Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Figure 3 Indexes of LV Systolic Function in Age-Matched Sham and ACF Rats

Left ventricular (LV) function in ACF (open circles) at 12 h; 2 and 5 days; and 4, 8, and 15 weeks compared with age-matched shams (closed circles). Left ventricular end-systolic (LVES) pressure (A), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) (B), LV fractional shortening (FS) (C), LVES wall stress ({sigma}) (D), and LV velocity of circumferential shortening (VCFr) (E). Alternating black and white boxes each represent one 24-h period. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n values given in Table 1 except: 4-week sham LVESD, LV fractional shortening, and LV VCFr (n = 9); 8-week sham LVESD, LV fractional shortening, and LV VCFr (n = 8). *p < 0.008 (= 0.05/6) sham versus ACF at each of the 6 time points. Analyses for left ventricular end-systolic pressure (LVESP), LVESD, and LVVCFr were based on their ranks, whereas analyses for LV fractional shortening and LVES {sigma} were based on their natural logarithms.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement