Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 53:1539-1542, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.048
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balligand, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balligand, J.-L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

EDITORIAL COMMENT

β3-Adrenoceptor Stimulation on Top of β1-Adrenoceptor Blockade

"Stop or Encore?"*

Jean-Luc Balligand, MD, PhD*

Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jean-Luc Balligand, Director, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Université catholique de Louvain, UCL-FATH 5349, Tour Vésale 5th Floor, 52 Avenue Mounier, 1200 Brussels, Belgium (Email: jl.balligand{at}uclouvain.be).

Key Words: nebivolol • beta3-adrenergic receptor • human heart • contractility • nitric oxide


Catecholamines released by the orthosympathetic system play a major role in the short- and long-term regulation of cardiac function. Although acute stimulation of adrenergic receptors (ARs) (mostly β1) increases all aspects of cardiac contractility and is generally considered as positive for heart function, their prolonged activation results in adverse remodeling of the myocardium, in part due to toxic effects on cardiomyocytes (and other cells composing cardiac muscle), as exemplified by the cardiac phenotype of mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of β1-AR (1). Accordingly, chronic overactivation of the orthosympathetic system in heart failure, albeit initially adaptive, is generally considered to be deleterious in the long term (2). This is amply supported by clinical evidence of the beneficial effect of β-adrenergic blockade in failing patients.

The mechanistic interpretation of this beneficial effect, however, is far from simple. Although the generic property to antagonize β1-AR activation (thereby preventing its long-term deleterious effects) is shared by all blockers with proven clinical efficacy, several characteristics have recently emerged as key factors to predict benefit (or absence thereof). These include polymorphisms at β-ARs (3–5) or G-protein receptor kinases regulating their desensitization (6), as well as ancillary pharmacodynamic properties of specific blockers.

Nebivolol belongs to the group of β-blockers with proven clinical benefit in a population of heart failure patients, as demonstrated in the SENIORS (Study of the Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalisation in Seniors with Heart Failure) trial (7). It is endowed with high specificity for β1-AR antagonism (8). However, its pharmacodynamic properties extend beyond just β1-AR blockade. Early work has identified ancillary properties as serotonin 5-HT1A receptor or P2Y purinergic receptor (9) agonist—at least in the kidney vasculature—β2-AR agonist (10), or more recently, alpha-1-AR antagonist (11). Most of these properties, however, are based on observations in heterologous expression systems (against recombinant receptors) or animal tissues, raising doubt about their generalizability to the drug's effect on native human receptors in situ. In a previous study on small resistance coronary vessels from human specimens, C. Dessy in our laboratory had demonstrated vasodilating properties of nebivolol through activation of the third isotype of beta-adrenoceptors, β3-ARs (12).

β3-ARs have classically been considered as receptors mediating metabolic effects (e.g., lipolysis) in adipocytes, although their low expression and lipolytic activity in (at least normal) human white fat tissue has dampened enthusiasm for their exploitation as therapeutic targets of obesity (13). They raised renewed interest in the cardiovascular field after the discovery of their expression in human ventricular myocardium (14). Surprisingly, in this tissue, their activation with preferential agonists (in the presence of combined β1- and β2-AR blockade) produced effects functionally antipathetic to those classically ascribed to the other 2 isotypes, (i.e., a decrease in developed cardiac muscle tension). This has been independently confirmed with similar pharmacologic approaches in ventricular cardiac tissues and cells from a number of animal species (15,16). Accordingly, mice with deletion of the β3-AR gene display an enhanced inotropic response to nonspecific β-adrenoceptor agonists (17), which could be interpreted as unopposed stimulation of the residual β1- and β2-ARs. Mechanistically, this countervailing effect of β3-AR stimulation was shown to involve G-alpha-i coupling to a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity (18), resulting in NO-mediated attenuation of β1- and β2-adrenergic effects on cardiac muscle (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Putative Beneficial Effects of Combined Activation of β3-Adrenoceptors and Blockade of β1-Adrenoceptors on Cardiac Function

Nebivolol combines the properties of a β1-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonist (β1-blocker) and a β3-AR agonist. In human myocardium, β3-ARs are expressed both on endothelial cells of the coronary microvasculature and on cardiac myocytes. (Left) Activation of β3-ARs on coronary endothelium produces the activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and the release of nitric oxide (NO) and of an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF), both of which contribute to increased vasodilation and coronary perfusion. In addition, NO may paracrinally promote cardiomyocyte relaxation and left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling, thereby enhancing diastolic reserve. (Right) In ventricular cardiomyocytes, nebivolol combines the effects of β1-AR blockade, which prevents the deleterious effects of chronic adrenergic stimulation on myocardial remodeling, and activation of β3-AR; the latter, through G-alpha-i coupling, (e)NOS activation and NO production may oppose the acute effects of adrenergic stimulation of contractility. Hypothetically, agonism on β3-ARs may contribute to additional protection against adverse remodeling under chronic adrenergic stress through sustained functional antagonism of the β1-AR/cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway or other (yet undetermined) pathways. The combined effects on remodeling, ventricular perfusion and filling ultimately would result in improved LV function. Figure illustration by Rob Flewell.

 
Other distinctive properties of β3-ARs deserve further consideration in the context of cardiac diseases. Contrary to β1-AR (and to a lesser extent β2-AR), the abundance of β3-AR messenger ribonucleic acid (and proteins) increases in ventricular myocardium from patients with heart failure from ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathies (19), as well as sepsis (20). Such paradoxical regulation is consistent with in vitro up-regulation of β3-ARs in rodent cardiomyocytes chronically exposed to catecholamines (21), as well as animal models of diabetes (22), a condition also associated with hyperadrenergism. Also, β3-ARs are more resistant (than β1- and β2-ARs) to homologous desensitization (23). Overall, this makes β3-ARs very attractive candidate targets for an efficient pharmacologic modulation in the diseased heart.

Building upon previous evidence for β3-AR agonism of nebivolol in human vessels (12), Rozec et al. (24) in this issue of the Journal tested the ability of the drug to activate similar receptors in human myocardium. Using ventricular biopsies from transplanted human hearts, they show a concentration-dependent attenuation of developed contraction force with nebivolol, which replicates similar effects of the preferential β3-AR agonist, BRL37344. This effect is maintained despite coincubation with the β1- and β2-AR blocker, nadolol, ruling out the implication of these 2 isotypes; conversely, it is strongly inhibited by coincubation with a β3-AR antagonist, L-748,337. As in previous studies on similar human material (18), this β3-AR effect is sensitive to NOS inhibition with L-NMMA, implicating a β3-AR–mediated activation of NO synthesis.

How do these findings bear on the clinical use of nebivolol? First, it should be remembered that the authors used human myocardium from transplanted hearts, studied in organ baths ex vivo. They have done an extensive characterization of this model in their earlier work (25), with contractile responsiveness consistent with inotropic modulation in classical cardiac preparations; they also carefully excluded rejecting hearts. However, their in vitro setting allows only limited prediction of the effect of similar agonists in vivo; in particular, loading conditions cannot be calibrated, and parameters such as relaxation cannot be studied accurately. Therefore, their observation of an attenuation of contractile tension with nebivolol may not necessarily translate into a negative inotropic effect in vivo. Indeed, a β3-AR–mediated blunting of the positive inotropic effect of catecholamines may abbreviate systolic contraction and increase the length of diastolic interval, which together with NO release in the myocardium may promote relaxation, diastolic filling, and subendocardial perfusion (26). The overall result would be an increased diastolic reserve and improved left ventricular function (Fig. 1).

The authors also selected myocardial samples from nonfailing hearts. Although this allows some degree of analysis of β3-AR effects in close to "normal" conditions, the conclusions may not necessarily apply to the failing heart; indeed, heart failure induces dramatic changes in excitation–contraction coupling, tissue remodeling, and alterations in some key intracellular signaling elements, including NOS expression, NOS coupling, and NO bioavailability due to increased oxidant stress. The latter, in particular, may obliterate some of the NO-dependent effects reported here. However, in a previous study by Moniotte et al. (19), the effect of β3-AR agonists was somewhat attenuated, but still present in biopsies from failing compared with nonfailing hearts, and was relatively less desensitized than the β1- and β2-AR positive inotropic effect. This would support a persistent attenuation of the β1- and β2-AR effects by β3-AR stimulation (including with nebivolol) in failing hearts. In addition, Dessy et al. (27) showed that the vasodilatory effect of β3-AR stimulation in human coronary microvessels (300-µm diameter) persisted despite deficient NO-mediated relaxation, due to alternative coupling to endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) vasorelaxing mechanisms. Finally, nebivolol is endowed with additional antioxidant properties in vitro (28), which may translate into additional protection against endothelial dysfunction (29) and tissue remodeling in vivo. Overall, there is a good probability that the combination of β1-AR blockade with β3-AR agonism by nebivolol may similarly be operative on the failing heart. This is supported by the results of an early clinical study with nebivolol on a limited number of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (30). The putative beneficial effect on diastolic reserve would have been particularly suited for the improvement of heart failure in elderly patients, as included in the SENIORS study, because of the high prevalence of heart failure with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (and altered diastole) in this population. Of interest, the effects observed in the present study were already apparent at nanomolar concentrations of nebivolol, which are probably close to therapeutic levels in vivo.

Several important questions remain and call for some "nuances" to the above paradigms. More careful analysis needs to be done on the electrophysiological effects of β3-AR stimulation in (animal or human) cardiac cells, in particular on the action potential and automaticity. Regional differences probably exist for these effects (e.g., between atria and ventricles). A recent study in human atrial cells showed an increase in ICa-L with increased contractile shortening in response to β3-AR stimulation (31), contrasting with the effects on ventricular muscle reported here (to the extent that isolated cell shortening can be compared with developed tension of whole, multicellular muscle tissue; the protocol for pharmacologic characterization of a β3-AR pathway also differs significantly between the 2 studies). Nevertheless, there are precedents for such differences at the atrial level, particularly for the effects of NO (32). The effect of β3-AR stimulation on heart rate is also difficult to predict; in vivo, infusion of β3-AR agonists resulted in cardiac acceleration, but this was mainly due to baroreflex tachycardia secondary to systemic vasodilatation (33). In the case of nebivolol, this would be counteracted by β1-AR blockade.

As importantly, the effect of long-term stimulation of cardiac β3-ARs on remodeling needs to be carefully examined. Chronic overexpression of β1-AR in transgenic mice results in the development of dilated cardiomyopathy, as mentioned previously (1). If β3-ARs antagonize the effects of β1-AR stimulation, as proposed in the preceding text, the prediction would be that long-term β3-AR stimulation would protect against adverse remodeling (Fig. 1). This is supported by observations on the phenotype of transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of β3-ARs under chronic catecholaminergic stress (34). Such a protective mechanism may also participate in the supplemental protection afforded by nebivolol (vs. metoprolol) in post-infarction remodeling (35).


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by the Fondation Jean Leducq, FP6-IP "EUGeneHeart" of the European Commission, the Politique Scientifique Fédérale (PAI-P6/55), the Communauté Française de Belgique (ARC 06/11-338), and Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique.

* Editorials published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. Back


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Engelhardt S, Hein L, Wiesmann F, et al. Progressive hypertrophy and heart failure in beta1-adrenergic receptor transgenic mice Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:7059-7064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Lohse MJ, Engelhardt S, Eschenhagen T. What is the role of beta-adrenergic signaling in heart failure? Circ Res 2003;93:896-906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Liggett SB, Mialet-Perez J, Thaneemit-Chen S, et al. A polymorphism within a conserved beta(1)-adrenergic receptor motif alters cardiac function and beta-blocker response in human heart failure Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:11288-11293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Brodde OE. Beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptor polymorphisms: functional importance, impact on cardiovascular diseases and drug responses Pharmacol Ther 2008;117:1-29.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5. Rochais F, Vilardaga JP, Nikolaev VO, et al. Real-time optical recording of beta1-adrenergic receptor activation reveals supersensitivity of the Arg389 variant to carvedilol J Clin Invest 2007;117:229-235.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6. Wang WC, Mihlbachler KA, Bleecker ER, et al. A polymorphism of G-protein coupled receptor kinase5 alters agonist-promoted desensitization of beta2-adrenergic receptors Pharmacogenet Genomics 2008;18:729-732.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7. Flather MD, Shibata MC, Coats AJ, et al. Randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS) Eur Heart J 2005;26:215-225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Maack C, Tyroller S, Schnabel P, et al. Characterization of beta(1)-selectivity, adrenoceptor-G(s)-protein interaction and inverse agonism of nebivolol in human myocardium Br J Pharmacol 2001;132:1817-1826.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9. Kalinowski L, Dobrucki LW, Szczepanska-Konkel M, et al. Third-generation beta-blockers stimulate nitric oxide release from endothelial cells through ATP efflux: a novel mechanism for antihypertensive action Circulation 2003;107:2747-2752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Broeders MA, Doevendans PA, Bekkers BC, et al. Nebivolol: a third-generation beta-blocker that augments vascular nitric oxide release: endothelial beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated nitric oxide production Circulation 2000;102:677-684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Rozec B, Quang TT, Noireaud J, et al. Mixed beta3-adrenoceptor agonist and alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist properties of nebivolol in rat thoracic aorta Br J Pharmacol 2006;147:699-706.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

12. Dessy C, Saliez J, Ghisdal P, et al. Endothelial beta3-adrenoreceptors mediate nitric oxide-dependent vasorelaxation of coronary microvessels in response to the third-generation beta-blocker nebivolol Circulation 2005;112:1198-1205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Tavernier G, Barbe P, Galitzky J, et al. Expression of beta3-adrenoceptors with low lipolytic action in human subcutaneous white adipocytes J Lipid Res 1996;37:87-97.[Abstract]

14. Gauthier C, Tavernier G, Charpentier F, et al. Functional beta3-adrenoceptor in the human heart J Clin Invest 1996;98:556-562.[Web of Science][Medline]

15. Gauthier C, Tavernier G, Trochu JN, et al. Interspecies differences in the cardiac negative inotropic effects of beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;290:687-693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Cheng HJ, Zhang ZS, Onishi K, et al. Upregulation of functional beta(3)-adrenergic receptor in the failing canine myocardium Circ Res 2001;89:599-606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Varghese P, Harrison RW, Lofthouse RA, et al. beta(3)-adrenoceptor deficiency blocks nitric oxide-dependent inhibition of myocardial contractility J Clin Invest 2000;106:697-703.[Web of Science][Medline]

18. Gauthier C, Leblais V, Kobzik L, et al. The negative inotropic effect of beta3-adrenoceptor stimulation is mediated by activation of a nitric oxide synthase pathway in human ventricle J Clin Invest 1998;102:1377-1384.[Web of Science][Medline]

19. Moniotte S, Kobzik L, Feron O, et al. Upregulation of beta(3)-adrenoceptors and altered contractile response to inotropic amines in human failing myocardium Circulation 2001;103:1649-1655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Moniotte S, Belge C, Sekkali B, et al. Sepsis is associated with an upregulation of functional beta3 adrenoceptors in the myocardium Eur J Heart Fail 2007;9:1163-1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Germack R, Dickenson JM. Induction of beta3-adrenergic receptor functional expression following chronic stimulation with noradrenaline in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006;316:392-402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Dincer UD, Bidasee KR, Guner S, et al. The effect of diabetes on expression of beta1-, beta2-, and beta3- adrenoreceptors in rat hearts Diabetes 2001;50:455-461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Liggett SB, Freedman NJ, Schwinn DA, et al. Structural basis for receptor subtype-specific regulation revealed by a chimeric beta 3/beta 2-adrenergic receptor Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:3665-3669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Rozec B, Erfanian M, Laurent K, Trochu J-N, Gauthier C. Nebivolol, a vasodilating selective β1-blocker, is a β3-adrenoceptor agonist in the nonfailing transplanted human heart J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;531532–8.

25. Gauthier C, Laurent K, Charpentier F, et al. Endomyocardial biopsies: a new approach for studying the electrical and mechanical properties of human ventricular myocardium J Mol Cell Cardiol 1994;26:1267-1271.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

26. Balligand JL, Feron O, Dessy C. eNOS activation by physical forces: from short-term regulation of contraction to chronic remodeling of cardiovascular tissues Physiol Rev 2009In press.

27. Dessy C, Moniotte S, Ghisdal P, et al. Endothelial beta3-adrenoceptors mediate vasorelaxation of human coronary microarteries through nitric oxide and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization Circulation 2004;110:948-954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Oelze M, Daiber A, Brandes RP, et al. Nebivolol inhibits superoxide formation by NADPH oxidase and endothelial dysfunction in angiotensin II-treated rats Hypertension 2006;48:677-684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Mason RP, Kalinowski L, Jacob RF, et al. Nebivolol reduces nitroxidative stress and restores nitric oxide bioavailability in endothelium of black Americans Circulation 2005;112:3795-3801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Stoleru L, Wijns W, van Eyll C, et al. Effects of D-nebivolol and L-nebivolol on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function: comparison with D-L-nebivolol and atenolol J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993;22:183-190.[Web of Science][Medline]

31. Skeberdis VA, Gendviliene V, Zablockaite D, et al. beta3-adrenergic receptor activation increases human atrial tissue contractility and stimulates the L-type Ca2+ current J Clin Invest 2008;118:3219-3227.[Web of Science][Medline]

32. Kirstein M, Rivet-Bastide M, Hatem S, et al. Nitric oxide regulates the calcium current in isolated human atrial myocytes J Clin Invest 1995;95:794-802.[Web of Science][Medline]

33. Donckier JE, Massart PE, Van Mechelen H, et al. Cardiovascular effects of beta 3-adrenoceptor stimulation in perinephritic hypertension Eur J Clin Invest 2001;31:681-689.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

34. Belge C, Sekkali B, Tavernier G, et al. Cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of beta3-adrenoceptors attenuates the hypertrophic response to catecholamines in vivo Circulation 2007;116:771.

35. Sorrentino SA, Doerries C, Mohmand W, et al. Nebivolol compared to metoprolol-succinate improves endothelial function, endothelial progenitor cell mobilization, left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction early after myocardial infarction Eur Heart J 2007;28:P451.


Related Articles

Nebivolol, a Vasodilating Selective β1-Blocker, Is a β3-Adrenoceptor Agonist in the Nonfailing Transplanted Human Heart
Bertrand Rozec, Mortéza Erfanian, Karine Laurent, Jean-Noël Trochu, and Chantal Gauthier
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: 1532-1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: A28. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
V. M. Conraads, M. Metra, O. Kamp, G. W. De Keulenaer, B. Pieske, J. Zamorano, P. E. Vardas, M. Bohm, and L. Dei Cas
Effects of the long-term administration of nebivolol on the clinical symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular function of patients with diastolic dysfunction: results of the ELANDD study
Eur J Heart Fail, February 1, 2012; 14(2): 219 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. P. Aragon, M. E. Condit, S. Bhushan, B. L. Predmore, S. S. Patel, D. B. Grinsfelder, S. Gundewar, S. Jha, J. W. Calvert, L. A. Barouch, et al.
Beta(3)-adrenoreceptor stimulation ameliorates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via endothelial nitric oxide synthase and neuronal nitric oxide synthase activation.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 13, 2011; 58(25): 2683 - 2691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. A. Sorrentino, C. Doerries, C. Manes, T. Speer, C. Dessy, I. Lobysheva, W. Mohmand, R. Akbar, F. Bahlmann, C. Besler, et al.
Nebivolol Exerts Beneficial Effects on Endothelial Function, Early Endothelial Progenitor Cells, Myocardial Neovascularization, and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Early After Myocardial Infarction Beyond Conventional {beta}1-Blockade
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2011; 57(5): 601 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2009
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 26, 2010; 55(4): 380 - 407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balligand, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balligand, J.-L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement