VIEWPOINT AND COMMENTARY
Computed Tomographic AngiographyMore Than Just a Pretty Picture?
Rita F. Redberg, MD, MSc, FACC*
Womens Cardiovascular Services, School of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, San Francisco, California.
Manuscript received August 17, 2006;
revised manuscript received October 26, 2006,
accepted October 30, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Rita F. Redberg, Womens Cardiovascular Services, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Suite M-1180, School of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, San Francisco, California 94143-0124. (Email: redberg{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).
There is increased interest in and use of cardiac computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging as the technology continues to improve. We have many small single-center trials on the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques, but no studies that show a patient benefit from testing. The American College of Cardiology has recently tackled the "appropriateness challenge" for imaging tests, including computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. The importance of outcomes data and risks of continuing our investment in computed tomography without outcomes data on benefits for patient care are discussed in this paper.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AC = Appropriateness Criteria | | ACC = American College of Cardiology | | CA = coronary angiography | | CT = computed tomography | | CTA = computed tomography angiography | | MR = magnetic resonance |
|
Related Article
-
Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography: Coronary Imaging Evolves
- Gilbert L. Raff and James A. Goldstein
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007 49: 1830-1833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Bateman
Business Aspects of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Tackling the Challenges
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
111 - 118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|