Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1223-1229, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.022 (Published online 9 September 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2007.06.022v1
50/13/1223    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerber, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerber, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V. L.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION

Coronary Revascularization in the Community

A Population-Based Study, 1990 to 2004

Yariv Gerber, PhD*,{dagger},{ddagger}, Charanjit S. Rihal, MD*, Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MD*, Jill M. Killian, BS{dagger}, Susan A. Weston, MS{dagger}, Terry M. Therneau, PhD{dagger} and Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH*,{dagger},1,*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
{dagger} Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
{ddagger} Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Manuscript received January 2, 2007; revised manuscript received May 22, 2007, accepted June 19, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Véronique L. Roger, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. (Email: roger.veronique{at}mayo.edu).

Objectives: We sought to examine temporal trends in the utilization of coronary revascularization in a geographically defined population.

Background: Earlier reports on revascularization utilization focused on inpatient settings and did not distinguish incident from recurrent procedures. Furthermore, little is known on age- and gender-specific trends. Finally, longitudinal data on the utilization and results of coronary angiography as explanatory factors for the changing revascularization practice are lacking.

Methods: Data integrating diagnostic and therapeutic coronary procedures performed in Olmsted County (Minnesota) between 1990 and 2004 were analyzed. Standardized rates were calculated applying the direct method and temporal trends compared using Poisson regression models.

Results: Revascularization utilization increased by 24% during the study (95% confidence interval [CI] 5% to 46%), but the trends diverged by procedure type, with a sustained increase (69%, 95% CI 43% to 101%) for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) contrasting with a stabilization, then decline (–33%, 95% CI –16% to –47%) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). For PCI, although the use increased in all categories, greater increases were noted in the elderly, in women, and for recurrent procedures. No such patterns were detected for CABG. Angiography use remained stable, and the rate of 3-vessel and/or left main disease declined (–22%, 95% CI –8% to –33%).

Conclusions: Over the 15-year period, revascularization increased in the community with a large increase in PCI partially offset by a decrease in CABG. More PCIs are performed in women and the elderly and for recurrent disease. These changes occurred within the context of a decline in multivessel disease and thus likely reflect the natural history of coronary artery disease.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CI = confidence interval
  LM = left main
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  RR = rate ratio




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. P. Vamos, C. Millett, C. Parsons, P. Aylin, A. Majeed, and A. Bottle
Nationwide Study on Trends in Hospital Admissions for Major Cardiovascular Events and Procedures Among People With and Without Diabetes in England, 2004-2009
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2012; 35(2): 265 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Goel, R. J. Lennon, R. T. Tilbury, R. W. Squires, and R. J. Thomas
Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Community
Circulation, May 31, 2011; 123(21): 2344 - 2352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
R. F. Riley, C. W. Don, W. Powell, C. Maynard, and L. S. Dean
Trends in Coronary Revascularization in the United States From 2001 to 2009: Recent Declines in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volumes
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, March 1, 2011; 4(2): 193 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L.-M. Stevens, A. K. Agnihotri, P. Khairy, and D. F. Torchiana
Financial Consequences of Implementing a Partner-in-Care in Cardiac Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2010; 90(3): 805 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
M. S. Vaughan Sarrazin, L. Bayman, and P. Cram
Trends During 1993-2004 in the Availability and Use of Revascularization After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Markets Affected by Certificate of Need Regulations
Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2010; 67(2): 213 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Chen, S.-L. T. Normand, Y. Wang, E. E. Drye, G. C. Schreiner, and H. M. Krumholz
Recent Declines in Hospitalizations for Acute Myocardial Infarction for Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries: Progress and Continuing Challenges
Circulation, March 23, 2010; 121(11): 1322 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. L. Roger, S. A. Weston, Y. Gerber, J. M. Killian, S. M. Dunlay, A. S. Jaffe, M. R. Bell, J. Kors, B. P. Yawn, and S. J. Jacobsen
Trends in Incidence, Severity, and Outcome of Hospitalized Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, February 23, 2010; 121(7): 863 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Gerber, Y. Benyamini, U. Goldbourt, Y. Drory, and for the Israel Study Group on First Acute Myocardi
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Context and Long-Term Survival After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, January 26, 2010; 121(3): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
C. Sirois, J. Moisan, P. Poirier, J. Couture, and J.-P. Gregoire
Association between age and the initiation of antihypertensive, lipid lowering and antiplateletet medications in elderly individuals newly treated with antidiabetic drugs
Age Ageing, November 1, 2009; 38(6): 741 - 745.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
K. C. Floyd, J. Yarzebski, F. A. Spencer, D. Lessard, J. E. Dalen, J. S. Alpert, J. M. Gore, and R. J. Goldberg
A 30-Year Perspective (1975-2005) Into the Changing Landscape of Patients Hospitalized With Initial Acute Myocardial Infarction: Worcester Heart Attack Study
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Ryan, W. Linde-Zwirble, L. Engelhart, L. Cooper, and D. J. Cohen
Temporal Changes in Coronary Revascularization Procedures, Outcomes, and Costs in the Bare-Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Eras: Results From the US Medicare Program
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 952 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. S. Brar, G. Syros, and G. Dangas
Multivessel Disease: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Classic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Indications
Angiology, August 1, 2008; 59(2_suppl): 83S - 88S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. F. Wilson and G. Raveendran
What's Good for the Gander Is Now Good for the Goose
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2321 - 2322.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement