Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:618-624, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.061
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, G.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, D.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, G.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, D.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Global 2-Dimensional Strain as a New Prognosticator in Patients With Heart Failure

Goo-Yeong Cho, MD, PhD*,*, Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD{dagger}, Hyun-Sook Kim, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Min-Kyu Kim, MD{ddagger}, Kyung-Soon Hong, MD, PhD{ddagger} and Dong-Jin Oh, MD, PhD{ddagger}

* Department of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
{dagger} Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
{ddagger} Department of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Manuscript received November 28, 2008; revised manuscript received April 6, 2009, accepted April 14, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Goo-Yeong Cho, Department of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam City, Gyeonggi-do, 463-802, South Korea (Email: cardioch{at}medimail.co.kr).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Objectives: We sought to evaluate whether global 2-dimensional (2D) strain offers additional benefit over left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to predict clinical events in heart failure.

Background: Although 2D strain based on speckle tracking has been proposed as a simple and reproducible tool to detect systolic dysfunction, the relationship of 2D strain and prognosis has not been studied.

Methods: Two hundred one patients (age 63 ± 11 years, 34% female, LVEF 34 ± 13%) hospitalized for acute heart failure underwent clinical evaluation and conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Using dedicated software, we measured the global longitudinal strain (GLS) in apical 4- and 2-chamber views and the global circumferential strain (GCS) in a parasternal short-axis view. Cardiac events were defined as readmission for heart failure or cardiac death.

Results: There were 23.4% clinical events during 39 ± 17 months of follow-up. In univariate analysis, age, left atrial volume, left ventricular volume, LVEF, ratio of early transmitral flow to early diastolic annular velocity (E/e'), and both GLS and GCS were predictive of cardiac events. In multivariate Cox models, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.10, p = 0.017) and GCS (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28; p = 0.006) were independently associated with cardiac events. By Cox proportional hazards model, the addition of GCS markedly improved the prognostic utility of a model containing ejection fraction, E/e', and GLS.

Conclusions: GCS is a powerful predictor of cardiac events and appears to be a better parameter than ejection fraction in patients with acute heart failure.

Key Words: congestive heart failure • prognosis • ventricular function • strain

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  2D = 2-dimensional
  CI = confidence interval
  E/e' = ratio of early transmitral flow to early diastolic annular velocity
  EF = ejection fraction
  GCS = global circumferential strain
  GLS = global longitudinal strain
  HR = hazard ratio
  LV = left ventricle/ventricular
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  ROC = receiver-operating characteristic


Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the most extensively investigated echocardiographic systolic function and has been established as a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with systolic heart failure (1,2). However, some reports have characterized the relationship between LVEF and mortality in heart failure patients with inconsistent results (3–5). Furthermore, assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function using an echocardiogram is often rather subjective, especially when the endocardial border cannot be clearly defined. LV systolic function is a complex, coordinated action involving longitudinal contraction, circumferential shortening, and radial thickening. Contraction of muscle fibers in the mid-wall, which is linearly related to circumferential strain (6), may better reflect intrinsic contractility than contraction of fibers in the endocardium (7).

The recently developed 2-dimensional (2D) strain based on speckle tracking is an innovative method providing multidimensional myocardial mechanics that involves rotation and longitudinal and circumferential motion. In an experimental study, both longitudinal and circumferential strain had good correlation and agreement with sonomicrometry and had real potential for quantification of LV deformation (8).

We hypothesized that global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) may potentially be stronger predictors of clinical events than LVEF in patients with congestive heart failure.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Patient population.   This was a single-center prospective observational study. Between June 2000 and September 2004, we prospectively recruited patients who were admitted to a cardiology department with heart failure. Of these, we narrowed our study population to include only patients who survived acute decompensated heart failure in New York Heart Association functional class ≥III. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Figure 1.


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

ACS = acute coronary syndromes; CHF = congestive heart failure; LV = left ventricular.

 
Patients received standard management as recommended for heart failure, with regard to beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics, including spironolactone.

The ischemic etiology of heart failure was defined by 1 of the following criteria: 1) significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis (>50%); or 2) history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Normal myocardial perfusion on radionucleotide imaging was regarded to be of nonischemic etiology. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University.

Echocardiography.   All images were obtained with a standard ultrasound machine (System 5 or Vivid 7, GE Vingmed, Horten, Norway) with a 2.5-MHz probe. Standard techniques were used to obtain M-mode, 2D, and Doppler measurement in accordance with American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Tissue Doppler-derived peak systolic (s'), early (e'), and late diastolic (a') velocities were derived from the septal mitral annulus. LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes along with the LVEF were calculated by the biplane Simpson's method from apical 4- and 2-chamber views. The percentage of LV fractional shortening was also calculated as follows: ([LV end-diastolic dimension – end systolic dimension]/LV end diastolic dimension) x 100. Mitral regurgitation was characterized as follows: mild (regurgitation orifice area ≤0.2 cm2), moderate (0.2 to 0.39 cm2), and severe (≥0.4 cm2).

Strain analysis.   For global 2D strain analysis, a digital loop was acquired from a parasternal short-axis view at the mid-papillary level, apical 4-chamber, and apical-2 chamber views. All images were stored digitally on a magnetic optical disc and analyzed off-line. We traced along the LV endocardial border at the end-systolic frame. The strain curve was extracted from the gray-scale images by using dedicated software (EchoPac, GE Vingmed). Peak strain was defined as the peak negative value on the strain curve during the entire cardiac cycle. Peak GLS and GCS were calculated for the entire U-shaped (GLS) and circular-shaped (GCS) LV myocardium as: global strain (%) = (L[end-systole] – L[end-diastole])/L(end-diastole) x 100 (9), where the global strain is the change of the whole myocardium, not an averaged value of each segmental strain, and L is the whole LV myocardium as one big segment. GLS was averaged from the apical 4- and 2-chamber views. All echocardiographic data were obtained at the time of discharge.

Follow-up and end points.   All patients were seen within 4 weeks post-discharge and every 2 months thereafter for the duration of the follow-up period. No patient was lost to follow-up. The cardiac events were defined as readmission for worsening of heart failure and cardiac death. In case of death, the reasons for death were verified from hospital records or a death certificate from the Korea National Statistical Office. The cause of death was identified in all patients.

Statistical analysis.   Data are expressed as mean ± SD for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. The comparison of continuous variables was performed by an independent sample t test. For categorical variables, the chi-square test was used. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis (forward stepwise) to investigate which prognostic factors identified using univariate analysis were significantly associated with cardiac events. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cutoff values of continuous variable. The best cutoff value was defined as the point with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity. The overall event-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the event rates were compared using the log-rank test. The 2-tailed p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Baseline characteristics.   A total of 201 patients fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria. During the mean follow-up duration of 39 ± 17 months, cardiac events occurred in 23.4% (47 of 201 patients), including cardiac death in 13%. The clinical and echocardiographic parameters are summarized in Table 1. As compared with patients who did not develop cardiac events, patients who developed cardiac events were older, and had a greater left atrium and LV volume, a higher E/e', a lower LVEF, and a lower GLS and GCS, but were similar with respect to the etiology of heart failure, LV mass index, and transmitral flow.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics
 
Predictors of cardiac events.   By univariate survival using a Cox proportional hazards model, age, left atrial volume, LV volume, LVFS, LVEF, systolic and early diastolic mitral annular velocities, E/e', and both GLS and GCS were significantly associated with cardiac events. The hazard ratio (HR) of each variable is shown in Table 2. Using multivariate Cox analysis, age (HR: 1.09; p = 0.012) and GCS (HR: 1.15; p = 0.007) were independent predictors of cardiac events in patients with heart failure. Importantly, reduced GCS was related to an increased risk of cardiac events in patients with heart failure of both an ischemic and nonischemic origin, but GLS was associated with patients with heart failure of an ischemic origin only (Fig. 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis
 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Incidence of Cardiac Events According to Etiology of Heart Failure

The cutoff values of global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were achieved by the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.

 
The additional benefit of global strain to predict cardiac events is shown in Figure 3. With regard to the incremental value, GLS offers a small additional benefit over conventional parameters (LVEF and E/e'). However, the addition of GCS markedly improved the prognostic utility of the model containing LVEF, E/e', and GLS.


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Prognostic Value of Echocardiographic Parameters

Incremental prognostic value of the risk factors (ratio of early transmitral flow to early diastolic annular velocity [E/e'], left ventricular ejection fraction, GLS, and GCS) by Cox proportional hazards model presented as a global chi-square value. The addition of GCS resulted in significant incremental improvement in the predictive value on the E/e', ejection fraction (EF), and GLS. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 
ROC curves to predict cardiac events.   By analyzing the ROC curve, the area under the ROC curve of GCS was the greatest, with a best cutoff point of –10.7% (Fig. 4). However, the areas under the ROC curve between each variable are not statistically different.


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curves to Predict Cardiac Events

Black line = GCS; green line = GLS; red line = left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). AUC = area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; CI = confidence interval; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 
Kaplan-Meier analysis.   The mean event-free survival evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis was longer in patients with GCS ≤–10.7% (59.0 ± 2.0 months) than in those with GCS >–10.7% (47.1 ± 3.4 months) (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Kaplan-Meier Analysis According to GCS

The cutoff value (–10.7%) was defined as the point with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity. GCS = global circumferential strain.

 
Feasibility and reproducibility.   We were able to measure ejection fraction (EF) by biplane Simpson's rule in 198 patients (98.5%). We obtained global strain only in the case of adequate tracking quality ≥5 of the 6 segments per view. Of the 201 patients, 88% of mean longitudinal strain and 92% of circumferential strain could be measured. The reproducibility was performed on a single set of recordings. Variability in the measurement of global strain was evaluated in 20 randomly selected patients. For intraobserver variability, the same observer measured global strain for each of the selected patients again 15 days later. The coefficients of variation of intraobserver variability for GLS and GCS were 3.5% and 4.9%, respectively. For the interobserver variability, a second independent observer repeated the analysis. The coefficients of variation of interobserver variability for GLS and GCS were 3.6% and 6.3%, respectively.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
This study is the first to demonstrate the prognostic significance of global 2D strain in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. GCS is an independent prognosticator to predict cardiac events in heart failure regardless age, LVEF, and E/e' and has greater prognostic power than GLS or LVEF. Furthermore, the measurement of global 2D strain is simple and highly feasible and shows excellent reproducibility.

Endocardial versus mid-wall function.   Although LVEF is an accepted prognostic indicator in heart failure, the relationship between EF and adverse outcome in the full spectrum of heart failure is less well documented. The prognosis in patients with most forms of heart failure is inversely related to LVEF, at least for an LVEF <45% (1,2,10). However, recent evidence suggests that the survival of patients with heart failure with preserved LV systolic function was similar to that of patients with a reduced EF (11).

LV systolic function is a complex, coordinated action by longitudinal and circumferential fiber contraction. The subepicardial and subendocardial fiber layers are longitudinally oriented, with a significant contribution to long-axis function, whereas the middle layer is circumferentially arranged and contributes to thickening and short-axis function. The circumferential fibers in the mid-wall play an important role in extensive endocardial thickening (12). Nonuniformity of fiber orientation was thus matched by a nonuniform susceptibility of the various layers to injury. Therefore, the measurement of both longitudinal and circumferential contraction is of great help to understand LV contractile function. Before the development of 2D strain, only magnetic resonance tagging had been used to compute circumferential strain. Mid-wall shortening can now be directly measured by 2D strain and might conceivably identify patients at risk for a poor outcome. The correlation between circumferential strain with mid-wall shortening is significant (6). In this group of patients, the association between circumferential strain and the cardiac events was present even after adjusting for the clinical factors most associated with prognosis: age, etiology of heart failure, chamber dimension, ejection fraction, and diastolic function.

In a prospective epidemiologic study, LV long-axis function rather than short-axis function independently predicted survival in chronic heart failure (13). This result is in contrast to the findings reported herein. In that study, short-axis function was assessed by endocardial fractional shortening. However, conventional parameters, such as LVEF or endocardial fractional shortening, reflect the geometric change of LV rather than the contractile function of the myocardium. Because LV geometry and wall thickening are not always uniform, mid-wall function has been proposed for evaluation of systolic function in conditions with altered LV geometry, especially LV hypertrophy (14). Furthermore, mid-wall shortening serves as an independent prediction of adverse outcome in arterial hypertension (15).

Ischemic versus nonischemic origin.   In this study, decreased circumferential strain rather than longitudinal strain was associated with increased cardiac events of both ischemic and nonischemic origin.

Because subendocardial fibers, which are mainly longitudinally oriented, are more susceptible to ischemia, it might be expected that the longitudinal function is altered earlier than the mid-wall function (8). Experimental studies have shown that ischemia-induced myocardial necrosis is characterized by extension from the endocardial layer to the subepicardium (16). Therefore, in early ischemic conditions, subendocardial dysfunction is likely to selectively affect the longitudinally directed fibers and manifest itself as decreased LVEF and longitudinal strain, whereas mid-wall function is relatively preserved. In contrast, transmural infarct is associated with a reduction of both long-axis and short-axis function (17).

In patients with coronary artery stenosis, circumferential myocardial shortening deteriorated to a greater extent during stress echocardiography among 3-directional deformations. The level of contribution of circumferential fiber to LV myocardial thickening is greater than that of longitudinal fibers (18). Therefore, a decrease in circumferential strain, which reflects more advanced myocardial ischemia, is more closely related with prognosis than longitudinal strain in ischemic heart failure.

Although there are no published reports of the prognostic implication of circumferential strain in nonischemic heart failure, the major abnormality in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is the marked reduction in fiber shortening (19). In nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, approximately 30% of patients have mid-wall fibrosis as determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, which is a predictor of adverse outcome regardless of LVEF (20,21). This could explain why decreased GCS was associated with an increased risk of cardiac events.

Although circumferential shortening currently cannot be considered part of routine clinical practice, this new technology provides important prognostic information in heart failure. Because estimation of global strain is reasonable, even for images with poor tracking quality in 1 segment of the 6, global strain has a theoretical advantage over other echocardiographic-based methods (9).

Study limitations.   The importance of this study seems limited because 2D strain can be measured using only dedicated software. The feasibility of GLS and GSC was only 88% and 92%, respectively. The 2D strain based on speckle tracking is highly dependent on image quality and the inherent limitation therein. We used 2 kinds of echocardiographs (Vivid 5 and 7). Although the 2D strain from Vivid 5 was less validated, it should work if the frame rate and images are adequate. For longitudinal strain, we analyzed data from the apical 4- and 2-chamber views. Additional analysis of the apical long-axis view provides optimal information for longitudinal strain. Although the relation between GCS and cardiac events remained significant after correction for classic risk factors, we did not obtain important factors in heart failure, such as brain natriuretic peptide, degree of pulmonary hypertension, or right ventricular function. Furthermore, the number of hard events was relatively low in identifying various predictors of heart failure. Finally, our conclusions apply to patients who were hospitalized for newly developed acute heart failure and should not be extrapolated to all heart failure patients.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
In our single-center study, we demonstrated that GCS is an independent predictor of cardiac events and appears to be a better parameter than LVEF or GLS for prognostic stratification in patients with acute heart failure.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors greatly thank O. K. Kim and M. J. Kum for their excellent contribution of 2D strain measurements.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. Marwick has had research collaborations/grants with GE Medical Systems and Philips.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
1. McDermott MM, Feinglass J, Lee PI, et al. Systolic function, readmission rates, and survival among consecutively hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure Am Heart J 1997;134:728-736.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2. St John SM, Pfeffer MA, Moye L, et al. Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial Circulation 1997;96:3294-3299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Curtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, et al. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:736-742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Kelly TL, Cremo R, Nielsen C, Shabetai R. Prediction of outcome in late-stage cardiomyopathy Am Heart J 1990;119:1111-1121.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5. Gottdiener JS, McClelland RL, Marshall R, et al. Outcome of congestive heart failure in elderly persons: influence of left ventricular systolic function: the Cardiovascular Health Study Ann Intern Med 2002;137:631-639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Hurlburt HM, Aurigemma GP, Hill JC, et al. Direct ultrasound measurement of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain using 2-dimensional strain imaging in normal adults Echocardiography 2007;24:723-731.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440-1463.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8. Reant P, Labrousse L, Lafitte S, et al. Experimental validation of circumferential, longitudinal, and radial 2-dimensional strain during dobutamine stress echocardiography in ischemic conditions J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:149-157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Reisner SA, Lysyansky P, Agmon Y, Mutlak D, Lessick J, Friedman Z. Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004;17:630-633.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10. Gustafsson F, Torp-Pedersen C, Brendorp B, Seibaek M, Burchardt H, Kober L. Long-term survival in patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: relation to preserved and reduced left ventricular systolic function Eur Heart J 2003;24:863-870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, et al. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study N Engl J Med 2006;355:260-269.[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Rademakers FE, Rogers WJ, Guier WH, et al. Relation of regional cross-fiber shortening to wall thickening in the intact heart: three-dimensional strain analysis by NMR tagging Circulation 1994;89:1174-1182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Svealv BG, Olofsson EL, Andersson B. Ventricular long-axis function is of major importance for long-term survival in patients with heart failure Heart 2008;94:284-289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Jung HO, Sheehan FH, Bolson EL, Waiss MP, Otto CM. Evaluation of midwall systolic function in left ventricular hypertrophy: a comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional echocardiographic indices J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:802-810.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

15. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Koren MJ, Mensah GA, Casale PN, Laragh JH. Midwall left ventricular mechanics: an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension Circulation 1996;93:259-265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death: 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;56:786-794.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Chan J, Hanekom L, Wong C, Leano R, Cho GY, Marwick TH. Differentiation of subendocardial and transmural infarction using two-dimensional strain rate imaging to assess short-axis and long-axis myocardial function J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2026-2033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Tanaka H, Oishi Y, Mizuguchi Y, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of dobutamine-induced changes in regional myocardial deformation in ischemic myocardium using ultrasonic strain measurements: the role of circumferential myocardial shortening J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:1294-1299.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

19. MacGowan GA, Shapiro EP, Azhari H, et al. Noninvasive measurement of shortening in the fiber and cross-fiber directions in the normal human left ventricle and in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy Circulation 1997;96:535-541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1977-1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, et al. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance Circulation 2003;108:54-59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Articles

Do We Need New Echocardiographic Prognosticators for the Management of Heart Failure Patients?
Stephane Lafitte
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 625-627. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A24. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. M. Shah and S. D. Solomon
Myocardial Deformation Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions
Circulation, January 17, 2012; 125(2): e244 - e248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. P. Leong, A. Chakrabarty, N. Shipp, P. Molaee, P. L. Madsen, L. Joerg, T. Sullivan, S. G. Worthley, C. G. De Pasquale, P. Sanders, et al.
Effects of myocardial fibrosis and ventricular dyssynchrony on response to therapy in new-presentation idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2011; (2011) ehr391v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M. L. Antoni, E. A. ten Brinke, J. Z. Atary, N. A. Marsan, E. R. Holman, M. J. Schalij, J. J. Bax, and V. Delgado
Left atrial strain is related to adverse events in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart, August 15, 2011; 97(16): 1332 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
E. Donal, N. Coquerel, S. Bodi, G. Kervio, F. Schnell, J.-C. Daubert, and F. Carre
Importance of ventricular longitudinal function in chronic heart failure
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, August 1, 2011; 12(8): 619 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A.-C. Pouleur, D. Knappe, A. M. Shah, H. Uno, M. Bourgoun, E. Foster, S. McNitt, W. J. Hall, W. Zareba, I. Goldenberg, et al.
Relationship between improvement in left ventricular dyssynchrony and contractile function and clinical outcome with cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MADIT-CRT trial
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2011; 32(14): 1720 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
B. Syeda, P. Hofer, P. Pichler, M. Vertesich, J. Bergler-Klein, S. Roedler, S. Mahr, G. Goliasch, A. Zuckermann, and T. Binder
Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: a study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2011; 12(7): 490 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-M. Song, S. H. Kang, E.-J. Lee, M.-J. Shin, J. W. Lee, C. H. Chung, D.-H. Kim, D.-H. Kang, and J.-K. Song
Echocardiographic Predictors of Left Ventricular Function and Clinical Outcomes After Successful Mitral Valve Repair: Conventional Two-Dimensional Versus Speckle-Tracking Parameters
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2011; 91(6): 1816 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. T. Cole, A. P. Kalogeropoulos, V. V. Georgiopoulou, M. Gheorghiade, A. Quyyumi, C. Yancy, and J. Butler
Hydralazine and Isosorbide Dinitrate in Heart Failure: Historical Perspective, Mechanisms, and Future Directions
Circulation, May 31, 2011; 123(21): 2414 - 2422.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
L. Macron, O. Lairez, J. Nahum, M. Berry, L. Deal, J.-F. Deux, A. Bensaid, J.-L. Dubois Rande, P. Gueret, and P. Lim
Impact of acoustic window on accuracy of longitudinal global strain: a comparison study to cardiac magnetic resonance
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2011; 12(5): 394 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
M. Galderisi, M. Y. Henein, J. D'hooge, R. Sicari, L. P. Badano, J. L. Zamorano, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi
Recommendations of the European Association of Echocardiography How to use echo-Doppler in clinical trials: different modalities for different purposes
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2011; 12(5): 339 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. T. Owens and M. Jessup
The Year in Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 12, 2011; 57(15): 1573 - 1583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
D. H. MacIver
A new method for quantification of left ventricular systolic function using a corrected ejection fraction
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2011; 12(3): 228 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Mondillo, M. Galderisi, D. Mele, M. Cameli, V. S. Lomoriello, V. Zaca, P. Ballo, A. D'Andrea, D. Muraru, M. Losi, et al.
Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography: A New Technique for Assessing Myocardial Function
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2011; 30(1): 71 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
C. Thebault, E. Donal, A. Bernard, O. Moreau, F. Schnell, P. Mabo, and C. Leclercq
Real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a novel technique to quantify global left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2011; 12(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. L. Antoni, S. A. Mollema, J. Z. Atary, C. J. W. Borleffs, E. Boersma, N. R. L. van de Veire, E. R. Holman, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, and J. J. Bax
Time course of global left ventricular strain after acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2010; 31(16): 2006 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A. P. Wijnmaalen, V. Delgado, M. J. Schalij, C. F. B. van Huls van Taxis, E. R. Holman, J. J. Bax, and K. Zeppenfeld
Beneficial effects of catheter ablation on left ventricular and right ventricular function in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions and preserved ejection fraction
Heart, August 1, 2010; 96(16): 1275 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T. Marwick
Mechanical synchrony and survival in heart failure
Heart, July 1, 2010; 96(13): 999 - 1000.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
T. H. Marwick
Consistency of myocardial deformation imaging between vendors
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, June 1, 2010; 11(5): 414 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
C. Eek, B. Grenne, H. Brunvand, S. Aakhus, K. Endresen, P. K. Hol, H.-J. Smith, O. A. Smiseth, T. Edvardsen, and H. Skulstad
Strain Echocardiography and Wall Motion Score Index Predicts Final Infarct Size in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2010; 3(2): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2009
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 26, 2010; 55(4): 380 - 407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Lafitte
Do We Need New Echocardiographic Prognosticators for the Management of Heart Failure Patients?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 11, 2009; 54(7): 625 - 627.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, G.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, D.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, G.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, D.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement