|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:2211-2214, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.090
(Published online 16 May 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Department of Cardiology, Childrens Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
DMCCP, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy.
Manuscript received December 20, 2006; accepted January 23, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Steven D. Colan, Department of Cardiology, Childrens Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. (Email: Steven.Colan{at}cardio.chboston.org).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: Analysis of BAV morphology is of prognostic relevance, as the fusion of right- and noncoronary leaflets (R-N) is associated with a greater degree of valve dysfunction compared with other subtypes. However, it is currently unknown whether morphologic differences translate into clinically relevant outcomes such as valve intervention.
Methods: A nested cohort study was conducted on 310 patients with right- and left-coronary leaflet (R-L) and R-N fusion who were selected randomly from an inception cohort of 1,192 patients with BAV who were identified between 1986 and 1999. Supplementary information on clinical parameters was collected retrospectively from medical charts and databases.
Results: Median age at follow-up was 16.1 years (range 5.6 to 34.4 years), and 71% were male. The R-N fusion (n = 108) was strongly predictive of valve intervention when compared with The R-L fusion (n = 202; hazard ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5 to 8.1; p < 0.0001). In a longitudinal analysis of 799 echocardiograms, R-N fusion also was associated with a greater progression of valve dysfunction. This was true for both increasing aortic valve gradient (generalized estimating equations [GEE] risk ratio 27.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 619.6, p = 0.0386) and aortic regurgitation (GEE risk ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.3, p = 0.0029).
Conclusion: The morphology of BAV is predictive of clinically important end points. The R-N fusion is associated with a more rapid progression of aortic stenosis and regurgitation and a shorter time to valve intervention.
| |||||||
0.001) and aortic regurgitation (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.8, p = 0.0002), compared with other forms of BAV (3). In light of these results, we sought to determine whether aortic stenosis and regurgitation continue to progress more rapidly during childhood and adolescence in this group of patients and whether morphological differences translate into clinically important outcomes such as valve intervention. | Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Statistical analyses. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median and range depending on the normality of their distribution. Ordinal and nominal variables are summarized as frequency and percentage. Patient characteristics according to the morphologic subtype of BAV were compared using chi-square tests, independent Student t tests, or Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate. Freedom from valve intervention was plotted and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank statistic. To assess the predictive value of the morphologic subtype of BAV on time to first valve intervention and time to first subacute bacterial endocarditis, Cox proportional hazard models accounted for duration of follow-up and adjusted for covariates. The proportional-hazards assumption was verified by time-dependent interactions and goodness-of-fit statistics.
Given that echocardiograms were performed serially and at variable time intervals, all analyses of progressive valve dysfunction took into consideration the nonindependent nature of the data structure. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to produce regression models for cluster sampling data by specifying distribution and link functions (i.e., IDENTITY for aortic valve gradient and LOGIT for progression of aortic regurgitation). Two-tailed p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The sample size provided >90% power to detect a 20% difference in progressive aortic regurgitation and a risk ratio of 2.0 for increasing aortic valve stenosis between the 2 morphologic subtypes of BAV. Data analysis was performed with SAS software Version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aortic stenosis/aortic regurgitation. Of the 310 patients, 164 had serial echocardiographic studies before any valve intervention or subacute bacterial endocarditis, permitting ascertainment of the rate of progression of valve disease in this subset. Characteristics of this subgroup of patients are provided in Table 1.
|
Bacterial endocarditis. In the nested study cohort of 310 patients, there were 4 (0.1%) documented cases of endocarditis. Given the limited number of endocarditis cases, statistical analysis could not be performed.
Valve intervention. The BAV with fusion of the R-N (n = 108) was strongly predictive of valve intervention when compared with fusion of the R-L (n = 202; hazard ratio 4.5, 95% CI 2.5 to 8.1, p < 0.0001). As depicted in Figure 1, the actuarial freedom from valve intervention for R-N fusion versus R-L fusion was 79.4% versus 94.5% at 1 year, 75.5% versus 93.0% at 5 years, 68.1% versus 92.2% at 15 years, and 64.1% versus 90.9% at 20 years (p < 0.0001). As summarized in Table 2, 49 of the 310 patients underwent valve intervention with 16 of 202 (8%) patients with fusion of the R-L compared with 33 of 108 (31%) patients with fusion of the R-N.
|
|
The primary indication for valve intervention was aortic stenosis in 41 patients (13 R-L fusion and 28 with R-N fusion), mixed aortic valve disease in 5 patients (1 R-L fusion and 4 R-N fusion), and pure aortic regurgitation in 2 patients, 1 of each morphology.
In regression analyses controlling for duration of follow-up, R-N fusion was associated with a >4-fold risk of valve intervention, when compared with R-L fusion (hazard ratio 4.5, 95% CI 2.5 to 8.1, p < 0.0001). Controlling for age, gender, and presence of aortic coarctation, R-N fusion remained an independent predictor for valve intervention (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.4, p = 0.0005).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the Second Natural History Study, Keane et al. (11) suggested that the freedom from aortic valve intervention was estimated to be 67% at 20-year follow up for patients presenting after 2 years of age (11). Consistent with these figures, we demonstrated a 64% freedom from intervention in patients with fusion of the R-N. However, in patients with fusion of the R-L, 91% freedom from intervention was noted. The overall greater freedom from valve intervention observed in our study may reflect increased rates of diagnosis of milder forms of disease resulting from improvements and availability of noninvasive imaging (12).
In 315 patients with an identified morphologic subtype of BAV undergoing valve replacement, Sabet et al. (1) found that the majority of aortic valve replacements in adult patients with a BAV had fusion of the R-L. In contrast, we demonstrate that fusion of the R-N is associated with a greater progression of valve dysfunction and a 4-fold risk of time-related valve intervention during childhood compared with BAVs with fusion of the R-L. This apparent discrepancy may be partly explained by the much greater overall prevalence of R-L fusion, identified in 70% of the 1,185 patients in our inception cohort and in 89% of patients with associated aortic coarctation (3). Moreover, we hypothesize that the proportion of adults with R-L fusion requiring intervention may be greater than in children, because many younger patients with fusion of R-N will have already undergone aortic valve intervention before adulthood. Longer-term follow-up of our cohort of patients is required to verify this speculation.
Study limitations. This study represents the population of children with BAV referred for echocardiography. Patients with BAV without significant aortic stenosis or regurgitation may not be referred for evaluation or echocardiography because of a lack of physical findings.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Tzemos, J. Therrien, J. Yip, G. Thanassoulis, S. Tremblay, M. T. Jamorski, G. D. Webb, and S. C. Siu Outcomes in Adults With Bicuspid Aortic Valves JAMA, September 17, 2008; 300(11): 1317 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. De Mozzi, U. G. Longo, G. Galanti, and N. Maffulli Bicuspid aortic valve: a literature review and its impact on sport activity Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2008; 85(1): 63 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |