CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Native Coronary Artery Disease
A Randomized Controlled Trial
David E. Kandzari, MD, FACC*,*,
Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC ,
Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC ,
Peter J. Fitzgerald, MD, FACC||,
Charles O’Shaughnessy, MD, FACC#,
Michael W. Ball, MD, FACC**,
Mark Turco, MD, FACC ,
Robert J. Applegate, MD, FACC,
Paul A. Gurbel, MD, FACC,
Mark G. Midei, MD, FACC,
Sejal S. Badre, MS,
Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, FACC,
Kweli P. Thompson, MD¶,
LeRoy A. LeNarz, MD¶,
Richard E. Kuntz, MD, FACC¶ for the ENDEAVOR III Investigators
* Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
Baptist Medical Center and Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
Harvard Clinical Research Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
|| Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
¶ Medtronic, Inc., Santa Rosa, California
# North Ohio Heart Center, Elyria, Ohio
** St. Vincent’s Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana
Washington Adventist Hospital, Takoma Park, Maryland
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland
St. Joseph’s Medical Center, Towson, Maryland.
Manuscript received March 24, 2006;
revised manuscript received August 7, 2006,
accepted August 7, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David E. Kandzari, Room 7063, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, North Carolina 27705. (Email: david.kandzari{at}duke.edu).
OBJECTIVES: This trial examined the relative clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes, and safety of zotarolimus-eluting coronary stents (ZES) with a phosphorylcholine polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).
BACKGROUND: Whether a cobalt-based alloy stent coated with the novel antiproliferative agent, zotarolimus, and a phosphorylcholine polymer may provide similar angiographic and clinical benefit compared with SES is undetermined.
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, 3:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ZES (n = 323) relative to SES (n = 113) in 436 patients undergoing elective percutaneous revascularization of de novo native coronary lesions with reference vessel diameters between 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm and lesion length  14 mm and  27 mm. The primary end point was 8-month angiographic in-segment late lumen loss.
RESULTS: Angiographic in-segment late lumen loss was significantly higher among patients treated with ZES compared with SES (0.34 ± 0.44 mm vs. 0.13 ± 0.32 mm, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events were significantly lower among patients treated with ZES (0.6% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.04). In-segment binary angiographic restenosis was also higher in the ZES cohort (11.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.04). Total (clinically and non-clinically driven) target lesion revascularization rates at 9 months were 9.8% and 3.5% for the ZES and SES groups, respectively (p = 0.04). However, neither clinically driven target lesion revascularization (6.3% zotarolimus vs. 3.5% sirolimus, p = 0.34) nor target vessel failure (12.0% zotarolimus vs. 11.5% sirolimus, p = 1.0) differed significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SES, treatment with a phosphorylcholine polymer-based ZES is associated with significantly higher late lumen loss and binary restenosis at 8-month angiographic follow-up.
(The Endeavor III CR; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/
NCT00265668
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
?order=1?)
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CK = creatine kinase | | IVUS = intravascular ultrasound | | MACE = major adverse cardiac events | | MLD = minimal lumen diameter | | SES = sirolimus-eluting stent | | ZES = zotarolimus-eluting stent |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J-S Kim, I-K Jang, J-S Kim, T H Kim, M Takano, T Kume, N W Hur, Y-G Ko, D Choi, M-K Hong, et al.
Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
Heart,
December 1, 2009;
95(23):
1907 - 1912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Kirtane, R. Patel, C. O'Shaughnessy, P. Overlie, B. McLaurin, S. Solomon, L. Mauri, P. Fitzgerald, J. J. Popma, D. E. Kandzari, et al.
Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in Diabetics From the ENDEAVOR IV Trial: Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
October 1, 2009;
2(10):
967 - 976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. T. Meredith, S. Worthley, R. Whitbourn, D. L. Walters, D. McClean, M. Horrigan, J. J. Popma, D. E. Cutlip, A. DePaoli, M. Negoita, et al.
Clinical and Angiographic Results With the Next-Generation Resolute Stent System: A Prospective, Multicenter, First-in-Human Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
October 1, 2009;
2(10):
977 - 985.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Chevalier, S. Silber, S.-J. Park, E. Garcia, G. Schuler, H. Suryapranata, J. Koolen, K. E. Hauptmann, W. Wijns, M.-C. Morice, et al.
Randomized Comparison of the Nobori Biolimus A9-Eluting Coronary Stent With the Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in Patients With Stenosis in Native Coronary Arteries: The NOBORI 1 Trial--Phase 2
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
June 1, 2009;
2(3):
188 - 195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Byrne, J. Mehilli, R. Iijima, S. Schulz, J. Pache, M. Seyfarth, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, and for the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Re
A polymer-free dual drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial vs. polymer-based drug-eluting stents
Eur. Heart J.,
April 2, 2009;
30(8):
923 - 931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Colombo and R. T. Gerber
Should dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents be continued for more than 1 year?: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stents Should Not Be Continued for More Than 1 Year and Preferably Indefinitely
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
December 1, 2008;
1(3):
226 - 232.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Chevalier, C. Di Mario, F.-J. Neumann, F. Ribichini, P. Urban, J. J. Popma, P. J. Fitzgerald, D. E. Cutlip, D. O. Williams, J. Ormiston, et al.
A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Zotarolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in De Novo Occlusive Lesions in Coronary Arteries: The ZoMaxx I Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
October 1, 2008;
1(5):
524 - 532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. van der Hoeven, S.-S. Liem, J. Dijkstra, S. C. Bergheanu, H. Putter, M. L. Antoni, D. E. Atsma, M. Bootsma, K. Zeppenfeld, J. W. Jukema, et al.
Stent Malapposition After Sirolimus-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Acute and 9-Month Intravascular Ultrasound Results of the MISSION! Intervention Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
April 1, 2008;
1(2):
192 - 201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Kip, K. Hollabaugh, O. C. Marroquin, and D. O. Williams
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 19, 2008;
51(7):
701 - 707.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Pocock, A. J. Lansky, R. Mehran, J. J. Popma, M. P. Fahy, Y. Na, G. Dangas, J. W. Moses, T. Pucelikova, D. E. Kandzari, et al.
Angiographic surrogate end points in drug-eluting stent trials: a systematic evaluation based on individual patient data from 11 randomized, controlled trials.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2008;
51(1):
23 - 32.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bode and M. Zehender
The use of antiplatelet agents following percutaneous coronary intervention: focus on late stent thrombosis
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
August 1, 2007;
9(suppl_D):
D10 - D19.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 17, 2007;
50(3):
270 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Daemen and P. W. Serruys
Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part I: A Survey of Current and Future Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Meaningful Advances or More of the Same?
Circulation,
July 17, 2007;
116(3):
316 - 328.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 30, 2007;
49(4):
509 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
