This Article Figures Only Full Text (PDF) View Data Supplements View Slide Set Executive Summary View Pocket Guide All Versions of this Article: j.jacc.2011.06.011v1 58/25/e212    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Gersh, B. J. Articles by Yancy, C. W. PubMed Articles by Gersh, B. J. Articles by Yancy, C. W.

PRACTICE GUIDELINE

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair, Writing Committee^_*,, Barry J. Maron, MD, FACC, Co-Chair, Writing Committee^_*,, Robert O. Bonow, MD, MACC, FAHA, Writing Committee Member, Joseph A. Dearani, MD, FACC, Writing Committee Member^,||, Michael A. Fifer, MD, FACC, FAHA, Writing Committee Member^_*,, Mark S. Link, MD, FACC, FHRS, Writing Committee Member^_*,¶, Srihari S. Naidu, MD, FACC, FSCAI, Writing Committee Member^_*,#, Rick A. Nishimura, MD, FACC, FAHA, Writing Committee Member, Steve R. Ommen, MD, FACC, FAHA, Writing Committee Member, Harry Rakowski, MD, FACC, FASE, Writing Committee Member^,_**, Christine E. Seidman, MD, FAHA, Writing Committee Member, Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Writing Committee Member, James E. Udelson, MD, FACC, FASNC, Writing Committee Member^, and Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FACC, FAHA, Writing Committee Member^||||

Key Words: ACCF/AHA Practice Guidelines • ablation • cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic • defibrillators, implantable • hypertrophy • myocardial disease • surgical procedures, operative

	ACCF/AHA Task Force Members

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

	Table of Contents

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 

Preamble......e214

1 Introduction......e216

1.1 Methodology and Evidence Review......e216

1.2 Organization of the Writing Committee......e216

1.3 Document Review and Approval......e216

1.4 Scope of the Guideline......e216

2 Prevalence/Nomenclature/Differential Diagnosis......e217

2.1 Prevalence......e217

2.2 Nomenclature......e217

2.2.1 Historical Context......e217

2.2.2 Clinical Definition and Differential Diagnosis......e217

2.2.3 Impact of Genetics......e218

2.2.4 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Centers......e218

3 Clinical Course and Natural History, Including Absence of Complications......e218

4 Pathophysiology......e219

4.1 LVOT Obstruction......e219

4.2 Diastolic Dysfunction......e220

4.3 Myocardial Ischemia......e220

4.4 Autonomic Dysfunction......e220

4.5 Mitral Regurgitation......e220

5 Diagnosis......e220

5.1 Genetic Testing Strategies/Family Screening—Recommendations......e220

5.1.1 Genotype-Positive/Phenotype-Negative Patients—Recommendation......e222

5.2 Electrocardiography—Recommendations......e222

5.3 Imaging......e223

5.3.1 Echocardiography—Recommendations......e223

5.3.2 Stress Testing—Recommendations......e224

5.3.3 Cardiac Magnetic Resonance—Recommendations......e225

5.4 Detection of Concomitant Coronary Disease—Recommendations......e226

5.4.1 Choice of Imaging Modality......e227

5.4.1.1 Invasive Coronary Arteriography......e227

5.4.1.2 Noninvasive CTA......e227

5.4.1.3 Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging......e227

5.4.1.4 Positron Emission Tomography......e228

5.4.1.5 Stress Echocardiography......e228

6 Management of HCM......e228

6.1 Asymptomatic Patients—Recommendations......e228

6.2 Symptomatic Patients......e230

6.2.1 Pharmacologic Management—Recommendations......e230

6.2.2 Invasive Therapies—Recommendations......e231

6.2.2.1 Selection of Patients......e232

6.2.2.2 Results of Invasive Therapy for the Relief of LVOT Obstruction......e232

6.2.2.3 Operator Experience......e233

6.2.2.4 Surgical Therapy......e233

6.2.2.4.1 Selection of Patients......e233

6.2.2.4.2 Outcomes......e233

6.2.2.4.3 Complications......e234

6.2.2.4.4 Mitral Valve Abnormalities and Other Anatomic Issues......e234

6.2.2.5 Alcohol Septal Ablation......e234

6.2.2.5.1 Selection of Patients......e234

6.2.2.5.2 Results......e235

6.2.2.5.3 Complications......e235

6.2.2.6 Pacing—Recommendations......e236

6.2.2.6.1 Results of DDD Pacing......e236

6.2.2.6.2 DDD Pacing: Caveats......e236

6.2.2.6.3 Pacing and ICDs......e236

6.2.3 Patients With LV Systolic Dysfunction—Recommendations......e237

6.2.4 Selection of Patients for Heart Transplantation—Recommendations......e237

6.3 Prevention of SCD......e237

6.3.1 SCD Risk Stratification—Recommendations......e237

6.3.1.1 Established Risk Markers......e238

6.3.1.1.1 Prior Personal History of Ventricular Fibrillation, SCD, or Sustained VT......e238

6.3.1.1.2 Family History of SCD......e238

6.3.1.1.3 Syncope......e238

6.3.1.1.4 Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia......e238

6.3.1.1.5 Maximum LV Wall Thickness......e238

6.3.1.1.6 Abnormal Blood Pressure Response During Exercise......e238

6.3.1.2 Other Potential SCD Risk Modifiers......e239

6.3.1.2.1 LVOT Obstruction......e239

6.3.1.2.2 LGE on CMR Imaging......e239

6.3.1.2.3 LV Apical Aneurysm......e239

6.3.1.2.4 Genetic Mutations......e239

6.3.1.3 Utility of SCD Risk Markers in Clinical Practice......e239

6.3.2 Selection of Patients for ICDs—Recommendations......e239

6.3.2.1 Results of ICD Therapy in HCM......e241

6.3.2.2 Complications of ICD Therapy in HCM......e241

6.3.2.3 Overall Risk Assessment and Selection of Patients for ICD Therapy......e241

6.3.2.4 Selection of ICD Device Type—Recommendations......e241

6.3.3 Participation in Competitive or Recreational Sports and Physical Activity—Recommendations......e242

6.4 Management of AF—Recommendations......e242

7 Other Issues......e244

7.1 Pregnancy/Delivery—Recommendations......e244

7.2 Occupational Considerations......e245

8 Future Research Needs......e245

8.1 Establishing the Cause of HCM......e245

8.2 Defining the Link Between Genotype and Phenotype......e245

8.3 Management and Evaluation of HCM Genotype-Positive/Phenotype-Negative Relatives......e245

8.4 Clinical Significance of Myocardial Fibrosis......e245

8.5 Therapies to Directly Modify the HCM Pathophysiology......e246

8.6 Refining Risk Stratification for SCD......e246

8.7 Comparative Assessment of Septal Reduction Strategies......e246

8.8 Therapies to Treat and Prevent AF and Its Associated Risks......e246

References......e246

Appendix 1. Author Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant)......e257

Appendix 2. Reviewer Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant)......e258

Appendix 3. Abbreviation List......e260

	Preamble

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have jointly engaged in the production of guidelines in the area of cardiovascular disease since 1980. The ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Task Force) is charged with developing, updating, and revising practice guidelines for cardiovascular diseases and procedures, and the Task Force directs and oversees this effort. Writing committees are charged with assessing the evidence as an independent group of authors to develop, update, or revise recommendations for clinical practice.

Experts in the subject under consideration have been selected from both organizations to examine subject-specific data and write guidelines in partnership with representatives from other medical practitioner and specialty groups. Writing committees are specifically charged to perform a formal literature review, weigh the strength of evidence for or against particular tests, treatments, or procedures, and include estimates of expected health outcomes where data exist. Patient-specific modifiers, comorbidities, and issues of patient preference that may influence the choice of tests or therapies are considered. When available, information from studies on cost is considered, but data on efficacy and clinical outcomes constitute the primary basis for recommendations in these guidelines.

In analyzing the data and developing the recommendations and supporting text, the writing committee used evidence-based methodologies developed by the Task Force, which are described elsewhere (1). The committee reviewed and ranked evidence supporting current recommendations with the weight of evidence ranked as Level A if the data were derived from multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses. The committee ranked available evidence as Level B when data were derived from a single RCT or nonrandomized studies. Evidence was ranked as Level C when the primary source of the recommendation was consensus opinion, case studies, or standard of care. In the narrative portions of these guidelines, evidence is generally presented in chronological order of development. Studies are identified as observational, retrospective, prospective, or randomized when appropriate. For certain conditions for which inadequate data are available, recommendations are based on expert consensus and clinical experience and ranked as Level C. An example is the use of penicillin for pneumococcal pneumonia, for which there are no RCTs and treatment is based on clinical experience. When recommendations at Level C are supported by historical clinical data, appropriate references (including clinical reviews) are cited if available. For issues where sparse data are available, a survey of current practice among the clinicians on the writing committee was the basis for Level C recommendations and no references are cited. The schema for Classification of Recommendations and Level of Evidence is summarized in Table 1 , which also illustrates how the grading system provides an estimate of the size and the certainty of the treatment effect. A new addition to the ACCF/AHA methodology is separation of the Class III recommendations to delineate whether the recommendation is determined to be of "no benefit" or associated with "harm" to the patient. In addition, in view of the increasing number of comparative effectiveness studies, comparator verbs and suggested phrases for writing recommendations for the comparative effectiveness of one treatment/strategy with respect to another for Class of Recommendation I and IIa, Level of Evidence A or B only have been added.

The ACCF/AHA practice guidelines address patient populations (and healthcare providers) residing in North America. As such, drugs that are currently unavailable in North America are discussed in the text without a specific class of recommendation. For studies performed in large numbers of subjects outside of North America, each writing group reviews the potential impact of different practice patterns and patient populations on the treatment effect and on the relevance to the ACCF/AHA target population to determine whether the findings should inform a specific recommendation.

The ACCF/AHA practice guidelines are intended to assist healthcare providers in clinical decision making by describing a range of generally acceptable approaches for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of specific diseases or conditions. These practice guidelines represent a consensus of expert opinion after a thorough review of the available current scientific evidence and are intended to improve patient care. The guidelines attempt to define practices that meet the needs of most patients in most circumstances. The ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient must be made by the healthcare provider and patient in light of all the circumstances presented by that patient. Thus, there are situations in which deviations from these guidelines may be appropriate. Clinical decision making should consider the quality and availability of expertise in the area where care is provided. When these guidelines are used as the basis for regulatory or payer decisions, the goal should be improvement in quality of care. The Task Force recognizes that situations arise for which additional data are needed to better inform patient care; these areas will be identified within each respective guideline when appropriate.

Prescribed courses of treatment in accordance with these recommendations are effective only if they are followed. Because lack of patient understanding and adherence may adversely affect outcomes, physicians and other healthcare providers should make every effort to engage the patient's active participation in prescribed medical regimens and lifestyles.

The guideline will be reviewed annually by the Task Force and considered current unless it is updated, revised, or withdrawn from distribution. Guidelines are official policy of both the ACCF and AHA.

Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA

Chair, ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines

	1. Introduction

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
1.1 Methodology and Evidence Review.   The recommendations listed in this document are, whenever possible, evidence based. An extensive evidence review was conducted through January 2011. Searches were limited to studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted in human subjects and published in English. Key search words included, but were not limited to, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), surgical myectomy, ablation, exercise, sudden cardiac death (SCD), athletes, dual-chamber pacing, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, alcohol septal ablation, automobile driving and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), catheter ablation, defibrillators, genetics, genotype, medical management, magnetic resonance imaging, pacing, permanent pacing, phenotype, pregnancy, risk stratification, sudden death in athletes, surgical septal myectomy, and septal reduction. Additionally, the committee reviewed documents related to the subject matter previously published by the ACCF and AHA. References selected and published in this document are representative and not all-inclusive.

To provide clinicians with a comprehensive set of data, whenever deemed appropriate or when published, the absolute risk difference and number needed to treat or harm are provided in the guideline, along with confidence intervals and data related to the relative treatment effects, such as odds ratio, relative risk, hazard ratio, or incidence rate ratio.

1.2 Organization of the Writing Committee.   The committee was composed of physicians and cardiac surgeons with expertise in HCM, invasive cardiology, noninvasive testing and imaging, pediatric cardiology, electrophysiology, and genetics. The committee included representatives from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

1.3 Document Review and Approval.   This document was reviewed by 2 outside reviewers nominated by both the ACCF and AHA, as well as 2 reviewers each from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Other content reviewers included members from the ACCF Adult Congenital and Pediatric Cardiology Council, ACCF Surgeons' Scientific Council, and ACCF Interventional Scientific Council. All information on reviewers' RWI was distributed to the writing committee and is published in this document (Appendix 2).

This document was approved for publication by the governing bodies of the ACCF and the AHA and endorsed by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

1.4 Scope of the Guideline.   Although there are reports of this disease dating back to the 1800s, the first modern pathologic description was provided over 50 years ago by Teare (2) and the most important early clinical report by Braunwald et al. in 1964 (3). Since then, there has been a growing understanding of the complexity and diversity of the underlying genetic substrate, the clinical phenotype, natural history, and approaches to treatment.

The impetus for the guideline is based on an appreciation of the frequency of this clinical entity and a realization that many aspects of clinical management, including the use of diagnostic modalities and genetic testing, lack consensus. Moreover, the emergence of 2 different approaches to septal reduction therapy (septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation) in addition to the ICD has created considerable controversy. The discussion and recommendations about the various diagnostic modalities apply to patients with established HCM and to a variable extent to patients with a high index of suspicion of the disease.

Although the Task Force was aware of the lack of high levels of evidence regarding HCM provided by clinical trials, it was believed that a guideline document based on expert consensus that outlines the most important diagnostic and management strategies would be helpful.

To facilitate ease of use, it was decided that recommendations in the pediatric and adolescent age groups would not appear as a separate section but instead would be integrated into the overall content of the guideline where relevant.

	2. Prevalence/Nomenclature/Differential Diagnosis

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
2.1 Prevalence.   HCM is a common genetic cardiovascular disease. In addition, HCM is a global disease (4), with epidemiological studies from several parts of the world (5) reporting a similar prevalence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, the quintessential phenotype of HCM, to be about 0.2% (i.e., 1:500) in the general population, which is equivalent to at least 600,000 people affected in the United States (6). This estimated frequency in the general population appears to exceed the relatively uncommon occurrence of HCM in cardiology practices, implying that most affected individuals remain unidentified, probably in most cases without symptoms or shortened life expectancy.

2.2 Nomenclature.   2.2.1 Historical Context
Although HCM is the preferred nomenclature to describe this disease (7), confusion over the names used to characterize the entity of HCM has arisen over the years. At last count, >80 individual names, terms, and acronyms have been used (most by early investigators) to describe HCM (7). Furthermore, nomenclature that was popular in the 1960s and 1970s, such as IHSS (idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis) or HOCM (hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy), is potentially confusing by virtue of the inference that LVOT is an invariable and obligatory component of the disease. In fact, fully one third of patients have no obstruction either at rest or with physiologic provocation (8). Although terms such as IHSS and HOCM persist occasionally in informal usage, they now rarely appear in the literature, whereas HCM, initially used in 1979, allows for both the obstructive and nonobstructive hemodynamic forms and has become the predominant formal term used to designate this disease (7).

2.2.2 Clinical Definition and Differential Diagnosis
The generally accepted definition of HCM, the clinical entity that is the subject of this guideline, is a disease state characterized by unexplained LV hypertrophy associated with nondilated ventricular chambers in the absence of another cardiac or systemic disease that itself would be capable of producing the magnitude of hypertrophy evident in a given patient (6,7,9–12), with the caveat that patients who are genotype positive may be phenotypically negative without overt hypertrophy (13,14). Clinically, HCM is usually recognized by maximal LV wall thickness 15 mm, with wall thickness of 13 to 14 mm considered borderline, particularly in the presence of other compelling information (e.g., family history of HCM), based on echocardiography. In terms of LV wall-thickness measurements, the literature at this time has been largely focused on echocardiography, although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is now used with increasing frequency in HCM (15), and we presume that data with this latter modality will increasingly emerge. In the case of children, increased LV wall thickness is defined as wall thickness 2 standard deviations above the mean (z score 2) for age, sex, or body size. However, it should be underscored that in principle, any degree of wall thickness is compatible with the presence of the HCM genetic substrate and that an emerging subgroup within the broad clinical spectrum is composed of family members with disease-causing sarcomere mutations but without evidence of the disease phenotype (i.e., LV hypertrophy) (16–19). These individuals are usually referred to as being "genotype positive/phenotype negative" or as having "subclinical HCM." Furthermore, although a myriad of patterns and distribution of LV hypertrophy (including diffuse and marked) have been reported in HCM (15,20,21) about one third of patients have largely segmental wall thickening involving only a small portion of the left ventricle, and indeed such patients with HCM usually have normal calculated LV mass (15). The clinical diagnosis of HCM may also be buttressed by other typical features, such as family history of the disease, cardiac symptoms, tachyarrhythmias, or electrocardiographic abnormalities (9,10).

Differential diagnosis of HCM and other cardiac conditions (with LV hypertrophy) may arise, most commonly with hypertensive heart disease and the physiologic remodeling associated with athletic training ("athlete's heart") (22–26). These are not uncommon clinical scenarios, and confusion between mild morphologic expressions of HCM and other conditions with LV hypertrophy usually arises when maximum wall thickness is in the modest range of 13 to 15 mm. In older patients with LV hypertrophy and a history of systemic hypertension, coexistence of HCM is often a consideration. The likelihood of HCM can be determined by identification of a diagnostic sarcomere mutation or inferred by marked LV thickness >25 mm and/or LVOT obstruction with systolic anterior motion (SAM) and mitral-septal contact.

The important distinction between pathologic LV hypertrophy (i.e., HCM) and physiologic LV hypertrophy (i.e., athlete's heart) is impacted by the recognition that athletic conditioning can produce LV, right ventricular, and left atrial (LA) chamber enlargement, ventricular septal thickening, and even aortic enlargement (26) but is often resolved by noninvasive markers, including sarcomeric mutations or family history of HCM, LV cavity dimension (if enlarged, favoring athlete's heart), diastolic function, pattern of LV hypertrophy (if unusual location or noncontiguous, favoring HCM), or short deconditioning periods in which a decrease in wall thickness would favor athlete's heart (22–26).

Notably, it is evident that metabolic or infiltrative storage disorders with LV hypertrophy in babies, older children, and young adults can mimic clinically diagnosed HCM (attributable to sarcomeric protein mutations), for example, conditions such as mitochondrial disease (27,28), Fabry disease (29), or storage diseases caused by mutations in the genes encoding the -2-regulatory subunit of the adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (PRKAG2) or the X-linked lysosome-associated membrane protein gene (LAMP2; Danon disease) (30–33). Use of the term HCM is not appropriate to describe these and other patients with LV hypertrophy that occurs in the context of a multisystem disorder such as Noonan syndrome (with craniofacial and congenital heart malformations, as well as LV hypertrophy from mutations in genes of the RAS [RAt Sarcoma] pathway [14,15]), or distinct cardiomyopathies such as Pompe disease (also a glycogen storage disease II, with skeletal muscle weakness and cardiomyopathy because of deficiency of α1,4 glycosidase [acid maltase]) (34–38) (Figure 1). In addition, differential diagnosis of HCM may require distinction from systemic hypertension or physiologic athlete's heart (23) or from dilated cardiomyopathy when HCM presents in the end stage (39).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1 Summary of the nomenclature that distinguishes HCM from other genetic diseases associated with LV hypertrophy. *At this time the overwhelming evidence links the clinical diagnosis of HCM with a variety of genes encoding protein components of the cardiac sarcomere. However, it is possible that in the future other nonsarcomeric (but also nonmetabolic) genes may prove to cause HCM. An example is Noonan syndrome with cardiomyopathy. Modified with permission from Maron et al. (12).

In conclusion, the writing committee believes that the most prudent recommendation for nomenclature is that hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the acronym HCM remain a clinical diagnosis limited to those patients in whom 1) overt disease expression (with LV hypertrophy) appears to be confined to the heart and 2) the definitive mutation is either one of a gene encoding proteins of the cardiac sarcomere or alternatively when the genotype is unresolved using current genetic testing. Therefore, nomenclature that describes patients as "Noonan hypertrophic cardiomyopathy" is discouraged, whereas "Noonan syndrome with LV hypertrophy" or "Noonan syndrome with cardiomyopathy" is preferred.

2.2.4 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Centers
The writing committee considers it important to emphasize that HCM is a complex disease entity with a broad (and increasing) clinical and genetic spectrum (9). Although HCM is one of the most common forms of genetic heart disease and relatively common in the general population (6), this disease entity is infrequent in general clinical practice, with most cardiologists responsible for the care of only a few patients with HCM (43). This principle has led to an impetus for establishing clinical programs of excellence—usually within established centers—in which cardiovascular care is focused on the management of HCM (i.e., "HCM centers") (43,44). Such programs are staffed by cardiologists and cardiac surgeons familiar with the contemporary management of HCM and offer all diagnostic and treatment options, including genetic testing and counseling, comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), CMR imaging, both surgical septal myectomy and alcohol ablation, and the management of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter, and ICDs. Another advantage is the potential to perform outcomes research on large groups of patients. Although the writing committee does not necessarily recommend that all patients with HCM should be evaluated in such centers, nevertheless, it is the strong view that patients with this disease may well benefit from a clinical environment with specific expertise in HCM. The selection of patients for referral to an HCM center should be based largely on the judgment of the managing cardiologist and the degree to which he or she is comfortable advising and evaluating patients with HCM with a particular clinical profile.

	3. Clinical Course and Natural History, Including Absence of Complications

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
HCM is a heterogeneous cardiac disease with a diverse clinical presentation and course, presenting in all age groups from infancy to the very elderly (9,10,39,45). Most affected individuals probably achieve a normal life expectancy without disability or the necessity for major therapeutic interventions (46–49). On the other hand, in some patients, HCM is associated with disease complications that may be profound, with the potential to result in disease progression or premature death (9,10,39,45,50,51). When the disease does result in significant complications, there are 3 relatively discrete but not mutually exclusive pathways of clinical progression (Figure 2):

1 SCD due to unpredictable ventricular tachyarrhythmias, most commonly in young asymptomatic patients <35 years of age (50–59) (including competitive athletes) (58,59).

2 Heart failure characterized by exertional dyspnea (with or without chest pain) that may be progressive despite preserved systolic function and sinus rhythm, or in a small proportion of patients, heart failure may progress to the end stage with LV remodeling and systolic dysfunction caused by extensive myocardial scarring (39).

3 AF, either paroxysmal or chronic, also associated with various degrees of heart failure (60) and an increased risk of systemic thromboembolism and both fatal and nonfatal stroke.

View larger version (3K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 2 Prognosis profiles for HCM and targets for therapy. AF indicates atrial fibrillation. Modified with permission from Maron et al. (10).

	4. Pathophysiology

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
The pathophysiology of HCM is complex and consists of multiple interrelated abnormalities, including LVOT obstruction, diastolic dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, myocardial ischemia, and arrhythmias (9,66,67). It is clinically important to distinguish between the obstructive and nonobstructive forms of HCM because management strategies are largely dependent on the presence or absence of symptoms caused by obstruction.

4.1 LVOT Obstruction.   The original observations by Brock (68) and Braunwald et al. (3) emphasized the functional subvalvular LVOT gradient, which was highly influenced by alterations in the load and contractility of the left ventricle. The clinical significance of the outflow tract gradient has periodically been controversial (69–72), but careful studies have shown definitively that true mechanical obstruction to outflow does occur (66,67). For HCM, it is the peak instantaneous LV outflow gradient rather than the mean gradient that influences treatment decisions. Throughout the remainder of this document the term gradient will be used to denote peak instantaneous gradient. Up to one third of patients with HCM will have obstruction under basal (resting) conditions (defined as gradients 30 mm Hg). Another one third or more of patients will have labile, physiologically provoked gradients (<30 mm Hg at rest and 30 mm Hg with physiologic provocation) (8). The final one third of patients will have the nonobstructive form of HCM (gradients <30 mm Hg at rest and with provocation) (Table 2). Marked gradients 50 mm Hg, either at rest or with provocation, represent the conventional threshold for surgical or percutaneous intervention if symptoms cannot be controlled with medications.

Obstruction to LV outflow is dynamic, varying with loading conditions and contractility of the ventricle (3). Increased myocardial contractility, decreased ventricular volume, or decreased afterload increases the degree of subaortic obstruction. Patients may have little or no obstruction of the LVOT at rest but can generate large LVOT gradients under conditions such as exercise, the strain phase of the Valsalva maneuver, or during pharmacologic provocation (66,67). There is often large spontaneous variation in the severity of the gradient during day-to-day activities or even with food or alcohol intake (81); exacerbation of symptoms during the postprandial period is common. Importantly, it has been well established that LVOT obstruction contributes to the debilitating heart failure–related symptoms that may occur in HCM (66,67) and is also a major determinant of outcome (45).

The presence and magnitude of outflow obstruction are usually assessed with 2-dimensional echocardiography and continuous wave Doppler. It is a late-peaking systolic velocity that reflects the occurrence of subaortic obstruction late in systole, and the peak instantaneous gradient derived from the peak velocity should be reported. If the resting outflow gradient is <50 mm Hg, provocative measures may be used to ascertain if higher gradients can be elicited, preferably with physiologic exercise (stress echocardiography) but alternatively with the Valsalva maneuver or selectively with amyl nitrite (3,10). Provocation with dobutamine infusion during Doppler echocardiography is no longer recommended as a strategy to induce outflow gradients in HCM. However in equivocal cases, cardiac catheterization with isoproterenol infusion may further aid in eliciting a provocable gradient (82). Otherwise, routine invasive cardiac catheterization to document outflow gradients is necessary only when there are discordant data from Doppler echocardiography and the physical examination (10). The peak-to-peak gradient obtained with catheterization most closely approximates the peak instantaneous gradient by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography (73,74).

4.2 Diastolic Dysfunction.   Diastolic dysfunction arising from multiple factors is a major pathophysiologic abnormality in HCM that ultimately affects both ventricular relaxation and chamber stiffness (66,67,83). Impairment of ventricular relaxation results from the systolic contraction load caused by outflow tract obstruction, nonuniformity of ventricular contraction and relaxation, and delayed inactivation caused by abnormal intracellular calcium reuptake. Severe hypertrophy of the myocardium results in an increase in chamber stiffness. Diffuse myocardial ischemia may further affect both relaxation and chamber stiffness. A compensatory increase in the contribution of late diastolic filling during atrial systole is associated with these alterations (84). With exercise or any other type of catecholamine stimulation, the decrease in diastolic filling period as well as myocardial ischemia will further lead to severe abnormalities of diastolic filling of the heart, with chest pain and/or an increase in pulmonary venous pressure causing dyspnea.

4.3 Myocardial Ischemia.   Severe myocardial ischemia and even infarction may occur in HCM (85,86). The myocardial ischemia is frequently unrelated to the atherosclerotic epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) but is caused by supply–demand mismatch. Patients with HCM of any age have increased oxygen demand caused by the hypertrophy and adverse loading conditions. They also have compromised coronary blood flow to the LV myocardium because of intramural arterioles with thickened walls attributable to medial hypertrophy associated with luminal narrowing (87).

4.4 Autonomic Dysfunction.   During exercise, approximately 25% of patients with HCM have an abnormal blood pressure response defined by either a failure of systolic blood pressure to rise >20 mm Hg or a fall in systolic blood pressure (88,89). The presence of this finding is associated with a poorer prognosis (89,90). This inability to augment and sustain systolic blood pressure during exercise is caused by either the dynamic LVOT obstruction or systemic vasodilatation during exercise. It is speculated that autonomic dysregulation (88) is present in patients with HCM and that the fall in blood pressure associated with bradycardia may be an abnormal reflex response to obstruction.

4.5 Mitral Regurgitation.   Mitral regurgitation is common in patients with LVOT obstruction and may play a primary role in producing symptoms of dyspnea. The temporal sequence of events of eject-obstruct-leak supports the concept that the mitral regurgitation in most patients is a secondary phenomenon (66,67,91). The mitral regurgitation is usually caused by the distortion of the mitral valve apparatus from the SAM secondary to the LVOT obstruction. The jet of mitral regurgitation is directed laterally and posteriorly and predominates during mid and late systole. An anteriorly directed jet should suggest an intrinsic abnormality of the mitral valve. If the mitral regurgitation is caused by distortion of leaflet motion by SAM of the mitral valve, the severity of the mitral regurgitation may be proportional to the LVOT obstruction in some patients. Changes in ventricular load and contractility that affect the severity of outflow tract obstruction similarly affect the degree of mitral regurgitation. It is important to identify patients with additional intrinsic disease of the mitral valve apparatus (prolapse or flail), because this finding influences subsequent treatment options (92).

	5. Diagnosis

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
The clinical diagnosis of HCM is conventionally made with cardiac imaging, at present most commonly with 2-dimensional echocardiography and increasingly with CMR. Morphologic diagnosis is based on the presence of a hypertrophied and nondilated left ventricle in the absence of another cardiac or systemic disease capable of producing the magnitude of hypertrophy evident in a patient (usually 15 mm in adults or the equivalent relative to body surface area in children). Genetic testing, which is now commercially available, is a powerful strategy for definitive diagnosis of affected genetic status and is currently used most effectively in the identification of affected relatives in families known to have HCM.

5.1 Genetic Testing Strategies/Family Screening—Recommendations.   Class I

1 Evaluation of familial inheritance and genetic counseling is recommended as part of the assessment of patients with HCM (17,31,93–96).(Level of Evidence: B)

2 Patients who undergo genetic testing should also undergo counseling by someone knowledgeable in the genetics of cardiovascular disease so that results and their clinical significance can be appropriately reviewed with the patient (97–101). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 Screening (clinical, with or without genetic testing) is recommended in first-degree relatives of patients with HCM (17,31,93,94,96,102,103). (Level of Evidence: B)

4 Genetic testing for HCM and other genetic causes of unexplained cardiac hypertrophy is recommended in patients with an atypical clinical presentation of HCM or when another genetic condition is suspected to be the cause (104–106). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIa

1 Genetic testing is reasonable in the index patient to facilitate the identification of first-degree family members at risk for developing HCM (17,95,102). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIb

1 The usefulness of genetic testing in the assessment of risk of SCD in HCM is uncertain (107,108). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class III: No Benefit

1 Genetic testing is not indicated in relatives when the index patient does not have a definitive pathogenic mutation (17,31,93–96,109). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 Ongoing clinical screening is not indicated in genotype-negative relatives in families with HCM (109–112). (Level of Evidence: B)

See Online Data Supplement 1 for additional data regarding genetic testing strategies/family screening.

HCM is caused by an autosomal dominant mutation in genes that encode sarcomere proteins or sarcomere-associated proteins. The most vigorous evidence indicates that 8 genes are known to definitively cause HCM: beta myosin heavy chain, myosin binding protein C, troponin T, troponin I, alpha tropomyosin, actin, regulatory light chain, and essential light chain (11,12,30,40–42). In addition, actinin and myozenin are associated with less definitive evidence for causing HCM. At this time there is inconclusive evidence to support other genes causing HCM (94,96,113,114), but research is ongoing and other genetic causes may be identified (93,115). A single mutation in 1 of the 2 alleles (or copies) of a gene is sufficient to cause HCM; however, 5% of patients with HCM have 2 mutations in the same gene or different genes (110,116).

Genetic and/or clinical screening of all first-degree family members of patients with HCM is important to identify those with unrecognized disease. On the basis of family history, clinical screening, and pedigree analyses, the pattern of inheritance is ascertained to identify and counsel relatives at risk (101). Because familial HCM is a dominant disorder, the risk that an affected patient will transmit disease to each offspring is 50%. When a pathogenic mutation is identified in an index patient, the genetic status of each family member can be readily ascertained. Because HCM mutations are highly penetrant, a mutation conveys substantial (>95%) risk over a lifetime for developing clinical and/or phenotypic evidence of HCM (94,96,113,114).

Genetic counseling before genetic testing will increase understanding of the medical and familial implications of test results, enabling informed decision making about potential risks and benefits (98,99). Genetic counseling can also reduce potential psychologic responses to learning one's mutation status (4,101). Even when genetic testing is not undertaken, genetic counseling about the potential for familial transmission of HCM is medically important.

The occurrence of HCM can be isolated or sporadic, but the frequency of sporadic HCM is unresolved. Sporadic HCM can reflect an inaccurate family history, incomplete penetrance (absence of clinical expression despite the presence of a mutation) in family members, or a de novo (new) mutation that can initiate new familial disease (93,115).

Because unrelated patients with HCM will have different mutations, a comprehensive sequence-based analysis of all HCM genes is necessary to define the pathogenic (e.g., disease-causing) mutation in an index patient. Experienced clinical laboratories identify the pathogenic HCM mutation in approximately 60% to 70% of patients with a positive family history and approximately 10% to 50% of patients without a family history (93,102). Genetic testing may identify a pathogenic mutation (e.g., analysis defines a sequence variant known to cause HCM) or a "likely pathogenic" mutation, a DNA variant that was previously unknown as a cause of HCM but has molecular characteristics that are similar to recognized HCM mutations. Genetic testing may also identify "variants of uncertain significance." This term indicates that the nucleotide change is not commonly recognized to be variable (or polymorphic) in the general population and that some molecular characteristics of the variant suggest deleterious consequences (similar to all pathogenic mutations). Genetic analyses of family members can help establish or refute the causality of "likely pathogenic" and "variants of uncertain significance." When a variant occurs in multiple clinically affected family members but is absent from clinically unaffected adult family members, the likelihood for pathogenicity increases. In contrast, when a variant occurs in multiple clinically unaffected adult family members, the likelihood for pathogenicity is low.

Adult patients with HCM and an established pathogenic mutation have increased risk for the combined endpoints of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, or progression to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV compared with patients with HCM in whom no mutation is identified (103). Studies suggest that the presence of >1 HCM-associated sarcomere mutation is associated with greater severity of disease (110,111,117,118).

When genetic testing reveals a mutation in the index patient, ascertainment of genetic status in first-degree relatives can be predictive of risk for developing HCM (105). Genetic counseling should precede genetic testing of family members (101). Relatives with overt HCM will have the same pathogenic HCM mutation as the index patient. Pathogenic mutations may also be identified in other relatives with unknown clinical status. These mutation carriers should be evaluated by physical examination, electrocardiography, and 2-dimensional echocardiography, and if HCM is identified, these individuals should undergo risk stratification (Section 6.3.1). Mutation carriers without evidence of HCM (genotype positive/phenotype negative) are at considerable risk for future development of HCM, and guidelines to evaluate these individuals are discussed below (13,14). Mutation-negative family members and their descendents have no risk for developing HCM and do not need further evaluation. Information from genotyping may help define clinical manifestations and outcomes in specific families with HCM (94–96,105,107–109,119).

When genetic testing is not performed or a mutation is not identified in the index patient, clinical screening of all first-degree family members is important to identify those with unrecognized HCM. Offspring of unaffected individuals do not warrant clinical screening unless prompted by unexpected signs or symptoms. For more information on screening intervals, see Section 5.3.1.

5.1.1 Genotype-Positive/Phenotype-Negative Patients—Recommendation
Class I

1 In individuals with pathogenic mutations who do not express the HCM phenotype, it is recommended to perform serial electrocardiogram (ECG), TTE, and clinical assessment at periodic intervals (12 to 18 months in children and adolescents and about every 5 years in adults), based on the patient's age and change in clinical status (16,120–122). (Level of Evidence: B)

Genetic screening of first-degree relatives of an index patient with HCM can reveal typically young family members with a mutation (genotype positive) but without cardiac hypertrophy (phenotype negative) (Table 3) (13,14,17,105,123,124). As the clinical expression of HCM usually increases with age, clinical screening (by physical examination, electrocardiography, and 2-dimensional echocardiography or CMR) of genotype-positive/phenotype-negative individuals is also recommended at the intervals indicated below. Electrocardiographic abnormalities, increased ejection fraction (EF), and delayed myocardial relaxation can precede the onset of hypertrophy (17,124). When abnormal, these parameters can indicate early emergence of clinical disease. Information about risk of SCD is limited (13,14,121,122).

5.2 Electrocardiography—Recommendations.   Class I

1 A 12-lead ECG is recommended in the initial evaluation of patients with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Twenty-four–hour ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiographic monitoring is recommended in the initial evaluation of patients with HCM to detect ventricular tachycardia (VT) and identify patients who may be candidates for ICD therapy (10,127–129). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 Twenty-four–hour ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiographic monitoring or event recording is recommended in patients with HCM who develop palpitations or lightheadedness (10,127,128). (Level of Evidence: B)

4 A repeat ECG is recommended for patients with HCM when there is worsening of symptoms. (Level of Evidence: C)

5 A 12-lead ECG is recommended every 12 to 18 months as a component of the screening algorithm for adolescent first-degree relatives of patients with HCM who have no evidence of hypertrophy on echocardiography. (Level of Evidence: C)

6 A 12-lead ECG is recommended as a component of the screening algorithm for first-degree relatives of patients with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1 Twenty-four–hour ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiographic monitoring, repeated every 1 to 2 years, is reasonable in patients with HCM who have no previous evidence of VT to identify patients who may be candidates for ICD therapy (129). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Annual 12-lead ECGs are reasonable in patients with known HCM who are clinically stable to evaluate for asymptomatic changes in conduction or rhythm (i.e., AF). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 Twenty-four–hour ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiographic monitoring might be considered in adults with HCM to assess for asymptomatic paroxysmal AF/atrial flutter. (Level of Evidence: C)

The 12-lead ECG is useful largely for raising the suspicion of HCM in family members without LV hypertrophy and in identifying patterns such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, which may suggest certain phenocopies of HCM (9,130–132). In addition, patterns mimicking myocardial infarction may provide evidence of the diagnosis and may be present in young individuals before there is manifest evidence of wall thickening on echocardiography (10,132,133). The 12-lead ECG is abnormal in 75% to 95% of patients with HCM (9,131,132). These abnormalities do not correlate with severity or pattern of hypertrophy as determined by echocardiography.

Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring for detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias plays an important role in risk stratification of asymptomatic or symptomatic patients with HCM because episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) identify patients at significantly higher risk of subsequent SCD (9,10,132–134). It is reasonable to perform serial ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring on an annual basis or every 2 years in patients who are stable and do not manifest arrhythmias on baseline 12-lead ECG and Holter monitoring and who do not have ICDs.

The yield of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring for detection of AF or atrial flutter in patients who were previously asymptomatic without arrhythmias is unknown.

5.3 Imaging.   5.3.1 Echocardiography—Recommendations
Class I

1 A TTE is recommended in the initial evaluation of all patients with suspected HCM (9,20,66,67,135–138). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 A TTE is recommended as a component of the screening algorithm for family members of patients with HCM unless the family member is genotype negative in a family with known definitive mutations (41,126,139,140). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 Periodic (12 to 18 months) TTE screening is recommended for children of patients with HCM, starting by age 12 years or earlier if a growth spurt or signs of puberty are evident and/or when there are plans for engaging in intense competitive sports or there is a family history of SCD (126,141). (Level of Evidence: C)

4 Repeat TTE is recommended for the evaluation of patients with HCM with a change in clinical status or new cardiovascular event (39,45,57,142–145). (Level of Evidence: B)

5 A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is recommended for the intraoperative guidance of surgical myectomy (146–148). (Level of Evidence: B)

6 TTE or TEE with intracoronary contrast injection of the candidate's septal perforator(s) is recommended for the intraprocedural guidance of alcohol septal ablation (62,149–151). (Level of Evidence: B)

7 TTE should be used to evaluate the effects of surgical myectomy or alcohol septal ablation for obstructive HCM (61,62,152–156). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1 TTE studies performed every 1 to 2 years can be useful in the serial evaluation of symptomatically stable patients with HCM to assess the degree of myocardial hypertrophy, dynamic obstruction, and myocardial function (20,67,136). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Exercise TTE can be useful in the detection and quantification of dynamic LVOT obstruction in the absence of resting outflow tract obstruction in patients with HCM (8,45,143,145,157). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 TEE can be useful if TTE is inconclusive for clinical decision making about medical therapy and in situations such as planning for myectomy, exclusion of subaortic membrane or mitral regurgitation secondary to structural abnormalities of the mitral valve apparatus, or in assessment for the feasibility of alcohol septal ablation (146–148). (Level of Evidence: C)

4 TTE combined with the injection of an intravenous contrast agent is reasonable if the diagnosis of apical HCM or apical infarction or severity of hypertrophy is in doubt, particularly when other imaging modalities such as CMR are not readily available, not diagnostic, or are contraindicated. (Level of Evidence: C)

5 Serial TTE studies are reasonable for clinically unaffected patients who have a first-degree relative with HCM when genetic status is unknown. Such follow-up may be considered every 12 to 18 months for children or adolescents from high-risk families and every 5 years for adult family members (41,126,140,141). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: No Benefit

1 TTE studies should not be performed more frequently than every 12 months in patients with HCM when it is unlikely that any changes have occurred that would have an impact on clinical decision making. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Routine TEE and/or contrast echocardiography is not recommended when TTE images are diagnostic of HCM and/or there is no suspicion of fixed obstruction or intrinsic mitral valve pathology. (Level of Evidence: C)

Comprehensive TTE and Doppler studies should be performed in the initial evaluation of all patients with suspected HCM, as well as during follow-up, particularly when there is a change in cardiovascular symptoms or an event. Echocardiographic studies are essential for establishing the diagnosis and the nature and extent of hypertrophy, defining prognosis, and guiding management (9,20,66,67,135–138). Although septal thickness 15 mm is commonly used to identify HCM, one must be aware of the potential confusion with secondary hypertrophy attributable to aortic valve or discrete subaortic stenosis, systemic hypertension, amyloidosis, and other genetic phenocopies such as Fabry disease (158). In affected family members with HCM, the degree of hypertrophy may be below the usual diagnostic threshold of 15 mm LV wall thickness, and indeed, some patients carry an HCM-definitive mutation without hypertrophy.

It has been suggested that identification of morphologic subtypes of LV hypertrophy, namely apical hypertrophy (159) or septal hypertrophy with reverse or neutral curvature, or sigmoid shape (160), has implications for the likelihood of detection of myofilament mutations and prognosis (139). However, there is no recognized relationship between the pattern or distribution of LV hypertrophy and clinical course or outcome. Nevertheless, documentation of the extent of hypertrophy is important because there is a relatively linear association between maximal wall thickness and sudden death, with highest risk in patients with wall thickness 30 mm (161).

The presence of dynamic LVOT obstruction is related to symptomatic status, as well as development of AF, embolic complications, and death (45,57,142–145). Continuous wave Doppler studies can accurately quantitate the LVOT gradient and determine the response to pharmacologic (157) and interventional therapy. Amyl nitrite can be used to provoke echocardiographically documented gradients when available and in laboratories with expertise and has the advantage of being capable of being integrated into a single examination. The correlation between pharmacologic and physiologic exercise provocation of outflow gradients is unresolved. Care must be taken to correctly identify the site of obstruction, distinguish the Doppler spectral profile from cavity obliteration, and avoid contamination of the signal by mitral regurgitation. Although many patients have dynamic LVOT obstruction at rest, a significant number will have new or higher gradients after the Valsalva maneuver, inhalation of amyl nitrite, or during provocative exercise (8). In HCM, it is the peak instantaneous LVOT velocity, usually caused by SAM, that should be used to determine the maximum gradient, using the modified Bernoulli formula (Table 2).

Systolic function, as assessed by wall motion and EF, is usually normal in patients with HCM; however, the development of systolic dysfunction heralds the risk of progressive and irreversible heart failure, which may result in heart transplantation or death (39). The importance of diastolic dysfunction in HCM has led to an extensive search for noninvasive methods to quantify its severity. With the complex interplay of factors causing diastolic dysfunction in HCM, no single noninvasive measure has been demonstrated as superior (162,163). LA volume may provide a long-term indication of the effects of chronically elevated filling pressures in patients with HCM (164–166). Patients with HCM and a maximal LA volume index 34 mL/m² have a higher incidence of abnormal diastolic filling, a higher mitral inflow/annular velocity (E/e‘) ratio, a higher calculated LA pressure, and less favorable outcome (164,166). Moreover, LA volumetric remodeling predicts exercise capacity in nonobstructive HCM and thus may reflect chronic LV diastolic burden independent of LVOT obstruction. The more recent use of myocardial deformation measurements to quantify strain parameters, torsion, and dyssynchrony has detected abnormalities in systolic performance, especially longitudinal strain and twist (167–171). These methods have also shown promise in better quantifying abnormalities in early relaxation and elevation of filling pressures (172). They may also be useful in distinguishing HCM from other forms of hypertrophy (173), as well as detecting preclinical disease (17,19,174).

Echocardiographic studies are useful in patients with LVOT obstruction who fail to respond to medical therapy and who undergo invasive intervention (61,146–148,155,175,176). TEE studies, performed before arrival in the operating suite for surgical septal myectomy (and intraoperative TEE), can determine the length and extent of myectomy required, evaluate the presence and severity of mitral regurgitation independent of obstruction, and identify the presence of abnormal papillary muscle architecture (146–148,155,176). Following myectomy, postbypass intraoperative TEE studies can confirm the adequacy of myectomy and quantitate residual gradients, severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation, ventricular function, and development of a ventricular septal defect (146–148,155,176). When the myectomy is inadequate based on TEE study, surgical revision can be considered.

Intraprocedural echocardiographic studies should be routinely performed during alcohol septal ablation procedures (62,149–152,156,177). Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic studies with intracoronary injection of the candidate coronary septal perforator(s) are important in determining the perfusion bed supplied by the septal perforator so that only an appropriate site and degree of myocardium is infarcted and complications avoided (149–151). After alcohol septal ablation there may be an early recurrence in the LVOT gradient a few days after the procedure, with subsequent reduction over 6 to 12 months (152,156).

It should be recognized that in some patients TTE studies may be limited by image quality, and other investigations, including CMR, should be performed. In addition, TEE may detect the presence of subaortic membrane causing fixed obstruction with or without coexisting dynamic obstruction. In patients with the apical variant of HCM, the diagnosis is missed by echocardiographic studies in about 10% of patients (159), and the use of peripheral injection of an echocardiographic contrast agent, as well as CMR, may be useful in establishing the diagnosis. Similarly, a subset of patients with HCM may have an apical LV aneurysm associated with normal epicardial coronary arteries (159), which is usually best visualized with CMR. TEE studies may be helpful in some patients, particularly when the cause and severity of mitral regurgitation are uncertain (147,148).

5.3.2 Stress Testing—Recommendations
Class IIa

1 Treadmill exercise testing is reasonable to determine functional capacity and response to therapy in patients with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Treadmill testing with monitoring of an ECG and blood pressure is reasonable for SCD risk stratification in patients with HCM (89,90,178). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 In patients with HCM who do not have a resting peak instantaneous gradient of greater than or equal to 50 mm Hg, exercise echocardiography is reasonable for the detection and quantification of exercise-induced dynamic LVOT obstruction (8,88–90). (Level of Evidence: B)

Exercise testing with monitoring of ECG and cuff blood pressure is helpful in risk assessment of patients with HCM, because abnormal blood pressure responses to exercise (defined as either a failure to increase by at least 20 mm Hg or a drop of at least 20 mm Hg during effort) has been demonstrated to be 1 factor associated with risk of SCD (9,10,89,90,134,178). A hypotensive blood pressure response was defined as either an initial increase in systolic blood pressure with a subsequent fall by peak exercise of >20 mm Hg compared with peak blood pressure value (8,90) or a continuous decrease in systolic blood pressure of >20 mm Hg throughout the exercise test when compared with baseline. A flat response was defined by a change in systolic blood pressure during the whole exercise period of <20 mm Hg compared with the resting systolic blood pressure. Most published studies examining exercise blood pressure response use symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing with a Bruce protocol (89,178), whereas others use symptom-limited bicycle ergometry, with 25-W increments in 3-minute stages (90).

Combining exercise testing with Doppler echocardiography is also useful for determining the presence of physiologically provocable LVOT obstruction and is particularly helpful in patients with symptoms during routine physical activities who do not manifest outflow obstruction at rest (8). Stress testing modalities include either bicycle, treadmill using the Bruce protocol, or cardiopulmonary (metabolic) testing, with measurement of gradient either during or immediately after exercise (8). In symptomatic patients with a peak resting gradient of <50 mm Hg, it is helpful to perform exercise echocardiography to determine if a significant exercise-induced gradient (or increase in mitral regurgitation) or augmentation thereof is present.

The role of metabolic stress testing (i.e., determination of maximum oxygen consumption) in the routine evaluation of patients with HCM remains to be decided, particularly with regard to clinical outcome, but in individual patients this test may be helpful in providing a more precise assessment of functional capacity (179).

5.3.3 Cardiac Magnetic Resonance—Recommendations
Class I

1 CMR imaging is indicated in patients with suspected HCM when echocardiography is inconclusive for diagnosis (180,181). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 CMR imaging is indicated in patients with known HCM when additional information that may have an impact on management or decision making regarding invasive management, such as magnitude and distribution of hypertrophy or anatomy of the mitral valve apparatus or papillary muscles, is not adequately defined with echocardiography (15,180–183). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIa

1 CMR imaging is reasonable in patients with HCM to define apical hypertrophy and/or aneurysm if echocardiography is inconclusive (180,182). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIb

1 In selected patients with known HCM, when SCD risk stratification is inconclusive after documentation of the conventional risk factors (Section 6.3.1), CMR imaging with assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) may be considered in resolving clinical decision making (184–188). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 CMR imaging may be considered in patients with LV hypertrophy and the suspicion of alternative diagnoses to HCM, including cardiac amyloidosis, Fabry disease, and genetic phenocopies such as LAMP2 cardiomyopathy (189–191). (Level of Evidence: C)

There have been significant advances in CMR in recent years, and most centers now have access to this advanced imaging technique. Compared with other noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities, CMR provides superior spatial resolution with sharp contrast between blood and myocardium, as well as complete tomographic imaging of the entire LV myocardium and therefore the opportunity to more accurately characterize the presence, distribution, and extent of LV hypertrophy in HCM. Because of the technical complexity of CMR imaging, data from the published literature are only generalizable if imaging is performed with high technical quality by experienced operators and interpreted by well-trained and experienced readers.

The primary role for CMR in patients with HCM is clarification of diagnosis and phenotype. Advances in 2-dimensional echocardiography have demonstrated the heterogeneity of the hypertrophic phenotype in patients with HCM, particularly with regard to distribution of LV hypertrophy and mechanisms of outflow obstruction (8–10,15,21,72,192). However, there remain patients in whom the diagnosis of HCM is suspected but the echocardiogram is inconclusive, mostly because of suboptimal imaging from poor acoustic windows or when hypertrophy is localized to regions of the LV myocardium not well visualized by echocardiography (15). In 1 study, 6% of patients with suspected HCM were identified with increased LV wall thickness (predominantly in the anterolateral wall) by CMR but not by echocardiography (15,181,183). In addition, in patients with HCM in whom hypertrophy is predominantly confined to the apex (i.e., apical HCM), increased wall thickness in this region of the LV myocardium may be difficult to visualize clearly with echocardiography but can be well seen with CMR (180,182). Similarly, in the subgroup of patients with HCM who develop apical aneurysms, CMR can more readily detect the presence of an aneurysm (particularly when small) compared with noncontrast echocardiography (182). Identification of the end-stage phenotype and particularly an apical aneurysm has implications for management in that an ICD may be indicated and anticoagulation could be considered, based on the morphologic appearance of the aneurysm. In addition to diagnosis, the extent of maximal LV wall thickening may be underestimated by echocardiography compared with CMR, particularly when this region involves the anterolateral wall (15,183). This observation is related to the limitation of 2-dimensional echocardiography in differentiating the epicardial border of the lateral LV free wall from thoracic parenchyma, allowing significant underestimation of wall thickness compared with CMR, which provides more reliable definition of the epicardial border. Accurate characterization of the HCM phenotype by CMR may also be useful in management decisions for invasive therapies (septal myectomy or alcohol septal ablation) by more precisely defining the location and magnitude of hypertrophy, as well as characterizing the mitral and submitral apparatus and papillary muscles (193,194).

The opportunity for contrast-enhanced CMR with LGE to identify areas of myocardial fibrosis in patients with HCM has been the subject of a growing area of the literature (185–187,195,196). The extent and transmural distribution of areas of infarction can be quantitatively defined in patients with CAD (197). Many studies have now documented that approximately half of patients with HCM have LGE suggestive of areas of fibrosis that in some patients may occupy a substantial volume of LV myocardium (i.e., on average, 10% of the LV wall) (185,195). Although patients with the end-stage phenotype almost universally demonstrate such findings (39), patients with HCM with preserved systolic function may also have areas of LGE (185–187). Importantly, patients with HCM with evidence of LGE on CMR imaging tend to have more markers of risk of SCD, such as NSVT on Holter monitoring, than patients without LGE (184,186).

It is a plausible and attractive concept that areas of LGE (i.e., probably largely replacement myocardial fibrosis) could represent a substrate for the generation of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias in HCM and thus a marker for risk of SCD. Several studies have addressed this issue and have reported either trends in such a direction or significant associations between the presence of LGE (not extent) and cardiac outcome events (187,198). However, there is insufficient evidence at this time to support a significant association between the extent of LGE and outcome. Larger studies with longer follow-up and more events with greater statistical power are needed to fully characterize whether the finding of LGE can be considered a specific risk marker for SCD to the same degree as currently accepted markers such as family history of SCD or extreme LV wall thickness. Nonetheless, the present cross-sectional and short-term follow-up data would support a potential role of contrast-enhanced CMR (with evidence of LGE) as an arbitrator to consider in clinical decision making for primary prevention ICDs in patients in whom high-risk status for SCD remains uncertain after assessment of conventional risk factors (185,186).

In some patients with LV hypertrophy, CMR imaging can depict patterns of LGE that may suggest an alternative diagnosis. In patients with Anderson-Fabry disease, it has been reported that approximately half have LGE localized to the mid-myocardial portion of the basal inferolateral wall, sparing the subendocardium (191), a location and distribution of LGE that may help distinguish this disease from other forms of nonischemic cardiomyopathies such as HCM (189). Patterns of LGE in HCM are heterogeneous, may occur commonly in either the ventricular septum or LV free wall, and usually involve segments of the chamber that are most hypertrophied and do not conform to particular coronary arterial distributions (185).

Among patients with LV hypertrophy caused by cardiac amyloidosis, it has been reported that approximately 70% demonstrate a pattern of global subendocardial gadolinium enhancement, a pattern of enhancement not usually seen in patients with HCM (190). These data suggest that gadolinium-enhanced CMR imaging may be useful in select cases to assist a clinician in the differential diagnosis of a patient with LV hypertrophy.

5.4 Detection of Concomitant Coronary Disease—Recommendations.   Class I

1 Coronary arteriography (invasive or computed tomographic imaging) is indicated in patients with HCM with chest discomfort who have an intermediate to high likelihood of CAD when the identification of concomitant CAD will change management strategies. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1 Assessment of coronary anatomy with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is reasonable for patients with HCM with chest discomfort and a low likelihood of CAD to assess for possible concomitant CAD. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Assessment of ischemia or perfusion abnormalities suggestive of CAD with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI; because of excellent negative predictive value) is reasonable in patients with HCM with chest discomfort and a low likelihood of CAD to rule out possible concomitant CAD. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: No Benefit

1 Routine SPECT MPI or stress echocardiography is not indicated for detection of "silent" CAD-related ischemia in patients with HCM who are asymptomatic. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Assessment for the presence of blunted flow reserve (microvascular ischemia) using quantitative myocardial blood flow measurements by PET is not indicated for the assessment of prognosis in patients with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

Chest discomfort is a common symptom in patients with HCM. A key management issue revolves around whether the discomfort may be caused by concomitant epicardial obstructive CAD with inducible ischemia, a consequence of microvascular dysfunction, or a combination of these factors (9). The concomitant presence of CAD, particularly if severe, in patients with HCM identifies a higher risk for adverse outcomes and patients who are potential candidates for revascularization (199,200). Moreover, in considering management options such as alcohol septal ablation or septal myectomy for patients with highly symptomatic HCM, knowledge of coronary anatomy is an important factor informing the decision.

Myocardial bridging (i.e., tunneling) is a clinical feature in patients with HCM that may be associated with myocardial ischemia in the absence of epicardial coronary stenosis. In myocardial bridging, a segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery courses within the myocardium. The prevalence of myocardial bridging varies based on the type of investigation. In a recent autopsy-based study in patients with HCM, bridging was evident in 40% of hearts (201), whereas angiographic prevalence in HCM is reported to be 15% (202). Myocardial bridges are a frequent component of phenotypically expressed HCM and more common than in other disorders with or without LV hypertrophy. Although it has been suggested that ischemia secondary to bridging could be a potential mechanism for sudden death in patients with HCM (203), there is no consistent evidence to support this hypothesis in either adults or children (202,204). However, the possibility that coronary arterial bridges could contribute to increased risk in some individual patients cannot be excluded, potentially impacting management decisions on a case-by-case basis.

In patients with HCM who have chest pain and who undergo coronary angiography, the finding of a myocardial bridge raises the question of whether myocardial ischemia associated with the bridge is the cause of symptoms. There are no data assessing stress MPI in patients with HCM with myocardial bridges; however, reports of patients with myocardial bridges who do not have HCM suggest that stress perfusion abnormalities may be commonly detected in the vascular territory distal to the bridge (205). Although it has been suggested that systolic compression of a bridged coronary artery may not be responsible for ischemia because most coronary blood flow takes place in diastole, angiographic studies have demonstrated arterial compression in diastole as well (206,207).

If chest pain symptoms in a patient with HCM are suspected to be related to abnormal coronary blood flow (as a result of bridging), beta blockers may be effective in controlling the symptoms. Intravenous beta blockade in patients with myocardial bridges and non-HCM disease has been shown to have favorable effects on coronary dimensions and myocardial blood flow and diminished ischemia induced by pacing tachycardia (207). If medical therapy is ineffective, consideration can be given to surgery with supra-arterial myotomy ("unroofing") (206,208), which may be technically challenging depending on the depth of the tunneled segment. CTA can define the course and depth of a bridged segment and may be useful in planning surgical strategy (209).

In patients with HCM who are undergoing surgical myectomy and in whom preoperative angiography has demonstrated a myocardial bridge, there are no data to guide the decision on whether to "unroof" the bridged segment during the surgical myectomy. In patients with chest pain in whom perfusion imaging demonstrates blunted flow reserve distal to the myocardial bridge, supra-arterial myotomy has been suggested to reduce anginal symptoms.

5.4.1 Choice of Imaging Modality
5.4.1.1 Invasive Coronary Arteriography
Invasive coronary arteriography is the gold standard for defining the presence, extent, severity, and location of epicardial coronary stenoses. Performance of invasive coronary arteriography is indicated in patients with HCM when knowledge of these features will importantly influence management strategies as discussed above. Invasive coronary arteriography should be a routine accompaniment to an invasive catheterization performed in a patient with HCM for assessment of hemodynamic status and in such cases should generally be performed after documentation of hemodynamics so as not to influence important measurements such as the magnitude of the LVOT gradient. When catheterization is performed, invasive coronary arteriography should be undertaken before alcohol septal ablation in order to define the anatomy of the septal perforators in detail and exclude obstructive coronary stenoses. Furthermore, if alcohol septal ablation is being considered, the decision may be influenced by the location and extent of coronary disease as defined by coronary arteriography.

5.4.1.2 Noninvasive CTA
Although there are no published data specifically assessing the performance characteristics of CTA for documenting the presence or absence of epicardial CAD in HCM, there is no reason to believe that performance of the test should differ in patients with HCM compared with those with suspected or known CAD. Many studies have reported very good capability of contemporary CTA technology to distinguish the presence from absence of a >50% epicardial stenosis (210). A high negative predictive value to exclude CAD is particularly consistent in the literature. In this regard, for patients with HCM with chest discomfort, CTA would be a reasonable strategy to assess for possible concomitant CAD. Anatomical demonstration of an epicardial stenosis does not necessarily indicate that the symptoms of chest discomfort are attributable to ischemia but are suggestive and outlines a potential management strategy, as well as indicates the need for specific preventive strategies.

5.4.1.3 Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Stress SPECT MPI in patients with HCM will often demonstrate reversible or fixed perfusion defects consistent with ischemia or infarction, respectively, even in the absence of epicardial CAD (211,212). In 1 study, approximately 50% of young patients with HCM (unlikely to have CAD attributable to age) had reversible perfusion defects on exercise stress SPECT MPI that were prevented when exercise imaging was repeated on verapamil (213). Several lines of evidence support that these defects, even in the absence of symptoms, represent true flow abnormalities and possibly "silent" ischemia. Studies of autopsy specimens or myectomy specimens in patients with HCM have shown that patients with HCM may have structural abnormalities of the myocardial microvasculature (87). During pacing-induced tachycardia, patients with HCM with reversible SPECT MPI defects demonstrate production of lactate consistent with ischemia (214), and following relief of outflow tract obstruction with myectomy, patients with HCM with reversible defects often have normal perfusion (215).

Fixed defects may also be seen with SPECT MPI, a finding consistent with infarction. These patients will often have the "end-stage" clinical phenotype with reduced EF (211) and likely correspond to patients who demonstrate LGE in CMR studies (39).

The concept that true abnormalities of perfusion at the tissue level may be demonstrated by SPECT MPI in patients with HCM in the absence of epicardial CAD, however, does make the interpretation of SPECT MPI to detect CAD challenging. Moreover, myocardial ischemia in patients with HCM, in the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis, may be attributable to intramural small-vessel abnormalities or massive hypertrophy (216). Given the above discussion, the positive predictive value of an abnormal SPECT MPI study for epicardial obstructive CAD in a patient with HCM with chest discomfort will be relatively low, but the negative predictive value will be high. The demonstration of a reversible defect, even in the absence of CAD, does suggest that the symptoms of chest discomfort may be caused by ischemia, although not necessarily related to the presence of obstructive CAD. Although the true performance characteristics of SPECT MPI for detection of CAD have not been rigorously studied in patients with HCM, it would be expected that the negative predictive value should be high.

In considering any imaging procedure that involves exposure to radiation such as SPECT or PET imaging (Section 5.4.1.4), CTA (5.4.1.2) or invasive procedures, contemporary recommendations suggest that the potential risks of radiation exposure be taken into account and that the benefits of the information gained sufficiently balance those risks (217). This concept may be particularly important in patients with HCM, who in general will be younger compared with other subgroups of patients being evaluated for heart disease.

Interpretation of SPECT perfusion imaging studies in patients with HCM should be mindful that areas with substantial wall thickening may appear inordinately "hot," making other areas without hypertrophy appear to have a relatively mild reduction in tracer activity. Quantitative analysis programs may falsely interpret this as a perfusion defect. Moreover, gated SPECT analysis of EF with use of contouring programs may underestimate EF, because the assumptions driving the contouring algorithms searching for the endocardial borders may not be reliable in some patients with HCM because of the relative brightness of the hypertrophied wall.

5.4.1.4 Positron Emission Tomography
PET imaging has been used in patients with HCM to study myocardial blood flow as well as myocardial metabolism. In patients with HCM with normal coronary arteries, myocardial perfusion PET studies have shown that although resting myocardial blood flow may be similar to that of normal control subjects, the augmentation of blood flow with vasodilation, for example, dipyridamole, may be significantly blunted (218–221). In addition, such abnormal myocardial blood flow reserve was shown to be more pronounced in the subendocardial regions, consistent with so-called "apparent" transient ischemic cavity dilatation (212,218,219). In 1 study using techniques to quantify myocardial blood flow reserve with PET perfusion tracers, patients with HCM who had blunted flow reserve in response to hyperemic stress had more unfavorable event-free survival compared with patients with preserved hyperemic flow reserve (220). A follow-up study suggested that 1 mechanism for the unfavorable outcomes associated with the flow reserve abnormalities included progression to a remodeled, end-stage phenotype (221). These findings are consistent with the concept that repetitive episodes of myocardial ischemia may influence long-term outcome of patients with HCM. However, the quantitative PET techniques used in these studies are not part of routine clinical practice, and the management implications of identifying abnormalities in flow reserve are unresolved.

5.4.1.5 Stress Echocardiography
There are no published studies addressing the performance characteristics of stress echocardiography to detect or exclude CAD in patients with HCM. Although performance of this modality has been well studied in patients who do not have HCM and criteria about appropriate use of the test exist (222), aspects of the HCM phenotype would in theory undermine performance. Patients with HCM have heterogeneous wall-thickness patterns, and wall motion at rest may appear abnormal in regions of hypertrophied myocardium. A wall-motion response to stress therefore would be complex to interpret and may be particularly so in the presence of the enhanced loading that occurs in the setting of outflow tract obstruction, which may be seen in up to 75% of patients during exercise. For these reasons, stress echocardiography to detect or rule out CAD may be unreliable in HCM but may be useful to document the presence or magnitude of outflow tract obstruction generated by exercise (8) (Section 4.1).

	6. Management of HCM

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
Treatment of patients with HCM requires a thorough understanding of the complex, diverse pathophysiology and natural history and must be individualized to the patient. The general approach of the writing committee is outlined in Figure 3.

View larger version (4K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 3 Treatment algorithm. ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; DM, diabetes mellitus; EF, ejection fraction; GL, guidelines; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HTN, hypertension; and LV, left ventricular.

1 For patients with HCM, it is recommended that comorbidities that may contribute to cardiovascular disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity) be treated in compliance with relevant existing guidelines (223). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1 Low-intensity aerobic exercise is reasonable as part of a healthy lifestyle for patients with HCM (10,224). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 The usefulness of beta blockade and calcium channel blockers to alter clinical outcome is not well established for the management of asymptomatic patients with HCM with or without obstruction (10). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: Harm

1 Septal reduction therapy should not be performed for asymptomatic adult and pediatric patients with HCM with normal effort tolerance regardless of the severity of obstruction (9,10). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 In patients with HCM with resting or provocable outflow tract obstruction, regardless of symptom status, pure vasodilators and high-dose diuretics are potentially harmful (3,9). (Level of Evidence: C)

A large proportion of patients presenting with HCM are asymptomatic, and most will achieve a normal life expectancy (48,131,225). It is essential to educate these patients and their families about the disease process, including screening of first-degree relatives and avoiding particularly strenuous activity or competitive athletics (134). Risk stratification for SCD should also be performed in all patients, irrespective of whether symptoms are present (9,10).

Because concomitant CAD has a significant impact on survival in patients with HCM (199), it is recommended that other risk factors that may contribute to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease be treated aggressively in concordance with existing guidelines (Figure 3) (10,223). This includes aggressive modification of risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and hyperlipidemia (223). A low-intensity aerobic exercise program is also reasonable to achieve cardiovascular fitness (224).

Hydration and avoidance of environmental situations where vasodilatation may occur are important in the asymptomatic patient with resting or provocable LVOT obstruction. High-dose diuretics and vasodilators (for treatment of other diseases such as hypertension) should be avoided, because these may exacerbate the degree of obstruction (3,9). However, the lack of symptoms attributable to HCM should not detract from the use of negative inotropic agents such as beta blockers or calcium channel blockers as treatment for relevant comorbidities such as hypertension (10). Although data support the use of verapamil to relieve symptoms in HCM, other calcium antagonists such as diltiazem, even though widely used, have not been studied systematically.

Preliminary data in the animal model suggest that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin pathway or statins or the calcium channel inhibitor diltiazem (226) may prevent progression of hypertrophy in animal models of HCM (227,228). However, there is no completed RCT to indicate that these drugs are effective in reducing hypertrophy in humans with HCM. Thus, these drugs should not be given with the intent of altering HCM-related clinical outcome but only for the control of heart failure–related symptoms. Finally, the indication for septal reduction therapy is to improve symptoms that are not relieved by medical therapy and that impair the patient's quality of life, usually consistent with NYHA functional classes III or IV (9,10). Thus, septal reduction therapy with either septal myectomy or alcohol septal ablation should not be performed in the asymptomatic patient, regardless of the severity of obstruction (9,10).

6.2 Symptomatic Patients.   6.2.1 Pharmacologic Management—Recommendations
Class I

1 Beta-blocking drugs are recommended for the treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in adult patients with obstructive or nonobstructive HCM but should be used with caution in patients with sinus bradycardia or severe conduction disease (3,9,10,134,137,229–236). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 If low doses of beta-blocking drugs are ineffective for controlling symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in patients with HCM, it is useful to titrate the dose to a resting heart rate of less than 60 to 65 bpm (up to generally accepted and recommended maximum doses of these drugs) (3,10,137,229–236). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 Verapamil therapy (starting in low doses and titrating up to 480 mg/d) is recommended for the treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in patients with obstructive or nonobstructive HCM who do not respond to beta-blocking drugs or who have side effects or contraindications to beta-blocking drugs. However, verapamil should be used with caution in patients with high gradients, advanced heart failure, or sinus bradycardia (10,134,137,237–241). (Level of Evidence: B)

4 Intravenous phenylephrine (or another pure vasoconstricting agent) is recommended for the treatment of acute hypotension in patients with obstructive HCM who do not respond to fluid administration (137,242–244). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIa

1 It is reasonable to combine disopyramide with a beta-blocking drug or verapamil in the treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in patients with obstructive HCM who do not respond to beta-blocking drugs or verapamil alone (10,134,137,245–248). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 It is reasonable to add oral diuretics in patients with nonobstructive HCM when dyspnea persists despite the use of beta blockers or verapamil or their combination (67,134). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 Beta-blocking drugs might be useful in the treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in children or adolescents with HCM, but patients treated with these drugs should be monitored for side effects, including depression, fatigue, or impaired scholastic performance. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 It may be reasonable to add oral diuretics with caution to patients with obstructive HCM when congestive symptoms persist despite the use of beta blockers or verapamil or their combination (10,134,137). (Level of Evidence: C)

3 The usefulness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in the treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in patients with HCM with preserved systolic function is not well established, and these drugs should be used cautiously (if at all) in patients with resting or provocable LVOT obstruction. (Level of Evidence: C)

4 In patients with HCM who do not tolerate verapamil or in whom verapamil is contraindicated, diltiazem may be considered. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: Harm

1 Nifedipine or other dihydropyridine calcium channel-blocking drugs are potentially harmful for treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in patients with HCM who have resting or provocable LVOT obstruction. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Verapamil is potentially harmful in patients with obstructive HCM in the setting of systemic hypotension or severe dyspnea at rest. (Level of Evidence: C)

3 Digitalis is potentially harmful in the treatment of dyspnea in patients with HCM and in the absence of AF (3,10,137,249–251). (Level of Evidence: B)

4 The use of disopyramide alone without beta blockers or verapamil is potentially harmful in the treatment of symptoms (angina or dyspnea) in patients with HCM with AF because disopyramide may enhance atrioventricular conduction and increase the ventricular rate during episodes of AF (10,66,134,252–257). (Level of Evidence: B)

5 Dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine, and other intravenous positive inotropic drugs are potentially harmful for the treatment of acute hypotension in patients with obstructive HCM (3,82,242–244,258–260). (Level of Evidence: B)

The major goal of pharmacologic therapy in symptomatic patients with HCM is to alleviate symptoms of exertional dyspnea, palpitations, and chest discomfort, which may reflect pathophysiologic mechanisms such as LVOT obstruction, reduced supply of myocardial oxygen, mitral regurgitation, and impaired LV diastolic relaxation and compliance (9,10,134).

Beta blockers are the mainstay of pharmacologic therapy and the first-line agents because of their negative inotropic effects (261) and their ability to attenuate adrenergic-induced tachycardia (Figure 3). These effects improve myocardial oxygen supply-demand relationships and hence reduce myocardial ischemia. The reduction in heart rate also prolongs the diastolic filling period, which may allow for more efficient inactivation of myocardial contractile proteins, thereby improving diastolic filling (262,263).

In those patients unable to tolerate beta blockers or those with symptoms unresponsive to beta blockers, calcium channel blockers may provide effective symptomatic relief. Verapamil has been the most intensively studied such agent (Figure 3) (239,264). Possible mechanisms for symptomatic improvement include negative inotropic and rate-lowering effects similar to those of beta blockers. However, the effect of verapamil on diastolic dysfunction is controversial (84,265–268). Whether improvement in indices of diastolic performance is a direct effect of verapamil or the result of reduction in ischemia is uncertain (213). Diltiazem has also been shown to improve measures of diastolic performance (269) and to prevent or diminish myocardial ischemia (270). Both verapamil and diltiazem should be used cautiously in patients with severe outflow tract obstruction, elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure, and low systemic blood pressure, because a decrease in blood pressure with treatment may trigger an increase in outflow obstruction and precipitate pulmonary edema. Administration of beta-blocking drugs with either verapamil or diltiazem should also be performed with caution because of the potential for high-grade atrioventricular block. In addition, because of the bradycardic effects when both classes of agents are used concomitantly, the addition of verapamil or diltiazem to a beta blocker may prevent titration of the beta blocker to optimal dosage. Dihydropyridine class calcium channel blockers (e.g., nifedipine) should not be used in patients with obstructive physiology because their vasodilatory effects may aggravate outflow obstruction.

In patients with obstructive HCM who remain symptomatic despite the use of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, alone or in combination, disopyramide may be effective in ameliorating symptoms in many patients (Figure 3) (157,271). Anticholinergic side effects may occur and can be managed if necessary by dose reduction. Symptomatic benefit with disopyramide appears to represent a pure negative inotropic effect. The initiation of disopyramide should be performed in-hospital with cardiac monitoring for potential arrhythmias and lengthening of the QT. Diuretics may be effective for symptomatic relief in patients with pulmonary congestion but should be used judiciously in those with outflow tract obstruction.

6.2.2 Invasive Therapies—Recommendations
Class I

1 Septal reduction therapy should be performed only by experienced operators_* in the context of a comprehensive HCM clinical program and only for the treatment of eligible patients with severe drug-refractory symptoms and LVOT obstruction. (272) (Level of Evidence: C)

^_*Experienced operators are defined as an individual operator with a cumulative case volume of at least 20 procedures or an individual operator who is working in a dedicated HCM program with a cumulative total of at least 50 procedures (Section 6.2.2.3).

Eligible patients are defined by all of the following:

a Clinical: Severe dyspnea or chest pain (usually NYHA functional classes III or IV) or occasionally other exertional symptoms (such as syncope or near syncope) that interfere with everyday activity or quality of life despite optimal medical therapy.

b Hemodynamic: Dynamic LVOT gradient at rest or with physiologic provocation 50 mm Hg associated with septal hypertrophy and SAM of the mitral valve.

c Anatomic: Targeted anterior septal thickness sufficient to perform the procedure safely and effectively in the judgment of the individual operator.

Class IIa

1 Consultation with centers experienced in performing both surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation is reasonable when discussing treatment options for eligible patients with HCM with severe drug-refractory symptoms and LVOT obstruction. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Surgical septal myectomy, when performed in experienced centers, can be beneficial and is the first consideration for the majority of eligible patients with HCM with severe drug-refractory symptoms and LVOT obstruction (61,62,155,273–275). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 Surgical septal myectomy, when performed at experienced centers, can be beneficial in symptomatic children with HCM and severe resting obstruction (>50 mm Hg) for whom standard medical therapy has failed (276). (Level of Evidence: C)

4 When surgery is contraindicated or the risk is considered unacceptable because of serious comorbidities or advanced age, alcohol septal ablation, when performed in experienced centers, can be beneficial in eligible adult patients with HCM with LVOT obstruction and severe drug-refractory symptoms (usually NYHA functional classes III or IV) (62,153,277–281). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIb

1 Alcohol septal ablation, when performed in experienced centers, may be considered as an alternative to surgical myectomy for eligible adult patients with HCM with severe drug-refractory symptoms and LVOT obstruction when, after a balanced and thorough discussion, the patient expresses a preference for septal ablation (153,273,278,280,281). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 The effectiveness of alcohol septal ablation is uncertain in patients with HCM with marked (i.e., >30 mm) septal hypertrophy, and therefore the procedure is generally discouraged in such patients. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: Harm

1 Septal reduction therapy should not be done for adult patients with HCM who are asymptomatic with normal exercise tolerance or whose symptoms are controlled or minimized on optimal medical therapy. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Septal reduction therapy should not be done unless performed as part of a program dedicated to the longitudinal and multidisciplinary care of patients with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

3 Mitral valve replacement for relief of LVOT obstruction should not be performed in patients with HCM in whom septal reduction therapy is an option. (Level of Evidence: C)

4 Alcohol septal ablation should not be done in patients with HCM with concomitant disease that independently warrants surgical correction (e.g., coronary artery bypass grafting for CAD, mitral valve repair for ruptured chordae) in whom surgical myectomy can be performed as part of the operation. (Level of Evidence: C)

5 Alcohol septal ablation should not be done in patients with HCM who are less than 21 years of age and is discouraged in adults less than 40 years of age if myectomy is a viable option. (Level of Evidence: C)

See Online Data Supplement 2 for additional data regarding invasive therapies.

Although the writing committee recognizes that surgical myectomy and ablation are methodologically very different approaches and interventions, in this section they are discussed together because they are the 2 generally accepted methods for relief of symptoms in patients with LVOT obstruction. Most patients with HCM lead active lifestyles with minimal or no symptoms, but some patients incur significant symptoms that interfere with everyday activity or quality of life (48). For symptoms that are attributable to LVOT obstruction, invasive therapies can be used to improve quality of life (Figure 3). Surgical approaches have been used for 5 decades (72,144) so that relief of outflow tract obstruction and symptoms can be achieved with minimal perioperative morbidity or mortality in experienced centers (61,155). However, some patients are not optimal surgical candidates (e.g., because of comorbidities or advanced age) or have such a strong desire to avoid surgery that alternative therapeutic interventions have been implemented. Alcohol septal ablation, which has been in use for the past 17 years, has become the leading strategy in these circumstances (282). This procedure causes a regional infarction of the basal septum, thereby initially decreasing contractility and eventually causing thinning (because of scarring) of the basal septum and consequent widening of the outflow tract.

Dual-chamber pacing has also been used and studied for the relief of outflow tract obstruction. The proposed mechanism relates to a change in the activation sequence of the septum and possibly long-term remodeling. RCTs suggested a modest benefit of pacing therapy, primarily in those >65 years of age (283,284). In the current era, application of dual-chamber pacing for the relief of symptoms attributable to outflow tract obstruction is primarily used in patients with significant comorbidities for whom both surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation are considered to have unacceptable risk or in patients who already have an implanted dual-chamber pacing device (often implanted for nonhemodynamic indications).

6.2.2.1 Selection of Patients
It is well recognized that the appropriate selection of patients for individual procedures is an important predictor of outcome. Because the majority of patients with HCM can achieve control of their symptoms with optimal pharmacologic therapy, and in light of the complications inherent with invasive therapies, a core set of clinical, anatomic, and hemodynamic criteria are required before patients are considered candidates for invasive therapies. Specifically, patients must have symptoms attributable to LVOT obstruction that are refractory to optimal pharmacologic therapy. Similarly, it must be demonstrated that the obstruction is caused by apposition of the mitral valve with the hypertrophied septum (and not attributable to systolic cavity obliteration) (72,144). It has been generally accepted that maximal instantaneous gradients of at least 50 mm Hg at rest or with physiologic provocation are necessary to produce symptoms amenable to invasive therapies (10).

Given the duration of experience, documented long-term results, and safety data, surgical septal myectomy is considered the preferred treatment for most patients who meet these criteria (Figure 3). Considerations that would favor surgical intervention include younger age, greater septal thickness, and concomitant cardiac disease independently requiring surgical correction (e.g., intrinsic mitral valve disease or coronary artery bypass grafting). Additionally, specific abnormalities of the mitral valve and its support apparatus can contribute significantly to the generation of outflow tract obstruction, suggesting the potential value of additional surgical approaches (e.g., plication, valvuloplasty, and papillary muscle relocation) and making myectomy more appropriate than alcohol septal ablation in some patients (16,80,285–290). Among patients who meet the core selection criteria, factors that influence a decision to proceed with alcohol septal ablation include older or advanced age, significant comorbidity that selectively increases surgical risk, (e.g., significant concerns about lung or airway management) and the patient's strong desire to avoid open-heart surgery after a thorough discussion of both options.

6.2.2.2 Results of Invasive Therapy for the Relief of LVOT Obstruction
More detailed discussions specific to each type of procedure follow in subsequent sections of this document. Overall, reports suggest that technical success, variably defined, is achieved in 90% to 95% of patients who undergo surgical myectomy (291), less in septal ablation, and only in the minority of patients studied in trials of pacemaker therapy (292–295). Patients undergoing septal ablation may have hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement comparable to septal myectomy if the area of the SAM-septal contact can be accessed by the first septal perforator and ablated. However, compared with septal myectomy in which the hypertrophied muscle is directly visualized and resected, successful septal ablation is dependent on the variable septal artery anatomy, which may not supply the targeted area of the septum in up to 20% to 25% of patients (62,296).

In a nonrandomized retrospective evaluation of patients with HCM <65 years of age, survival free from recurrent symptoms favored myectomy over ablation (89% versus 71%; p=0.01) (62). Procedural success is associated with very low procedural mortality (<1% for myectomy [61,155,297], ranging from 0% to 4% for ablation) (298–300), and low nonfatal complication rates (2% to 3% in experienced centers). The exception is high-grade atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemakers following septal ablation (in 10% to 20% of patients), an inherent aspect of the septal infarction (301–303). The data from trials of dual-chamber pacing suggest that there was a significant placebo effect and inconsistent symptomatic benefit (283,284,294).

6.2.2.3 Operator Experience
Operator and institutional experience, including procedural volume, is a key determinant of successful outcomes and lower complication rates for any procedure. For HCM, a disease of substantial heterogeneity that is relatively uncommon in general cardiology practice, this is an important issue. As with the recommendations made in the "2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease" about expected outcomes for surgeons offering mitral valve repair (304), it would be prudent and appropriate for individual centers, surgeons, and interventional cardiologists to demonstrate sufficient success and safety to justify ongoing use of these procedures. Although it is difficult to define a precise case volume or cumulative experience required to perform these procedures, at least 1 study suggests that the learning curve relative to invasive therapy in HCM may require the performance of at least 40 procedures (272). As a consensus opinion, the writing committee recommends an operator volume of at least 20 procedures or that the operator work within the context of an HCM program with a cumulative procedural volume of at least 50 procedures. In addition, given the data available from experienced centers, operators and institutions should aim to achieve mortality rates of <1% and major complication rates of <3%, with documented success in both hemodynamic and symptom benefit for their patients. This is best achieved in the context of a systematic program dedicated to the multidisciplinary and longitudinal care of patients with HCM.

6.2.2.4 Surgical Therapy
Transaortic septal myectomy is currently considered the most appropriate treatment for the majority of patients with obstructive HCM and severe symptoms unresponsive to medical therapy (Figure 3) (276,291,305–313). Surgical results, although vastly improved in recent years, are nevertheless limited to relatively few centers with extensive experience and particular interest in the management of HCM (288,314). Both the traditional myectomy (Morrow procedure) with about a 3-cm long resection (309) or extended myectomy (a resection of about 7 cm) are currently used (288,314).

The transaortic approach remains the primary method of exposure. Virtual abolition of the LV outflow gradient and mitral regurgitation is usually accomplished by muscular resection resulting in physical enlargement of the outflow tract and by interruption of the mitral valve SAM, which is usually responsible for the outflow gradient (315). Septal myectomy in the current era is commonly referred to as an "extended myectomy." This refers to the fact that the muscular resection becomes progressively wider as the resection proceeds into the ventricle (i.e., toward the apex), effectively making the trough wider at the mid-ventricular level. As a result, the myectomy resection is opposite the lateral portion of the anterior leaflet (to avoid conduction tissue), the chordae, and both papillary muscles. In addition, muscular resection is also performed along the left lateral free wall (also part of the LVOT), resulting in a much more extensive myectomy than that originally described by Morrow et al. about 50 years ago (309).

The transaortic approach remains the primary method of exposure. Virtual abolition of the LV outflow gradient and mitral regurgitation is usually accomplished by muscular resection resulting in physical enlargement of the outflow tract and by interruption of the mitral valve SAM, which is usually responsible for the outflow gradient (315). In selected circumstances, some surgeons have also used concomitant mitral valve repair, particularly when the anterior leaflet is elongated. This valve repair maneuver usually involves shortening the height of the anterior leaflet. However, residual mitral valve regurgitation after adequate septal myectomy is almost always caused by intrinsic mitral valve abnormalities such as ruptured chordae, myxomatous degeneration with prolapse, or annular dilatation, and can be corrected by direct valve repair. Finally, enlarged or malpositioned papillary muscles can also contribute to residual obstruction. This can be effectively treated by shaving the hypertrophied papillary muscles, incising papillary muscles off the ventricular free wall, and in selected circumstances repositioning one papillary muscle by suture approximation to the adjacent papillary muscle.

The surgical specimen obtained at the time of myectomy should be submitted for pathologic examination, not only to confirm the histopathology of HCM, but also for special stains to rule out storage diseases that can mimic HCM (31).

   6.2.2.4.1 Selection of Patients
It is important to underscore that the subjective assessment of operative risk by clinicians frequently results in an overestimate of risk, resulting in the denial of proven therapies for eligible patients in favor of less effective or less proven options (316). In patients perceived to be at prohibitively high risk because of major comorbidities, including age, the use of objective risk tools in the context of individual institutional experience could lead to a reassessment of operative risk that is lower than initially thought.

   6.2.2.4.2 Outcomes
Early Results. Based on the experience and data assembled from multiple centers worldwide over the last 4 decades (276,291,305,307,308,310,311), septal myectomy is established as the most effective and proven approach for reversing the consequences of heart failure by providing amelioration of obstruction (and relief of mitral regurgitation) at rest, with restoration of functional capacity and acceptable quality of life at any age, exceeding that achievable with long-term administration of cardioactive drugs (10,175). These salutary benefits have been demonstrated subjectively by patient history and objectively by increased treadmill time, maximum workload, peak oxygen consumption, and improved myocardial oxygen demand, metabolism, and coronary flow (10,273,294).

LV outflow gradient reduction with myectomy results from basal septal thinning with resultant enlargement of the LVOT area (and redirection of forward flow with loss of the drag and Venturi effects on the mitral valve) (317) and consequently abolition of SAM and mitral-septal contact (314,318,319). Mitral regurgitation is also usually eliminated without the need for additional mitral valve surgery (148). With myectomy, LA size (and possibly long-term risk for AF) is reduced (155) and LV pressures (and wall stress) are normalized (10,61,148,317,320). Thus, obstructive HCM is a surgically and mechanically reversible form of heart failure. In experienced centers, operative risk is now particularly low, in the range of <1% (175).

Late Results. Relief of outflow obstruction by septal myectomy may also extend the longevity of patients with HCM (61). Although RCTs involving myectomy surgery have not been performed, in a nonrandomized study, myectomy resulted in excellent long-term survival similar to that in the general population. After septal myectomy, long-term actuarial survival was 99%, 98%, and 95% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively (when considering HCM-related mortality). This survival rate did not differ from that expected in a matched general US population and was superior to that achieved by patients with obstructed HCM who did not undergo surgical myectomy (61). Similarly, the rate of SCD or appropriate ICD discharge after myectomy is very low (<0.9%) (61,321,322). Nonetheless, surgical myectomy does not eliminate the need to assess each patient's risk for SCD and to consider placement of an ICD in those with a significant risk burden.

   6.2.2.4.3 Complications
Complications following myectomy are rare when performed in experienced centers (315). The risk of complete heart block is approximately 2% with myectomy (higher in patients with preexisting right bundle-branch block), but in myectomy patients who have had previous alcohol septal ablation, risk is much higher (50% to 85%) (323). Iatrogenic ventricular septal defect occurs in <1% of patients. Finally, the risk of aortic valve or mitral valve injury is also low (<1%), particularly when myectomy is performed by an experienced operator.

   6.2.2.4.4 Mitral Valve Abnormalities and Other Anatomic Issues
Abnormalities of the mitral valve and subvalvar apparatus (including anomalous direct anterolateral papillary muscle insertion into anterior mitral leaflet and elongated mitral leaflets) (80,324) can be identified preoperatively with TTE or intraoperative TEE and can be corrected with modified mitral valve repair or extended myectomy techniques without the need for mitral valve replacement. Indeed, the excellent early and late outcomes of extended myectomy for treatment of obstructive HCM have made mitral valve replacement exceedingly rare (315). Associated degenerative mitral valve disease (i.e., prolapse, ruptured chordae) can be treated by concomitant mitral valve repair at the time of myectomy. Mitral valve repair techniques may need to be modified in HCM to avoid subsequent development of SAM (325).

Mitral valve replacement in patients with obstruction has been performed rarely when septal reduction therapy was judged unsafe or likely to be ineffective. When the basal septum is only mildly hypertrophied (<16 mm), the risk for either iatrogenic ventricular septal defect from excessive muscular resection or residual postoperative outflow obstruction from inadequate resection increases. Mitral valve replacement may be an option in rare patients (326,327).

6.2.2.5 Alcohol Septal Ablation
First reported in 1995 (282), alcohol septal ablation uses transcoronary administration of absolute ethanol via a percutaneous approach to induce a localized infarction of the basal septum at the point of contact of the anterior mitral valve leaflet, thereby reducing outflow tract gradient and associated mitral regurgitation and simulating the results of surgical myectomy. Developed as an alternative to surgical septal myectomy, the technique is particularly useful when surgery is contraindicated and in patients who are considered poor surgical candidates (279). Since its development, alcohol septal ablation has been performed successfully in a large number of patients (153).

After measurement of resting or provoked outflow tract gradients, a temporary pacemaker is placed in the right ventricle because of the risk of procedural complete heart block (328–330). With the use of standard angioplasty equipment and anticoagulation, a guidewire and coronary angioplasty balloon are placed in the septal perforator that appears to perfuse the target myocardium. Contrast angiography of the septal perforator through the balloon central lumen with simultaneous echocardiographic guidance (331,332) confirms delivery to only the target myocardium. About 1 to 3 mL of alcohol is infused in controlled fashion (151,333–335). Incorporation of myocardial contrast echocardiography reduces the number of septal branches into which ethanol is injected and may both improve the success rate and lower cardiac biomarker release and the need for pacing (331–333,336). It is important that the balloon be inflated and that a contrast injection also show that there is no extravasation of dye into the distal left anterior descending coronary artery. Contrast enhancement of other regions (papillary muscles, free wall) indicates collateral circulation from the septal perforator artery, and alcohol should not be infused. A decrease in resting and provocable gradients usually occurs immediately after the procedure (because of stunning), and remodeling can result in continued or variable gradient reduction over the first 3 months after the procedure. Patients are monitored for arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in the intensive care unit for 24 to 48 hours; implantation of a permanent pacemaker may be necessary for complete or high-grade atrioventricular block and through discharge at 3 to 4 days.

   6.2.2.5.1 Selection of Patients
Alcohol septal ablation has the potential for greater patient satisfaction because of the absence of a surgical incision and general anesthesia, less overall discomfort, and a much shorter recovery time. The benefit of alcohol septal ablation in patients of advanced age is similar to that in other patients (277,337). Because the postoperative risks and complications of cardiac surgery increase with age, ablation may offer a selective advantage in older patients, in whom operative risk may be increased because of comorbidities. Alcohol septal ablation is not indicated in children.

On the other hand, longer-term follow-up data are available for septal myectomy than for septal ablation, a consideration relevant to the selection of patients for either septal reduction therapy. The likelihood of implantation of a permanent pacemaker is 4- to 5-fold higher after septal ablation than after septal myectomy. Clinical and hemodynamic benefit is achieved immediately after recovery from septal myectomy but may be delayed for up to 3 months after septal ablation, although many patients achieve a notable symptomatic benefit after the procedure. Furthermore, patients with massive septal thickness approaching or exceeding 30 mm may experience little or no benefit from septal ablation. The surgeon can tailor the myectomy under direct visualization to address specific anatomic abnormalities of the LVOT or mitral valve apparatus, whereas alcohol septal ablation indirectly (and is restricted to) targets the distribution of the septal perforator artery.

Septal myectomy is the preferred treatment option for most severely symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM, especially in younger, healthy adults, whereas septal ablation is preferred in patients for whom surgery is contraindicated or considered high risk (particularly the elderly) (Figure 3). Data comparing alcohol septal ablation with septal myectomy are inadequate to fully inform clinical decision making in certain cases. For such patients, the principle of patient autonomy dictates that it is appropriate for the informed patient to choose between the 2 procedures.

   6.2.2.5.2 Results
Necrosis of the basal ventricular septum (338) produces an immediate fall in gradient from decreased septal contraction in >90% of patients (156,300,339–341). This effect is followed by LV remodeling over 6 to 12 months, a process that includes scar retraction and resultant widening of the outflow tract, associated with further reduction in gradient and degree of mitral regurgitation, regression of hypertrophy, and improvement in diastolic function (154,300,342–344). LA pressure is reduced, which may promote a decreased incidence of AF and amelioration of pulmonary hypertension (345). Two studies have demonstrated that, as with septal myectomy, the benefit of septal ablation in patients with provocable gradients is similar to that in patients with resting gradients (346,347). The beneficial results of alcohol septal ablation have been reported to almost 5 years after the procedure with improved functional and angina classes, exercise capacity, and quality of life (153,300,348–351). However, hemodynamic and symptomatic success is dependent on the ability to cannulate and ablate a septal perforator artery that supplies the area of the SAM-septal contact.

Although RCTs comparing surgical myectomy with alcohol septal ablation have not been conducted and are highly unlikely in the future, meta-analyses have noted similar hemodynamic and functional improvement over 3 to 5 years when examining the cumulative average of outcomes (352–354). What the meta-analyses do not report are a subset of patients in whom alcohol septal ablation is unreliable because of the inability to ablate the area of the SAM-septal contact (355). Older patients, especially those considered to be at high surgical risk, may be well served by alcohol septal ablation, whereas younger patients may benefit most from surgical myectomy (62,279). Despite age differences in treatment allocation, with septal ablation patients on average approximately 10 years older in clinical practice (352,353), the 4-year survival rate is similar for the 2 procedures (62,278). Most studies that have compared surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation have involved a large single-center experience in which treatment assignment was not randomized.

   6.2.2.5.3 Complications
In approximately half of patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation, temporary complete atrioventricular block occurs during the procedure (328–330). Persistent complete heart block prompting implantation of a permanent pacemaker occurs in 10% to 20% of patients based on the available data (36). Approximately 5% of patients have sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias during hospitalization. The in-hospital mortality rate is up to 2% (62,153,279,353). Because of the potential for creating a ventricular septal defect, septal ablation should not be performed if the target septal thickness is 15 mm.

Alcohol septal ablation is a therapeutic alternative to surgical myectomy for selected patients and produces a transmural infarction of ventricular septum occupying on average 10% of the overall LV wall (53,296,356). There has been concern that the potential ventricular arrhythmogenicity of the scar created by septal ablation might augment risk in the HCM population. Several studies have documented the occurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (332,349,357–363) and SCD following septal ablation (322) in about 3% to 10% of patients both with or without risk factors for SCD. In a single-center experience (n=91), 21% of patients experienced sudden or other cardiac death, aborted SCD, and/or appropriate ICD discharge resulting in an annualized event rate of 4.4% per year after ablation (322). In a second single-center experience (n=89), no mortality was attributable to SCD in 5.0±2.3 years of follow-up. However, in a selected subset of 42 patients with an ICD or permanent pacemaker that enabled detection of device-stored electrograms, the annualized event rate (VT, ventricular fibrillation, and/or appropriate ICD discharge, including periprocedural arrhythmias) was 4.9% per year (362). Data from another center suggest appropriate ICD intervention rates after ablation of 2.8% per year (364); similarly, the multicenter HCM ICD registry (n=506) demonstrated that the rate of appropriate ICD therapy among ablation patients with primary prevention ICDs was 3 to 4 times more frequent than in other patients in that registry (10.3% per year compared with 2.6% per year) (55). Patients with HCM considered to carry sufficient risk to warrant ICD placement have an annual incidence of appropriate interventions for VT/ventricular fibrillation of 3% to 10% (55,360,364). It is uncertain how common such events are attributable to the procedure or alternatively to the underlying disease, but the incidence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias after myectomy is extremely low (0.2% to 0.9% per year) (61,321,322).

Meta-analyses have indicated no difference between septal ablation and myectomy in the medium-term incidence of SCD or all-cause mortality (352,365). Although no definitive evidence is available that the ablation scar as such increases (or does not increase) long-term risk for SCD in absolute terms in this patient population, resolution will require greatly extended follow-up studies in larger patient cohorts (53,357).

6.2.2.6 Pacing—Recommendations
Class IIa

1 In patients with HCM who have had a dual-chamber device implanted for non-HCM indications, it is reasonable to consider a trial of dual-chamber atrial-ventricular pacing (from the right ventricular apex) for the relief of symptoms attributable to LVOT obstruction (292,294,295,366). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIb

1 Permanent pacing may be considered in medically refractory symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM who are suboptimal candidates for septal reduction therapy (283,292,294,295,366). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class III: No Benefit

1 Permanent pacemaker implantation for the purpose of reducing gradient should not be performed in patients with HCM who are asymptomatic or whose symptoms are medically controlled (283,284,367). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Permanent pacemaker implantation should not be performed as a first-line therapy to relieve symptoms in medically refractory symptomatic patients with HCM and LVOT obstruction who are candidates for septal reduction (283,284,367). (Level of Evidence: B)

See Online Data Supplement 3 for additional data regarding pacing.

Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker was proposed as an alternative treatment for patients with severe symptomatic obstructive HCM (369–371). Pacing the right ventricular apex with maintenance of atrioventricular synchrony results in a decrease in the LVOT gradient and improvement of symptoms in a subset of patients. Although the exact mechanism of improvement with pacing remains unknown, the decrease in gradient may be caused by timing of septal contraction but may also reflect long-term remodeling (369). Although there was an initial enthusiasm for dual-chamber pacing as a primary treatment for patients with obstructive HCM, subsequent RCTs demonstrated long-lasting beneficial results in only a small minority of patients, whereas most perceived improvement was judged to be a placebo effect (283,284,367). A trial of dual-chamber pacing may be considered for symptomatic patients with obstruction in whom an ICD has already been implanted for high-risk status.

   6.2.2.6.1 Results of DDD Pacing
Initial cohort studies of the results of dual-chamber pacing in patients with obstructive HCM and limiting symptoms showed symptomatic improvement in almost 90% of patients, accompanied by an improvement in exercise time and a reduction in gradient (368–371). However, there have been 3 randomized crossover trials in which patients received 2 to 3 months of continuous DDD pacing but also underwent a back-up AAI mode (no pacing) as a control arm (283,284,367). DDD pacing consists of continuously sensing or pacing the atrium and pacing the right ventricular apex. The overall reduction in outflow tract gradient was modest (25% to 40%) with substantial variation among individual patients. Objective measurements of exercise capacity were improved during DDD pacing versus baseline, but there was no significant difference comparing the AAI back-up mode with continuous DDD pacing. Although symptomatic improvement was reported by the majority of patients following continuous DDD pacing, a similar frequency of improvement was reported by patients during the AAI mode (control mode without pacing). These findings suggest a placebo effect as well as a "training effect" contributing to the initial symptomatic improvement of patients undergoing dual-chamber pacing (283,284,372).

Overall, the percentage of patients with sustained symptomatic improvement from continuous dual-chamber pacing varies from 30% to 80% (292,294,295,366). A consistent improvement in symptoms with a decrease in gradient and objective improvement in exercise duration is seen in <50% of patients. The overall success rate in terms of symptom relief and gradient reduction is significantly lower than that seen in patients who undergo septal myectomy. The mean residual gradient after septal myectomy is <10 mm Hg compared with a 40 to 50 mm Hg gradient after dual-chamber pacing (283,284,295,369). There is no reliable predictor of success for dual-chamber pacing, including the results of acute hemodynamic studies or morphologic echocardiographic features (295,367,373). Patients >65 years of age may be a subgroup who achieve the greatest benefit (283). There are no data that indicate dual-chamber pacing either reduces the risk of SCD in patients with HCM or alters the underlying progression of disease (283,369). Dual-chamber pacing has not been shown to be beneficial for patients with nonobstructive HCM (374).

   6.2.2.6.2 DDD Pacing: Caveats
A thorough understanding of the complex interplay between pacemaker programming and the hemodynamics of HCM is necessary to achieve possible beneficial results from this therapy. It is necessary to optimize the atrioventricular delay because too short an interval results in hemodynamic deterioration and too long an atrioventricular interval without complete preexcitation of the ventricle results in an inadequate response (375). The position of the pacemaker lead is important, requiring distal apical capture for optimal hemodynamic results (376). Programming of rate-adaptive pacing is also necessary so that full preexcitation of the ventricle is obtained during exercise.

   6.2.2.6.3 Pacing and ICDs
Patients with HCM are at increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD. Comprehensive SCD risk stratification should be performed in all patients with HCM (Section 6.3.1). However, current SCD risk stratification does not identify all patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias and SCD (377). An ICD has been shown to be effective at aborting SCD in patients with HCM (55). Consideration of an ICD if a pacing device is indicated for either rhythm or hemodynamic indications is controversial in contrast to the situation in patients with established risk factors for SCD.

6.2.3 Patients With LV Systolic Dysfunction—Recommendations
Class I

1 Patients with nonobstructive HCM who develop systolic dysfunction with an EF less than or equal to 50% should be treated according to evidence-based medical therapy for adults with other forms of heart failure with reduced EF, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers, and other indicated drugs (39,378). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 Other concomitant causes of systolic dysfunction (such as CAD) should be considered as potential contributors to systolic dysfunction in patients with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 ICD therapy may be considered in adult patients with advanced (as defined by NYHA functional class III or IV heart failure) nonobstructive HCM, on maximal medical therapy, and EF less than or equal to 50%, who do not otherwise have an indication for an ICD (39). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 For patients with HCM who develop systolic dysfunction, it may be reasonable to reassess the use of negative inotropic agents previously indicated, for example, verapamil, diltiazem, or disopyramide, and to consider discontinuing those therapies. (Level of Evidence: C)

Although HCM has typically been excluded from RCTs in heart failure, there is no compelling reason to believe that the etiology of reduced EF heart failure differs sufficiently to disqualify many highly effective, evidence-based, guideline-directed therapies for heart failure with reduced EF (379). Standard heart failure therapies should be implemented in patients with HCM when the EF is 50% for patients with CAD (39).

The discovery of reduced EF in the setting of HCM is not inconsistent with the known natural history of HCM but is uncommon (approximately 3%) and should prompt an appropriate search for other potential contributing causes of LV dysfunction (39). Those causes should include, but are not limited to, CAD, valvular heart disease, and metabolic disorders.

Patients with HCM were not included in the primary prevention ICD trials for patients with heart failure due to CAD or dilated cardiomyopathy (and reducted EF). Prophylatic ICD implantation is nevertheless the generally accepted clinical practice for primary prevention in HCM patients with systolic dysfunction. Furthermore, despite the absence of clinical trials or observational data, the use of negative inotropic drugs that would otherwise be discouraged in the setting of conventional heart failure with reduced EF can be considered in patients with HCM.

6.2.4 Selection of Patients for Heart Transplantation—Recommendations
Class I

1 Patients with advanced heart failure (end stage^_*) and nonobstructive HCM not otherwise amenable to other treatment interventions, with EF less than or equal to 50% (or occasionally with preserved EF), should be considered for heart transplantation (39,381). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 Symptomatic children with HCM with restrictive physiology who are not responsive to or appropriate candidates for other therapeutic interventions should be considered for heart transplantation (382,383). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: Harm

1 Heart transplantation should not be performed in mildly symptomatic patients of any age with HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

In general, the indications for heart transplantation include advanced heart disease, typically with NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms that are refractory to all other reasonable interventions. Transplant referral for refractory symptoms does not absolutely require reduced EF, although this treatment strategy is rarely recommended and performed in the presence of preserved EF. For patients with HCM, outcome after heart transplantation is not different from that of patients with other heart diseases (39,384,385).

6.3 Prevention of SCD.   6.3.1 SCD Risk Stratification—Recommendations
Class I

1 All patients with HCM should undergo comprehensive SCD risk stratification at initial evaluation to determine the presence of the following: (50,53,55,127,128,386–392) (Level of Evidence: B)

a A personal history for ventricular fibrillation, sustained VT, or SCD events, including appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

b A family history for SCD events, including appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

c Unexplained syncope.

d Documented NSVT defined as 3 or more beats at greater than or equal to 120 bpm on ambulatory (Holter) ECG.

e Maximal LV wall thickness greater than or equal to 30 mm.

Class IIa

1 It is reasonable to assess blood pressure response during exercise as part of SCD risk stratification in patients with HCM (89,127,390). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 SCD risk stratification is reasonable on a periodic basis (every 12 to 24 months) for patients with HCM who have not undergone ICD implantation but would otherwise be eligible in the event that risk factors are identified (12 to 24 months). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 The usefulness of the following potential SCD risk modifiers is unclear but might be considered in selected patients with HCM for whom risk remains borderline after documentation of conventional risk factors:

a CMR imaging with LGE (184,188). (Level of Evidence: C)

b Double and compound mutations (i.e., >1). (Level of Evidence: C)

c Marked LVOT obstruction (45,127,143,390). (Level of Evidence: B)

Class III: Harm

1 Invasive electrophysiologic testing as routine SCD risk stratification for patients with HCM should not be performed. (Level of Evidence: C)

See Online Data Supplement 4 for additional data regarding SCD risk stratification.

A minority of clinically recognized patients with HCM are judged to be at increased risk for SCD, with a rate of about 1% per year (53,55,386–389). ICDs offer the only effective means of preventing SCD and prolonging life in patients with HCM (55). Selection of patients who are appropriate for implantation for primary as opposed to secondary prevention can be a difficult clinical decision, owing to the individuality of each patient and family, variable definitions for risk markers, sparse clinical data, the relative infrequency of both HCM and SCD in most clinical practices, and the cumulative morbidity of living with an ICD.

6.3.1.1 Established Risk Markers
   6.3.1.1.1 Prior Personal History of Ventricular Fibrillation, SCD, or Sustained VT
As expected, patients with HCM who have experienced SCD or sustained VT represent the highest risk for subsequent arrhythmogenic events. The annualized rate of subsequent events is approximately 10% per year, although it has been shown that individuals may have no recurrent events or may have decades-long arrhythmia-free intervals between episodes (55,387–389,393).

   6.3.1.1.2 Family History of SCD
It has been recognized that SCD events can cluster in families. Notably, some studies have not demonstrated an independent link between family history of SCD and risk for individual patients on multivariate analysis (50,390,394), whereas others have suggested that family history is an independent predictor (394). These differences may be explained in part by the relative infrequency of events but also likely reflect variability in the definition of a family history of SCD. Some studies have used a definition of SCD in 2 first-degree relatives (50), whereas others have counted a single event (127,390). None of these studies have rigorously accounted for the total number of clinically apparent patients with HCM in each family, nor have they included SCD in more remote relations (e.g., cousins, uncles, aunts, grandparents).

   6.3.1.1.3 Syncope
Syncope represents a complex symptom with a multifactorial etiology that requires a careful clinical history before it can be considered a potential marker for SCD (50,392). In one analysis, syncope that was unexplained or thought to be consistent with arrhythmia (i.e., not neurally mediated) showed a significant independent association with SCD only when the events occurred in the recent past (<6 months) but not if the syncopal episodes occurred >5 years before the clinical visit (392). One other large study reports a similar independent association between recent unexplained syncope and SCD (127). Another study showed that it was the interaction between syncope and family history that was an important prognostic marker (50).

   6.3.1.1.4 Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia
Although sustained ventricular arrhythmia is clearly associated with SCD, the data for NSVT are less robust. Only 1 of 5 studies showed a univariate association between NSVT on 24-hour ambulatory monitors and SCD (50,128,389,395–397), whereas 1 contemporary and larger study showed that NSVT is independently associated with SCD on multivariate analysis (127) and is more important in younger patients (<30 years of age) (129). Furthermore, exercise-induced NSVT has been found to have independent association with SCD (398). NSVT probably should not be considered in a simply binary manner (i.e., as either positive or negative), and there may be some value in long-term ambulatory monitoring when NSVT is discovered on the screening 24-hour assessment. Intuitively, it would seem appropriate to place more weight on frequent, longer, and/or faster episodes of NSVT; however, there have been no systematic investigations of whether number of episodes and duration or ventricular rate of episodes of NSVT definitely have an impact on SCD risk.

   6.3.1.1.5 Maximum LV Wall Thickness
The relationship between severity of LV hypertrophy and SCD has been investigated in several studies predicated on the concept that the more severe the disease expression, the more likely the individual patient is to experience adverse events. Most, but not all (51,399), studies have shown at least a univariate association between maximum wall thickness and SCD (389,396,399), whereas other large studies have shown that when magnitude of hypertrophy is 30 mm, there is an independent association with SCD (50,161,392). Notably, 3 reports derive from overlapping samples of patients (50,127,391) have shown different strengths in the relationship between wall thickness and SCD that may reflect a slight variance in exclusion criteria, definition of other risk markers, and the number of risk markers included in multivariate analysis. It is crucial to recognize that the risk estimate does not abruptly increase for patients with 30 mm wall thickness but rather increases in a linear fashion (161) and appears to carry more prognostic significance in younger patients (400). With this in mind, a young adult with hypertrophy that approaches 30 mm may have similar or greater SCD risk than older patients with maximum wall thickness 30 mm.

   6.3.1.1.6 Abnormal Blood Pressure Response During Exercise
For up to a third of patients with HCM, there is an inappropriate systemic systolic blood pressure response during exercise testing (defined as either a failure to increase by at least 20 mm Hg or a drop of at least 20 mm Hg during effort) (89,90). It has been postulated that this finding is a risk factor for SCD. Two studies have shown a univariate association between this finding and subsequent SCD (50,89,127,390). It is also unclear how this finding is related to the well-recognized increase in dynamic LVOT obstruction that occurs with effort, a hemodynamic condition that is readily modifiable with medication or mechanical procedures. It would be appropriate to reassess this particular SCD risk marker following invasive therapies to relieve outflow tract obstruction, although there are no data in such patients.

6.3.1.2 Other Potential SCD Risk Modifiers
   6.3.1.2.1 LVOT Obstruction
Although some studies have not found a significant association between LVOT obstruction and SCD (47,161), other studies have found higher rates of SCD among patients with resting gradients 30 mm Hg (127,390) and that the risk is positively correlated with severity of LVOT obstruction (127). Conversely, relief of outflow tract obstruction through surgical myectomy is associated with very low rates of SCD (61,321). A limitation to using LVOT obstruction as an independent risk marker is that the obstruction in HCM is dynamic and highly variable from hour to hour to the extent that no gradient may be detectable during one evaluation, whereas the next day (or even a short time later during the same day), a moderate to severe gradient may be apparent (81,401). This variability makes it not only difficult to assess risk in the individual patient, but it also likely explains the difficulty in demonstrating statistical significance in smaller studies. Whether exercise-induced augmentation of the gradient is one of the mechanisms that results in syncope and/or abnormal blood pressure response during exercise has not been completely addressed.

   6.3.1.2.2 LGE on CMR Imaging
There has been considerable interest in promoting LGE on CMR imaging as a potential SCD risk marker in HCM. Because LGE is believed to represent myocardial fibrosis or scarring, it has been hypothesized that LGE may represent myocardium prone to ventricular tachyarrhythmia (188). Indeed, LGE has been associated with NSVT and ventricular ectopy but has not been associated with clinical SCD events or ICD discharge in published studies (184,185,188). More recent studies have shown a relationship between LGE and SCD and heart failure but with low positive predictive accuracy (186,187). LGE is a common feature observed in patients with HCM, and there is no consensus on the appropriate imaging protocols or threshold for detection of LGE. Both of these features currently limit the role of LGE as an independent risk marker.

   6.3.1.2.3 LV Apical Aneurysm
A subset of patients with HCM (prevalence about 2%) develop a thin-walled LV apical aneurysm associated with regional scarring (182) and more adverse clinical events during follow-up, including progressive heart failure and evolution into the end-stage phase as well as SCD. Although data on LV aneurysms in HCM are limited, this abnormality may warrant consideration in SCD risk-assessment strategies.

   6.3.1.2.4 Genetic Mutations
SCD may cluster in certain families with HCM, and the possibility that specific sarcomere mutations may confer SCD risk has been hypothesized. Indeed, several early studies of HCM pedigrees implicated certain mutations as "malignant" (107,114,402,403). However, subsequent studies of less selected consecutive patients with HCM found that it was problematic to infer likelihood of SCD events on the basis of the proposed mutations, because in some instances the rate of adverse events (and prevalence of associated SCD risk markers) was lower in patients with "malignant" mutations than it was in those with mutations believed to be "benign" (95,404–406). The data from unselected consecutive outpatients suggest that most mutations are "novel" and limited to particular families ("private" mutations). Therefore, routine mutational screening would appear to be of little prognostic value in HCM.

6.3.1.3 Utility of SCD Risk Markers in Clinical Practice
Other than cardiac arrest, each of the HCM risk factors has low positive predictive value (approximately 10% to 20%) and modestly high negative predictive value (85% to 95%). Multiple risk markers in individual patients would intuitively suggest greater risk for SCD; however, the vast majority of patients with 1 risk marker will not experience SCD, and simple arithmetic summing of risk markers is not precise because of the uncertainty implicit in assigning a relative weight to any individual risk factor (50,51,407). Notably, in the international HCM-ICD registry (55), the number of risk factors did not correlate with the rate of subsequent appropriate ICD discharges among presumably high-risk patients selected for ICD placement. These data suggest that the presence of a single risk marker may be sufficient to warrant ICD placement in many patients, but these decisions need to be individualized with regard to age, the strength of the risk factor, and the risk-benefit of lifelong ICD therapy (55,408).

6.3.2 Selection of Patients for ICDs—Recommendations
Class I

1 The decision to place an ICD in patients with HCM should include application of individual clinical judgment, as well as a thorough discussion of the strength of evidence, benefits, and risks to allow the informed patient's active participation in decision making (Figure 4) (53–56). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 ICD placement is recommended for patients with HCM with prior documented cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, or hemodynamically significant VT (55,387–389). (Level of Evidence: B)

View larger version (6K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 4 Indications for ICDs in HCM. *SCD risk modifiers include established risk factors and emerging risk modifiers (Section 6.3.1.2). BP indicates blood pressure; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LV, left ventricular; SCD, sudden cardiac death; SD, sudden death; and VT, ventricular tachycardia.

1 It is reasonable to recommend an ICD for patients with HCM with:

a Sudden death presumably caused by HCM in 1 or more first-degree relatives (394). (Level of Evidence: C)

b A maximum LV wall thickness greater than or equal to 30 mm (50,51,161,400). (Level of Evidence: C)

c One or more recent, unexplained syncopal episodes (392). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 An ICD can be useful in select patients with NSVT (particularly those <30 years of age) in the presence of other SCD risk factors or modifiers(53,129). (Level of Evidence: C)

3 An ICD can be useful in select patients with HCM with an abnormal blood pressure response with exercise in the presence of other SCD risk factors or modifiers (89,90,390). (Level of Evidence: C)

4 It is reasonable to recommend an ICD for high-risk children with HCM, based on unexplained syncope, massive LV hypertrophy, or family history of SCD, after taking into account the relatively high complication rate of long-term ICD implantation. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 The usefulness of an ICD is uncertain in patients with HCM with isolated bursts of NSVT when in the absence of any other SCD risk factors or modifiers (53). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 The usefulness of an ICD is uncertain in patients with HCM with an abnormal blood pressure response with exercise when in the absence of any other SCD risk factors or modifiers, particularly in the presence of significant outflow obstruction (89,90,390). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: Harm

1 ICD placement as a routine strategy in patients with HCM without an indication of increased risk is potentially harmful. (Level of Evidence: C)

2 ICD placement as a strategy to permit patients with HCM to participate in competitive athletics is potentially harmful. (Level of Evidence: C)

3 ICD placement in patients who have an identified HCM genotype in the absence of clinical manifestations of HCM is potentially harmful. (Level of Evidence: C)

Although the overall rate of SCD in HCM is approximately 1% per year, clearly there are individuals at higher risk for whom prophylactic therapy may be indicated. Pharmacologic therapy has not been demonstrated to provide protection from SCD. Conversely, the ICD has proved to be effective in terminating life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in HCM, altering the natural course of the disease and prolonging life.

The decision for placement of primary prevention ICD in HCM often involves a large measure of individual clinical judgment, particularly when the evidence for risk is ambiguous. The potential for SCD needs to be discussed with each fully informed HCM patient and family member in the context of their concerns and anxieties and should be balanced against the risks and benefits of proposed prophylactic ICD strategy. Consideration of the patient's age is warranted, particularly because device complications are more likely in children and young adults over the long period of follow-up (55,408).

6.3.2.1 Results of ICD Therapy in HCM
There have been 2 reports from an international, multicenter registry of patients with HCM who have undergone ICD placement on the basis of the clinical perception of SCD sufficient to justify device therapy (54,55). Among patients who received a device as a result of a prior personal history of cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular arrhythmia (secondary prevention ICD), the annualized rate of subsequent appropriate ICD discharge was 10% per year. Patients with primary prevention ICDs placed on the basis of 1 or more of the conventional risk markers experienced appropriate ICD therapy at a rate of approximately 4% per year (54,55). Among these patients, who were selected for ICD placement based on clinical risk perceptions, the number of risk markers present did not predict subsequent device discharge. Whether this is related to the highly selected population involved or possibly because an appropriate ICD discharge may not necessarily be synonymous with SCD prevention is uncertain. The relative weight of the individual risk markers in predicting device discharge rate has not been reported (55,408).

6.3.2.2 Complications of ICD Therapy in HCM
It is important to recognize and discuss with patients potential ICD-related complications (both procedural and long term) that occur at a rate of 4% per year in patients with HCM (408). Potential early problems may include pneumothorax, pericardial effusion, pocket hematoma, acute pocket infection, and/or lead dislodgment. Late complications include upper extremity deep venous thrombosis, lead dislodgment, infection, high defibrillation threshold necessitating lead revision, and inappropriate shocks, that is, shocks triggered by supraventricular arrhythmias, sinus tachycardia, lead fractures or dislodgment, oversensing, double counting, and programming malfunctions.

Reported rates of complications include approximately 25% of patients with HCM who experienced inappropriate ICD discharge; 6% to 13% who experienced lead complications (fracture, dislodgment, oversensing); 4% to 5% who developed device-related infection; and approximately 2% to 3% who experienced bleeding or thrombosis complications (55,408). The rate of inappropriate shocks and lead fractures appears to be higher in children than in adults, largely because their activity level and body growth places continual strain on the leads, which are the weakest link in the system (386). This issue is of particular concern, given the long periods that young patients will have prophylactically implanted devices.

Industry-related ICD problems have affected patients with HCM. Prominent recalls have included defective generators leading to several deaths (409) and small-diameter high-voltage leads prone to fracture (410,411). The implant procedure has been largely free of significant risk, without reported deaths, although selected patients with extreme hypertrophy or who have received amiodarone may require high-energy output generators or epicardial lead systems (412).

6.3.2.3 Overall Risk Assessment and Selection of Patients for ICD Therapy
The decision to recommend and pursue ICD placement is a complex process that can be oversimplified. The individuality of each patient and family circumstance, including level of anxiety, life situation, and views on death, and individual assessment of the relative weight of potential benefits compared with potential risks must be processed for each patient. The low positive predictive value of any of the SCD risk factors and the variability in the strength of data also introduce a degree of ambiguity to the SCD risk assessment and dramatically limit the applicability of counting the number of risk factors as the primary risk assessment methodology. Based on the weight of evidence, plausibility, and consensus judgment reflecting clinical experience, it is recognized that patients with massive hypertrophy, a family history of HCM-related SCD, or recent unexplained syncope would probably benefit from ICD placement. Apart from these, it was believed that a combination of conventional risk factors and other risk modifiers provided the optimal identification of the subset of patients with HCM with sufficient risk of SCD to warrant strong consideration of ICD placement (Figure 4).

6.3.2.4 Selection of ICD Device Type—Recommendations
Class IIa

1 In patients with HCM who meet indications for ICD implantation, single-chamber devices are reasonable in younger patients without a need for atrial or ventricular pacing (410,413–415). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 In patients with HCM who meet indications for ICD implantation, dual-chamber ICDs are reasonable for patients with sinus bradycardia and/or paroxysmal AF (413). (Level of Evidence: C)

3 In patients with HCM who meet indications for ICD implantation, dual-chamber ICDs are reasonable for patients with elevated resting outflow gradients greater than 50 mm Hg and significant heart failure symptoms who may benefit from right ventricular pacing (most commonly, but not limited to, patients >65 years of age) (283,284,367,413). (Level of Evidence: B)

All ICDs incorporate a right ventricular lead that has both pacing and defibrillation capabilities. ICDs are available as single-chamber, dual-chamber, or 3-chamber (i.e., cardiac resynchronization therapy) devices. Whether a patient receives a dual-chamber or cardiac resynchronization therapy system depends on other considerations, including the need for atrial pacing, enhanced supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discrimination, right ventricular pacing, and importantly, consideration of the patient's age and the subsequent longevity of the lead and ICD system (416). In patients with LVOT obstruction, particularly the elderly, in whom ICDs are indicated, dual-chamber pacing may have the potential to reduce gradient and symptoms in some patients (Section 6.2.2.6).

ICD leads fail at a rate of 0.5% to 1% per year, although there are data showing that failure rates are increased in a younger, healthier population (410). When a lead fails, a new lead is needed; the old lead can remain in, which over time places the patient at risk for venous obstruction, or the old lead may be removed, which carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. In young patients with HCM, an ICD may be needed for up to 70 years. There is no expectation that a single lead will remain functional for that amount of time. Thus, in general, the younger the patient, the more appropriate it is for single-chamber devices to be used to decrease the amount of hardware in the venous system.

Dual-chamber devices have been advocated to increase the ability of the ICD to differentiate between SVT and ventricular arrhythmias. Data to support this hypothesis are mixed with some studies showing no difference between inappropriate therapy for SVT (417,418) and others showing a benefit (419,420). Currently, discrimination of SVT is inadequate as a sole justification for a dual-chamber device in patients with HCM.

Whether cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are useful for patients with HCM is unclear. There is a paucity of published data on the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in patients with HCM and end-stage heart failure (421).

6.3.3 Participation in Competitive or Recreational Sports and Physical Activity—Recommendations
Class IIa

1 It is reasonable for patients with HCM to participate in low-intensity competitive sports (e.g., golf and bowling) (422,423). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 It is reasonable for patients with HCM to participate in a range of recreational sporting activities as outlined inTable 4(224). (Level of Evidence: C)

1 Patients with HCM should not participate in intense competitive sports regardless of age, sex, race, presence or absence of LVOT obstruction, prior septal reduction therapy, or implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator for high-risk status (58,59,422–426). (Level of Evidence: C)

A number of large cohort studies from the United States indicate that HCM is the most common cardiovascular cause of SCD in young athletes, accounting for about one third of these events (58,59,425,427). The American College of Cardiology Bethesda Conference No. 36 (422,429) as well as the European Society of Cardiology guidelines (423,429) indicate that risk for SCD is increased during intense competitive sports and also suggest that the removal of these individuals from the athletic arena can diminish their risk. This principle is the basis for disqualification of athletes with HCM from sanctioned high school and college sports (422,429). It should be underscored that these consensus recommendations for competitive athletes are independent of those for noncompetitive, informal recreational sporting activities (224).

General recommendations for recreational exercise in patients with HCM should be tailored to the individual's desires and abilities; however, certain guidelines prevail. For example, aerobic exercise as opposed to isometric exercise is preferable. Patients with HCM should avoid recreational sports in which participation is intense and simulates competitive organized athletics. Also, burst exertion, in which an abrupt increase in heart rate is triggered (e.g., sprinting in half-court basketball), is less desirable than swimming laps or cycling. Finally, it is prudent for such patients to avoid physical activity in extreme environmental conditions of heat, cold, or high humidity, with attention paid to maintaining volume status. Detailed recommendations for individual sports appear in Table 4.

6.4 Management of AF—Recommendations.   Class I

1 Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (i.e., warfarin, to an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0) is indicated in patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or chronic AF and HCM (60,430,431). (Anticoagulation with direct thrombin inhibitors [i.e., dabigatran] may represent another option to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events, but data for patients with HCM are not available (432). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 Ventricular rate control in patients with HCM with AF is indicated for rapid ventricular rates and can require high doses of beta antagonists and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (60,430). (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1 Disopyramide (with ventricular rate–controlling agents) and amiodarone are reasonable antiarrhythmic agents for AF in patients with HCM (430,433). (Level of Evidence: B)

2 Radiofrequency ablation for AF can be beneficial in patients with HCM who have refractory symptoms or who are unable to take antiarrhythmic drugs (63–65,434,435). (Level of Evidence: B)

3 Maze procedure with closure of LA appendage is reasonable in patients with HCM with a history of AF, either during septal myectomy or as an isolated procedure in selected patients. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1 Sotalol, dofetilide, and dronedarone might be considered alternative antiarrhythmic agents in patients with HCM, especially in those with an ICD, but clinical experience is limited. (Level of Evidence: C)

AF is an important cause of symptoms, morbidity, and even mortality in patients with HCM (57,60). Diagnosis may be made by an ECG during an AF episode or occasionally on ambulatory Holter monitoring; use of an event recorder may be helpful in some patients. Patients with HCM are at increased risk of AF compared with age-matched cohorts, but AF is seldom seen in young patients with HCM who are <30 years of age and becomes more prevalent with age. Risk factors for AF in HCM include age, congestive heart failure, and LA function, diameter, and volume (60,436). A family history of AF is a risk factor in the Framingham Heart Study, but there are no data in patients with HCM. AF occurring in HCM may not be associated with symptoms or hemodynamic compromise in one third of patients but is poorly tolerated in many others. There is evidence that AF is an indicator of unfavorable prognosis, including increased risk of HCM-related heart failure, death, and stroke (60,437).

Therapy for AF includes prevention of thromboembolic stroke and controlling symptoms (Figure 5). The risk of systemic embolization is high in patients with HCM with AF but is not related to the severity of symptoms (57,60). Occurrence of paroxysmal, persistent, or chronic AF is a strong indication for anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (430). Whether there is a threshold for AF that warrants anticoagulation is unresolved; however, given the high risk of thromboembolism in HCM, even patients with short episodes of AF should be strongly considered for anticoagulation. Even a single episode of AF should be cause to consider anticoagulation because the likelihood of recurrent AF is high. Aspirin should be reserved for those who cannot or will not take warfarin or other oral anticoagulants, but its efficacy in HCM is unestablished. The role of LA occlusion devices in HCM is untested but could possibly be a future option in patients who cannot tolerate anticoagulant therapy (438).

View larger version (5K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 5 Management of AF in HCM. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; AV, atrioventricular; INR, international normalized ratio; PPM, permanent pacemaker; and PVI, pulmonary vein isolation.

The long-term benefits of radiofrequency ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with HCM remain to be established. It does appear that early success and complication rates are similar between HCM and other forms of heart disease or absence of heart disease (63–65,445). Thus, radiofrequency ablation may play a role in the management of AF, but further investigation is necessary. The surgical maze procedure for AF has shown some limited success (446); however, whether a prophylactic or therapeutic surgical maze procedure is indicated for patients undergoing other open chest surgical procedures (i.e., septal myectomy) is unresolved.

	7. Other Issues

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
7.1 Pregnancy/Delivery—Recommendations.   Class I

1 In women with HCM who are asymptomatic or whose symptoms are controlled with beta-blocking drugs, the drugs should be continued during pregnancy, but increased surveillance for fetal bradycardia or other complications is warranted (41,140,447,448). (Level of Evidence: C)

2 For patients (mother or father) with HCM, genetic counseling is indicated before planned conception. (Level of Evidence: C)

3 In women with HCM and resting or provocable LVOT obstruction greater than or equal to 50 mm Hg and/or cardiac symptoms not controlled by medical therapy alone, pregnancy is associated with increased risk, and these patients should be referred to a high-risk obstetrician. (Level of Evidence: C)

4 The diagnosis of HCM among asymptomatic women is not considered a contraindication for pregnancy, but patients should be carefully evaluated in regard to the risk of pregnancy. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1 For women with HCM whose symptoms are controlled (mild to moderate), pregnancy is reasonable, but expert maternal/fetal medical specialist care, including cardiovascular and prenatal monitoring, is advised. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III: Harm

1 For women with advanced heart failure symptoms and HCM, pregnancy is associated with excess morbidity/mortality. (Level of Evidence: C)

Women with HCM safely experience pregnancy and labor with minimal documented risks. The maternal mortality rate is extraordinarily low and limited to those patients with particularly advanced disease (449). Nevertheless, careful evaluation of the mother and functional assessment is paramount during and just prior to pregnancy. Usually, special medical precautions are unnecessary, and cesarean delivery is not obligatory. However, women with advanced disease, including progressive heart failure, severe diastolic dysfunction, VT, SVT, or marked LVOT obstruction, will require the care of a high-risk maternal/fetal medical team with close involvement of a cardiologist. For the woman whose disease is well controlled with medical therapy (beta blockers, verapamil, or disopyramide), there should be no interruption of therapy, but careful maternal and fetal monitoring is advised (157). For any woman of childbearing age with HCM, it is paramount that genetic counseling be advised before conception. Such patients should be counseled prospectively about the risks of pregnancy and discouraged if deemed necessary. Careful monitoring is advisable in the first 24 hours after delivery, when large fluid shifts can lead to acute pulmonary edema in the setting of a noncompliant and hypertrophied left ventricle.

7.2 Occupational Considerations.   In 2002, the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration published its "Cardiovascular Advisory Panel Guidelines for the Medical Examination of Commercial Motor Vehicle Drivers." The guidelines state that "irrespective of symptoms, a person should not be certified as a [commercial motor vehicle] driver if a firm diagnosis of [HCM] is made..." (450).^{(p83) ||} Although consideration has subsequently been given to liberalizing this restriction, the guidelines have not yet been revised.

The criteria for the disqualification of aircraft pilots with cardiovascular disease are set by the Federal Aviation Administration. Currently, HCM is regarded as generally incompatible with the highest grade aviation license for commercial pilots, based on the unpredictable risk for impairment in the cockpit attributable to HCM (452).

	8. Future Research Needs

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
Despite progress in the understanding of the etiology and pathophysiology of HCM and in certain aspects of management, more substantial insights into the fundamental and clinical components of HCM provide considerable opportunities to improve patient outcomes. The research priorities in HCM were detailed in 2010 by a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group (453).

8.1 Establishing the Cause of HCM.   Over the past 20 years there have been major advances in identification of genetic mutations that cause HCM. Contemporary data sets include >1,400 mutations that primarily occur in at least 8 genes that encode protein components of the sarcomere. Nonetheless, the genetic cause remains unknown for a substantial proportion of patients with clinical manifestations of HCM. Mutation-negative patients may have LV hypertrophy attributable to another genetic (or nongenetic) cause, with morphologic features that mimic HCM but with distinctive pathophysiology and clinical outcomes. Definition of the cause(s) of HCM morphology in mutation-negative patients is important for the basic understanding of mechanisms that remodel the heart and for determining whether or not the clinical practice guidelines established for HCM are relevant in these patients. The ability to pool data from multiple registries is encouraged.

8.2 Defining the Link Between Genotype and Phenotype.   The emergence of newer sequencing methodologies provides unparalleled opportunities for defining the precise mutation in most patients with HCM. Such information can expand our understanding of the relationship between genotype and phenotype in HCM, a link that remains incompletely understood. Directing future efforts to identify genetic modifiers (i.e., genes that influence clinical expression) and environmental influences may expand understanding of the signaling pathways that are responsible for phenotypic expression of HCM and related disease states. These strategies also hold the potential to define novel therapeutic targets that may attenuate the consequences of sarcomere gene mutations, so that disease expression may be delayed or conceivably prevented.

8.3 Management and Evaluation of HCM Genotype-Positive/Phenotype-Negative Relatives.   Gene-based diagnosis of HCM families has increased the identification of genotype-positive/phenotype-negative individuals. There are many unanswered questions about the natural history of these patients, including the identity of factors that influence duration of the preclinical phase, the likelihood of clinical identification by screening with echocardiography (or CMR), the risk of SCD, and decisions about the periodicity of clinical screening, the use of ICDs for primary prevention, and participation in competitive sports. Longitudinal data are needed to develop appropriate management recommendations for this growing subset of patients. In addition, as more information is accrued regarding the signaling pathways that account for clinical manifestation associated with sarcomere protein gene mutations, the study of therapeutic interventions aimed at preventing the emergence of disease in preclinical patients can be expected.

8.4 Clinical Significance of Myocardial Fibrosis.   Myocardial fibrosis of the heart is increased in HCM because of an expansion of the interstitial matrix and also myocardial replacement scarring (caused by microvascular ischemia and other factors). Consistent with histopathologic findings, serum biomarkers of collagen turnover are elevated in patients with clinically overt HCM. Recent studies in HCM models indicate that extracellular matrix remodeling predates the emergence of hypertrophy and may contribute to diastolic dysfunction (18). Studies are needed to ascertain whether prevention of interstitial (matrix) expansion or replacement scarring can improve HCM pathophysiology and reduce late outcomes such as progressive heart failure.

Replacement fibrosis and scarring can be visualized (in vivo) by CMR gadolinium contrast enhancement. Clearer understanding of the relationship between LGE, fibrosis, and clinical outcomes (including ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD) is needed.

8.5 Therapies to Directly Modify the HCM Pathophysiology.   The most widely used medical therapies for patients with HCM (beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers, disopyramide) nonspecifically address aspects of the hemodynamic abnormalities in patients with HCM, such as reducing contractility to diminish the magnitude of outflow tract obstruction. As noted above, a more sophisticated understanding of the links between the molecular pathophysiology and outcome is necessary in HCM to promote the development of more relevant and targeted treatment strategies (453). For example, characterization of the fundamental biophysical defects produced by different mutations in sarcomere proteins, assessment of energy requirements of the heart in HCM, and assessment of the role of myocardial ischemia may lead to interventions that alter the natural history of disease expression.

8.6 Refining Risk Stratification for SCD.   As noted in this document, identifiable clinical markers are being used successfully in risk stratification for SCD in HCM, assisting in recommendations about prophylactic ICDs. Nonetheless, much ambiguity is often encountered in using the current SCD risk stratification algorithm in individual patients, and there is a need to identify additional and more sensitive/specific risk factors. Moreover, SCD may occasionally occur in "low-risk" patients without conventional risk factors. The assembly of larger cohorts from multiple centers with detailed clinical, genetic, and lifestyle information may improve SCD risk stratification and enable more efficient use of ICDs.

8.7 Comparative Assessment of Septal Reduction Strategies.   The opportunity for percutaneous strategies to reduce outflow tract obstruction in HCM was realized through the development of alcohol septal ablation. The potential of this approach to provide clinical benefit in reducing symptoms with lower patient morbidity and reduced healthcare expenditures has been somewhat undermined by a concern for increased ventricular arrhythmias following the procedure. Robust information about the types and frequency of adverse outcomes following alcohol septal ablation are needed in addition to rigorous assessment of whether these events are intrinsic to the procedure or related to underlying hypertrophic substrate, concomitant coronary or other comorbid disease, or the advanced age at which patients receive this therapy versus myectomy. In addition, observational registries might be useful to compare rates of HCM-related death. Such comparisons of short- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with alcohol septal ablation or myectomy surgery would foster appropriate use of these strategies and improve patient symptoms and outcomes.

8.8 Therapies to Treat and Prevent AF and Its Associated Risks.   AF is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with HCM. Anticoagulation is well established in other causes of AF and almost certainly extends to the HCM patient with paroxysmal, chronic, or persistent AF. However, whether anticoagulation should extend to those patients with HCM who are at high risk of development of AF is unclear. In addition, the relative roles of antiarrhythmic agents, radiofrequency ablation, and surgical maze procedure need improved definition.

	Staff

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
American College of Cardiology Foundation.  

David R. Holmes, Jr., MD, FACC, President

John C. Lewin, MD, Chief Executive Officer

Janet Wright, MD, FACC, Senior Vice President, Science and Quality

Charlene May, Senior Director, Science and Clinical Policy

American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association.  

Lisa Bradfield, CAE, Director, Science and Clinical Policy

Sue Keller, BSN, MPH, Senior Specialist, Evidence-Based Medicine

Jesse M. Welsh, Specialist, Science and Clinical Policy

American Heart Association.  

Ralph L. Sacco, MS, MD, FAAN, FAHA, President

Nancy Brown, Chief Executive Officer

Rose Marie Robertson, MD, FAHA, Chief Science Officer

Gayle R. Whitman, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN, Senior Vice President, Office of Science Operations

Mark D. Stewart, MPH, Science and Medicine Advisor, Office of Science Operations

Jody Hundley, Production Manager, Scientific Publications, Office of Science Operations

	Footnotes

 
This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in April 2011. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons approved the document in June 2011.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation requests that this document be cited as follows: Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Dearani JA, Fifer MA, Link MS, Naidu SS, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Rakowski H, Seidman CE, Towbin JA, Udelson JE, Yancy CW. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:e212–60.

This article is copublished in Circulation.

Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.cardiosource.org) and the American Heart Association (my.americanheart.org). For copies of this document, please contact Elsevier Inc. Reprint Department, fax (212) 633-3820, e-mail reprints{at}elsevier.com.

Permissions: Multiple copies, modification, alteration, enhancement, and/or distribution of this document are not permitted without the express permission of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Please contact Elsevier's permission department at healthpermissions{at}elsevier.com.

^_* Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information.

ACCF/AHA Representative.

ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison.

Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative.

^|| American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative.

^¶ Heart Rhythm Society Representative.

^# Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative.

^_** American Society of Echocardiography Representative.

Pediatric Content Expert.

Heart Failure Society of America Representative.

American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Representative.

^|||| ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison.

^¶¶ Former Task Force member during this writing effort.

^_* Characterized by systolic dysfunction (EF 50%), often associated with LV remodeling, including cavity enlargement and wall thinning, and because of diffuse myocardial scarring.

Appropriate ICD discharge is defined as ICD therapy triggered by VT or ventricular fibrillation, documented by stored intracardiac electrogram or cycle-length data, in conjunction with the patient's symptoms immediately before and after device discharge.

SCD risk modifiers are discussed in Section 6.3.1.2.

Dabigatran should not be used in patients with prosthetic valves, hemodynamically significant valve disease, advanced liver failure, or severe renal failure (creatinine clearance <15 mL/min) [432]).

^|| The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration defines commercial motor vehicle as a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle:

(a) has a gross combination weight rating of 11,794 kg (26,001 lb) inclusive of a towed unit(s) with a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 kg (10,000 lb); or

(b) has a gross vehicle weight rating of 11,794 kg (26,001 lb); or

(c) is designed to transport 16 passengers, including the driver; or

(d) is of any size and is used in the transportation of hazardous materials as defined [by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration] (451).

	References

Top ACCF/AHA Task Force Members Table of Contents Preamble 1. Introduction 2.... 3. Clinical Course and... 4. Pathophysiology 5. Diagnosis 6. Management of HCM 7. Other Issues 8. Future Research Needs Staff References

 
1. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Methodology Manual and Policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines http://assets.cardiosource.com/Methodology_Manual_for_ACC_AHA_Writing_Committees.pdf http://circ.ahajournals.org/site/manual/index.xhtmlAccessed July 11, 2011.

2. Teare D. Asymmetrical hypertrophy of the heart in young adults Br Heart J 1958;20:1-8.[Free Full Text]

3. Braunwald E, Lambert CT, Rockoff SD, et al. Idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis, I: a description of the disease based upon an analysis of 64 patients Circulation 1964;30(suppl 4):119.

4. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an important global disease Am J Med 2004;116:63-65.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5. Zou Y, Song L, Wang Z, et al. Prevalence of idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in China: a population-based echocardiographic analysis of 8080 adults Am J Med 2004;116:14-18.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6. Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, et al. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults: echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults Circulation 1995;92:785-789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Maron BJ, Epstein SE. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a discussion of nomenclature Am J Cardiol 1979;43:1242-1244.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Zenovich AG, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is predominantly a disease of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction Circulation 2006;114:2232-2239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review JAMA 2002;287:1308-1320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Maron BJ, McKenna WJ, Danielson GK, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1687-1713.[Free Full Text]

11. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Circulation 2006;113:1807-1816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Maron BJ, Seidman CE, Ackerman MJ, et al. How should hypertrophic cardiomyopathy be classified? What's in a name? Dilemmas in nomenclature characterizing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009;2:81-85.[Free Full Text]

13. Maron BJ, Yeates L, Semsarian C. Clinical challenges of genotype positive (+)-phenotype negative (–) family members in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2011;107:604-608.[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Maron BJ, Semsarian C. Emergence of gene mutation carriers and the expanding disease spectrum of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 2010;31:1551-1553.[Free Full Text]

15. Maron MS, Maron BJ, Harrigan C, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotype revisited after 50 years with cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:220-228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Christiaans I, Lekanne dit Deprez RH, van Langen IM, et al. Ventricular fibrillation in MYH7-related hypertrophic cardiomyopathy before onset of ventricular hypertrophy Heart Rhythm 2009;6:1366-1369.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17. Ho CY, Sweitzer NK, McDonough B, et al. Assessment of diastolic function with Doppler tissue imaging to predict genotype in preclinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2002;105:2992-2997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Ho CY, Lopez B, Coelho-Filho OR, et al. Myocardial fibrosis as an early manifestation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2010;363:552-563.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

19. Nagueh SF, McFalls J, Meyer D, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging predicts the development of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in subjects with subclinical disease Circulation 2003;108:395-398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Klues HG, Schiffers A, Maron BJ. Phenotypic spectrum and patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: morphologic observations and significance as assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography in 600 patients J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1699-1708.[Abstract]

21. Maron BJ, Gottdiener JS, Epstein SE. Patterns and significance of distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a wide angle, two dimensional echocardiographic study of 125 patients Am J Cardiol 1981;48:418-428.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

22. Maron BJ, Pelliccia A, Spirito P. Cardiac disease in young trained athletes: insights into methods for distinguishing athlete's heart from structural heart disease, with particular emphasis on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1995;91:1596-1601.[Free Full Text]

23. Maron BJ, Pelliccia A. The heart of trained athletes: cardiac remodeling and the risks of sports, including sudden death Circulation 2006;114:1633-1644.[Free Full Text]

24. Maron BJ. Distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart physiological remodelling: clinical significance, diagnostic strategies and implications for preparticipation screening Br J Sports Med 2009;43:649-656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Pelliccia A, Kinoshita N, Pisicchio C, et al. Long-term clinical consequences of intense, uninterrupted endurance training in Olympic athletes J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1619-1625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Pelliccia A, Di Paolo FM, De Blasiis E, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of aortic root dilation in highly trained competitive athletes Circulation 2010;122:698-7063 p following 706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Cox GF, Sleeper LA, Lowe AM, et al. Factors associated with establishing a causal diagnosis for children with cardiomyopathy Pediatrics 2006;118:1519-1531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Scaglia F, Towbin JA, Craigen WJ, et al. Clinical spectrum, morbidity, and mortality in 113 pediatric patients with mitochondrial disease Pediatrics 2004;114:925-931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Monserrat L, Gimeno-Blanes JR, Marin F, et al. Prevalence of Fabry disease in a cohort of 508 unrelated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2399-2403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Alcalai R, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from bench to the clinics J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:104-110.[Web of Science][Medline]

31. Arad M, Maron BJ, Gorham JM, et al. Glycogen storage diseases presenting as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2005;352:362-372.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

32. Maron BJ, Roberts WC, Arad M, et al. Clinical outcome and phenotypic expression in LAMP2 cardiomyopathy JAMA 2009;301:1253-1259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Yang Z, McMahon CJ, Smith LR, et al. Danon disease as an underrecognized cause of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children Circulation 2005;112:1612-1617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Colan SD, Lipshultz SE, Lowe AM, et al. Epidemiology and causespecific outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children: findings from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry Circulation 2007;115:773-781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Gelb BD, Tartaglia M. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: dysregulated RAS-mitogen activated protein kinase signal transduction Hum Mol Genet 2006:R220-R226Spec No 2.

36. Montalvo AL, Bembi B, Donnarumma M, et al. Mutation profile of the GAA gene in Italian patients with late onset glycogen storage disease type II Hum Mutat 2006;27:999-1006.[CrossRef][Medline]

37. Pandit B, Sarkozy A, Pennacchio LA, et al. Gain-of-function RAF1 mutations cause Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Nat Genet. 2007;39:1007-1012.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

38. van den Hout HM, Hop W, van Diggelen OP, et al. The natural course of infantile Pompe's disease: 20 original cases compared with 133 cases from the literature Pediatrics 2003;112:332-340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Harris KM, Spirito P, Maron MS, et al. Prevalence, clinical profile, and significance of left ventricular remodeling in the end-stage phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2006;114:216-225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Ahmad F, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. The genetic basis for cardiac remodeling Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2005;6:185-216.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

41. Bos JM, Towbin JA, Ackerman MJ. Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:201-211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Seidman JG, Seidman C. The genetic basis for cardiomyopathy: from mutation identification to mechanistic paradigms Cell 2001;104:557-567.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

43. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centers Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1158-1159.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

44. Ingles J, Lind JM, Phongsavan P, et al. Psychosocial impact of specialized cardiac genetic clinics for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Genet Med 2008;10:117-120.[Medline]

45. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Betocchi S, et al. Effect of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on clinical outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2003;348:295-303.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

46. Cannan CR, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, et al. Natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a population-based study, 1976 through 1990 Circulation 1995;92:2488-2495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Cecchi F, Olivotto I, Montereggi A, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Tuscany: clinical course and outcome in an unselected regional population J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1529-1536.[Abstract]

48. Maron BJ, Casey SA, Poliac LC, et al. Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a regional United States cohort JAMA 1999;281:650-655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Spirito P, Chiarella F, Carratino L, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an outpatient population N Engl J Med 1989;320:749-755.[Web of Science][Medline]

50. Elliott PM, Poloniecki J, Dickie S, et al. Sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: identification of high risk patients J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2212-2218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Elliott PM, Gimeno Blanes JR, Mahon NG, et al. Relation between severity of left-ventricular hypertrophy and prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Lancet 2001;357:420-424.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

52. Maron BJ, Semsarian C, Shen WK, et al. Circadian patterns in the occurrence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias triggering defibrillator interventions in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart Rhythm 2009;6:599-602.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

53. Maron BJ. Contemporary insights and strategies for risk stratification and prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2010;121:445-456.[Free Full Text]

54. Maron BJ, Shen WK, Link MS, et al. Efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the prevention of sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2000;342:365-373.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

55. Maron BJ, Spirito P, Shen WK, et al. Implantable cardioverterdefibrillators and prevention of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy JAMA 2007;298:405-412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Maron BJ, Spirito P. Implantable defibrillators and prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:1118-1126.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

57. Maron BJ, Olivotto I, Spirito P, et al. Epidemiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-related death: revisited in a large non-referral-based patient population Circulation 2000;102:858-864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Maron BJ. Sudden death in young athletes N Engl J Med 2003;349:1064-1075.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

59. Maron BJ, Doerer JJ, Haas TS, et al. Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: analysis of 1866 deaths in the United States, 1980-2006 Circulation 2009;119:1085-1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Casey SA, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2001;104:2517-2524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Ommen SR, Maron BJ, Olivotto I, et al. Long-term effects of surgical septal myectomy on survival in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:470-476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Sorajja P, Valeti U, Nishimura RA, et al. Outcome of alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2008;118:131-139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

63. Bunch TJ, Munger TM, Friedman PA, et al. Substrate and procedural predictors of outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:1009-1014.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

64. Gaita F, Di Donna P, Olivotto I, et al. Usefulness and safety of transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1575-1581.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

65. Kilicaslan F, Verma A, Saad E, et al. Efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Heart Rhythm 2006;3:275-280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

66. Wigle ED, Sasson Z, Henderson MA, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the importance of the site and the extent of hypertrophy: a review Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985;28:1-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

67. Wigle ED, Rakowski H, Kimball BP, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clinical spectrum and treatment Circulation 1995;92:1680-1692.[Free Full Text]

68. Brock R. Functional obstruction of the left ventricle: acquired aortic subvalvar stenosis Guys Hosp Rep 1957;106:221-238.[Medline]

69. Criley JM, Siegel RJ. Has "obstruction" hindered our understanding of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy? Circulation 1985;72:1148-1154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70. Criley JM, Siegel RJ. Obstruction is unimportant in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Postgrad Med J 1986;62:515-529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

71. Criley JM. Unobstructed thinking (and terminology) is called for in the understanding and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:741-743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

72. Maron BJ, Maron MS, Wigle ED, et al. The 50-year history, controversy, and clinical implications of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:191-200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

73. Panza JA, Petrone RK, Fananapazir L, et al. Utility of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in the noninvasive assessment of left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:91-99.[Abstract]

74. Sasson Z, Yock PG, Hatle LK, et al. Doppler echocardiographic determination of the pressure gradient in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:752-756.[Abstract]

75. Shah PM, Taylor RD, Wong M. Abnormal mitral valve coaptation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: proposed role in systolic anterior motion of mitral valve Am J Cardiol 1981;48:258-262.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

76. Sherrid MV, Chu CK, Delia E, et al. An echocardiographic study of the fluid mechanics of obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:816-825.[Abstract]

77. Sherrid MV. Dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy revisited: significance, pathogenesis, and treatment Cardiol Rev 1998;6:135-145.[Medline]

78. Sherrid MV, Gunsburg DZ, Moldenhauer S, et al. Systolic anterior motion begins at low left ventricular outflow tract velocity in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1344-1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

79. Falicov RE, Resnekov L, Bharati S, et al. Mid-ventricular obstruction: a variant of obstructive cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1976;37:432-437.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

80. Maron BJ, Nishimura RA, Danielson GK. Pitfalls in clinical recognition and a novel operative approach for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with severe outflow obstruction due to anomalous papillary muscle Circulation 1998;98:2505-2508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

81. Geske JB, Sorajja P, Ommen SR, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient variability in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Clin Cardiol 2009;32:397-402.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

82. Elesber A, Nishimura RA, Rihal CS, et al. Utility of isoproterenol to provoke outflow tract gradients in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2008;101:516-520.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

83. Paulus WJ, Lorell BH, Craig WE, et al. Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside and nifedipine on diastolic properties in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: altered left ventricular loading or improved muscle inactivation? J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;2:879-886.[Abstract]

84. Bonow RO, Dilsizian V, Rosing DR, et al. Verapamil-induced improvement in left ventricular diastolic filling and increased exercise tolerance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: short- and long-term effects Circulation 1985;72:853-864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

85. Cannon III RO, Rosing DR, Maron BJ, et al. Myocardial ischemia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: contribution of inadequate vasodilator reserve and elevated left ventricular filling pressures Circulation 1985;71:234-243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

86. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Maron BJ, et al. The case for myocardial ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:866-875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

87. Maron BJ, Wolfson JK, Epstein SE, et al. Intramural ("small vessel") coronary artery disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:545-557.[Abstract]

88. Frenneaux MP, Counihan PJ, Caforio AL, et al. Abnormal blood pressure response during exercise in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1990;82:1995-2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

89. Sadoul N, Prasad K, Elliott PM, et al. Prospective prognostic assessment of blood pressure response during exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1997;96:2987-2991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

90. Olivotto I, Maron BJ, Montereggi A, et al. Prognostic value of systemic blood pressure response during exercise in a community-based patient population with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2044-2051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

91. Wigle ED, Adelman AG, Auger P, et al. Mitral regurgitation in muscular subaortic stenosis Am J Cardiol 1969;24:698-706.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

92. Zhu WX, Oh JK, Kopecky SL, et al. Mitral regurgitation due to ruptured chordae tendineae in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:242-247.[Abstract]

93. Morita H, Rehm HL, Menesses A, et al. Shared genetic causes of cardiac hypertrophy in children and adults N Engl J Med 2008;358:1899-1908.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

94. Niimura H, Bachinski LL, Sangwatanaroj S, et al. Mutations in the gene for cardiac myosin-binding protein C and late-onset familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 1998;338:1248-1257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

95. Van Driest SL, Ackerman MJ, Ommen SR, et al. Prevalence and severity of "benign" mutations in the beta-myosin heavy chain, cardiac troponin T, and alpha-tropomyosin genes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2002;106:3085-3090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

96. Van Driest SL, Jaeger MA, Ommen SR, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the beta-myosin heavy chain gene in 389 unrelated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:602-610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

97. Christiaans I, van Langen IM, Birnie E, et al. Genetic counseling and cardiac care in predictively tested hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers: the patients' perspective Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:1444-1451.

98. Michie S, French D, Allanson A, et al. Information recall in genetic counselling: a pilot study of its assessment Patient Educ Couns 1997;32:93-100.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

99. Michie S, Allanson A, Armstrong D, et al. Objectives of genetic counselling: differing views of purchasers, providers and users J Public Health Med 1998;20:404-408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

100. Offit K, Groeger E, Turner S, et al. The "duty to warn" a patient's family members about hereditary disease risks JAMA 2004;292:1469-1473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

101. Christiaans I, van Langen IM, Birnie E, et al. Quality of life and psychological distress in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers: a cross-sectional cohort study Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:602-612.[Medline]

102. Fokstuen S, Lyle R, Munoz A, et al. A DNA resequencing array for pathogenic mutation detection in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Hum Mutat 2008;29:879-885.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

103. Olivotto I, Girolami F, Ackerman MJ, et al. Myofilament protein gene mutation screening and outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:630-638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

104. Maron BJ, Niimura H, Casey SA, et al. Development of left ventricular hypertrophy in adults in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy caused by cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene mutations J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:315-321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

105. Rosenzweig A, Watkins H, Hwang DS, et al. Preclinical diagnosis of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by genetic analysis of blood lymphocytes N Engl J Med 1991;325:1753-1760.[Web of Science][Medline]

106. Spada M, Pagliardini S, Yasuda M, et al. High incidence of later-onset Fabry disease revealed by newborn screening Am J Hum Genet 2006;79:31-40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

107. Moolman JC, Corfield VA, Posen B, et al. Sudden death due to troponin T mutations J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:549-555.[Abstract]

108. Woo A, Rakowski H, Liew JC, et al. Mutations of the beta myosin heavy chain gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: critical functional sites determine prognosis Heart 2003;89:1179-1185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

109. Ho CY, Lever HM, DeSanctis R, et al. Homozygous mutation in cardiac troponin T: implications for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2000;102:1950-1955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

110. Ingles J, Doolan A, Chiu C, et al. Compound and double mutations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: implications for genetic testing and counseling J Med Genet 2005;42:e59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

111. Van Driest SL, Vasile VC, Ommen SR, et al. Myosin binding protein C mutations and compound heterozygosity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1903-1910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

112. Jeschke B, Uhl K, Weist B, et al. A high risk phenotype of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with a compound genotype of two mutated beta-myosin heavy chain genes Hum Genet 1998;102:299-304.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

113. Watkins H, McKenna WJ, Thierfelder L, et al. Mutations in the genes for cardiac troponin T and alpha-tropomyosin in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 1995;332:1058-1064.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

114. Watkins H, Rosenzweig A, Hwang DS, et al. Characteristics and prognostic implications of myosin missense mutations in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 1992;326:1108-1114.[Web of Science][Medline]

115. Watkins H, Thierfelder L, Hwang DS, et al. Sporadic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to de novo myosin mutations J Clin Invest 1992;90:1666-1671.[Web of Science][Medline]

116. Girolami F, Ho CY, Semsarian C, et al. Clinical features and outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with triple sarcomere protein gene mutations J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1444-1453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

117. Saltzman AJ, Mancini-DiNardo D, Li C, et al. The cardiac myosin binding protein C Arg502Trp mutation: a common cause of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ Res 2010;106:1549-1552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

118. Kelly M, Semsarian C. Multiple mutations in genetic cardiovascular disease: a marker of disease severity? Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009;2:182-190.[Free Full Text]

119. Chimenti C, Pieroni M, Morgante E, et al. Prevalence of Fabry disease in female patients with late-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2004;110:1047-1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

120. Andersen PS, Havndrup O, Hougs L, et al. Diagnostic yield, interpretation, and clinical utility of mutation screening of sarcomere encoding genes in Danish hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients and relatives Hum Mutat 2009;30:363-370.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

121. Christiaans I, Birnie E, van Langen IM, et al. The yield of risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myosinbinding protein C gene mutation carriers: focus on predictive screening Eur Heart J 2010;31:842-848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

122. Michels M, Soliman OI, Phefferkorn J, et al. Disease penetrance and risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in asymptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers Eur Heart J 2009;30:2593-2598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

123. Maron BJ, Ho CY. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without hypertrophy: an emerging pre-clinical subgroup composed of genetically affected family members J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:65-68.[Free Full Text]

124. Poutanen T, Tikanoja T, Jaaskelainen P, et al. Diastolic dysfunction without left ventricular hypertrophy is an early finding in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-causing mutations in the beta-myosin heavy chain, alpha-tropomyosin, and myosin-binding protein C genes Am Heart J 2006;151:725.e1-725.e9.[CrossRef][Medline]

125. Rigon F, Bianchin L, Bernasconi S, et al. Update on age at menarche in Italy: toward the leveling off of the secular trend J Adolesc Health 2010;46:238-244.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

126. Maron BJ, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Proposal for contemporary screening strategies in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2125-2132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

127. Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, Tome MT, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 2006;27:1933-1941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

128. Maron BJ, Savage DD, Wolfson JK, et al. Prognostic significance of 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a prospective study Am J Cardiol 1981;48:252-257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

129. Monserrat L, Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, et al. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an independent marker of sudden death risk in young patients J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:873-879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

130. Corrado D, Basso C, Schiavon M, et al. Screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young athletes N Engl J Med 1998;339:364-369.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

131. Maron BJ, Mathenge R, Casey SA, et al. Clinical profile of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy identified de novo in rural communities J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1590-1595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

132. Maron BJ. The electrocardiogram as a diagnostic tool for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: revisited Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2001;6:277-279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

133. Panza JA, Maron BJ. Relation of electrocardiographic abnormalities to evolving left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy during childhood Am J Cardiol 1989;63:1258-1265.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

134. Spirito P, Seidman CE, McKenna WJ, et al. The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 1997;336:775-785.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

135. Adabag AS, Kuskowski MA, Maron BJ. Determinants for clinical diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1507-1511.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

136. Afonso LC, Bernal J, Bax JJ, et al. Echocardiography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the role of conventional and emerging technologies J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1:787-800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

137. Fifer MA, Vlahakes GJ. Management of symptoms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2008;117:429-439.[Free Full Text]

138. Soor GS, Luk A, Ahn E, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: current understanding and treatment objectives J Clin Pathol 2009;62:226-235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

139. Binder J, Ommen SR, Gersh BJ, et al. Echocardiography-guided genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: septal morphological features predict the presence of myofilament mutations Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:459-467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

140. Hershberger RE, Cowan J, Morales A, et al. Progress with genetic cardiomyopathies: screening, counseling, and testing in dilated, hypertrophic, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy Circ Heart Fail 2009;2:253-261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

141. Schwartz ML, Cox GF, Lin AE, et al. Clinical approach to genetic cardiomyopathy in children Circulation 1996;94:2021-2038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

142. Dimitrow PP, Dubiel JS. Echocardiographic risk factors predisposing to sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart 2005;91:93-94.[Free Full Text]

143. Efthimiadis GK, Parcharidou DG, Giannakoulas G, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction as a risk factor for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2009;104:695-699.[CrossRef][Medline]

144. Ommen SR, Shah PM, Tajik AJ. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: past, present and future Heart 2008;94:1276-1281.[Free Full Text]

145. Sorajja P, Nishimura RA, Gersh BJ, et al. Outcome of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a long-term follow-up study J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:234-241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

146. Grigg LE, Wigle ED, Williams WG, et al. Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clarification of pathophysiology and importance in intraoperative decision making J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:42-52.[Abstract]

147. Marwick TH, Stewart WJ, Lever HM, et al. Benefits of intraoperative echocardiography in the surgical management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1066-1072.[Abstract]

148. Yu EH, Omran AS, Wigle ED, et al. Mitral regurgitation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: relationship to obstruction and relief with myectomy J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2219-2225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

149. Faber L, Seggewiss H, Welge D, et al. Echo-guided percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: 7 years of experience Eur J Echocardiogr 2004;5:347-355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

150. Monakier D, Woo A, Puri T, et al. Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiographic quantification of risk area for predicting postprocedural complications in patients undergoing septal ethanol ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1515-1522.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

151. Nagueh SF, Lakkis NM, He ZX, et al. Role of myocardial contrast echocardiography during nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:225-229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

152. Carasso S, Woo A, Yang H, et al. Myocardial mechanics explains the time course of benefit for septal ethanol ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:493-499.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

153. Fernandes VL, Nielsen C, Nagueh SF, et al. Follow-up of alcohol septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: the Baylor and Medical University of South Carolina experience 1996 to 2007 J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:561-570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

154. Jassal DS, Neilan TG, Fifer MA, et al. Sustained improvement in left ventricular diastolic function after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 2006;27:1805-1810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

155. Woo A, Williams WG, Choi R, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic determinants of long-term survival after surgical myectomy in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2005;111:2033-2041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

156. Yoerger DM, Picard MH, Palacios IF, et al. Time course of pressure gradient response after first alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1511-1514.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

157. Sherrid MV, Barac I, McKenna WJ, et al. Multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of disopyramide in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1251-1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

158. Maron BJ, Casey SA, Hurrell DG, et al. Relation of left ventricular thickness to age and gender in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1195-1198.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

159. Eriksson MJ, Sonnenberg B, Woo A, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:638-645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

160. Lever HM, Karam RF, Currie PJ, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the elderly: distinctions from the young based on cardiac shape Circulation 1989;79:580-589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

161. Spirito P, Bellone P, Harris KM, et al. Magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2000;342:1778-1785.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

162. Geske JB, Sorajja P, Nishimura RA, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures by Doppler echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: correlation with direct left atrial pressure measurement at cardiac catheterization Circulation 2007;116:2702-2708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

163. Rakowski H, Carasso S. Quantifying diastolic function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the ongoing search for the holy grail Circulation 2007;116:2662-2665.[Free Full Text]

164. Kjaergaard J, Johnson BD, Pellikka PA, et al. Left atrial index is a predictor of exercise capacity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1373-1380.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

165. Nistri S, Olivotto I, Betocchi S, et al. Prognostic significance of left atrial size in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (from the Italian Registry for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy) Am J Cardiol 2006;98:960-965.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

166. Yang H, Woo A, Monakier D, et al. Enlarged left atrial volume in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a marker for disease severity J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1074-1082.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

167. Carasso S, Yang H, Woo A, et al. Systolic myocardial mechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: novel concepts and implications for clinical status J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:675-683.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

168. Choi EY, Ha JW, Rim SJ, et al. Incremental value of left ventricular diastolic function reserve index for predicting exercise capacity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:487-492.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

169. Popovic ZB, Kwon DH, Mishra M, et al. Association between regional ventricular function and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography and delayed hyperenhancement magnetic resonance imaging J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:1299-1305.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

170. Serri K, Reant P, Lafitte M, et al. Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two-dimensional strain: application in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1175-1181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

171. Wang J, Buergler JM, Veerasamy K, et al. Delayed untwisting: the mechanistic link between dynamic obstruction and exercise tolerance in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1326-1334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

172. Carasso S, Yang H, Woo A, et al. Diastolic myocardial mechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:164-171.[CrossRef][Medline]

173. Kato TS, Noda A, Izawa H, et al. Discrimination of nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy on the basis of strain rate imaging by tissue Doppler ultrasonography Circulation 2004;110:3808-3814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

174. Ho CY, Carlsen C, Thune JJ, et al. Echocardiographic strain imaging to assess early and late consequences of sarcomere mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009;2:314-321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

175. Maron BJ. Controversies in cardiovascular medicine. Surgical myectomy remains the primary treatment option for severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2007;116:196-206.[Free Full Text]

176. McCully RB, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, et al. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: preoperative echocardiographic predictors of outcome after septal myectomy J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1491-1496.[Abstract]

177. Pedone C, Vijayakumar M, Ligthart JM, et al. Intracardiac echocardiography guidance during percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005;7:134-137.[Medline]

178. Ciampi Q, Betocchi S, Lombardi R, et al. Hemodynamic determinants of exercise-induced abnormal blood pressure response in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:278-284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

179. Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, et al. Clinician's guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 2010;122:191-225.[Free Full Text]

180. Moon JC, Fisher NG, McKenna WJ, et al. Detection of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with non-diagnostic echocardiography Heart 2004;90:645-649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

181. Rickers C, Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2005;112:855-861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

182. Maron MS, Finley JJ, Bos JM, et al. Prevalence, clinical significance, and natural history of left ventricular apical aneurysms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2008;118:1541-1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

183. Maron MS, Lesser JR, Maron BJ. Management implications of massive left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy significantly underestimated by echocardiography but identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1842-1843.[CrossRef][Medline]

184. Adabag AS, Maron BJ, Appelbaum E, et al. Occurrence and frequency of arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in relation to delayed enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1369-1374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

185. Maron MS, Appelbaum E, Harrigan CJ, et al. Clinical profile and significance of delayed enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ Heart Fail 2008;1:184-191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

186. Rubinshtein R, Glockner JF, Ommen SR, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of late gadolinium enhancement by contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:51-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

187. O'Hanlon R, Grasso A, Roughton M, et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:867-874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

188. Moon JC, McKenna WJ, McCrohon JA, et al. Toward clinical risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1561-1567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

189. Gange CA, Link MS, Maron MS. Utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of Anderson-Fabry disease Circulation 2009;120:e96-e97.[Free Full Text]

190. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis Circulation 2005;111:186-193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

191. Moon JC, Sachdev B, Elkington AG, et al. Gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Anderson-Fabry disease: evidence for a disease specific abnormality of the myocardial interstitium Eur Heart J 2003;24:2151-2155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

192. Maron BJ, Sherrid MV, Haas TS, et al. Novel hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotype: segmental hypertrophy isolated to the posterobasal left ventricular free wall Am J Cardiol 2010;106:750-752.[CrossRef][Medline]

193. Harrigan CJ, Appelbaum E, Maron BJ, et al. Significance of papillary muscle abnormalities identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2008;101:668-673.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

194. Kwon DH, Setser RM, Thamilarasan M, et al. Abnormal papillary muscle morphology is independently associated with increased left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart 2008;94:1295-1301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

195. Choudhury L, Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, et al. Myocardial scarring in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:2156-2164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

196. Al-Mallah M, Kwong RY. Clinical application of cardiac CMR Rev Cardiovasc Med 2009;10:134-141.[Medline]

197. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

198. Bruder O, Wagner A, Jensen CJ, et al. Myocardial scar visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts major adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:875-887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

199. Sorajja P, Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, et al. Adverse prognosis of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who have epicardial coronary artery disease Circulation 2003;108:2342-2348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

200. Smith Jr SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld Jr JW, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:216-235.[Free Full Text]

201. Basso C, Thiene G, Mackey-Bojack S, et al. Myocardial bridging, a frequent component of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotype, lacks systematic association with sudden cardiac death Eur Heart J 2009;30:1627-1634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

202. Sorajja P, Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, et al. Myocardial bridging in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:889-894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

203. Yetman AT, McCrindle BW, MacDonald C, et al. Myocardial bridging in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a risk factor for sudden death N Engl J Med 1998;339:1201-1209.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

204. Mohiddin SA, Begley D, Shih J, et al. Myocardial bridging does not predict sudden death in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but is associated with more severe cardiac disease J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2270-2278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

205. Vallejo E, Morales M, Sanchez I, et al. Myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in patients with myocardial bridging J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:318-323.[CrossRef][Medline]

206. Bourassa MG, Butnaru A, Lesperance J, et al. Symptomatic myocardial bridges: overview of ischemic mechanisms and current diagnostic and treatment strategies J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:351-359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

207. Schwarz ER, Klues HG, vom Dahl J, et al. Functional, angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1637-1645.[Abstract]

208. Pey J, de Dios RM, Epeldegui A. Myocardial bridging and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: relief of ischemia by surgery Int J Cardiol 1985;8:327-330.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

209. Konen E, Goitein O, Sternik L, et al. The prevalence and anatomical patterns of intramuscular coronary arteries: a coronary computed tomography angiographic study J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:587-593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

210. Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, et al. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging Ann Intern Med 2010;152:167-177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

211. O'Gara PT, Bonow RO, Maron BJ, et al. Myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: assessment with thallium-201 emission computed tomography Circulation 1987;76:1214-1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

212. Dilsizian V, Bonow RO, Epstein SE, et al. Myocardial ischemia detected by thallium scintigraphy is frequently related to cardiac arrest and syncope in young patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:796-804.[Abstract]

213. Udelson JE, Bonow RO, O'Gara PT, et al. Verapamil prevents silent myocardial perfusion abnormalities during exercise in asymptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1989;79:1052-1060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

214. Cannon III RO, Dilsizian V, O'Gara PT, et al. Myocardial metabolic, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic significance of reversible thallium-201 abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1991;83:1660-1667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

215. Cannon III RO, Dilsizian V, O'Gara PT, et al. Impact of surgical relief of outflow obstruction on thallium perfusion abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1992;85:1039-1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

216. Dilsizian V, Panza JA, Bonow RO. Myocardial perfusion imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2010;3:1078-1080.[Free Full Text]

217. Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:709-718.[CrossRef][Medline]

218. Camici P, Chiriatti G, Lorenzoni R, et al. Coronary vasodilation is impaired in both hypertrophied and nonhypertrophied myocardium of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study with nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:879-886.[Abstract]

219. Cannon III RO, McIntosh CL, Schenke WH, et al. Effect of surgical reduction of left ventricular outflow obstruction on hemodynamics, coronary flow, and myocardial metabolism in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1989;79:766-775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

220. Cecchi F, Olivotto I, Gistri R, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2003;349:1027-1035.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

221. Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Gistri R, et al. Relevance of coronary microvascular flow impairment to long-term remodeling and systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1043-1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

222. Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF, et al. ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1127-1147.[Free Full Text]

223. Redberg RF, Benjamin EJ, Bittner V, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 performance measures for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1364-1405.[Free Full Text]

224. Maron BJ, Chaitman BR, Ackerman MJ, et al. Recommendations for physical activity and recreational sports participation for young patients with genetic cardiovascular diseases Circulation 2004;109:2807-2816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

225. Maron BJ, Casey SA, Hauser RG, et al. Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with survival to advanced age J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:882-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

226. Semsarian C, Ahmad I, Giewat M, et al. The L-type calcium channel inhibitor diltiazem prevents cardiomyopathy in a mouse model J Clin Invest 2002;109:1013-1020.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

227. Patel R, Nagueh SF, Tsybouleva N, et al. Simvastatin induces regression of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis and improves cardiac function in a transgenic rabbit model of human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2001;104:317-324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

228. Senthil V, Chen SN, Tsybouleva N, et al. Prevention of cardiac hypertrophy by atorvastatin in a transgenic rabbit model of human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ Res 2005;97:285-292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

229. Adelman AG, Shah PM, Gramiak R, et al. Long-term propranolol therapy in muscular subaortic stenosis Br Heart J 1970;32:804-811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

230. Cohen LS, Braunwald E. Amelioration of angina pectoris in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis with beta-adrenergic blockade Circulation 1967;35:847-851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

231. Flamm MD, Harrison DC, Hancock EW. Muscular subaortic stenosis: prevention of outflow obstruction with propranolol Circulation 1968;38:846-858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

232. Frank MJ, Abdulla AM, Canedo MI, et al. Long-term medical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1978;42:993-1001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

233. Harrison DC, Braunwald E, Glick G, et al. Effects of beta adrenergic blockade on the circulation with particular reference to observations in patients with hypertrophic subaortic stenosis Circulation 1964;29:84-98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

234. Stenson RE, Flamm Jr, MD, Harrison DC, et al. Hypertrophic subaortic stenosis: clinical and hemodynamic effects of long-term propranolol therapy Am J Cardiol 1973;31:763-773.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

235. Swanton RH, Brooksby IA, Jenkins BS, et al. Hemodynamic studies of beta blockade in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Eur J Cardiol 1977;5:327-341.[Web of Science][Medline]

236. Wigle ED, Adelman AG, Felderhof CH. Medical and surgical treatment of the cardiomyopathies Circ Res 1974;35(suppl II):196-207.[Web of Science][Medline]

237. Bonow RO, Rosing DR, Bacharach SL, et al. Effects of verapamil on left ventricular systolic function and diastolic filling in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1981;64:787-796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

238. Epstein SE, Rosing DR. Verapamil: its potential for causing serious complications in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1981;64:437-441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

239. Rosing DR, Kent KM, Maron BJ, et al. Verapamil therapy: a new approach to the pharmacologic treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, II: effects on exercise capacity and symptomatic status Circulation 1979;60:1208-1213.[Free Full Text]

240. Rosing DR, Kent KM, Borer JS, et al. Verapamil therapy: a new approach to the pharmacologic treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, I: hemodynamic effects Circulation 1979;60:1201-1207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

241. Rosing DR, Condit JR, Maron BJ, et al. Verapamil therapy: a new approach to the pharmacologic treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, III: effects of long-term administration Am J Cardiol 1981;48:545-553.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

242. Braunwald E, Ebert PA. Hemodynamic alterations in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis induced by sympathomimetic drugs Am J Cardiol 1962;10:489-495.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

243. Wigle ED, David PR, Labroose CJ, et al. Muscular subaortic stenosis: the interrelation of wall tension, outflow tract "distending pressure" and orifice radius Am J Cardiol 1965;15:761-772.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

244. Haley JH, Sinak LJ, Tajik AJ, et al. Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in acute coronary syndromes: an important cause of new systolic murmur and cardiogenic shock Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:901-906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

245. Kimball BP, Bui S, Wigle ED. Acute dose-response effects of intravenous disopyramide in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Am Heart J 1993;125:1691-1697.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

246. Pollick C, Kimball B, Henderson M, et al. Disopyramide in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, I: hemodynamic assessment after intravenous administration Am J Cardiol 1988;62:1248-1251.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

247. Pollick C. Disopyramide in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, II: noninvasive assessment after oral administration Am J Cardiol 1988;62:1252-1255.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

248. Sherrid M, Delia E, Dwyer E. Oral disopyramide therapy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1988;62:1085-1088.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

249. Braunwald E, Bloodwell RD, Goldberg LI, et al. Studies on digitalis, IV: observation in man on the effects of digitalis preparations on the contractility of the non-failing heart and on total vascular resistance J Clin Invest 1961;40:52-59.[Web of Science][Medline]

250. Braunwald E, Brockenbrough EC, Frye RL. Studies on digitalis, V: comparison of the effects of ouabain on left ventricular dynamics in valvular aortic stenosis and hypertrophic subaortic stenosis Circulation 1962;26:166-173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

251. Sonnenblick EH, Williams Jr JF, Glick G, et al. Studies on digitalis, XV: effects of cardiac glycosides on myocardial force-velocity relations in the nonfailing human heart Circulation 1966;34:532-539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

252. Bergfeldt L, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Dahlqvist R. Comparative class 1 electrophysiologic and anticholinergic effects of disopyramide and its main metabolite (mono-N-dealkylated disopyramide) in healthy humans Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1992;6:529-537.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

253. Birkhead JS, Vaughan Williams EM. Dual effect of disopyramide on atrial and atrioventricular conduction and refractory periods Br Heart J 1977;39:657-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

254. Jensen G, Uhrenholt A. Circulatory effects of intravenous disopyramide in heart failure J Int Med Res 1976;4:42-45.[Medline]

255. Lara M, Oakley GD, Rowbotham D. Potentially dangerous effect of disopyramide on atrioventricular conduction in a patient on digitalis Br Med J 1980;281:198.[Free Full Text]

256. Morady F, Scheinman MM, Desai J. Disopyramide Ann Intern Med 1982;96:337-343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

257. Robertson CE, Miller HC. Extreme tachycardia complicating the use of disopyramide in atrial flutter Br Heart J 1980;44:602-603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

258. Krasnow N, Rolett E, Hood WBJ, et al. Reversible obstruction of the ventricular outflow tract Am J Cardiol 1963;11:1-7.[CrossRef][Medline]

259. Pierce GE, Morrow AG, Braunwald E. Idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis, 3: intraoperative studies of the mechanism of obstruction and its hemodynamic consequences Circulation 1964;30(suppl 4):152.[Medline]

260. Whalen RE, Cohen AI, Sumner RG, et al. Demonstration of the dynamic nature of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis Am J Cardiol 1963;11:8-17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

261. Sherrid MV, Pearle G, Gunsburg DZ. Mechanism of benefit of negative inotropes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1998;97:41-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

262. Alvares RF, Goodwin JF. Non-invasive assessment of diastolic function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy on and off beta adrenergic blocking drugs Br Heart J 1982;48:204-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

263. Bourmayan C, Razavi A, Fournier C, et al. Effect of propranolol on left ventricular relaxation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an echographic study Am Heart J 1985;109:1311-1316.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

264. Gilligan DM, Chan WL, Joshi J, et al. A double-blind, placebocontrolled crossover trial of nadolol and verapamil in mild and moderately symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1672-1679.[Abstract]

265. Bonow RO, Frederick TM, Bacharach SL, et al. Atrial systole and left ventricular filling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: effect of verapamil Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1386-1391.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

266. Bonow RO, Ostrow HG, Rosing DR, et al. Effects of verapamil on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: pressure-volume analysis with a nonimaging scintillation probe Circulation 1983;68:1062-1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

267. Bonow RO, Vitale DF, Maron BJ, et al. Regional left ventricular asynchrony and impaired global left ventricular filling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: effect of verapamil J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:1108-1116.[Abstract]

268. Kass DA, Wolff MR, Ting CT, et al. Diastolic compliance of hypertrophied ventricle is not acutely altered by pharmacologic agents influencing active processes Ann Intern Med 1993;119:466-473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

269. Betocchi S, Piscione F, Losi MA, et al. Effects of diltiazem on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1996;78:451-457.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

270. Sugihara H, Taniguchi Y, Ito K, et al. Effects of diltiazem on myocardial perfusion abnormalities during exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Ann Nucl Med 1998;12:349-354.[Medline]

271. Pollick C. Muscular subaortic stenosis: hemodynamic and clinical improvement after disopyramide N Engl J Med. 1982;307:997-999.[Web of Science][Medline]

272. van der Lee C, Scholzel B, ten Berg JM, et al. Usefulness of clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural characteristics to predict outcome after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1315-1320.[CrossRef][Medline]

273. Firoozi S, Elliott PM, Sharma S, et al. Septal myotomy-myectomy and transcoronary septal alcohol ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a comparison of clinical, haemodynamic and exercise outcomes Eur Heart J 2002;23:1617-1624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

274. Ralph-Edwards A, Woo A, McCrindle BW, et al. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: comparison of outcomes after myectomy or alcohol ablation adjusted by propensity score J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:351-358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

275. Smedira NG, Lytle BW, Lever HM, et al. Current effectiveness and risks of isolated septal myectomy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:127-133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

276. Theodoro DA, Danielson GK, Feldt RH, et al. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in pediatric patients: results of surgical treatment J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1589-1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

277. Gietzen FH, Leuner CJ, Obergassel L, et al. Transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: feasibility, clinical benefit, and short term results in elderly patients Heart 2004;90:638-644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

278. Kuhn H, Lawrenz T, Lieder F, et al. Survival after transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (TASH): a 10 year experience Clin Res Cardiol 2008;97:234-243.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

279. Kwon DH, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, et al. Long-term outcomes in high-risk symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing alcohol septal ablation J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:432-438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

280. Nagueh SF, Ommen SR, Lakkis NM, et al. Comparison of ethanol septal reduction therapy with surgical myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1701-1706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

281. Qin JX, Shiota T, Lever HM, et al. Outcome of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation and septal myectomy surgery J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1994-2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

282. Sigwart U. Non-surgical myocardial reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Lancet 1995;346:211-214.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

283. Maron BJ, Nishimura RA, McKenna WJ, et al. Assessment of permanent dual-chamber pacing as a treatment for drug-refractory symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study (M-PATHY) Circulation 1999;99:2927-2933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

284. Nishimura RA, Trusty JM, Hayes DL, et al. Dual-chamber pacing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:435-441.[Abstract]

285. Balaram SK, Tyrie L, Sherrid MV, et al. Resection-plication-release for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clinical and echocardiographic follow-up Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1539-1544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

286. Austin BA, Kwon DH, Smedira NG, et al. Abnormally thickened papillary muscle resulting in dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction: an unusual presentation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:105-106.[Medline]

287. Klues HG, Proschan MA, Dollar AL, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of mitral valve size in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: anatomic validation from mitral valve specimen Circulation 1993;88:548-555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

288. Minakata K, Dearani JA, Nishimura RA, et al. Extended septal myectomy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with anomalous mitral papillary muscles or chordae J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:481-489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

289. Schoendube FA, Klues HG, Reith S, et al. Surgical correction of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with combined myectomy, mobilisation and partial excision of the papillary muscles Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:603-608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

290. Klues HG, Maron BJ, Dollar AL, et al. Diversity of structural mitral valve alterations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1992;85:1651-1660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

291. McCully RB, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ, et al. Extent of clinical improvement after surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 1996;94:467-471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

292. Erwin III JP, Nishimura RA, Lloyd MA, et al. Dual chamber pacing for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a clinical perspective in 2000 Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:173-180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

293. Gadler F, Linde C, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, et al. Long-term effects of dual chamber pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without outflow tract obstruction at rest Eur Heart J 1997;18:636-642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

294. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Squires RW, et al. Comparison of dualchamber pacing versus septal myectomy for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a comparison of objective hemodynamic and exercise end points J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:191-196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

295. Slade AK, Sadoul N, Shapiro L, et al. DDD pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multicentre clinical experience Heart 1996;75:44-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

296. Valeti US, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, et al. Comparison of surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:350-357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

297. Maron BJ, Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, et al. Myths about surgical myectomy: rumors of its death have been greatly exaggerated Am J Cardiol 2008;101:887-889.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

298. Faber L, Seggewiss H, Gietzen FH, et al. Catheter-based septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: follow-up results of the TASH-registry of the German Cardiac Society Z Kardiol 2005;94:516-523.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

299. Fernandes VL, Nagueh SF, Wang W, et al. A prospective follow-up of alcohol septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: the Baylor experience (1996-2002) Clin Cardiol 2005;28:124-130.[Web of Science][Medline]

300. Lakkis NM, Nagueh SF, Dunn JK, et al. Nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: one-year follow-up J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:852-855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

301. Chang SM, Nagueh SF, Spencer III WH, et al. Complete heart block: determinants and clinical impact in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing nonsurgical septal reduction therapy J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:296-300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

302. Qin JX, Shiota T, Lever HM, et al. Conduction system abnormalities in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy following septal reduction interventions Am J Cardiol 2004;93:171-175.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

303. Talreja DR, Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, et al. Alcohol septal ablation versus surgical septal myectomy: comparison of effects on atrioventricular conduction tissue J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2329-2332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

304. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease Circulation 2008;118:e523-e661.[Free Full Text]

305. Cohn LH, Trehan H, Collins Jr JJ. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing myotomy/myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1992;70:657-660.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

306. Kirklin JW, Ellis Jr FH. Surgical relief of diffuse subvalvular aortic stenosis Circulation 1961;24:739-742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

307. McIntosh CL, Maron BJ. Current operative treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1988;78:487-495.[Free Full Text]

308. Mohr R, Schaff HV, Puga FJ, et al. Results of operation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in children and adults less than 40 years of age Circulation 1989;80:I191-I196.[Medline]

309. Morrow AG, Brockenbrough EC. Surgical treatment of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis: technic and hemodynamic results of subaortic ventriculomyotomy Ann Surg 1961;154:181-189.[Web of Science][Medline]

310. Robbins RC, Stinson EB. Long-term results of left ventricular myotomy and myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:586-594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

311. Schulte HD, Borisov K, Gams E, et al. Management of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: long-term results after surgical therapy Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;47:213-218.[Web of Science][Medline]

312. Williams WG, Wigle ED, Rakowski H, et al. Results of surgery for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 1987:V104-V108.

313. Williams WG, Rebeyka IM. Surgical intervention and support for cardiomyopathies of childhood Prog Pediatr Cardiol 1992;1:61-71.

314. Schoendube FA, Klues HG, Reith S, et al. Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up after surgical correction of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with extended myectomy and reconstruction of the subvalvular mitral apparatus. Circulation;92(suppl 9):II122-7.

315. Maron BJ, Dearani JA, Ommen SR, et al. The case for surgery in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2044-2053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

316. Bach DS, Siao D, Girard SE, et al. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:533-539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

317. Sherrid MV, Chaudhry FA, Swistel DG. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiography, pathophysiology, and the continuing evolution of surgery for obstruction Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:620-632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

318. Maron BJ, Harding AM, Spirito P, et al. Systolic anterior motion of the posterior mitral leaflet: a previously unrecognized cause of dynamic subaortic obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 1983;68:282-293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

319. Spirito P, Maron BJ, Rosing DR. Morphologic determinants of hemodynamic state after ventricular septal myotomy-myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy:Mmode and two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment Circulation 1984;70:984-995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

320. Nishimura RA, Holmes Jr DR. Clinical practice. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1320-1327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

321. McLeod CJ, Ommen SR, Ackerman MJ, et al. Surgical septal myectomy decreases the risk for appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 2007;28:2583-2588.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

322. Ten Cate FJ, Soliman OI, Michels M, et al. Long-term outcome of alcohol septal ablation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a word of caution Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:362-369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

323. ElBardissi AW, Dearani JA, Nishimura RA, et al. Septal myectomy after previous septal artery ablation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:1516-1522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

324. Klues HG, Roberts WC, Maron BJ. Anomalous insertion of papillary muscle directly into anterior mitral leaflet in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: significance in producing left ventricular outflow obstruction Circulation 1991;84:1188-1197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

325. Wan CK, Dearani JA, Sundt III TM, et al. What is the best surgical treatment for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and degenerative mitral regurgitation? Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:727-731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

326. Krajcer Z, Leachman RD, Cooley DA, et al. Mitral valve replacement and septal myomectomy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: ten-year follow-up in 80 patients Circulation 1988;78:I35-I43.[Medline]

327. McIntosh CL, Greenberg GJ, Maron BJ, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic results after mitral valve replacement in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:236-246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

328. Chen AA, Palacios IF, Mela T, et al. Acute predictors of subacute complete heart block after alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2006;97:264-269.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

329. Faber L, Welge D, Fassbender D, et al. Percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: managing the risk of procedure-related AV conduction disturbances Int J Cardiol 2007;119:163-167.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

330. Reinhard W, Ten Cate FJ, Scholten M, et al. Permanent pacing for complete atrioventricular block after nonsurgical (alcohol) septal reduction in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1064-1066.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

331. Faber L, Seggewiss H, Gleichmann U. Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: results with respect to intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography Circulation 1998;98:2415-2421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

332. Lakkis NM, Nagueh SF, Kleiman NS, et al. Echocardiography-guided ethanol septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 1998;98:1750-1755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

333. Faber L, Seggewiss H, Ziemssen P, et al. Intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography as a routine procedure in percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation: detection of threatening myocardial necrosis distant from the septal target area Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;47:462-466.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

334. Holmes Jr DR, Valeti US, Nishimura RA. Alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: indications and technique Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:375-389.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

335. Veselka J, Zemanek D, Tomasov P, et al. Alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: ultra-low dose of alcohol (1 ml) is still effective Heart Vessels 2009;24:27-31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

336. Seggewiss H. Current status of alcohol septal ablation for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Curr Cardiol Rep 2001;3:160-166.[Medline]

337. Veselka J, Duchonova R, Palenickova J, et al. Age-related hemodynamic and morphologic differences in patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circ J 2006;70:880-884.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

338. Baggish AL, Smith RN, Palacios I, et al. Pathological effects of alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Heart 2006;92:1773-1778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

339. Flores-Ramirez R, Lakkis NM, Middleton KJ, et al. Echocardiographic insights into the mechanisms of relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:208-214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

340. Kuhn H, Gietzen FH, Schafers M, et al. Changes in the left ventricular outflow tract after transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH) for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy as assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography and by measuring myocardial glucose utilization and perfusion Eur Heart J 1999;20:1808-1817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

341. Park TH, Lakkis NM, Middleton KJ, et al. Acute effect of nonsurgical septal reduction therapy on regional left ventricular asynchrony in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 2002;106:412-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

342. Lakkis N. New treatment methods for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15:172-177.[CrossRef][Medline]

343. Mazur W, Nagueh SF, Lakkis NM, et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 2001;103:1492-1496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

344. van Dockum WG, Beek AM, Ten Cate FJ, et al. Early onset and progression of left ventricular remodeling after alcohol septal ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 2005;111:2503-2508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

345. Sorajja P, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, et al. Effect of septal ablation on myocardial relaxation and left atrial pressure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy an invasive hemodynamic study J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:552-560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

346. Gietzen FH, Leuner CJ, Obergassel L, et al. Role of transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, and outflow obstruction only under provocable conditions Circulation 2002;106:454-459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

347. Lakkis N, Plana JC, Nagueh S, et al. Efficacy of nonsurgical septal reduction therapy in symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and provocable gradients Am J Cardiol 2001;88:583-586.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

348. Faber L, Meissner A, Ziemssen P, et al. Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: long term follow up of the first series of 25 patients Heart 2000;83:326-331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

349. Gietzen FH, Leuner CJ, Raute-Kreinsen U, et al. Acute and long-term results after transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH): catheter interventional treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 1999;20:1342-1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

350. Kim JJ, Lee CW, Park SW, et al. Improvement in exercise capacity and exercise blood pressure response after transcoronary alcohol ablation therapy of septal hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1220-1223.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

351. Serber ER, Sears SF, Nielsen CD, et al. Depression, anxiety, and quality of life in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy three months after alcohol septal ablation Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1592-1597.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

352. Leonardi RA, Kransdorf EP, Simel DL, et al. Meta-analyses of septal reduction therapies for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparative rates of overall mortality and sudden cardiac death after treatment Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:97-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

353. Alam M, Dokainish H, Lakkis NM. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy- alcohol septal ablation vs. myectomy: a meta-analysis Eur Heart J 2009;30:1080-1087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

354. Olivotto I, Ommen SR, Maron MS, et al. Surgical myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: will there ever be a randomized trial? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:831-834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

355. Nishimura RA, Ommen SR. Septal reduction therapy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden death: what statistics cannot tell you Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:91-93.[Free Full Text]

356. van Dockum WG, Ten Cate FJ, ten Berg JM, et al. Myocardial infarction after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: evaluation by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:27-34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

357. Boltwood Jr CM, Chien W, Ports T. Ventricular tachycardia complicating alcohol septal ablation N Engl J Med 2004;351:1914-1915.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

358. Hori Y, Ueda M, Nakayama T, et al. Occurrence of de novo sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia induced after percutaneous transluminal alcohol septal myocardial ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Int J Cardiol 2007;119:403-407.[CrossRef][Medline]

359. Kazmierczak J, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Kisly M, et al. Electrocardiographic changes after alcohol septal ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Heart 1998;80:257-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

360. Lawrenz T, Obergassel L, Lieder F, et al. Transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy does not alter ICD intervention rates in high risk patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:295-300.[CrossRef][Medline]

361. McGregor JB, Rahman A, Rosanio S, et al. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: a late complication of percutaneous alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Med Sci 2004;328:185-188.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

362. Noseworthy PA, Rosenberg MA, Fifer MA, et al. Ventricular arrhythmia following alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2009;104:128-132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

363. Simon RD, Crawford III FA, Spencer III WH, et al. Sustained ventricular tachycardia following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:1354-1356.[CrossRef][Medline]

364. Cuoco FA, Spencer III WH, Fernandes VL, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for primary prevention of sudden death after alcohol septal ablation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1718-1723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

365. Agarwal S, Tuzcu EM, Desai MY, et al. Updated meta-analysis of septal alcohol ablation versus myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:823-834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

366. Gadler F, Linde C, Daubert C, et al. Significant improvement of quality of life following atrioventricular synchronous pacing in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: data from 1 year of follow-up Eur Heart J 1999;20:1044-1050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

367. Kappenberger L, Linde C, Daubert C, et al. Pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a randomized crossover study Eur Heart J 1997;18:1249-1256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

368. Fananapazir L, Cannon III RO, Tripodi D, et al. Impact of dual-chamber permanent pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with symptoms refractory to verapamil and beta-adrenergic blocker therapy Circulation 1992;85:2149-2161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

369. Fananapazir L, Epstein ND, Curiel RV, et al. Long-term results of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: evidence for progressive symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement and reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy Circulation 1994;90:2731-2742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

370. Jeanrenaud X, Goy JJ, Kappenberger L. Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Lancet 1992;339:1318-1323.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

371. McDonald K, McWilliams E, O'Keeffe B, et al. Functional assessment of patients treated with permanent dual chamber pacing as a primary treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 1988;9:893-898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

372. Linde C, Gadler F, Kappenberger L, Ryde'n L, PIC Study Group Placebo effect of pacemaker implantation in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1999;83:903-907.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

373. Binder J, Ommen SR, Sorajja P, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic variables fail to predict response to dual-chamber pacing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:796-800.[CrossRef][Medline]

374. Cannon III RO, Tripodi D, Dilsizian V, et al. Results of permanent dual-chamber pacing in symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1994;73:571-576.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

375. Nishimura RA, Hayes DL, Ilstrup DM, et al. Effect of dual-chamber pacing on systolic and diastolic function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: acute Doppler echocardiographic and catheterization hemodynamic study J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:421-430.[Abstract]

376. Gadler F, Linde C, Juhlin-Dannfeldt A, et al. Influence of right ventricular pacing site on left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1219-1224.[Abstract]

377. Maron BJ, Maron MS, Lesser JR, et al. Sudden cardiac arrest in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the absence of conventional criteria for high risk status Am J Cardiol 2008;101:544-547.[Web of Science][Medline]

378. Maron BJ, Spirito P. Implications of left ventricular remodeling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1998;81:1339-1344.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

379. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 focused update incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:e1-e90.[Free Full Text]

380. Deleted in proof.

381. Biagini E, Spirito P, Leone O, et al. Heart transplantation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2008;101:387-392.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

382. Gajarski R, Naftel DC, Pahl E, et al. Outcomes of pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy listed for transplant J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:1329-1334.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

383. Towbin JA. Cardiomyopathy and heart transplantation in children Curr Opin Cardiol 2002;17:274-279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

384. Maron MS, Kalsmith BM, Udelson JE, et al. Survival after cardiac transplantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:574-579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

385. Mehra MR, Jessup M, Gronda E, et al. Rationale and process: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates-2006 J Heart Lung Transplant 2006;25:1001-1002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

386. Maron BJ. Risk stratification and role of implantable defibrillators for prevention of sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circ J 2010;74:2271-2282.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

387. Cecchi F, Maron BJ, Epstein SE. Long-term outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:1283-1288.[Abstract]

388. Elliott PM, Sharma S, Varnava A, et al. Survival after cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1596-1601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

389. Fananapazir L, Chang AC, Epstein SE, et al. Prognostic determinants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: prospective evaluation of a therapeutic strategy based on clinical, Holter, hemodynamic, and electrophysiological findings Circulation 1992;86:730-740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

390. Maki S, Ikeda H, Muro A, et al. Predictors of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1998;82:774-778.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

391. McKenna W, Deanfield J, Faruqui A, et al. Prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: role of age and clinical, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic features Am J Cardiol 1981;47:532-538.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

392. Spirito P, Autore C, Rapezzi C, et al. Syncope and risk of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2009;119:1703-1710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

393. Maron BJ, Haas TS, Shannon KM, et al. Long-term survival after cardiac arrest in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart Rhythm 2009;6:993-997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

394. Bos JM, Maron BJ, Ackerman MJ, et al. Role of family history of sudden death in risk stratification and prevention of sudden death with implantable defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2010;106:1481-1486.[CrossRef][Medline]

395. Adabag AS, Casey SA, Kuskowski MA, et al. Spectrum and prognostic significance of arrhythmias on ambulatory Holter electrocardiogram in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:697-704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

396. Cecchi F, Olivotto I, Montereggi A, et al. Prognostic value of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and the potential role of amiodarone treatment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: assessment in an unselected non-referral based patient population Heart 1998;79:331-336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

397. Spirito P, Rapezzi C, Autore C, et al. Prognosis of asymptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia Circulation 1994;90:2743-2747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

398. Gimeno JR, Tome-Esteban M, Lofiego C, et al. Exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias and risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 2009;30:2599-2605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

399. Olivotto I, Gistri R, Petrone P, et al. Maximum left ventricular thickness and risk of sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:315-321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

400. Sorajja P, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, et al. Use of echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clinical implications of massive hypertrophy J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:788-795.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

401. Kizilbash AM, Heinle SK, Grayburn PA. Spontaneous variability of left ventricular outflow tract gradient in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 1998;97:461-466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

402. Anan R, Greve G, Thierfelder L, et al. Prognostic implications of novel beta cardiac myosin heavy chain gene mutations that cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Clin Invest 1994;93:280-285.[Web of Science][Medline]

403. Marian AJ, Roberts R. Molecular genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: genetic markers for sudden cardiac death J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:88-99.[Web of Science][Medline]

404. Semsarian C, Yu B, Ryce C, et al. Sudden cardiac death in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: are "benign" mutations really benign? Pathology 1997;29:305-308.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

405. Ackerman MJ, VanDriest SL, Ommen SR, et al. Prevalence and agedependence of malignant mutations in the beta-myosin heavy chain and troponin T genes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a comprehensive outpatient perspective J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:2042-2048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

406. Van Driest SL, Maron BJ, Ackerman MJ. From malignant mutations to malignant domains: the continuing search for prognostic significance in the mutant genes causing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart 2004;90:7-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

407. McKenna WJ, Behr ER. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: management, risk stratification, and prevention of sudden death Heart 2002;87:169-176.[Free Full Text]

408. Lin G, Nishimura RA, Gersh BJ, et al. Device complications and inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart 2009;95:709-714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

409. Hauser RG, Maron BJ. Lessons from the failure and recall of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Circulation 2005;112:2040-2042.[Free Full Text]

410. Hauser RG, Maron BJ, Marine JE, et al. Safety and efficacy of transvenous high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in high-risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients Heart Rhythm 2008;5:1517-1522.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

411. Hauser RG, Maisel WH, Friedman PA, et al. Longevity of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads and risk factors for failure: implications for patient management Circulation 2011;123:358-363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

412. Almquist AK, Montgomery JV, Haas TS, et al. Cardioverterdefibrillator implantation in high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart Rhythm 2005;2:814-819.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

413. Boriani G, Maron BJ, Shen WK, et al. Prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: but which defibrillator for which patient? Circulation 2004;110:e438-e442.[Free Full Text]

414. Kleemann T, Becker T, Doenges K, et al. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of _10 years Circulation 2007;115:2474-2480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

415. Maisel WH, Sweeney MO, Stevenson WG, et al. Recalls and safety alerts involving pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generators JAMA 2001;286:793-799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

416. Epstein AE, Dimarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:e1-e62.[Free Full Text]

417. Deisenhofer I, Kolb C, Ndrepepa G, et al. Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies?. A randomized, prospective study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:134-142.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

418. Theuns DA, Klootwijk AP, Goedhart DM, et al. Prevention of inappropriate therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a prospective, randomized study of tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2362-2367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

419. Dorian P, Philippon F, Thibault B, et al. Randomized controlled study of detection enhancements versus rate-only detection to prevent inappropriate therapy in a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Heart Rhythm 2004;1:540-547.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

420. Friedman PA, McClelland RL, Bamlet WR, et al. Dual-chamber versus single-chamber detection enhancements for implantable defibrillator rhythm diagnosis: the Detect Supraventricular Tachycardia Study Circulation 2006;113:2871-2879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

421. Rogers DP, Marazia S, Chow AW, et al. Effect of biventricular pacing on symptoms and cardiac remodelling in patients with end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur J Heart Fail 2008;10:507-513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

422. Maron BJ, Ackerman MJ, Nishimura RA, et al. Task Force 4: HCM and other cardiomyopathies, mitral valve prolapse, myocarditis, and Marfan syndrome J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1340-1345.[Free Full Text]

423. Pelliccia A, Fagard R, Bjornstad HH, et al. Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease: a consensus document from the Study Group of Sports Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology Eur Heart J 2005;26:1422-1445.[Free Full Text]

424. Maron BJ, Epstein SE, Roberts WC. Causes of sudden death in competitive athletes J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:204-214.[Abstract]

425. Maron BJ, Carney KP, Lever HM, et al. Relationship of race to sudden cardiac death in competitive athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:974-980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

426. Corrado D, Basso C, Rizzoli G, et al. Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1959-1963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

427. Maron BJ, Shirani J, Poliac LC, et al. Sudden death in young competitive athletes: clinical, demographic, and pathological profiles JAMA 1996;276:199-204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

428. Deleted in proof.

429. Pelliccia A, Zipes DP, Maron BJ. Bethesda Conference #36 and the European Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations revisited: a comparison of U.S. and European criteria for eligibility and disqualification of competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1990-1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

430. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:101-198.[Web of Science]

431. Maron BJ, Olivotto I, Bellone P, et al. Clinical profile of stroke in 900 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:301-307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

432. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz, MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139-1151.[CrossRef][Medline]

433. Tendera M, Wycisk A, Schneeweiss A, et al. Effect of sotalol on arrhythmias and exercise tolerance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Cardiology 1993;82:335-342.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

434. Callans DJ. Ablation of atrial fibrillation in the setting of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:1015-1016.[CrossRef][Medline]

435. Di Donna P, Olivotto I, Delcre SD, et al. Efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: impact of age, atrial remodelling, and disease progression Europace 2010;12:347-355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

436. Losi MA, Betocchi S, Aversa M, et al. Determinants of atrial fibrillation development in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2004;94:895-900.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

437. Doi Y, Kitaoka H. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the elderly: significance of atrial fibrillation J Cardiol 2001;37(Suppl 1):133-138.[Medline]

438. Maisel WH. Left atrial appendage occlusion: closure or just the beginning? N Engl J Med 2009;360:2601-2603.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

439. Harris L, McKenna WJ, Rowland E, et al. Side effects of long-term amiodarone therapy Circulation 1983;67:45-51.[Free Full Text]

440. McKenna WJ, Harris L, Rowland E, et al. Amiodarone for long-term management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 1984;54:802-810.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

441. McKenna WJ, Harris L, Mulrow JP, et al. Amiodarone dose titration: a method to minimise side effects during long term therapy Br J Clin Pract Suppl 1986;44:121-131.[Medline]

442. Robinson K, Frenneaux MP, Stockins B, et al. Atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a longitudinal study J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1279-1285.[Abstract]

443. Matsubara H, Nakatani S, Nagata S, et al. Salutary effect of disopyramide on left ventricular diastolic function in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:768-775.[Abstract]

444. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial N Engl J Med 1991;324:781-788.[Web of Science][Medline]

445. Liu X, Ouyang F, Mavrakis H, et al. Complete pulmonary vein isolation guided by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Europace 2005;7:421-427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

446. Chen MS, McCarthy PM, Lever HM, et al. Effectiveness of atrial fibrillation surgery in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Am J Cardiol 2004;93:373-375.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

447. Bascou V, Ferrandis J, Bauer V, et al. Obstructive myocardiopathy and pregnancy J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1993;22:309-311.[Medline]

448. Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Byrne L, Gerhardt CA, et al. Parental knowledge and attitudes toward hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genetic testing Pediatr Cardiol 2010;31:195-202.[CrossRef][Medline]

449. Autore C, Conte MR, Piccininno M, et al. Risk associated with pregnancy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1864-1869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

450. U.S. Department of Transportation Motor Carrier Safety Administration Cardiovascular Advisory Panel Guidelines for the Medical Examination of Commercial Motor Vehicle Drivers http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/documents/cardio.pdf 2002Accessed May 6, 2011.

451. U.S. Department of Transportation Motor Carrier Safety Administration Commercial Driver's License Standards; Requirements and Penalties, $383.5. Definitions http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rulesregulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.aspx?reg=383.5 2002Accessed May 6, 2011.

452. Maron BJ, Barry JA, Poole RS. Pilots, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and issues of aviation and public safety Am J Cardiol 2004;93:441-444.[CrossRef][Medline]

453. Force T, Bonow RO, Houser SR, et al. Research priorities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: report of a Working Group of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Circulation 2010;122:1130-1133.[Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				New Guidelines for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Journal Watch Cardiology, January 25, 2012; 2012(125): 1 - 1. [Full Text]

This Article Figures Only Full Text (PDF) View Data Supplements View Slide Set Executive Summary View Pocket Guide All Versions of this Article: j.jacc.2011.06.011v1 58/25/e212    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Gersh, B. J. Articles by Yancy, C. W. PubMed Articles by Gersh, B. J. Articles by Yancy, C. W.