|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:2450-2456, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.062
(Published online 7 June 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,1



* Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway
Institute of Surgical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway.
Manuscript received July 18, 2006; revised manuscript received February 12, 2007, accepted February 13, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Eirik Pettersen, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, 0027 Oslo, Norway. (Email: eirik.pettersen{at}medisin.uio.no).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: Reduced longitudinal function of the systemic RV compared with the normal RV has been interpreted as ventricular dysfunction. However, longitudinal shortening represents only one aspect of myocardial deformation, and changes in contraction in other dimensions have not previously been described.
Methods: Fourteen Senning-operated patients age 18.4 ± 0.9 years (mean ± SD) with transposition of the great arteries were studied. We compared the contraction pattern of the systemic RV with findings in the RV and left ventricle (LV) of normal subjects (n = 14) using tissue Doppler imaging and magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: In the systemic RV free wall, circumferential strain exceeded longitudinal strain (23.3 ± 3.4% vs. 15.0 ± 3.0%, p < 0.001) as was also the case in the normal LV (25.7 ± 3.1% vs. 16.5 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001), opposite from the findings in the normal RV (15.8 ± 1.3% vs. 30.7 ± 3.3%, p < 0.001). Strain in the interventricular septum did not differ from normal. Ventricular torsion was essentially absent in the systemic RV (0.3 ± 1.8°), in contrast to a torsion of 16.7 ± 4.8° in the normal LV (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: In the systemic RV as in the normal LV, there was predominant circumferential over longitudinal free wall shortening, opposite from findings in the normal RV. This may represent an adaptive response to the systemic load. Noticeably, however, the systemic RV did not display torsion as found in the normal LV.
| |||||||||
The aim of the present study was, therefore, to describe systemic RV function in terms of longitudinal and circumferential myocardial shortening and ventricular torsion, employing tissue Doppler (TDI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Healthy Control Subjects
Fourteen healthy volunteers (4 women) were examined by echocardiography and MRI.
Operated Control Subjects
To exclude that systemic RV findings might merely reflect postoperative effects, we performed echocardiograms in 14 patients (3 women) with systemic left ventricles (LVs) age 18.1 ± 4.8 years successfully operated for other congenital heart disease (3 for aortic valvular disease, 5 for perimembranous ventricular septal defects, 6 for TGA with arterial switch).
All study subjects gave written informed consent (minors by proxy) to participate in the study. The protocol was approved by the regional ethics committee.
Clinical examination and exercise testing. The Senning-operated TGA patients underwent clinical examination and electrocardiogram (ECG). They performed bicycle exercise testing with an initial work load of 25 W or 50 W, individualized to yield an exercise duration of about 10 min, increased by 25 W every 2 min. Ventilatory oxygen uptake was measured with an open circuit-technique (EOS/SPRINT, E. Jaeger, Wurzburg, Germany).
Echocardiography. Recordings were obtained with a GE Vingmed Vivid 7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). Gray scale and color TDI images (frame rate 90 to 240 frames/s) of both ventricles were analyzed off-line using dedicated software (EchoPac, GE Vingmed Ultrasound) by an observer blinded to the MRI data.
Ventricular geometry was described by the position of the interventricular septum (IVS) as the ratio between end-systolic RV and LV septum-to-free-wall diameters and by free wall radius of curvature measured using a dedicated Matlab application (MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts) (Fig. 1).
|
MRI scanning. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed in patients and healthy control subjects using a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Vision Plus, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Right ventricular mass, volumes, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated from area measurements of multiple short-axis breath-hold images covering the entire RV.
Myocardial Strain by MRI Tagging
Tagged MRI images were obtained as described previously (6). Recordings were analyzed by Harmonic Phase Imaging (HARP, version 1.0, Diagnosoft Inc., Palo Alto, California) (7). Circumferential peak systolic strain at the midventricular level of the RV lateral wall was measured as a reference method for Doppler-derived circumferential strain.
Ventricular Torsion
Global basal and apical systolic rotations were measured from tagged MRI images using HARP (6). Ventricular torsion was calculated as the difference between basal and apical rotation. Global rotation could not be calculated for the normal RV, as the rotation algorithm presupposes a relatively circular short-axis shape. However, rotation of the entire heart could be measured using the common center of gravity of the 2 ventricles as a reference point, allowing extraction of regional data for rotation of the normal RV free wall.
Statistical analysis. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Student t test was used for comparisons between 2 groups and 1-way analysis of variance with post-hoc Bonferroni correction for comparisons between more than 2 groups. Pearsons correlation coefficient was used where appropriate. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Tissue Doppler imaging and MRI strain measurements were compared by a Bland-Altman plot.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Longitudinal and circumferential shortening.
Senning-Operated TGA Patients vs. Healthy Control Subjects
Strain and strain rate values are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
All values in the text are from the midsegment, unless otherwise stated. In the systemic RV free wall, circumferential strain was greater than longitudinal strain (23.3 ± 3.4% vs. 15.0 ± 3.0%, p < 0.001), opposite from findings in the normal RV free wall (15.8 ± 1.3% vs. 30.7 ± 3.3%, p < 0.001), but similar to the contraction pattern of the normal LV (25.7 ± 3.1% vs. 16.5 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Strain rate showed a similar pattern with greater circumferential than longitudinal rate of shortening in the systemic RV free wall (1.5 ± 0.5 s1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2 s1, p = 0.001). However, strain rate values in the systemic RV were significantly less than in the normal LV. In the IVS, there was no difference in strain between the patients with systemic RVs and the healthy control subjects. However, as in the free wall, strain rate in the IVS was significantly reduced in the Senning-operated TGA patients compared with the control subjects.
|
|
|
Strain by TDI and MRI
There was good agreement between strain obtained by TDI and MRI (Fig. 3). The correlation coefficient for strain by the 2 techniques was r = 0.82 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in circumferential strain by the 2 techniques. Importantly, MRI confirmed the finding of higher circumferential strain in the systemic RV than in the normal RV (22.4 ± 2.4% vs. 16.4 ± 2.6%, p < 0.001).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Geometrical changes and patterns of myocardial shortening. The leftward shift of the IVS with decreased radius of curvature gives the systemic RV a more circular short-axis shape comparable to that of the normal LV. This may facilitate circumferential shortening through reduced regional wall stress. Furthermore, in right ventricular pressure overload, it is mainly the middle circumferential layer that hypertrophies (8,9). Also in this regard, the systemic RV is more similar to the normal LV, which has a well-developed middle circumferential layer (10). A relative increase in circumferential fiber mass may, thus, also contribute to the predominant circumferential RV free wall shortening.
Another issue to be discussed is whether open chest surgery per se affects the RV strain pattern. The normal strain and strain rate in the operated control subjects rule out the possibility that the observed contraction pattern in the systemic RV could be merely a postoperative effect.
Ventricular torsion. In the normal LV, torsion contributes to energy-efficient ejection (11). Our findings on ventricular torsion in the healthy control subjects are consistent with recent findings by MRI tagging and subsequent 3-dimensional reconstruction (12). A previous study reported regional differences in rotation in the systemic RV (13). However, when values are averaged over segments, the resulting global rotation is close to 0 both at the basal and the apical level with no definite global ventricular torsion.
Torsion results from contraction of myocardial fibers arranged obliquely to the ventricular axis (14). However, the fraction of obliquely oriented muscle fibers in the chronically pressure loaded RV is approximately half of that in the normal RV, while the fraction of circumferentially oriented fibers is higher (9). Furthermore, in the normal heart, the systemic ventricle may be partly responsible for the rotation of the subpulmonary ventricle. Reduced torsion of 1 ventricle may, therefore, affect the other through ventricular coupling effects. These factors might contribute to the observed changes in ventricular torsion with consequently less energy-efficient ejection, possibly representing a potential for myocardial dysfunction.
Adaptive response or ventricular dysfunction?. It must be addressed whether our findings reflect an adaptive response or systemic RV dysfunction. None of our patients had clinical evidence of heart failure, and the mean systemic RV EF was close to that reported as normal in this setting (15). Moreover, the contraction pattern was uniform in all patients with systemic RV, regardless of their RV EF. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in strain between the systemic RV and normal LV.
The TGA patients had reduced exercise capacity, consistent with previous findings (16). However, these patients also have pulmonary abnormalities (17) and reduced atrioventricular filling rates during exercise (18). The latter study demonstrated an increase in contractility during inotropic stimulation as seen in the normal LV, indicating preserved systolic systemic RV function despite reduced exercise capacity.
These aspects considered, the reduced longitudinal strain in the systemic RV should not necessarily be interpreted as ventricular failure. Since strain values were similar to those in the normal LV, the shortening pattern may represent an adaptive response to the systemic load. However, strain rate was significantly reduced and rotation absent compared with the normal LV. These findings may imply incipient myocardial dysfunction.
Study limitations. Our study group is selected, and only includes patients without heart failure. Further changes in myocardial deformation may be expected with the development of myocardial dysfunction, and this warrants further study.
The control subjects were slightly older than the TGA patients. As RV longitudinal function is reduced with age (19), it is unlikely that the lower longitudinal strain in the systemic RV of the younger TGA patients could be the result of age-dependent changes.
Strain might be underestimated, Doppler strain by angle dependency and MRI strain by low temporal resolution. Biological variability may also influence the results. As seen from the Bland-Altman plot, variability from this does not seem to represent a problem in the present study.
Circumferential strain and strain rate were assessed only in 1 region. There might be regional variations not discovered by our approach. Furthermore, measurements were performed only in 2 dimensions. A 3-dimensional analysis could provide further insights into the deformation of the systemic RV.
As described, the reference point differs somewhat for calculation of normal RV free wall rotation and global rotation of the systemic ventricles. Thus, although these measures are not directly comparable, they can be compared with regard to presence, direction, and approximate magnitude of rotation.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Khairy, L. Harris, M. J. Landzberg, S. M. Fernandes, A. Barlow, L.-A. Mercier, S. Viswanathan, P. Chetaille, E. Gordon, A. Dore, et al. Sudden Death and Defibrillators in Transposition of the Great Arteries With Intra-atrial Baffles: A Multicenter Study Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, October 1, 2008; 1(4): 250 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P-C Chow, X-C Liang, E W Y Cheung, W W M Lam, and Y-F Cheung New two-dimensional global longitudinal strain and strain rate imaging for assessment of systemic right ventricular function Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 855 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Sengupta, A. J. Tajik, K. Chandrasekaran, and B. K. Khandheria Twist Mechanics of the Left Ventricle: Principles and Application J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 366 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al. Highlights of the year in JACC 2007. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |