Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 1 Representative example of the dramatic effect that a single isolated ectopic beat and its correction might have in the measurement of baroreflex sensitivity by the transfer function method (TF-BRS). Tracings (A) show systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and RR interval time series with a ventricular premature complex at the beginning of the recording. Measurement of TF-BRS on these signals gives 1.2 ms/mm Hg, whereas excluding the ectopic beat from the computation (i.e., starting the analysis window from the dashed bar) gives 6.2 ms/mm Hg. Tracings (B) show the same signals after correction of the ectopic beat by linear interpolation. Despite the apparent negligible effect on the fluctuation pattern of the two signals, TF-BRS becomes 4.7 ms/mm Hg, that is, –24% compared with the measurement obtained without the ectopic beat. Although the effect of the correction is not always so dramatic, this example highlights the need to perform a careful check every time a correction is made.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement