Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:326-331, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.086 (Published online 22 December 2005).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.06.086v1
47/2/326    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vida, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Castañeda, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vida, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Castañeda, A. R.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: TRANSCATHETER CLOSURE OF CONGENITAL DEFECT

Surgical Versus Percutaneous Occlusion of Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defects

Results and Cost-Effective Considerations in a Low-Income Country

Vladimiro L. Vida, MD*, Joaquin Barnoya, MD, MPH, Mauricio O’Connell, MD, Juan Leon-Wyss, MD, Luis A. Larrazabal, MD and Aldo R. Castañeda, MD, PhD

Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Unidad de Cirugía Cardiovascular de Cardiovascular (UNICAR), Guatemala City, Guatemala

Manuscript received March 28, 2005; revised manuscript received May 27, 2005, accepted June 6, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Vladimiro Vida, Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, UNICAR, 9 Avenue, 8-00 zona 1, Guatemala City, 01011 Guatemala CA. (Email: vladimirovida{at}interfree.it).

OBJECTIVES: We compared the effectiveness and cost of percutaneous occlusion using an Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) (AGA Medical Corp., Golden Valley, Minnesota) device compared with surgical closure of an ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD II) in Guatemala.

BACKGROUND: The percutaneous occlusion of ASD II in first-world nations seems to offer better clinical results and lower cost compared with surgical closure.

METHODS: We reviewed the clinical course of 111 patients referred to our institution for closure of isolated ASD II. Successful closure was assessed immediately after the procedures and at 12 months. Actual hospital costs were calculated for every patient who underwent either of the two procedures.

RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with ASD II (75%) were selected for percutaneous occlusion with the ASO device, and the remaining 28 patients (25%) underwent surgical closure. In the device group, in 72 patients (86.7%) devices were successfully deployed. At immediate and 12-month follow-up, the complete closure rate was 87.5% (63 of 72 patients) and 97.2% (70 of 71 patients), respectively. In the surgical group, all patients had successful closure immediately after the procedure and at 12 months. Surgical closure offered a 27% cost savings in comparison with percutaneous occlusion (U.S. $3,329.50 ± $411.30 and U.S. $4,521.03 ± $429.71; p < 0.001, respectively). Cost of the device (U.S. $2,930.00) proved to be the main cause for this difference.

CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the clinical advantages of percutaneous occlusion over surgical closure of ASD II. However, percutaneous occlusion costs were higher compared with surgical closure. In Guatemala, where health care resources are limited, ASD II closure with the ASO device did not prove to be cost-effective.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ASD II = ostium secundum atrial septal defect
  ASO = Amplatzer septal occluder
  CHD = congenital heart disease
  CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass
  ICU = intensive care unit
  UNICAR = Unidad de Cirugía Cardiovascular de Cardiovascular




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Karamlou, B. S. Diggs, R. M. Ungerleider, B. W. McCrindle, and K. F. Welke
The Rush to Atrial Septal Defect Closure: Is the Introduction of Percutaneous Closure Driving Utilization?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1584 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L. Hongxin, S. Lijun, Z.-j. Wang, J. Zi, W.-l. Zhang, H.-z. Zhang, G. Wenbin, and C.-w. Zou
Intraoperative device closure of large secundum atrial septal defects; a safe alternative to transcatheter closure
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1055 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Hongxin, G. Wenbin, S. Lijun, W. Zhengjun, L. Hao, Z. Chengwei, D. Liang, and Y. Guidao
Intraoperative device closure of secundum atrial septal defect with a right anterior minithoracotomy in 100 patients.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 946 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 270 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Webb and M. A. Gatzoulis
Atrial Septal Defects in the Adult: Recent Progress and Overview
Circulation, October 10, 2006; 114(15): 1645 - 1653.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement