Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1293-1302, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.019
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nikolsky, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nikolsky, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

QUARTERLY FOCUS ISSUE: PREVENTION/OUTCOMES: OUTCOMES IN ACS

Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Implications

Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial

Eugenia Nikolsky, MD, PhD*,*, Gregg W. Stone, MD*, Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, SM*, George D. Dangas, MD, PhD*, Alexandra J. Lansky, MD*, Brent McLaurin, MD{ddagger}, A. Michael Lincoff, MD§, Frederick Feit, MD{dagger}, Jeffrey W. Moses, MD*, Martin Fahy, MSc*, Steven V. Manoukian, MD||, Harvey D. White, MD**, E. Magnus Ohman, MD, Michel E. Bertrand, MD{dagger}{dagger}, David A. Cox, MD# and Roxana Mehran, MD*

* Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
{dagger} New York University, New York, New York
{ddagger} AnMed Health, Anderson, South Carolina
§ The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
|| Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Hospital Corporation of America, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
# Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania
** Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
{dagger}{dagger} Hopital Cardiologique, Lille, France

Manuscript received April 14, 2009; revised manuscript received July 8, 2009, accepted July 12, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Eugenia Nikolsky, Director, Academic Affairs, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 111 East 59th Street, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (Email: enikolsky{at}crf.org).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Objectives: We assessed the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Background: GIB is a potential hemorrhagic complication in patients with ACS treated with antithrombotic and/or antiplatelet medications. The clinical outcomes associated with GIB in this setting have not been systematically studied.

Methods: In the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial, 13,819 patients with moderate- and high-risk ACS, enrolled at 450 centers in 17 countries between August 2003 and December 2005, were randomized to the open-label use of 1 of 3 antithrombin regimens (heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin monotherapy).

Results: GIB within 30 days occurred in 178 patients (1.3%). Older age, baseline anemia, longer duration of study drug administration before angiogram, smoking, ST-segment deviation ≥1 mm, and diabetes were identified as independent predictors of GIB. On multivariable analysis, GIB was strongly associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.87 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.61 to 9.08], p < 0.0001), cardiac mortality (HR: 5.35 [IQR 2.71 to 10.59], p < 0.0001), and composite ischemia (HR: 1.94 [IQR 1.14 to 3.30], p = 0.014), as well as with 1-year all-cause mortality (HR: 3.97 [IQR 2.64 to 5.99], p < 0.0001), cardiac mortality (HR: 3.77 [IQR 2.14 to 6.63], p < 0.0001), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.74 [IQR 1.01 to 3.02], p = 0.047), and composite ischemia (HR: 1.90 [IQR 1.37 to 2.64], p = 0.0001). Patients who experienced GIB had significantly higher rates of stent thrombosis compared with patients without GIB (5.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.009).

Conclusions: GIB is a serious condition in the scenario of ACS and is independently associated with mortality and ischemic complications.

Key Words: gastrointestinal • hemorrhage • bleeding • coronary disease

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndrome
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  GIB = gastrointestinal bleeding
  GPI = glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor
  IQR = interquartile range
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction


Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is one of the common sources of hemorrhage in conservatively treated patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and in patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (1,2). Even in nonselected populations, GIB results in high rates of morbidity and mortality (3,4). The data are scarce, however, regarding the specific implications of GIB in patients with ACS whose contemporary management typically includes a combination of antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy (5,6).

We, therefore, examined the database from the large, multicenter, randomized ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial to analyze the incidence, predictors and outcomes of GIB occurring within 30 days after randomization in moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Study design.   Design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and principal results of the ACUITY trial have been reported in detail elsewhere (7–9). In brief, eligible patients were randomized to the open-label use of 1 of 3 antithrombin regimens started prior to angiography: heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), bivalirudin plus a GPI, or bivalirudin monotherapy. Patients assigned to heparin plus a GPI or bivalirudin plus a GPI were randomized again in a 2 x 2 factorial design to routine upstream GPI started in all patients immediately after randomization versus deferred selective GPI initiation in the catheterization laboratory only after diagnostic angiography identified which patients would undergo immediate PCI (7).

After mandatory angiography performed within 72 h of randomization, the patients were triaged according to physician discretion to management by PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or medical therapy. Aspirin 300 to 325 mg orally (PO) or 250 to 500 mg intravenously (IV) was administered daily during the index hospitalization, and 75 to 325 mg daily was prescribed indefinitely after discharge. The initial dosing and timing of clopidogrel were left to physician discretion per local standards, although a 300-mg or greater loading dose was required in all cases within 2 h of PCI. Clopidogrel 75 mg daily was recommended for 1 year in all patients with coronary artery disease.

Clinical end points.   The primary end point in the ACUITY trial was composite ischemia (death from any cause, myocardial infarction [MI], or unplanned revascularization for ischemia), major bleeding not related to CABG, and net clinical outcomes (composite ischemia or major bleeding) (7). The 30-day end points were measured as cumulative events occurring within 25 to 35 days after randomization. Major bleeding was intracranial or intraocular hemorrhage, hematoma ≥5 cm in diameter, access site hemorrhage requiring intervention, reoperation for bleeding, clinically overt bleeding resulting in a decrease in hemoglobin by ≥3 g/dl, reduction in hemoglobin concentration of ≥4 g/dl without an overt source of bleeding, or the use of any blood product transfusion (7). The definitions of other individual primary end points have been described (7–9). Bleeding events were also stratified using Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classification (10).

Gastrointestinal bleeding was defined as an episode of coffee ground emesis, hematemesis, melena, or red blood per rectum occurring within 25 to 35 days after randomization and documented by a treating physician in the patient's original source documents. Anemia was defined as a baseline hematocrit value <39% for men and <36% for women (11). Chronic renal insufficiency was defined as creatinine clearance <60 ml/min (12). Acquired thrombocytopenia was defined as a nadir in-hospital platelet count ≤150 x 109/l in patients whose admission platelet count was >150 x 109/l and was further subdivided into mild, moderate, severe, and profound when nadir platelet counts were 100 to 150, 50 to 100, 20 to 50, and <20 x 109/l, respectively. Stent thrombosis was adjudicated based on Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria (13).

A clinical events committee blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated all end point events using original source documents. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating center; all patients provided written informed consent.

Statistical analysis.   Categorical variables were compared with chi-square tests or the Fisher exact test where appropriate. Continuous variables are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The 30-day and 1-year outcomes are presented as Kaplan-Meier percentages and compared using log-rank tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of GIB. The independent association of the occurrence of GIB and subsequent mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, composite ischemia, and stent thrombosis within the 1-year follow-up period was examined using Cox proportional hazards models in which GIB was treated as a time-dependent covariate. All multivariable models controlled for the following baseline covariates: age, sex, diabetic status, hypertension, current smoking, prior MI, prior CABG, prior PCI, baseline cardiac biomarker elevation, ST-segment deviation, chronic renal insufficiency, baseline anemia, treatment with heparin before randomization, randomization to 1 of the antithrombotic regimens, triage to PCI versus CABG versus medical management, and time from study drug administration to angiogram. A forward stepwise algorithm was used to select significant covariates from this list.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Study population.   Among a total of 13,819 patients with ACS enrolled at 450 sites in 17 countries in the ACUITY trial, GIB within 30 days of randomization occurred in 178 patients (1.3%), including 107 of 7,789 (1.4%) patients triaged to PCI, 28 of 1,539 (1.8%) patients triaged to CABG, and 43 of 4,491 (1.0%) patients triaged to medical management. Rates of GIB were the highest in patients randomized to heparin plus a GPI (1.5%) followed by bivalirudin plus a GPI (1.4%) and bivalirudin monotherapy (0.9%) (p = 0.019). The incidence of GIB increased with age from 0.57% in patients ≤50 years of age to 0.95%, 1.13%, 1.87%, and 3.54% in patients >50 to ≤60, >60 to ≤70, >70 to ≤80, and >80 years of age, respectively.

A total of 48.2% of patients with GIB versus 4.1% of patients without GIB met ACUITY protocol criteria for major bleeding not related to CABG (p < 0.0001), whereas TIMI major bleeding criteria were met in 19.8% versus 1.2% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.0001).

Clinical and procedural characteristics of patients who developed GIB versus patients without GIB are shown in Table 1. Patients who developed GIB were older and more frequently female, and had higher rates of diabetes mellitus, including a higher prevalence of insulin-treated diabetes, worse renal function, anemia, and higher TIMI risk scores. The occurrence of GIB was associated with higher rates of low molecular weight heparin administration before coronary angiography and GPI before angiography and during PCI, longer duration of study drug administration before performance of angiogram, and with triage to revascularization with either PCI or CABG (75.8% vs. 67.4%, respectively, p = 0.016) rather than medical therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Baseline Clinical Data, Randomization Assignment, and Triage Strategy in Patients With and Without GIB
 
Independent predictors of GIB.   As shown in Table 2, multivariable predictors of GIB in the entire study population included older age, baseline anemia, longer duration of study drug administration before angiogram, smoking, ST-segment deviation ≥1 mm, and diabetes. In patients triaged to PCI, multivariable predictors of GIB included older age, baseline anemia, diabetes, smoking, and longer duration of study drug administration before angiogram. Randomization to bivalirudin monotherapy compared with randomization to heparin plus a GPI showed a trend toward lower risk of GIB in the entire study population, especially in the PCI cohort. Older age was the only independent predictor of GIB in patients triaged to CABG. In patients triaged to medical management, time from study drug administration to angiogram, chronic renal insufficiency, and baseline anemia were independent predictors of GIB.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Multivariable Predictors of GIB in the Entire ACUITY Population and in Patients Triaged to PCI, CABG, or Medical Management
 
Outcomes of patients with GIB.   Patients with GIB compared with patients without GIB had a higher frequency of acquired thrombocytopenia (21.6% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001) due to a higher incidence of mild (14.7% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.003) and moderate thrombocytopenia (6.3% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.0001), but not severe or profound thrombocytopenia (0.6% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.61). A hemoglobin drop of ≥3 g/dl during index hospitalization occurred in 30.4% versus 1.3% of the patients with and without GIB, respectively (p < 0.0001). As expected, rates of blood product transfusion not related to CABG were significantly higher in patients with versus without GIB (39.2% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.0001). The index hospitalization was significantly longer in patients who experienced GIB compared with those who did not (6.0 days [IQR 4.0 to 10.0 days] vs. 3.0 days [IQR 2.0 to 6.0 days], p < 0.0001).

As shown in Figures 1 and 2,Go in the entire study population, at 30-day and 1-year follow-up, GIB was associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and nonfatal MI resulting in notably higher rates of composite ischemia. Rates of urgent revascularization were not influenced by GIB.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Ischemic Events at 30 Days and 1 Year in Patients With and Without GIB

Patients with versus without gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) have significantly increased 30-day (A) and 1-year (B) rates of cardiac and all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and composite ischemic outcome.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Cumulative Risk of All-Cause and Cardiac Death in Patients With and Without GIB

By Kaplan-Meier estimates, patients with versus without gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) had significantly higher all-cause (A) and cardiac (B) death at 1 year.

 
By multivariable analysis, GIB was an independent predictor of 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.87 [IQR 2.61 to 9.08], p < 0.0001), cardiac mortality (HR: 5.35 [IQR 2.71 to 10.59], p < 0.0001), and composite ischemia (HR: 1.94 [IQR 1.14 to 3.30], p = 0.014). At 1-year follow-up, this relationship continued to be significant, and GIB was also a predictor of myocardial infarction (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Multivariable Predictors of 1-Year Individual and Composite Ischemic End Point

Gastrointestinal bleeding was an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and the composite ischemic end point. CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; MI = myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

 
Outcomes of patients with GIB in relation to triaged treatment.   The negative impact of GIB on rates of death, MI, and composite ischemia was consistent across patients triaged to PCI and medical treatment (Table 3). In patients triaged to CABG, the occurrence of GIB also resulted in higher all-cause and cardiac mortality at 30 days and 1 year, whereas rates of nonfatal MI were unrelated to GIB.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 30-Day and 1-Year Clinical Outcomes of Patients With and Without GIB Triaged to PCI, CABG, or Medical Management
 
Stent thrombosis.   Among 7,789 patients triaged to PCI, stent thrombosis (definite, probable, or possible) developed within 1 year in 6 of 107 (5.8%) patients with GIB and 161 of 7,682 (2.4%) patients without GIB (p = 0.009). All 6 cases of stent thrombosis (1 definite and 5 probable) in the GIB group occurred within 35 days of randomization. Five of these cases were fatal, including 3 patients who died during the index hospitalization (no information is available concerning whether antiplatelet therapy was continued after GIB episodes in these patients) and 2 patients who died after discharge (both were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge). The only patient with GIB who survived an episode of stent thrombosis was prescribed a thienopyridine, but not aspirin, at discharge.

Medication use.   Medications at admission did not differ significantly between patients with and without GIB (Table 4). At discharge and 30-day and 1-year follow-up, patients with GIB were significantly less likely to be treated with aspirin than those without GIB. Daily dosages of aspirin at discharge were similar between the 2 groups. Treatment with thienopyridines at discharge, 30 days, and 1 year was also less likely in patients with versus without GIB. However, the difference was significant only at discharge. Other medications at follow-up, including beta-blockers, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or receptor blockers, did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Medication Use at Different Time Intervals in Patients With and Without GIB
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
The major results of this analysis are: 1) GIB within 30 days of randomization occurred in 1.3% of moderate- and high-risk patients with ACS, and was associated with strikingly increased rates of early and late mortality, nonfatal MI, stent thrombosis, acquired mild or moderate thrombocytopenia, need for blood product transfusions, and prolonged in-hospital stay; 2) older age, baseline anemia, longer duration of study drug administration before angiogram, smoking, ST-segment deviation ≥1 mm, and diabetes were strongly related to GIB within 30 days of randomization; and 3) aspirin and/or thienopyridine withdrawal was frequent among patients experiencing GIB, resulting in one-fourth of patients not receiving aspirin and almost one-half of patients not receiving thienopyridines at discharge.

In the ACUITY trial, GIB was the second most frequent source of non–CABG-related bleeding after access site bleeding in the entire study population, and was the most common source of bleeding among patients triaged to medical management. As patients with hemorrhagic diatheses and recent bleeding were excluded from the ACUITY trial, the true incidence of GIB in a nonselected ACS population is likely to be higher given the increasing incidence of GIB as the population ages. In 1 retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with ACS treated with a combination of aspirin, clopidogrel, and enoxaparin, rates of GIB were 2.7% (5).

Outcomes of patients with ACS experiencing GIB are typically poor. In this analysis, index hospitalization was twice as long in patients who experienced GIB compared with those who did not. Patients who developed GIB had extremely high rates of mortality and MI. Specifically, 9.6% of the patients who had GIB died within 35 days, with the majority of these patients (77%) dying from cardiac causes. Five of 6 patients who had GIB and probable/definite stent thrombosis died. At 1 year, around one-fifth of patients with GIB had died, one-half from a cardiac cause; cardiac mortality in patients with GIB nearly doubled; and more than one-third had died or experienced a nonfatal MI or an unplanned revascularization. In this analysis, 1-year mortality in patients experiencing GIB was almost 2-fold higher compared with a combined unstable angina/ACS population of 5,673 patients undergoing PCI from a large case-controlled Australian study (6). In the same study, patients with ACS had an approximately 5-fold increase in the odds of GIB compared with patients with stable coronary syndromes.

The mechanisms behind the high rates of mortality and nonfatal MI in patients with ACS experiencing GIB are multifactorial. These patients had a more unfavorable baseline clinical profile that included older age, higher prevalence of diabetes, anemia, and chronic renal insufficiency, all factors known to worsen the prognosis of patients with ACS (14–17). Bleeding-related hemodynamic instability may provoke or aggravate ischemia, resulting in adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with GIB are commonly treated with blood product transfusion, as happened with more than one-third of the patients in this analysis. Although no randomized trial has prospectively assessed the impact of blood transfusion on outcomes in patients with ACS, analyses from large retrospective series have provided evidence that transfusion may be harmful (18,19). In this analysis, occurrence of GIB correlated with higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, which is also known to worsen the prognosis of patients with ACS (20). The retrospective nature of this study does not allow us to identify the exact mechanisms of thrombocytopenia that might be related to the higher rates of treatment with GPI in patients who developed GIB or to administration of heparin resulting in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with/without thrombosis. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a well-known cause of premature cessation of antiplatelet therapy, which poses additional risk for ischemic outcomes in patients with ACS (1,21,22). In this analysis, one-fifth (20.8%) of the patients with GIB were not taking either aspirin or thienopyridines at discharge. The percentage of patients not on aspirin or thienopyridines was highest among patients triaged to medical management (40.0%), followed by patients triaged to CABG (27.3%) and to PCI (13.3%). Of note, in the ACUITY trial, aspirin was recommended at a relatively high daily dosage (300 to 325 mg PO or 250 to 500 mg IV) during index hospitalization. Although aspirin at any dosage is known to be ulcerogenic, an escalating dose is related to a higher incidence of GIB (23). The optimal dosage of aspirin in ACS is still not known and is being investigated in an ongoing trial (24).

Consistent with previous reports, in this analysis, occurrence of GIB was strongly associated with older age, anemia, and smoking (25–27). A novel and an important practical finding of this study is that the duration of antithrombotic therapy before angiography was more than doubled in patients with GIB compared with patients without GIB. By multivariable analysis, there was a 12% increment in odds of GIB per 10-h increase in duration of antithrombotic medications. To reduce the incidence of GIB and perhaps other bleeding complications, this time should be shortened in ACS patients at high risk for bleeding.

Concern is warranted regarding treatment with heparin plus a GPI, which by multivariable analysis was associated with a trend toward a higher incidence of GIB compared with bivalirudin monotherapy across the entire ACUITY population, especially in patients triaged to PCI. Although GPI are known to increase access site–related bleeding in patients treated with PCI, an increased incidence of GIB has not been reported in any of the pivotal trials assessing safety and efficacy of different GPIs in the setting of PCI (28–30) or conservative treatment (31,32). Still, in the randomized REPLACE-2 (Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events) trial, GIB occurred significantly more often in patients randomized to heparin plus a GPI compared with patients randomized to bivalirudin (0.6% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.003) (2). It is also possible that rates of GIB may vary with different types of GPI. In a large regional registry of contemporary PCI, treatment with abciximab as opposed to eptifibatide was associated with a higher incidence of GIB in patients treated with primary PCI (4.8% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.01) (33). The results of this analysis coupled with the data from the REPLACE-2 trial support the use of bivalirudin rather than heparin plus a GPI in patients with ACS at high risk for GIB.

Study limitations.   The ACUITY trial was not specifically powered to evaluate the predictors and clinical outcomes of GIB. Nonetheless, GIB was rigorously defined in the protocol, and all bleeding and end point data were prospectively collected and adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee that was blinded to randomized treatment assignment. Given the post hoc nature of this analysis, data are lacking on the specific causes and management of GIB. Even by multivariable analysis, GIB was strongly associated with mortality and the composite ischemic end point; however, no definite conclusion may be drawn with regard to GIB as a direct cause of these events. Information on other drugs known to increase the risk of GIB, including warfarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and spironolactone, was not collected. This analysis also lacks data on treatment with proton pump inhibitors. Although their efficacy for the secondary prevention of upper GIB was confirmed in randomized controlled trials (34,35), no study has prospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of this therapy in the primary prevention of upper GIB. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that proton pump inhibitors may decrease clopidogrel's inhibitory effect on platelet P2Y12 receptors and are associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes after ACS (36,37). Additional clinical measurements not included in this analysis (e.g., certain comorbidities) may also have interacted with GIB. By study protocol, bleeding events occurring after 30-day follow-up were not collected, nor was the timing of discontinuation of aspirin and/or thienopyridines.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
GIB, even at a level that does not meet the definition of major bleeding, is a devastating condition in the setting of ACS and is associated with high rates of mortality, nonfatal MI, stent thrombosis, and prolonged hospitalization. Physicians should be aware of GIB in high-risk populations, including the elderly, smokers, and patients with anemia. Given the adverse prognostic significance of GIB, it should be reported in any trial assessing the safety of new antithrombotic agents and regimens.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. Nikolsky has received lecture fees from Abbott. Drs. Stone and Lincoff have received research support from The Medicines Company. Dr. Kirtane has received honoraria from The Medicines Company and is a consultant for Medicure. Dr. Dangas is a speaker for The Medicines Company. Dr. Lansky has received unrestricted research support (modest) from The Medicines Company. Dr. Feit is a consultant for The Medicines Company and is a shareholder for Johnson & Johnson and The Medicines Company. Dr. Manoukian is a consultant for The Medicines Company (significant) and for Bristol-Myers Squibb (modest), and has received an educational grant from Sanofi-Aventis (significant). Dr. White has received a research grant from The Medicines Company. Dr. Ohman is a consultant for Abiomed, CV Therapeutics, Datascope, Inovise, Liposcience, Response Biomedical, Northpoint Domain, and Pozen Inc.; has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, CV Therapeutics, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Datascope, Eli Lilly & Co, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough Corporation, and The Medicines Company; and has equity in Inovoise. Dr. Cox is a consultant for Abbott Vascular and for Boston Scientific and is on the Speakers' Bureau for The Medicines Company. Dr. Mehran is a consultant for and has received honoraria from The Medicines Company, Daichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, Cordis, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
1. Newby LK, Bhapkar MV, White HD, et al. SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY Investigators Aspirin use post-acute coronary syndromes: intolerance, bleeding and discontinuation J Thromb Thrombolysis 2003;16:119-128.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2. Lincoff AM, Kleiman NS, Kereiakes DJ, et al. REPLACE-2 Investigators Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization: REPLACE-2 randomized trial JAMA 2004;292:696-703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Yavorski RT, Wong RK, Maydonovitch C, Battin LS, Furnia A, Amundson DE. Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:568-573.[Web of Science][Medline]

4. Barkun A, Sabbah S, Enns R, et al. RUGBE Investigators The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibition are associated with improved outcomes in a real-life setting Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1238-1246.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5. Ng FH, Wong SY, Lam KF, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving a combination of aspirin, clopidogrel, and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndrome Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:865-871.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6. Chin MW, Yong G, Bulsara MK, Rankin J, Forbes GM. Predictive and protective factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case-control study Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2411-2416.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7. Stone GW, Bertrand M, Colombo A, et al. Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale Am Heart J 2004;148:764-775.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8. Stone GW, White HD, Ohman EM, et al. Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) Trial Investigators Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial Lancet 2007;369:907-919.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9. Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW, et al. ACUITY Investigators Routine upstream initiation vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Timing trial JAMA 2007;297:591-602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Bovill EG, Terrin ML, Stump DC, et al. Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), phase II trial. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:256-265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Nutritional Anemias: Report of a WHO Scientific GroupGeneva: World Health Organization; 1968.

12. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine Nephron 1976;16:31-41.[Web of Science][Medline]

13. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Academic Research Consortium Clinical endpoints in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions Circulation 2007;115:2344-2351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Nikolsky E, Aymong ED, Halkin A, et al. Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:547-553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Avezum A, Makdisse M, Spencer F, et al. GRACE Investigators Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Am Heart J 2005;149:67-73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

16. Keough-Ryan TM, Kiberd BA, Dipchand CS, et al. Outcomes of acute coronary syndrome in a large Canadian cohort: impact of chronic renal insufficiency, cardiac interventions, and anemia Am J Kidney Dis 2005;46:845-855.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17. Feit F, Manoukian SV, Ebrahimi R, et al. Safety and efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndromes: a report from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1645-1652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Yang X, Alexander KP, Chen AY, et al. CRUSADE Investigators The implications of blood transfusions for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1490-1495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Rao SV, Jollis JG, Harrington RA, et al. Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes JAMA 2004;292:1555-1562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Nikolsky E, Sadeghi HM, Effron MB, et al. Impact of in-hospital acquired thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 2005;96:474-481.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

21. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey Jr. DE, et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:734-739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Ferrari E, Benhamou M, Cerboni P, Marcel B. Coronary syndromes following aspirin withdrawal: a special risk for late stent thrombosis J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:456-459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Lanas A, García-Rodríguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al. Asociación Española de Gastroenterología Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations Gut 2006;55:1731-1738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Mehta SR, Bassand JP, Chrolavicius S, et al. CURRENT-OASIS 7 Steering Committee Design and rationale of CURRENT-OASIS 7: a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial trial evaluating optimal dosing strategies for clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with ST and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy Am Heart J 2008;156:1080-1088.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

25. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcer Disease Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease JAMA 1994;272:65-69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Talley NJ, Evans JM, Fleming KC, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Melton 3rd LJ. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and dyspepsia in the elderly Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:1345-1350.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

27. Andersen IB, Jørgensen T, Bonnevie O, Grønbaek M, Sørensen TI. Smoking and alcohol intake as risk factors for bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers: a population-based cohort study Epidemiology 2000;11:434-439.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

28. Topol EJ, Califf RM, Weisman HF, et al. The EPIC Investigators Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months Lancet 1994;343:881-886.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

29. The EPILOG Investigators Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization N Engl J Med 1998;339:1861-1863.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

30. The EPISTENT Investigators Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet 1998;352:87-92.[Web of Science][Medline]

31. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina N Engl J Med 1998;338:1498-1505.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

32. The PURSUIT Trial Investigators Inhibition of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy. N Engl J Med 1998;339:436-443.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

33. Gurm HS, Smith DE, Collins JS, et al. The relative safety and efficacy of abciximab and eptifibatide in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a large regional registry of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:529-535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Lau JY, Leung WK, Wu JC, et al. Omeprazole before endoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding N Engl J Med 2007;356:1631-1640.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

35. Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding N Engl J Med 2005;352:238-244.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

36. Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC, et al. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, double-blind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:256-260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Ho PM, Maddox TM, Wang L, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome JAMA 2009;301:937-944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A26. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Afilalo, J. Therrien, L. Pilote, R. Ionescu-Ittu, G. Martucci, and A. J. Marelli
Geriatric Congenital Heart Disease: Burden of Disease and Predictors of Mortality
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 27, 2011; 58(14): 1509 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. L. Dauerman, S. V. Rao, F. S. Resnic, and R. J. Applegate
Bleeding Avoidance Strategies: Consensus and Controversy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 28, 2011; 58(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G. Cayla, J. Silvain, O. Barthelemy, S. O. Connor, L. Payot, A. Bellemain-Appaix, F. Beygui, M. Aout, J.-P. Collet, E. Vicaut, et al.
Trans-radial approach for catheterisation in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: an analysis of major bleeding complications in the ABOARD Study
Heart, June 1, 2011; 97(11): 887 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J. M. Scheiman, P. J. Devereaux, J. Herlitz, P. H. Katelaris, A. Lanas, S. Veldhuyzen van Zanten, E. Naucler, and L.-E. Svedberg
Prevention of peptic ulcers with esomeprazole in patients at risk of ulcer development treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid: a randomised, controlled trial (OBERON)
Heart, May 15, 2011; 97(10): 797 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S.-K. Chua, C.-S. Liao, H.-F. Hung, J.-J. Cheng, C.-Z. Chiu, C.-M. Chang, S.-H. Lee, S.-C. Lin, J.-Y. Liou, H.-M. Lo, et al.
Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2011; 20(3): 218 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & RehabilitationHome page
F. Bellotto, P. Palmisano, L. Compostella, N. Russo, M. Zaccaria, P. Guida, T. Setzu, A. Cati, A. Maddalozzo, S. Favale, et al.
Anemia does not preclude increments in cardiac performance during a short period of intensive, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, April 1, 2011; 18(2): 150 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. L. O'Donoghue
CYP2C19 Genotype and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients: Does It Take Two to Tango?
Circulation, February 8, 2011; 123(5): 468 - 470.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. P. Giugliano and E. Braunwald
The Year in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 14, 2010; 56(25): 2126 - 2138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 18, 2010; 55(20): 2272 - 2286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
D. T. Ko, L. Yun, H. C. Wijeysundera, C. A. Jackevicius, S. V. Rao, P. C. Austin, J. F. Marquis, and J. V. Tu
Incidence, Predictors, and Prognostic Implications of Hospitalization for Late Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients Older Than 65 Years
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, April 1, 2010; 3(2): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2009
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 26, 2010; 55(4): 380 - 407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Van de Werf
Balancing Benefit and Bleeding Risk of Antithrombotic Agents in the Individual Patient With an Acute Coronary Syndrome
Circulation, January 5, 2010; 121(1): 5 - 7.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nikolsky, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nikolsky, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement