EXPEDITED REVIEW: EXPEDITED REVIEW
Accuracy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography to Classify and Quantify Plaque Volumes in the Proximal Coronary System
A Comparative Study Using Intravascular Ultrasound
Alexander W. Leber, MD*, ,*,
Alexander Becker, MD*,
Andreas Knez, MD*,
Franz von Ziegler, MD*,
Marc Sirol, MD ,
Konstantin Nikolaou, MD ,
Bernd Ohnesorge, PhD ,
Zahi A. Fayad, PhD ,
Christoph R. Becker, MD ,
Maximilian Reiser, MD ,
Gerhard Steinbeck, MD* and
Peter Boekstegers, MD*
* Department of Cardiology
Institute for Diagnostic Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Siemens Medical Solutions CT-Division, Forchheim, Germany
Mount Sinai Medical Center New York, Imaging Science Laboratory, New York, New York
Manuscript received April 21, 2005;
revised manuscript received September 28, 2005,
accepted October 10, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Alexander W. Leber, University of Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Medizinische Klinik I, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany.
(Email: aleber{at}med.uni-muenchen.de).
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the accuracy of a new 64-slice computed tomography (CT) scanner, compared with intravascular ultrasound, to visualize atherosclerosis in the proximal coronary system.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive determination of plaque composition and plaque burden may be important to improve risk stratification.
METHODS: In 20 patients, a 64-slice CT scan (Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) and an intravascular ultrasound investigation of vessels without stenosis >50% was performed. Diagnostic image quality with 64-slice CT was obtained in 36 vessels in 19 patients.
RESULTS: In these vessels, which were divided in 3-mm sections, 64-slice CT enabled a correct detection of plaque in 54 of 65 (83%) sections containing noncalcified plaques, 50 of 53 (94%) sections containing mixed plaques, and 41 of 43 (95%) sections containing calcified plaques. In 192 of 204 (94%) sections, atherosclerotic lesions were excluded correctly. In addition, 64-slice CT enabled the visualization of 7 of 10 (70%) sections revealing a lipid pool and could identify a spotty calcification pattern in 27 of 30 (90%) sections. The correlation coefficient to determine plaque volumes per vessel was r2 = 0.69 (p < 0.001) with an underestimation of mixed and noncalcified plaque volumes (p < 0.03) and a trend to overestimate calcified plaque volumes by 64-slice CT. The interobserver variability to determine plaque volumes was 37%. Interobserver agreement to identify atherosclerotic sections was good (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 64-slice CT reveals encouraging results to noninvasively detect different types of coronary plaques located in the proximal coronary system. The ability to determine plaque burden currently is hampered by mainly an insufficient reproducibility.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CT = computed tomography | | IVUS = intravascular ultrasound | | MDCT = multi-detector computer tomography |
|
Direct noninvasive determination of coronary atherosclerotic plaque morphology and plaque burden may have important value to improve risk stratification and to monitor the course of the disease. It has been established that evidence of coronary calcium, identified using computed tomography (CT), is an indicator for coronary artery disease and that the quantity of calcification is a strong predictor for coronary events (1,2). In addition, it has been shown that serial calcium measurements can illustrate the effect of drug therapies (3). However, there is striking heterogeneity among human atherosclerotic lesions, and coronary plaques often consist of noncalcified tissue. Thus, even in coronary vessels without calcified plaques, severe atherosclerosis may be present. Hence, the visualization of both calcified and noncalcified plaques is desirable. Recently, the potential of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) (4- and 16-slice) has been demonstrated to allow the detection and classification of coronary plaques and to determine vessel remodeling (46). However, thus far, the ability of MDCT to identify important morphological features of atherosclerotic lesions, such as the presence of a lipid core or the calcification pattern (spotty vs. wide), as well as the potential to determine plaque volumes is unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of a new 64-slice MDCT scanner with improved spatial and temporal resolution to identify different types of coronary plaques and to determine plaque volumes in comparison to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Patients.
From August 2004 to February 2005, we performed a contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT investigation as part of a research protocol in 112 patients who were scheduled for coronary angiography because of suspected coronary artery disease and referral from an independent external cardiologist. In 20 of these patients (18 men, 2 women, 59 ± 9 years) IVUS was performed in one to three vessels as part of the invasive catheterization procedure to evaluate coronary vessels without angiographic evidence of a significant stenosis >50% diameter reduction. In 12 patients, no history of coronary artery disease was known. Eight patients had coronary artery disease with previous stent implantation. The MDCT was performed at least 1 day (range, 1 to 2 days) before coronary catheterization. In patients with heart rates >70 beats/min, 50 to 100 mg of metoprolol was administered orally 60 min before the CT scan. In the presence of contraindications for a beta-blocker or an unsatisfactory lowering of the heart rate, the scan was performed at even greater heart rates. Patients with atrial fibrillation, contraindications for the administration of contrast agent, or an unstable clinical condition were not enrolled. The institutional review board of the Medical University of Munich approved the research protocol, and all patients gave informed consent.
64-slice CT scanning technique.
The CT angiography was performed using a Sensation 64-slice CT scanner (Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). A bolus of 80 ml of contrast agent (Solutrast 300, 300 mgI/ml1, Altana, Konstanz, Germany) was injected intravenously (5 ml/s1). As soon as the signal in the ascending aorta reached a predefined threshold of 100 HU, the scan started automatically and the entire volume of the heart was acquired during one breath-hold in 8 to 9 s with simultaneous recording of the electrocardiogram (ECG)-trace. Detector collimation was 32 x 0.6 mm, gantry rotation speed was 330 ms per rotation, and tube voltage was 120 kV at a current of 550 to 750 mAs (depending on patient size) during 55% of the cardiac cycle (diastole) and a reduction of the current by 80% during the remaining time of the R-R interval. Per rotation, each detector is read out twice using a wobbling X-ray beam, resulting in 64 overlapping slices per rotation. This technology (z-sharp, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) allows one to generate slices with an overlap of 0.3 mm, resulting in a reconstructed slice thickness of approximately 0.4 mm. A detailed description of the technology is given elsewhere (7). In heart rates <65 beats/min, a half scan algorithm was applied, and for heart rates >65 beats/min, a two-segment reconstruction-algorithm offering a maximal temporal resolution of 83 ms was used (7,8). Using retrospective ECG-gating, the optimal ECG-phase providing best image quality was chosen.
64-slice CT image analysis.
The display setting used for lumen and plaque quantification was empirically determined in a subset of six patients (recruited from the study population). In each patient, four different coronary sites that were easy to identify because of their location next to landmarks were selected. The image display setting at each site was then manipulated so that the MDCT image equaled the IVUS image in size (external elastic membrane area) and pattern and allowed exact separation between vessel, surrounding tissue, plaque, and lumen. The values for window width and window level of the respective section were recorded and were set in relation to the mean intensity within the lumen at the corresponding site. The results of this analysis revealed that the optimal setting to detect plaque and outer vessel boundaries is obtained on average at a width representing 155% (range, 395 to 809 Hounsfield units [HU]) of the mean intensity within the lumen and at a level representing 65% of the mean intensity (range, 165 to 339 HU). By keeping the window level (65% of mean intensity within the corresponding lumen) and reducing width to 1, lumen measurements provided optimal matching with IVUS. An independent investigator who was not involved in the later comparative analysis performed those initial measurements.
To allow comparison to IVUS, the coronary artery was divided in 3-mm sections, each section was classified according to the following criteria: Any structure with a density of 130 HU or more that: 1) could be visualized separately from the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen (either because it was "embedded" within noncalcified plaque or because its density was above the contrast-enhanced lumen); 2) could be assigned to the coronary artery wall; and 3) could be identified in at least two independent planes was defined as calcified atherosclerotic plaque (4). Structures clearly assignable to the vessel wall (in at least two views) with densities less than the lumen contrast were classified as noncalcified plaque components (5,9). Plaques in which >50% of the plaque area was occupied by calcified tissue (in the respective 3-mm section) were classified as calcified, and lesions with <50% calcium as mixed and lesions without any calcium were classified as noncalcified lesions. In addition, we classified the pattern of calcified tissue as spotty (at least two calcium spots <2 mm2 embedded in noncalcified plaque tissue) or wide calcification (calcified areas >2 mm2). In the next step, all sections were analyzed for the presence of hypodense spots (lipid pools) that were defined as structures >2 mm2 revealing a density of at least 20 HU less than the average value of surrounding noncalcified plaque tissue. The plaque volume for each 3-mm section was determined by multiplying the maximum plaque area within this section by 3. By adding plaque volumes of all respective sections, vessel plaque burden was calculated. Two independent investigators, both blinded to the IVUS results, did the analysis.
IVUS.
We used a Volcano Eagle Eye IVUS-catheter (20-MHz, electronic transducer, Volcano Inc., Rancho Cordova, California) that accords to the technical requirements for IVUS systems recommended by the American College of Cardiology (10). The tip of the IVUS catheter was placed in the coronary vessel unless a diameter <2.5 mm was present. The pullback was performed automatically with 0.5 mm/s (Volcano Track Back II). The complete investigation was stored digitally, and the data sets were assessed offline by a cardiologist blinded to the 64-slice CT results. Because one IVUS pullback contains more than 1,000 frames, our analysis was performed by subsampling intervals of 1 mm acquired at diastole. As with MDCT, 3-mm sections were analyzed. According to the American College of Cardiology recommendations, atherosclerotic plaques were defined as structures located between the media and the intima with a thickness of at least 0.5 mm (10). The plaque volume for each 3-mm section was determined by multiplying the maximum plaque area by 3. By adding plaque volumes of all respective sections, vessel plaque burden was calculated.
Calcified plaques were defined as plaque tissue containing any tissue with an echogenity as bright or brighter than the adventitia causing acoustic shadows with an arc of calcium >180° in the respective 3-mm section. Mixed plaques were defined as having an arc of calcium <180° in the respective 3-mm section. Finally, noncalcified plaques were defined as plaque tissue without acoustic shadowing. Furthermore, we defined plaques containing an echolucent zone (no signal) as lipid core plaques, and we specifically determined the pattern of calcium as either spotty (multiple small calcium spots, arc <90%) or wide (arc <90°) (11,12).
Comparison of 64-slice CT and IVUS.
To ensure that the same corresponding coronary sections were always compared with IVUS and MDCT, we selected fiduciary points, such as side branches, characteristic calcifications, or stents, for the distal starting reference. The distances between the fiduciary points and the coronary ostium were measured using the longitudinal reconstructed IVUS data sets and multiplanar reconstructions of the 64-slice CT datasets to ensure that distance measurements were the same with both methods. A measurement-discrepancy of 1.5 mm per vessel was tolerated. In the case of larger discrepancies, our comparison was restricted to smaller subsections. Starting from the distal reference point the coronary vessel was analyzed in 3-mm intervals and each section was directly compared with both methods.
Statistical analysis.
For comparison of plaque volumes obtained by 64-slice CT and IVUS, Bland-Altman analysis was performed. The paired Student t test was used to test for potential differences between mean values obtained by both methods. To determine the correlation of volume measurements by both methods, Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated. The interobserver variability for 64-slice CT measurements was calculated by the following formula: (volume observer 1 volume observer 2) / [(0.5 x volume observer 1) + (0.5 x volume observer 2)], by averaging the values obtained for each individual patient the average variability was determined. For the reproducibility to detect atherosclerotic lesions within the respective sections, Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated. A p value <0.05 was considered to be significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
We performed IVUS in 38 vessels in 20 patients. Beta-blockers to reduce the heart rate were given in 12 patients. During the 64-slice CT scan, 17 patients revealed heart rates <65 beats/min and 3 patients >65 beats/min. Diagnostic CT image quality was obtained in 19 patients and 36 vessels. A total of 365 sections were available for the comparison with IVUS; in 161 of these (26 vessels), atherosclerotic plaques were present. The use of 64-slice CT enabled a correct detection of plaque in 54 of 65 (83%) sections containing noncalcified plaques, 50 of 53 (94%) sections containing mixed plaques, and 41 of 43 (95%) sections containing calcified plaques, resulting in an accuracy of 90% to detect any plaque (145 of 161). In 192 of 204 (94%) sections, atherosclerotic lesions were correctly excluded. In addition to the ability to classify calcified, mixed, and noncalcified lesions, 64-slice CT enabled the visualization of lipid pools in 7 of 10 (70%) sections and enabled us to identify a spotty calcification pattern in 27 of 30 (90%) sections. In three sections without evidence for echolucency on IVUS, hypodense areas (lipid cores) were identified by 64-slice CT. In 314 of 365 sections (86%), consensus between IVUS and 64-slice CT was achieved regarding the morphologic classification (Table 1). The plaque type was misclassified by 64-slice CT in 23 of 145 atherosclerotic sections (Table 1).
Spearman's correlation coefficient for plaque volumes determined by 64-slice CT and IVUS was r2 = 0.69, p < 0.001. Bland-Altman analysis showed that noncalcified and mixed plaque volumes were systematically underestimated (59.8 ± 76.6 mm3 vs. 67.7 ± 67.9 mm3 and 47.7 ± 87.5 mm3 vs. 57.5 ± 99.4 mm3, p < 0.03). Calcified plaques were systematically overestimated (65.8 ± 110.0 mm3 vs. 53.2 ± 90.3 mm3, p = 0.19). The Bland-Altman plot and the correlation-diagram for determination of vessel-plaque volume are given in Figure 1. The interobserver variability for plaque-volume measurements by 64-slice CT was 37%. Cohen's kappa coefficient for the sole detection of atherosclerotic sections was 0.75, indicating good agreement.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Bland-Altman plot (A) and correlation graph (B) for plaque volumes per vessel determined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus 64-slice computed tomography (SCT). Vessel plaque volume is underestimated systematically by 64-slice computed tomography (p < 0.05), and correlation is moderate (Spearman correlation coefficient r2 = 0.69).
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The newly developed 64-slice CT technology offers the opportunity to accurately identify different types of coronary plaques. Of particular interest is the finding that features that frequently are associated with plaque ruptures, such as lipid cores and spotty calcifications, can be imaged noninvasively (Figs. 2 and 3). The determination of plaque burden by this innovative technology is limited by an only moderate concordance to IVUS measurements and an insufficient reproducibility.

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Lipid core within a mixed plaque detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and 64-slice computed tomography (CT). ca = calcium; lc = lipid core.
|
|

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Noncalcified section with an embedded lipid core indicated by echolucency on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and hypodensity on 64-slice computed tomography (CT).
|
|
Clinical data concerning the accuracy of MDCT to identify atherosclerotic plaques in vivo are rare. The two existing studies using a 16-slice CT reported from a sensitivity of 91% and 95% to detect calcified and 78% and 58% for noncalcified lesions (5,6). Most probably, the improved spatial resolution of the scanner used in the present study increased the sensitivity to detect noncalcified lesions to 83%. Because of the high CT attenuation of calcified lesions, their differentiation from fibrous and lipid-rich lesions is easy. The subclassification of noncalcified plaques in contrast is more challenging. Previous reports consistently showed a wide overlap of density values measured within hyperechoic and hypoechoic plaques that substantially complicates a prospective discrimination (6,13,14). Taking into account the natural course of atherosclerotic plaque evolution, these overlapping density values are not surprising. Atherosclerotic lesions typically consist of multiple different components ranging from necrotic to calcified tissue (e.g., high-risk plaques with a lipid core and a thin fibrous cap may be either predominantly calcified [Stary IVa], fibrous [Stary IVb], or soft [Stary IVc], but all are assigned to Stary class IV), so that intrinsic CT attenuation of lesions even within the same Stary class may differ (15). Furthermore, do technical restrictions of CT prevent an accurate assessment of plaque densities, in particular because of partial volume effects caused by the high attenuation of contrast agent or calcifications (16)? However, other morphologic features of coronary plaques exist that may serve as potential targets for noninvasive imaging. Invasive studies demonstrated that lipid pools and spotty calcifications embedded in atherosclerotic lesions are associated with plaque vulnerability (11,12,17,18). Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the potential of 64-slice CT to identify these features instead of classifying plaques on the basis of their density.
It is uniformly reported that plaques revealing large lipid cores constitute the majority of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. So far, there is only one prospective study imaging coronary plaques before an acute coronary event. In this study Yamagishi et al. (19) underscored the critical importance of lipid core plaques. They found that 12 of 16 lesions that revealed a lipid core at baseline IVUS examination counted for 12 of 14 acute coronary events during a 22-month follow-up period.
Although our results are encouraging in the identification of lipid cores by means of 64-slice CT, there are some important limitations: 1) the sensitivity of IVUS to detect lipid pools is limited to 50% to 75%; and 2) all lipid pools detected in our study were located in large proximal segments. Hence, it has to be assumed that the true accuracy of 64-slice CT to detect lipid pools is significantly lower than observed here.
The pattern of calcification within plaques constitutes another potential morphologic target in particular for MSCT. Just recently, Ehara et al. (11) described the frequent presence of spotty calcium depositions in vulnerable plaques. Thus, our results indicate the unique potential of 64-slice CT to assess specific features of coronary atherosclerosis. However, the clinical and prognostic impact of these findings has to be evaluated in future prospective studies.
Evidence suggests that coronary plaque burden and changes of plaque volume over the course of time may be important prognostic parameters; thus, one of the aims of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of 64-slice CT to assess plaque burden noninvasively. Although promising, the results of our study clearly demonstrate the current limitations of 64-slice CT: technical restrictions concerning spatial and temporal resolution prevent an exact separation of lumen, plaque, and vessel wall. The major challenge for plaque quantification is the edge definition of the outer vessel boundary. Because coronary plaques and surrounding tissue are very heterogeneous, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible (with the given resolution), to define thresholds that would allow accurate automated or semiautomated edge detection. Therefore edge definition is, at least in part, always dependent on the respective investigator. As a consequence, we observed a high interobserver variability for 64-slice CT measurements and an only moderate concordance to IVUS measurements.
Study limitations.
A potential limitation of the present study is the fact that we did not enroll consecutive patients. However, all patients in the present study were recruited from clinical routine without any additional preselection criteria (e.g., obese patients, low heart rates, older patients) that may have affected the 64-slice CT results. An important issue and limitation for all CT studies is the significant radiation exposure to the patient, which is in the range of 9 to 14 msv with the current 64-slice CT-technology. This exposure is critical, especially if this technique is considered for preventional purposes in asymptomatic patients.
To find the optimal display settings allowing for the most accurate edge definition, we empirically determined image settings in a subset of our patients. Consequently, all results are related to these settings and may vary with the use of other settings. However, it is not likely those other settings will significantly improve the performance of 64-slice CT because only an improvement in resolution will diminish partial voluming and motion artifacts.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Dr. Leber is an external scientific consultant of Siemens Medical Solutions. Drs. Leber and Becker contributed equally to this study.
 |
References
|
|---|
1. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1253-1260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]2. Detrano RC, Romero EV. Coronary artery calcium screening: where do we go from here? Ital Heart J 2004;5:421-422.[Medline] 3. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle K, et al. Influence of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of coronary artery calcification: a prospective evaluation Circulation 2002;106:1077-1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 4. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U, et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:842-847.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 5. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound Circulation 2004;109:14-17.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 6. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1241-1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 7. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot Rofo 2004;176:1803-1810.[Web of Science][Medline] 8. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B. Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:907-923.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 9. Moselewski F, Ropers D, Pohle K, et al. Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1294-1297.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 10. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS)A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478-1492.[Free Full Text] 11. Ehara S, Kobayashi Y, Yoshiyama M, et al. Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study Circulation 2004;110:3424-3429.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 12. Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Litovsky S, Willerson JT, Casscells W. Finding vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: is it worth the effort? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:1775-1782.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 13. Schroeder S, Flohr T, Kopp AF, et al. Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by X-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:900-906.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 14. Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Muders M, et al. Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT Eur Radiol 2003;13:2094-2098.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 15. Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Pathology of the thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque J Interv Cardiol 2003;16:267-272.[CrossRef][Medline] 16. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography Eur Radiol 2005;15:1426-1431.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 17. Ge J, Baumgart D, Haude M, et al. Role of intravascular ultrasound imaging in identifying vulnerable plaques Herz 1999;24:32-41.[Web of Science][Medline] 18. Maehara A, Mintz GS, Bui AB, et al. Morphologic and angiographic features of coronary plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:904-910.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 19. Yamagishi M, Terashima M, Awano K, et al. Morphology of vulnerable coronary plaque: insights from follow-up of patients examined by intravascular ultrasound before an acute coronary syndrome J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:106-111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Nienaber, S. Kische, V. Skriabina, and H. Ince
Noninvasive Imaging Approaches to Evaluate the Patient With Known or Suspected Aortic Disease
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
November 1, 2009;
2(6):
499 - 506.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lehman, C. L. Schlett, F. Bamberg, H. Lee, P. Donnelly, L. Shturman, M. F. Kriegel, T. J. Brady, and U. Hoffmann
Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Semiquantitative Score
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
November 1, 2009;
2(11):
1262 - 1270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Bastarrika, Y. S. Lee, W. Huda, B. Ruzsics, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology,
November 1, 2009;
253(2):
317 - 338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Slomka, V. Y. Cheng, D. Dey, J. Woo, A. Ramesh, S. Van Kriekinge, Y. Suzuki, Y. Elad, R. Karlsberg, D. S. Berman, et al.
Quantitative Analysis of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Anatomically Guided by Coregistered 64-Slice Coronary CT Angiography
J. Nucl. Med.,
October 1, 2009;
50(10):
1621 - 1630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. Bauer, C. Thilo, S. A. Chiaramida, T. J. Vogl, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Noncalcified Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden at Coronary CT Angiography: A Better Predictor of Ischemia at Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Than Calcium Score and Stenosis Severity
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
August 1, 2009;
193(2):
410 - 418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Djaberi, J. D. Schuijf, E. Boersma, L. J.M. Kroft, A. M. Pereira, J. A. Romijn, A. J. Scholte, J. W. Jukema, and J. J. Bax
Differences in Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden and Morphology Between Type 1 and 2 Diabetes as Assessed by Multislice Computed Tomography
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2009;
32(8):
1507 - 1512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Motoyama, M. Sarai, H. Harigaya, H. Anno, K. Inoue, T. Hara, H. Naruse, J. Ishii, H. Hishida, N. D. Wong, et al.
Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 30, 2009;
54(1):
49 - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hoffmann and F. Bamberg
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
May 1, 2009;
2(3):
251 - 263.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Greif, A. Becker, F. von Ziegler, C. Lebherz, M. Lehrke, U. C. Broedl, J. Tittus, K. Parhofer, C. Becker, M. Reiser, et al.
Pericardial Adipose Tissue Determined by Dual Source CT Is a Risk Factor for Coronary Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
May 1, 2009;
29(5):
781 - 786.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wykrzykowska, S. Lehman, G. Williams, J. A. Parker, M. R. Palmer, S. Varkey, G. Kolodny, and R. Laham
Imaging of Inflamed and Vulnerable Plaque in Coronary Arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Suppression of Myocardial Uptake Using a Low-Carbohydrate, High-Fat Preparation
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2009;
50(4):
563 - 568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Brodoefel, C. Burgstahler, A. Sabir, C.-S. Yam, F. Khosa, C. D. Claussen, and M. E. Clouse
Coronary Plaque Quantification by Voxel Analysis: Dual-Source MDCT Angiography Versus Intravascular Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
March 1, 2009;
192(3):
W84 - W89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Carrigan, D. Nair, P. Schoenhagen, R. J. Curtin, Z. B. Popovic, S. Halliburton, S. Kuzmiak, R. D. White, S. D. Flamm, and M. Y. Desai
Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2009;
30(3):
362 - 371.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. de Feyter, S. Achenbach, and K. Nieman
CHAPTER 6 Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,
January 1, 2009;
2(1):
med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zhang, D. C. Levin, E. J. Halpern, D. Fischman, M. Savage, and P. Walinsky
Accuracy of MDCT in Assessing the Degree of Stenosis Caused by Calcified Coronary Artery Plaques
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
December 1, 2008;
191(6):
1676 - 1683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Rumberger
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Our Time Has Come, But There Are Miles to Go Before We Sleep
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 18, 2008;
52(21):
1733 - 1735.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Min and L. J. Shaw
Noninvasive Diagnostic and Prognostic Assessment of Individuals With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Perspective
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
November 1, 2008;
1(3):
270 - 281.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P. K. Vanhoenacker, E. Boersma, J. H.C. Reiber, M. J. Schalij, W. Wijns, et al.
Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2008;
29(19):
2373 - 2381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-K. Choi, S. I. Choi, J. J. Rivera, K. Nasir, S.-A. Chang, E. J. Chun, H.-K. Kim, D.-J. Choi, R. S. Blumenthal, and H.-J. Chang
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Occult Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Individuals
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 29, 2008;
52(5):
357 - 365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation,
July 29, 2008;
118(5):
586 - 606.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Henneman, J. D. Schuijf, G. Pundziute, J. M. van Werkhoven, E. E. van der Wall, J. W. Jukema, and J. J. Bax
Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 15, 2008;
52(3):
216 - 222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Achenbach
Quantification of coronary artery stenoses by computed tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2008;
1(4):
472 - 474.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W T Roberts, J J Bax, and L C Davies
Cardiac CT and CT coronary angiography: technology and application
Heart,
June 1, 2008;
94(6):
781 - 792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Clouse, A. Sabir, C.-S. Yam, N. Yoshimura, S. Lin, F. Welty, P. Martinez-Clark, and V. Raptopoulos
Measuring Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Voxel Analysis with MDCT Angiography: A Pilot Clinical Study
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
June 1, 2008;
190(6):
1553 - 1560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wintermark, S.S. Jawadi, J.H. Rapp, T. Tihan, E. Tong, D.V. Glidden, S. Abedin, S. Schaeffer, G. Acevedo-Bolton, B. Boudignon, et al.
High-Resolution CT Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.,
May 1, 2008;
29(5):
875 - 882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P. K. Vanhoenacker, J. H.C. Reiber, M. J. Schalij, W. Wijns, and J. J. Bax
Head-to-Head Comparison of Coronary Plaque Evaluation Between Multislice Computed Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
April 1, 2008;
1(2):
176 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Voros
Can Computed Tomography Angiography of the Coronary Arteries Characterize Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition?: Is the CAT (Scan) Out of the Bag?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
April 1, 2008;
1(2):
183 - 185.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sato, M. Hiroe, M. Tamura, H. Ohigashi, T. Nozato, H. Hikita, A. Takahashi, K. Aonuma, and M. Isobe
Quantitative Measures of Coronary Stenosis Severity by 64-Slice CT Angiography and Relation to Physiologic Significance of Perfusion in Nonobese Patients: Comparison with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2008;
49(4):
564 - 572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Gottlieb and J. A.C. Lima
Screening High-Risk Patients With Computed Tomography Angiography
Circulation,
March 11, 2008;
117(10):
1318 - 1332.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Sun, Z. Zhang, B. Lu, W. Yu, Y. Yang, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, and Z. Fan
Identification and Quantification of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques: A Comparison of 64-MDCT and Intravascular Ultrasound
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
March 1, 2008;
190(3):
748 - 754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Bamberg, N. Dannemann, M. D. Shapiro, S. K. Seneviratne, M. Ferencik, J. Butler, W. Koenig, K. Nasir, R. C. Cury, A. Tawakol, et al.
Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Profiles and the Presence and Extent of Different Types of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque as Detected by Multidetector Computed Tomography
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
March 1, 2008;
28(3):
568 - 574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Earls, E. L. Berman, B. A. Urban, C. A. Curry, J. L. Lane, R. S. Jennings, C. C. McCulloch, J. Hsieh, and J. H. Londt
Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose
Radiology,
March 1, 2008;
246(3):
742 - 753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al.
Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology
Eur. Heart J.,
February 2, 2008;
29(4):
531 - 556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shinohara, T. Yamashita, H. Tawa, M. Takeda, N. Sasaki, T. Takaya, R. Toh, A. Takeuchi, T. Ohigashi, K. Shinohara, et al.
Atherosclerotic plaque imaging using phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
February 1, 2008;
294(2):
H1094 - H1100.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Williams, L. J. Shaw, P. Raggi, D. Morris, V. Vaccarino, S. T. Liu, S. R. Weinstein, T. P. Mosler, P. H. Tseng, F. R. Flores, et al.
Prognostic value of number and site of calcified coronary lesions compared with the total score.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
61 - 69.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Costa, S. Shoemaker, H. Futamatsu, C. Klassen, D. J. Angiolillo, M. Nguyen, A. Siuciak, P. Gilmore, M. M. Zenni, L. Guzman, et al.
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Detects Anatomic and Physiologic Coronary Artery Disease as Measured by Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 7, 2007;
50(6):
514 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Kaufmann, J. M. Sanders, C. Davis, A. Xie, P. Aldred, I. J. Sarembock, and J. R. Lindner
Molecular Imaging of Inflammation in Atherosclerosis With Targeted Ultrasound Detection of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
Circulation,
July 17, 2007;
116(3):
276 - 284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A.C. Lima and J. Hare
Visualizing the Coronaries in Patients Presenting With Heart Failure of Unknown Etiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 22, 2007;
49(20):
2051 - 2052.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, E. Boersma, A. J.H.A. Scholte, L. J.M. Kroft, E. E. van der Wall, and J. J. Bax
Noninvasive Assessment of Plaque Characteristics With Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Symptomatic Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care,
May 1, 2007;
30(5):
1113 - 1119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 30, 2007;
49(4):
509 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 5, 2006;
48(11):
2324 - 2339.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Achenbach
Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 21, 2006;
48(10):
1919 - 1928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. Primak, C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, J. Zhang, and J. G. Fletcher
Relationship between Noise, Dose, and Pitch in Cardiac Multi-Detector Row CT
RadioGraphics,
November 1, 2006;
26(6):
1785 - 1794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Rumberger
Noncardiac Abnormalities in Diagnostic Cardiac Computed Tomography: Within Normal Limits or We Never Looked!
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 18, 2006;
48(2):
407 - 408.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hoffmann, M. Ferencik, R. C. Cury, and A. J. Pena
Coronary CT Angiography
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2006;
47(5):
797 - 806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Rumberger
The Promise of Quantitative Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Noninvasive Segmental Coronary Plaque Quantification: Pushing the "Edge"
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 7, 2006;
47(3):
678 - 680.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|