnitude of LDL-C lowering. However, the risk of cancer is significantly associated with lower achieved LDL-C levels. These findings suggest that drug- and dose-specific effects are more important determinants of liver and muscle toxicity than magnitude of LDL-C lowering. Furthermore, the cardiovascular benefits of low achieved levels of LDL-C may in part be offset by an increased risk of cancer.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | HMG-CoA = hydroxyl methyl glutaryl coenzyme A | | LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol |
|
Related Articles
-
Means and Ends of Statins and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
- John C. LaRosa
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007 50: 419-420.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Low-Density Lipoprotein Reduction and Cancer: Not Definitive But Provocative
- Anthony N. DeMaria and Ori Ben-Yehuda
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007 50: 421-422.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Pasquali and J. S. Li
Prevention of Future Cardiovascular Disease in High-Risk Pediatric Patients: A Role for Lipid Lowering Therapy?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,
November 1, 2008;
1(2):
131 - 133.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Steinberg
Statin Treatment Does Not Cause Cancer
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 30, 2008;
52(14):
1148 - 1149.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Alsheikh-Ali, T. A. Trikalinos, D. M. Kent, and R. H. Karas
Statins, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Risk of Cancer
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 30, 2008;
52(14):
1141 - 1147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Ben-Yehuda and A. N. DeMaria
Low LDL-C Levels and Cancer: Reassuring But Still Not Definitive
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 30, 2008;
52(14):
1150 - 1151.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Elkeles, I. F. Godsland, M. D. Feher, M. B. Rubens, M. Roughton, F. Nugara, S. E. Humphries, W. Richmond, M. D. Flather, and for the PREDICT Study Group
Coronary calcium measurement improves prediction of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: the PREDICT study
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2008;
29(18):
2244 - 2251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Ding ScD and F. B. Hu MD PhD
Cancer and cholesterol: understanding the V-shaped association in patients with diabetes
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
August 26, 2008;
179(5):
403 - 404.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Yang PhD, W. So MBChB, G. T.C. Ko MD, R. C.W. Ma MBChB, A. P.S. Kong MBChB, C.-C. Chow MBBS, P. C.Y. Tong PhD, and J. C.N. Chan MD
Independent associations between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
August 26, 2008;
179(5):
427 - 437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Kittisupamongkol
Drawing Conclusions about Short-Term Variability in Liver Function Test Results
Ann Intern Med,
July 15, 2008;
149(2):
144 - 144.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Byers
Statins, Breast Cancer, and an Invisible Switch?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
May 1, 2008;
17(5):
1026 - 1027.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ramasubbu, J. Estep, D. L. White, A. Deswal, and D. L. Mann
Experimental and clinical basis for the use of statins in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 29, 2008;
51(4):
415 - 426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al.
Highlights of the year in JACC 2007.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 29, 2008;
51(4):
490 - 512.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Rembold
Age predicts cancer incidence better than statin-induced low-density lipoprotein level.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2008;
51(1):
90 - 91.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kjekshus
Risk associated with statin treatment.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2008;
51(1):
91 - 91.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Alsheikh-Ali and R. H. Karas
Reply.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2008;
51(1):
92 - 92.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Strandberg
Low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cancer risk.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2008;
51(1):
91 - 92.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Platz
Epidemiologic Musing on Statin Drugs in the Prevention of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
November 1, 2007;
16(11):
2175 - 2180.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. LaRosa
Means and Ends of Statins and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 31, 2007;
50(5):
419 - 420.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria and O. Ben-Yehuda
Low-Density Lipoprotein Reduction and Cancer: Not Definitive But Provocative
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 31, 2007;
50(5):
421 - 422.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Shor, J. Wainstein, D. Oz, M. Boaz, Z. Matas, A. Fux, and A. Halabe
Low Serum LDL Cholesterol Levels and the Risk of Fever, Sepsis, and Malignancy
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.,
January 1, 2007;
37(4):
343 - 348.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|