Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Figure 1 LV Remodeling in Age-Matched Sham and ACF Rats

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling in aortocaval fistula (ACF) (open circles) at 12 h; 2 and 5 days; and 4, 8, and 15 weeks compared with age-matched shams (closed circles). Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (A), LVEDD/wall thickness (B), isolated cardiomyocyte length (C), left ventricular end-diastolic (LVED) wall thickness (D), and LV wet weight (E). Alternating black and white boxes each represent one 24-h period. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n values given in Tables 1 and 2 except: 4-week sham LVEDD, LVEDD/wall thickness, LVED wall thickness (n = 9); 4-week ACF echocardiographic parameters and LV wet weight (n = 9); 8-week sham echocardiographic parameters and LV wet weight (n = 8); 15-week sham LV wet weight (n = 12); and 15-week ACF LV wet weight (n = 9). *p < 0.008 (= 0.05/6) for sham versus ACF at each time of the 6 time points except for isolated cardiomyocyte length, where p < 0.01 (= 0.05/5) for each of the 5 time points. Analyses were based on ranks of all the variables in this figure.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement