CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDER
Robotic Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Carlo Pappone, MD, PhD*,
Gabriele Vicedomini, MD,
Francesco Manguso, MD, PhD,
Filippo Gugliotta, BE,
Patrizio Mazzone, MD,
Simone Gulletta, MD,
Nicoleta Sora, MD,
Simone Sala, MD,
Alessandra Marzi, MD,
Giuseppe Augello, MD,
Laura Livolsi, MD,
Andreina Santagostino, MD and
Vincenzo Santinelli, MD
Department of Electrophysiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Manuscript received August 23, 2005;
revised manuscript received November 9, 2005,
accepted November 16, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Carlo Pappone, Department of Arrhythmology, University Hospital San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy (Email: carlo.pappone{at}hsr.it).
OBJECTIVES: We assessed feasibility of magnetic catheter guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA).
BACKGROUND: No data are available on feasibility of remote navigation for AF ablation.
METHODS: Forty patients underwent CPVA for symptomatic AF using the NIOBE II remote magnetic system (Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, Missouri). Ablation was performed with a 4-mm tip, magnetic catheter (65°C, maximum 50 W, 15 s). The catheter tip was guided by a uniform magnetic field (0.08-T), and a motor drive (Cardiodrive unit, Stereotaxis Inc.). Left atrium maps were created using an integrated CARTO RMT system (Stereotaxis Inc.). End point of ablation was voltage abatement >90% of bipolar electrogram amplitude.
RESULTS: Remote ablation was successful in 38 of 40 patients without complications. The median mapping and ablation time was 152.5 min (range, 90 to 380 min) but was much longer in the first 12 patients (192.5 min vs. 148 min; p = 0.012). Median ablation time was 49.5 min (range, 17 to 154 min), but it was much shorter in the last 28 patients than in the first 12 patients (49 min vs. 70 min; p = 0.021). Patients receiving remote ablation had longer procedure times than control patients (p < 0.001) with similar mapping time but shorter ablation time on right-sided pulmonary veins. Many more mapping points regardless of their location were collected remotely (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Remote magnetic navigation for AF ablation is safe and feasible with a short learning curve. Although all procedures were performed by a highly experienced operator, remote AF ablation can be performed even by less experienced operators.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AF = atrial fibrillation | | CPVA = circumferential pulmonary vein ablation | | LAO = left anterior oblique | | LIPV = left inferior pulmonary vein | | LSPV = left superior pulmonary vein | | PV = pulmonary vein | | RAO = right anterior oblique | | RF = radiofrequency |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. D. Burkhardt and A. Natale
New Technologies in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Circulation,
October 13, 2009;
120(15):
1533 - 1541.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Aliot, W. G. Stevenson, J. M. Almendral-Garrote, F. Bogun, C. H. Calkins, E. Delacretaz, P. D. Bella, G. Hindricks, P. Jais, M. E. Josephson, et al.
EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA)
Europace,
June 1, 2009;
11(6):
771 - 817.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Peters, J. V. Wylie, T. H. Hauser, R. Nezafat, Y. Han, J. J. Woo, J. Taclas, K. V. Kissinger, B. Goddu, M. E. Josephson, et al.
Recurrence of atrial fibrillation correlates with the extent of post-procedural late gadolinium enhancement a pilot study.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
March 1, 2009;
2(3):
308 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ernst
The future of atrial fibrillation ablation: new technologies and indications: Atrial fibrillation
Heart,
January 15, 2009;
95(2):
158 - 163.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Schmidt, K. R. J. Chun, R. R. Tilz, B. Koektuerk, F. Ouyang, and K.-H. Kuck
Remote navigation systems in electrophysiology
Europace,
November 1, 2008;
10(suppl_3):
iii57 - iii61.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Saliba, V. Y. Reddy, O. Wazni, J. E. Cummings, J. D. Burkhardt, M. Haissaguerre, J. Kautzner, P. Peichl, P. Neuzil, V. Schibgilla, et al.
Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system initial human experience and long-term follow-up results.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 24, 2008;
51(25):
2407 - 2411.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Minami, H. Chung, M. Kudo, S. Kitai, S. Takahashi, T. Inoue, K. Ueshima, and H. Shiozaki
Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Virtual CT Sonography with Magnetic Navigation
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
June 1, 2008;
190(6):
W335 - W341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Pappone and V. Santinelli
Safety and efficacy of remote magnetic ablation for atrial fibrillation.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 22, 2008;
51(16):
1614 - 1615.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Di Biase, J. D. Burkhardt, R. A. Schweikert, W. I. Saliba, and A. Natale
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 22, 2008;
51(16):
1615 - 1616.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mehta, D. T. Hart, B. S. Nagra, Z. Liu, and B. K. Kantharia
Successful ablation of focal left atrial tachycardia using Stereotaxis NiobeTM remote magnetic navigation system
Europace,
March 1, 2008;
10(3):
280 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Pappone and V. Santinelli
Non-fluoroscopic mapping as a guide for atrial ablation: current status and expectations for the future
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
December 1, 2007;
9(suppl_I):
I36 - I47.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Lindsay
Is Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation a Critical Determinant of Recurrent Arrhythmias After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 28, 2007;
50(9):
875 - 876.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Di Biase, T. S. Fahmy, D. Patel, R. Bai, K. Civello, O. M. Wazni, M. Kanj, C. S. Elayi, C. K. Ching, M. Khan, et al.
Remote Magnetic Navigation: Human Experience in Pulmonary Vein Ablation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 28, 2007;
50(9):
868 - 874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al.
HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society.
Europace,
June 1, 2007;
9(6):
335 - 379.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Y. Reddy, P. Neuzil, Z. J. Malchano, R. Vijaykumar, R. Cury, S. Abbara, J. Weichet, C. D. McPherson, and J. N. Ruskin
View-Synchronized Robotic Image-Guided Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Experimental Validation and Clinical Feasibility
Circulation,
May 29, 2007;
115(21):
2705 - 2714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Aryana, A. d'Avila, E. K. Heist, T. Mela, J. P. Singh, J. N. Ruskin, and V. Y. Reddy
Remote Magnetic Navigation to Guide Endocardial and Epicardial Catheter Mapping of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia
Circulation,
March 13, 2007;
115(10):
1191 - 1200.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
