CLINICAL RESEARCH: ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
Right Ventricular Dysfunction Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Poor Prognosis Late After Myocardial Infarction
Eric Larose, DVM, MD*,1,
Peter Ganz, MD*,
H. Glenn Reynolds, MSc ,
Sharmila Dorbala, MD ,
Marcelo F. Di Carli, MD ,
Kenneth A. Brown, MD and
Raymond Y. Kwong, MD, MPH*,*
* Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
General Electric Healthcare, Boston, Massachusetts
Cardiology Unit, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, the Vermont.
Manuscript received May 18, 2006;
revised manuscript received October 3, 2006,
accepted October 9, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Raymond Y. Kwong, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. (Email: rykwong{at}partners.org).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether right ventricular (RV) function late after myocardial infarction (MI) impacts long-term prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure predicts early mortality in patients with acute MI. The prognostic impact of RV function late after MI is not well defined. Accordingly, we determined whether RV dysfunction late after MI influences survival beyond traditional risk predictors, including patient age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and infarct size.
METHODS: We studied 147 consecutive patients >30 days after MI (mean age of infarct 6.7 ± 8.2 years) who were referred for contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. We assessed hazard ratios for death by RV ejection fraction (RVEF). The association of RVEF with mortality adjusted to traditional risk predictors was examined by using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 26 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 17 months (range 6 to 53 months). By univariable analysis, RVEF <40% was strongly associated with mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio 4.02; p = 0.0007). By multivariable analysis that adjusted for patient age, left ventricular (LV) infarct size, and LVEF, RVEF <40% remained a significant independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.86; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular ejection fraction quantified late after MI is an important predictor of prognosis adjusted for patient age, LV infarct size, and LVEF. Accordingly, evaluation of RVEF using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging can improve risk-stratification and potentially refine patient management after MI.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging | | EF = ejection fraction | | ESVi = indexed end-systolic volume | | HR = hazard ratio | | LA = left atrium | | LGE = late gadolinium enhancement | | LV = left ventricular | | LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction | | MI = myocardial infarction | | RV = right ventricular | | RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perazzolo Marra, J. A. C. Lima, and S. Iliceto
MRI in acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2011;
32(3):
284 - 293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Flachskampf, M. Schmid, C. Rost, S. Achenbach, A. N. DeMaria, and W. G. Daniel
Cardiac imaging after myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2011;
32(3):
272 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Bourantas, H. P. Loh, T. Bragadeesh, A. S. Rigby, E. I. Lukaschuk, S. Garg, A. C. Tweddel, F. M. Alamgir, N. P. Nikitin, A. L. Clark, et al.
Relationship between right ventricular volumes measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail,
January 1, 2011;
13(1):
52 - 60.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. V. M. Dupont, C. A. Dragean, and E. E. Coche
Right Ventricle Function Assessment by MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
January 1, 2011;
196(1):
77 - 86.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Miszalski-Jamka, P. Klimeczek, M. Tomala, M. Krupinski, G. Zawadowski, J. Noelting, M. Lada, K. Sip, R. Banys, W. Mazur, et al.
Extent of RV Dysfunction and Myocardial Infarction Assessed by CMR Are Independent Outcome Predictors Early After STEMI Treated With Primary Angioplasty
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
December 1, 2010;
3(12):
1237 - 1246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Masci, M. Francone, W. Desmet, J. Ganame, G. Todiere, R. Donato, V. Siciliano, I. Carbone, M. Mangia, E. Strata, et al.
Right Ventricular Ischemic Injury in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Characterization With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Circulation,
October 5, 2010;
122(14):
1405 - 1412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Beek and A. C. van Rossum
Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of left ventricular function, scar and viability in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic myocardial infarction
Heart,
September 1, 2010;
96(18):
1494 - 1501.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Herrmann
Leave me alone: the right ventricle in anterior myocardial infarction
Cardiovasc Res,
September 1, 2010;
87(4):
585 - 586.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Slaughter and P. M. Mottram
What Should Be the Principle Imaging Test in Heart Failure--CMR or Echocardiography?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2010;
3(7):
776 - 782.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Larose, J. Rodes-Cabau, P. Pibarot, S. Rinfret, G. Proulx, C. M. Nguyen, J. P. Dery, O. Gleeton, L. Roy, B. Noel, et al.
Predicting Late Myocardial Recovery and Outcomes in the Early Hours of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Traditional Measures Compared With Microvascular Obstruction, Salvaged Myocardium, and Necrosis Characteristics by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 1, 2010;
55(22):
2459 - 2469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. D. Karamitsos, J. M. Francis, S. Myerson, J. B. Selvanayagam, and S. Neubauer
The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 6, 2009;
54(15):
1407 - 1424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wright, T. Adriaenssens, S. Dymarkowski, W. Desmet, and J. Bogaert
Quantification of Myocardial Area at Risk With T2-Weighted CMR: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced CMR and Coronary Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2009;
2(7):
825 - 831.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lockie, E. Nagel, S. Redwood, and S. Plein
Use of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Circulation,
March 31, 2009;
119(12):
1671 - 1681.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. H. Marwick and M. Schwaiger
The Future of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure, Part 1: Tasks and Tools
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
July 1, 2008;
1(1):
58 - 69.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Plumhans, G. Muhlenbruch, A. Rapaee, K.-H. Sim, T. Seyfarth, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken
Assessment of Global Right Ventricular Function on 64-MDCT Compared with MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
May 1, 2008;
190(5):
1358 - 1361.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|