CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDER
Frequency Analysis in Different Types of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Yenn-Jiang Lin, MD*, ,
Ching-Tai Tai, MD*,
Tsair Kao, PhD ,
Han-Wen Tso, MS ,
Satoshi Higa, MD*,
Hsuan-Ming Tsao, MD*,
Shih-Lin Chang, MD*, ,
Ming-Hsiung Hsieh, MD*, and
Shih-Ann Chen, MD*, ,*
* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Institute of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Research, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Manuscript received July 14, 2005;
revised manuscript received October 25, 2005,
accepted October 31, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Shih-Ann Chen, Division of Cardiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan (Email: epsachen{at}ms41.hinet.net).
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the regional frequency distribution from multiple bi-atrial sites in different types of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
BACKGROUND: A previous study showed a left atrium (LA) to right atrium (RA) frequency gradient in patients with paroxysmal AF.
METHODS: Forty-four patients (age = 60 ± 16, male patients = 27) with paroxysmal AF originating from the pulmonary veins (PVs) (n = 31) or superior vena cava (SVC) (n = 13) were included. Frequency analysis was performed on the intracardiac electrograms (7 s, 1 kHz/channel) recorded from PV, posterior LA, coronary sinus (CS), posterolateral RA, and SVC. The largest peak frequency was identified as the dominant frequency (DF).
RESULTS: In the PV-AF patients, there was a frequency gradient from the PV ostium to the LA, RA, and SVC (8.5 ± 3.3 Hz vs. 5.9 ± 1.1 Hz vs. 5.2 ± 0.85 Hz vs. 5.5 ± 0.48 Hz, respectively, p < 0.001). The highest DFs were mostly located at the arrhythmogenic PV ostium (58%). The DFs of the arrhythmogenic PV and PV ostium were significantly higher than those of the non-arrhythmogenic PVs and PV ostia (p < 0.05). In the SVC-AF patients, there was a frequency gradient from the SVC to the RA, LA, and PV (8.0 ± 2.4 Hz vs. 5.9 ± 1.1 Hz vs. 5.9 ± 0.7 Hz vs. 5.8 ± 0.7 Hz, respectively, p = 0.001). The highest DFs were mostly located inside the SVC (77%) instead of the SVC ostium (as compared with PV-AF patients, p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: The location of the highest DF depended on the arrhythmogenic PV or SVC. A frequency gradient was present between the arrhythmogenic thoracic vein and atrium in all patients.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AF = atrial fibrillation | | CS = coronary sinus | | DF = dominant frequency | | LA = left atrium/atrial | | LIPV = left inferior pulmonary vein | | LSPV = left superior pulmonary vein | | PV = pulmonary vein | | RA = right atrium/atrial | | RIPV = right inferior pulmonary vein | | RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein | | SVC = superior vena cava |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. CHOWDHURY, W. R. LEWIS, R. A. SCHWEIKERT, and J. E. CUMMINGS
Ablation of atrial fibrillation: What can we tell our patients?
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine,
September 1, 2009;
76(9):
543 - 550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Lin, C.-T. Tai, T. Kao, S.-L. Chang, L.-W. Lo, T.-C. Tuan, A. R. Udyavar, W. Wongcharoen, Y.-F. Hu, H.-W. Tso, et al.
Spatiotemporal Organization of the Left Atrial Substrate After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Atrial Fibrillation
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
June 1, 2009;
2(3):
233 - 241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Arenal, T. Datino, L. Atea, F. Atienza, E. Gonzalez-Torrecilla, J. Almendral, L. Castilla, P. L. Sanchez, and F. Fernandez-Aviles
Dominant frequency differences in atrial fibrillation patients with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Europace,
April 1, 2009;
11(4):
450 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Diemberger, J. McCready, L. Nunn, and A. W.C. Chow
Is atrial fibrillation with very short cycle length suitable for ablation? A case report
Europace,
November 1, 2008;
10(11):
1336 - 1339.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Rostock, D. Steven, B. Lutomsky, H. Servatius, I. Drewitz, H. Klemm, K. Mullerleile, R. Ventura, T. Meinertz, and S. Willems
Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation in the pulmonary veins on the impact of atrial fibrillation on the electrophysiological properties of the pulmonary veins in humans.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 3, 2008;
51(22):
2153 - 2160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N.-W. Hsu, Y.-J. Lin, C.-T. Tai, T. Kao, S.-L. Chang, W. Wongcharoen, L.-W. Lo, A. R. Udyavar, Y.-F. Hu, H.-W. Tso, et al.
Frequency analysis of the fibrillatory activity from surface ECG lead V1 and intracardiac recordings: implications for mapping of AF
Europace,
April 1, 2008;
10(4):
438 - 443.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bollmann, D. Husser, M. Stridh, F. Holmqvist, A. Roijer, C. J. Meurling, L. Sornmo, and S. B. Olsson
Atrial fibrillatory rate and risk of left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation
Europace,
August 1, 2007;
9(8):
621 - 626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mansour
Highest Dominant Frequencies in Atrial Fibrillation: A New Target for Ablation?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 4, 2006;
47(7):
1408 - 1409.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|