cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Figure 2 Examples of the Superiority of 3-T Imaging When Compared to 1.5-T

Patient #1 (top row) has a 70% stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Whereas 3-Tesla (T) imaging demonstrates a corresponding stress perfusion deficit in the anteroseptal segment, visual assessment of the 1.5-T scan failed to delineate a deficit. Patient #2 (bottom row) had significant multivessel coronary artery disease (left system not shown). Although 1.5-T imaging demonstrates a perfusion deficit of the anterior segment (white arrow), corresponding to a LAD coronary stenosis, it fails to identify a perfusion deficit relating to the 90% stenosis in the right coronary artery. The 3-T imaging detects reversible perfusion deficits in the anterior, anteroseptal, inferoseptal, and inferior segments (white arrows), corresponding to significant stenoses in the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home