Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010; 55:608-609, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.030
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

CORRESPONDENCE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply

Barry J. Maron, MD*, Martin S. Maron, MD, E. Douglas Wigle, OC, MD and Eugene Braunwald, MD

* Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 920 East 28th Street, Suite 620, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 (Email: hcm.maron{at}mhif.org).


We appreciate the correspondence from Dr. Murgo, stimulated by our recent historical review focused on the evolving understanding of left ventricular (LV) outflow gradients in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (1). Dr. Murgo has had an important role in this conversation, which has spanned virtually the last 5 decades (2), for this heterogeneous disease with complex ejection dynamics (1,3).

However, on the issue of whether obstruction represents true mechanical impedance we must depart sharply from ideas resolutely held by Dr. Michael Criley in the 1960s, which we believe have plagued the contemporary understanding of HCM and its management, that is, that somehow LV outflow gradients are incidental to this disease and are not responsible for heart failure symptoms that disable many patients.

We would like to take this opportunity fortuitously afforded by Dr. Murgo's letter to once again underscore a crucial principle in HCM, that is, subaortic gradients due to mitral valve systolic anterior motion represent true mechanical obstruction to LV outflow and are responsible for high intraventricular pressures and increased wall stress, which (in association with mitral regurgitation) lead to exertional dyspnea and physical limitation compromising quality of life.

Fifty years after the initial description of HCM (1), evidence for the clinical significance of true obstruction to outflow in HCM is overwhelming, having recently been demonstrated in large cohorts followed up for long periods of time (1,4,5). Relief of LV outflow obstruction by surgical septal myectomy (or selectively by alcohol ablation) has been shown repeatedly to relieve heart failure symptoms, and in the case of myectomy, to enhance long-term survival (5). Indeed, this is not unlike the clinical experience with obstruction due to aortic valve stenosis, albeit with different ejection dynamics.

The present discussion is reminiscent of the "second HCM obstruction debate" 25 years ago at the American College of Cardiology meeting (1) when Dr. Murgo lectured passionately about the nuances of LV ejection dynamics and nomenclature, but in the process may not have addressed the essential clinical message, that is, that outflow gradients (and secondary mitral regurgitation) are associated with substantially elevated LV systolic (and diastolic) pressures, which can cause disabling symptoms but are mechanically reversible by septal reduction intervention and with resultant restoration of quality of life and longevity.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Maron BJ, Maron MS, Wigle ED, Braunwald E. The 50-year history, controversy, and clinical implications of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:191-200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Murgo JP, Alter BR, Dorethy JF, Altobelli SA, McGranahan Jr. GM. Dynamics of left ventricular ejection in obstructive and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Clin Invest 1980;66:1369-1382.[Web of Science][Medline]

3. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review JAMA 2002;287:1308-1320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Betocchi S, et al. Effect of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on clinical outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2003;348:295-303.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5. Ommen SR, Maron BJ, Olivotto I, et al. Long-term effects of surgical septal myectomy on survival in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:470-476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article

Have We Really Come to Understand the Relationship Between the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Gradient and Left Ventricular Emptying in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?
Joseph P. Murgo
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 608. [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement