Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Figure 1 Distribution of Late Loss of Both SES and PES

(A) Distribution of late loss of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for the total cohort. Late loss was not normally distributed (p = 0.0001) and was higher in the PES group: 0.45 mm (interquartile ratio [IQR] 0.07 to 0.99) compared with 0.23 mm (IQR –0.02 to 0.69) after SES, p = 0.0001. (B) Distribution of late loss of both SES and PES for nonrestenotic lesions. Late loss was normally distributed and was significantly higher in the PES group: 0.32 ± 0.55 mm compared with 0.06 ± 0.52 mm, p = 0.0001. (C) Distribution of late loss of both SES and PES for restenotic lesions. Late loss was normally distributed, and there was no difference in late loss between the 2 groups: PES 1.78 ± 0.72 mm compared with SES 1.7 ± 0.69 mm, p = 0.39.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement