|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:291-295, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.097
(Published online 6 July 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Gleneagles Medical Center, Singapore
|| University and Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
# Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California.
Manuscript received November 7, 2006; revised manuscript received January 19, 2007, accepted January 22, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Eric J. Topol, Director, Scripps Translational Science Institute, Chief Academic Officer, Scripps Health, Professor of Translational Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps Clinic, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, 10666 North Torey Pines Road, Mail Drop SW206, La Jolla, California 92037. (Email: etopol{at}scripps.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: There are conflicting data regarding whether statins predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 reduce the metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite and diminish its clinical efficacy.
Methods: The CHARISMA trial was a randomized trial comparing long-term 75 mg/day clopidogrel versus placebo in patients with cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors on aspirin. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death at median follow-up of 28 months. We performed a secondary analysis evaluating the interaction of clopidogrel versus placebo with statin administration, categorizing baseline statin use to those predominantly CYP3A4 metabolized (atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin; CYP3A4-MET) or others (pravastatin, fluvastatin; nonCYP3A4-MET).
Results: Of 15,603 patients enrolled, 10,078 received a statin at baseline (8,245 CYP3A4-MET, 1,748 nonCYP3A4-MET) and 5,496 did not. For the overall population, the primary end point was 6.8% with clopidogrel and 7.3% with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; p = 0.22). This was similar among patients on CYP3A4-MET (5.9% clopidogrel, 6.6% placebo, HR 0.89; p = 0.18) or nonCYP3A4-MET statin (5.7% clopidogrel, 7.2% placebo, HR 0.78; p = 0.19). There was no interaction between statin types and randomized treatment (p = 0.69). Patients on atorvastatin (n = 4,127) (5.7% clopidogrel, 7.1% placebo, HR 0.80; p = 0.06) or pravastatin (n = 1,440) (5.1% clopidogrel, 7.0% placebo, HR 0.72; p = 0.13) had similar event rates.
Conclusions: Despite theoretic concerns and ex vivo testing suggesting a potential negative interaction with concomitant clopidogrel and CYP3A4-MET statin administration, there was no evidence of an interaction clinically in a large placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up.
| |||||||
The CHARISMA (Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance) study (15) inclusive of 15,603 high-risk patients provided an opportunity to more definitively evaluate the clinical impact of concomitant clopidogrel and statin therapy. We therefore performed a secondary analysis of CHARISMA, stratifying patients into statins administered according to CYP3A4 metabolism.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
45 years with either multiple atherothrombotic risk factors or documented coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Patients were excluded if they were judged to have established indications for clopidogrel therapy (e.g., acute coronary syndrome, stent implantation). The follow-up was at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until the end of the trial. The primary efficacy end point was the first occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular death with the median of 28 months follow-up. The primary safety end point was major bleeding according to the GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries) definition (16), which includes fatal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage or bleeding that caused hemodynamic compromise requiring blood or fluid replacement, inotropic support, or surgical intervention. We performed a secondary analysis of the CHARISMA trial, evaluating the differential treatment effect (interaction) of clopidogrel versus placebo according to the type of statin administration. Statin administration was nonrandomized and directed by the treating physicians. We divided patients into 2 major groups according to baseline statin administration: 1) those receiving statins that are predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 (atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin; CYP3A4-MET); and 2) those on statins that are not predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 (pravastatin, fluvastatin; nonCYP3A4-MET). Additionally, clinical outcomes were evaluated separately in patients receiving atorvastatin or pravastatin. We compared the relative efficacy of clopidogrel versus placebo on the primary efficacy and safety end points according to the type of statin administered. The analyses were performed on the entire cohort of the CHARISMA trial patients as well as the subgroup of patients with established cardiovascular disease.
Statistics. All data analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat population. Hypothesis tests were done using 2-sided tests at the 5% significance level. Baseline characteristics were compared with chi-square tests for discrete and continuous variables. The primary efficacy of clopidogrel versus placebo was assessed with the log rank test. Statistical comparisons of the primary safety end point in the 2 treatment groups were performed with Pearson chi-square test. The treatment effect, measured by the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), was estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model for the primary efficacy end point and by odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI from logistic regression model for the primary safety end point. Interactions were tested in a Cox proportional hazards model, incorporating terms for randomized treatment, statin, and the treatment-by-statin interaction, to assess if treatment effect differed for CYP3A4-MET versus nonCYP3A4-MET and atorvastatin versus pravastatin. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Bleeding complications. There was no difference in the primary safety end point of major bleeding between the groups: all patients (clopidogrel 1.6%, placebo 1.3%, OR 1.24; p = 0.11), no statin (clopidogrel 2.1%, placebo 1.7%, OR 1.29; p = 0.20), any statin (clopidogrel 1.4%, placebo 1.2%, OR 1.19; p = 0.33), CYP3A4-MET (clopidogrel 1.4%, placebo 1.2%, OR 1.19; p = 0.39), nonCYP3A4-MET (clopidogrel 1.3%, placebo 1.2%, OR 1.14; p = 0.76), atorvastatin (clopidogrel 1.2%, placebo 1.3%, OR 0.87; p = 0.61), and pravastatin (clopidogrel 1.3%, placebo 1.3%, OR 1.04; p = 0.93).
Patients with established cardiovascular disease. There were 12,153 patients with established cardiovascular disease in the overall CHARISMA study. In this symptomatic subgroup, there was a marginally significant reduction in the primary end point with clopidogrel (6.9%) versus placebo (7.9%; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.998; p = 0.046). Given that this prespecified cohort of patients had differential effects with clopidogrel from the asymptomatic CHARISMA population (p = 0.045 for interaction in the main CHARISMA manuscript), separate interaction analyses were performed. In the symptomatic subgroup, the interaction of the type of statin used (CYP3A4-MET or nonCYP3A4-MET) and the randomized treatment (clopidogrel vs. placebo) remained insignificant (p = 0.18). Likewise, the interaction of atorvastatin versus pravastatin and randomized treatment was not significant (p = 0.25).
Statins versus no statins. The use of any statins at randomization was associated with a lower primary end point for both patients randomized to clopidogrel (5.9% statins, 8.7% no statins; p < 0.001) and to placebo (6.7% statins, 8.5% no statins; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant interaction between the use of statins (vs. no statins) and randomized treatment (clopidogrel vs. placebo; p = 0.21).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clopidogrel is an inactive prodrug that is metabolized to its active form in the liver by the cytochrome P450 enzyme, primarily by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. Other isoenzymes involved to lesser degrees include CYP3A5, CYP2B6, and CYP1A2 (1). Several statins are also metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4 for elimination. Although 2 ex vivo studies showed that atorvastatin inhibited clopidogrel's antiplatelet activity (3,5), both of those studies did not use the gold-standard light transmission aggregometry. In the study by Lau et al. (3), platelet aggregation was assessed by the bedside Plateletworks test, which indirectly measures platelet aggregation using a cell counter to measure objects exceeding the threshold platelet size. Likewise, Neubauer et al. (5) used flow cytometry to evaluate ADP-stimulated expression of P-selectin as a marker of platelet activation, without correlating to light transmission aggregometry.
In fact, all ex vivo studies using light transmission aggregometry have contradicted the clopidogrel and statin interaction (4,611). For instance, in the INTERACTION (Interaction of Atorvastatin and Clopidogrel) study, Serebruany et al. (8) prospectively assessed platelet function in 75 patients undergoing coronary stenting (pretreated with 325 mg/day aspirin and 300 mg loading clopidogrel) who had been taking atorvastatin, other statins, or no statins for at least 30 days. They found similar platelet inhibition at 4 h and at 24 h, assessed by light transmission aggregometry and flow cytometry (e.g., PECAM-1, P-selectin, CD40 ligand), irrespective of atorvastatin or other statin administration. In the study by Mitsios et al. (7), patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 30) were administered 375 mg loading clopidogrel (followed by 75 mg/day) and randomized to 10 mg atorvastatin or 40 mg pravastatin. Neither statin adversely affected clopidogrel's platelet inhibition when assessed with light transmission aggregometry and flow cytometry expressions of P-selectin and CD40 ligand. Furthermore, in the largest relevant laboratory study to date (539 of 1,001 patients undergoing catheterization were on statins), Hochholzer et al. (10) found that the use of CYP3A4-MET statins did not adversely affect platelet aggregation with clopidogrel as assessed by light transmission aggregometry and flow cytometry surface expressions of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa. Of note, these studies were performed during the acute loading phase of clopidogrel administration, where steady state may not have been achieved in all patients, given the individual variability of response to clopidogrel. However, in the study by Vinholt et al. (9), in which patients with stable ischemic heart disease (n = 66) had been on 75 mg/day clopidogrel for at least 10 weeks, there also was no adverse laboratory interaction with statins (irrespective of CYP3A4 metabolism) when assessed with light transmission aggregometry.
Whether this controversial laboratory interaction translates to adverse clinical events had been previously evaluated in several studies. In a post hoc analysis of the CREDO (Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation) study (n = 2,116), we showed no statistical interaction in the 28-day or 1-year composite death, MI, and stroke event rates with coadministration of clopidogrel and a CYP3A4-MET statin in patients who underwent coronary stenting (12). Wienbergen et al. (13) analyzed the MITRA-PLUS (Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction Plus) registry of acute coronary syndrome patients on clopidogrel (n = 2,086), segregating patients into those receiving atorvastatin versus other statins (including both CYP3A4-MET and nonCYP3A4-MET statins). They found no difference in mortality or stroke events between the 2 groups at a median follow-up of 14 months. In a single-center experience, Mukherjee et al. (14) also evaluated acute coronary syndrome patients (n = 1,691) on clopidogrel and found no difference in major adverse cardiac events at 6 months when they stratified patients according to the use of CYP3A4-MET statin. In contrast, in the observational study of the Quebec universal insurance database by Brophy et al. (17) of 2,927 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions and received clopidogrel, those who were prescribed atorvastatin had worse 30-day outcomes than control subjects. However, there was no dose-dependent relationship with atorvastatin administration, and patients who were prescribed atorvastatin were likely a higher-risk cohort, thus introducing bias into the analysis (18).
The present study confirms the results of the 3 previous post hoc analyses showing lack of clinical interaction between clopidogrel and statins, extending the findings out beyond 2 years of concomitant therapy. The other major strength of the present study is the large patient population of the CHARISMA study. Excluding the MITRA-PLUS registry (which did not stratify patients according to CYP3A4 metabolism), we now have 3 studies concluding that the treatment benefit of clopidogrel is similar in patients on concomitant CYP3A4-MET statin or nonCYP3A4-MET statin. Furthermore, the present study suggests that this high-risk patient cohort benefited from statin administration, with lower clinical event-rates compared with those not on statins.
Study limitations. The major limitations of the present study include its retrospective post hoc design, which precludes definitive conclusions. The choice of statin administered was at the discretion of treating physicians, and thus potential selection bias may exist. However, clopidogrel allocation was randomized and blinded; therefore, any bias introduced by statin choice should be well balanced between clopidogrel and control groups. We did not perform laboratory assessments of platelet aggregation or activation, and the dose of statins administered and compliance with statins were not known. Our analyses were based upon baseline statin use, which is subject to error if there were major changes in statin prescription. However, when we evaluated statin usage over the study time period, we found an overall absolute 6% increase in statin use that was spread evenly between the different types of statins. Furthermore, when we reanalyzed the data including only patients on the same statin throughout the study, the results and conclusions remained unchanged (data not shown).
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Ang, V. Palakodeti, A. Khalid, S. Tsimikas, Z. Idrees, P. Tran, P. Clopton, N. Zafar, G. Bromberg-Marin, S. Keramati, et al. Elevated Plasma Fibrinogen and Diabetes Mellitus Are Associated With Lower Inhibition of Platelet Reactivity With Clopidogrel J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1052 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bhindi, O. Ormerod, J. Newton, A.P. Banning, and L. Testa Interaction between statins and clopidogrel: is there anything clinically relevant? QJM, August 1, 2008; (2008) hcn089v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Geisler, C. Zurn, M. Paterok, K. Gohring-Frischholz, B. Bigalke, K. Stellos, P. Seizer, B. F. Kraemer, J. Dippon, A. E. May, et al. Statins do not adversely affect post-interventional residual platelet aggregation and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary stenting treated by dual antiplatelet therapy Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2008; 29(13): 1635 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Michelson P2Y12 Antagonism: Promises and Challenges Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): s33 - s38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al. Highlights of the year in JACC 2007. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Statin Clopidogrel Interactions: Are They Clinically Important? Journal Watch (General), September 6, 2007; 2007(906): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Angiolillo and F. Alfonso Clopidogrel Statin Interaction: Myth or Reality? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 24, 2007; 50(4): 296 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Fitzgerald and A. Maree Aspirin and Clopidogrel Resistance Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 114 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |