EDITORIAL COMMENT
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Fibrosis, and Aortic StiffnessAn Unidentified Association Unraveled by Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Harald P. Kühl, MD, PhD*
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Harald P. Kühl, Klinik für Kardiologie, Klinikum Harlaching, München, Germany (Email: harald.kuehl{at}klinikum-muenchen.de).
Key Words: pulse wave velocity aortic stiffness hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardial fibrosis magnetic resonance imaging
Aortic stiffness has been identified as an important predictor of cardiovascular outcome independent of and additive to traditional cardiovascular risk factors in different patient populations including patients with hypertension (1), diabetes (2), and end-stage renal disease (3), and in elderly hospitalized subjects (4). More recently, the prognostic significance of increased aortic stiffness has also been demonstrated in the general population (5). The adverse effects of elevated aortic stiffness are thought to be caused by a premature return of reflected pressure waves in late systole, which increases central pressure and thus systolic blood pressure. Increased systolic blood pressure, in turn, increases the load on the left ventricle, inducing left ventricular hypertrophy, increasing myocardial oxygen demand, and causing subendocardial ischemia. In addition to the effects on the heart, increased aortic stiffness has been associated with an increase in the risk of stroke. Elevated aortic stiffness is not confined to aging or atherosclerotic diseases but has also been reported in noncardiovascular disorders such as generalized inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (6) or genetic disorders such as the Marfan syndrome (7). Interestingly, there have been no reports so far investigating aortic stiffness in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
The report of Boonyasirinant et al. (8) in this issue of the Journal is an important contribution to fill this gap in knowledge. Aortic stiffness was determined in 100 HCM patients and compared with that in 35 control subjects measuring aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) with velocity-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Remarkably, the authors observed an increased aortic stiffness in patients with HCM compared with healthy control subjects. There were no differences in age, sex, body surface area, or blood pressure between patients and control subjects, factors known to affect PWV measurements. In addition, aortic dimensions were similar in both groups. Yet, PWV was 8.72 ± 5.83 m/s in patients and 3.74 ± 0.86 m/s in control subjects, a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the authors made another intriguing observation: in the group of patients with HCM, those demonstrating myocardial fibrosis at late gadolinium-enhanced CMR revealed increased PWV compared with HCM patients without myocardial fibrosis (9.66 ± 6.43 m/s vs. 6.51 ± 3.25 m/s, respectively; p = 0.005). Regrettably, no data are presented on the relationship between the extent of myocardial fibrosis and PWV.
What is the link between HCM, myocardial fibrosis, and increased stiffness of the aorta? The paper by Boonyasirinant et al. (8) fails to give a definite answer to this question. Since increased aortic stiffness has been associated with structural changes of the arterial wall with rearrangement of its 3-dimensional architecture (9) and HCM is a disorder characterized by the disorganization of myocardial fiber architecture, it is tempting to speculate that the structural changes in the myocardium and the aortic wall may have a common pathway reflecting different phenotypic characteristics of the same disease. What is more, arterial stiffness may have a genetic component that is largely independent of the influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (9). Similarly, HCM is a genetic disorder, which may strengthen the argument for a common pathophysiology of the myocardial and the aortic disease. Another potential explanation is that increased aortic stiffness is the sequel of an atherosclerotic process, which is not infrequently found in patients with HCM. These are interesting questions that await further clarification.
In HCM, stiffening of the aorta may impose an additional burden on an already stiff ventricle. This may have important implications for ventricular-arterial coupling, which is the central determinant of left ventricular performance and cardiac energetics. Modulation of cardiac performance by the arterial system may affect stroke work and energy efficiency (i.e., the energy consumed by the heart to achieve the required stroke work, at rest and during exercise). It is likely that aortic stiffening may adversely affect cardiac performance in HCM patients especially during exercise. Thus, focusing exclusively on the heart may not be sufficient to completely understand the complex pathophysiology of HCM.
An important question that will have to be addressed in the future is whether the finding of an increased aortic stiffness in HCM patients is a marker of a worse prognosis akin to subjects with hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, or end-stage renal disease. Since in HCM patients the finding of myocardial fibrosis at delayed enhanced CMR has been suggested as a marker of sudden cardiac death (10), it is tempting to speculate that excessive aortic stiffness may also be associated with worse prognosis in these patients. Yet, the relative contribution of myocardial fibrosis and aortic stiffness to outcome in HCM patients needs to be elucidated in larger studies.
Increased aortic stiffness has been shown to be amenable to pharmacological treatment. For example, in Marfan patients, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has been reported to reverse increased aortic stiffness as well as aortic diameter (7). Likewise, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, statin therapy has been shown to reduce elevated aortic stiffness (6). In HCM patients the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on cardiac performance and coronary flow have been discussed controversially (11). Notwithstanding, it will be important to investigate whether aortic stiffness can be influenced by pharmacological treatment or nonpharmacological interventions (i.e., septal ablation, myectomy) in HCM patients and whether such treatment may result in improved prognosis.
The second important aspect of this article relates to the methodology used for assessing aortic stiffness. Although carotid femoral PWV is considered the "gold standard" for assessing arterial stiffness, measuring the exact distance between the flow-probe position at the carotid and femoral level may be difficult especially in obese men or women with large chest size. In contrast, CMR provides the advantage of allowing exact distance measurements in the 3-dimensional space. Thus, PWV measured from the time delay of aortic flow between the ascending to the descending aorta can be assessed very precisely using CMR. In addition, the method is highly reproducible as elegantly shown by Boonyasirinant et al. (8). Although in HCM patients CMR has proven superior to echocardiography in the accurate characterization of the distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy (12), the most significant advantage of CMR over other imaging modalities may be attributed to the fact that it allows assessment of different morphological and functional parameters in 1 single imaging session including cine imaging, perfusion, and delayed enhancement imaging as well as flow measurements. Thus, CMR may currently be the only imaging technique providing a fully comprehensive noninvasive evaluation of cardiovascular pathophysiology in HCM patients in one single step. In addition, CMR provides unique information on tissue characteristics not obtainable by any other imaging modality. This highlights the outstanding importance of CMR imaging for the complete characterization of complex cardiovascular disease.
In summary, the paper by Boonyasirinant et al. (8) is important because it gives us new insights into the complex pathophysiology of HCM that, apart from being a cardiac disease, may also affect the vascular system. This paper reminds us to broaden our view, which may sometimes be too focused on the heart. We should learn from this paper that in order to better understand cardiac disease we need to look at both the heart and vasculature. CMR is an exceptional and unique imaging modality to support us in this regard.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Dr. Kühl is currently affiliated with the Klinik für Kardiologie, Klinikum Harlaching, München, Germany.
* Editorials published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. 
 |
References
|
|---|
1. Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study Hypertension 2002;39:10-15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]2. Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, Gosling RG. Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function? Circulation 2002;106:2085-2090.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 3. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease Circulation 1999;99:2434-2439.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 4. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, et al. Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults Circulation 2005;111:3384-3390.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 5. Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population Circulation 2006;113:664-670.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 6. Maki-Petaja KM, Booth AD, Hall FC, et al. Ezetimibe and simvastatin reduce inflammation, disease activity, and aortic stiffness and improve endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:852-858.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 7. Ahimastos AA, Aggarwal A, D'Orsa KM, et al. Effect of perindopril on large artery stiffness and aortic root diameter in patients with Marfan syndrome: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2007;298:1539-1547.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 8. Boonyasirinant T, Rajiah P, Setser RM, et al. Aortic stiffness is increased in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with myocardial fibrosis: novel insights in vascular function from magnetic resonance imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:255-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 9. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P. Structural and genetic bases of arterial stiffness Hypertension 2005;45:1050-1055.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 10. Moon JC, McKenna WJ, McCrohon JA, Elliott PM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ. Toward clinical risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1561-1567.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 11. Kyriakidis M, Triposkiadis F, Dernellis J, et al. Effects of cardiac versus circulatory angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular diastolic function and coronary blood flow in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Circulation 1998;97:1342-1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 12. Rickers C, Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2005;112:855-861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Related Articles
-
Aortic Stiffness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- Michael F. O'Rourke, Thomas Weber, and Audrey Adji
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 504-505.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Aortic Stiffness Is Increased in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Myocardial Fibrosis: Novel Insights in Vascular Function From Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Thananya Boonyasirinant, Prabhakar Rajiah, Randolph M. Setser, Michael L. Lieber, Harry M. Lever, Milind Y. Desai, and Scott D. Flamm
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 255-262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A24.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Austin, Z. B. Popovic, D. H. Kwon, M. Thamilarasan, T. Boonyasirinant, S. D. Flamm, H. M. Lever, and M. Y. Desai
Aortic stiffness independently predicts exercise capacity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multimodality imaging study
Heart,
August 1, 2010;
96(16):
1303 - 1310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. O'Rourke, T. Weber, and A. Adji
Aortic Stiffness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 2, 2010;
55(5):
504 - 505.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|