|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:1289-1295, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.074
(Published online 9 March 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospitals and the Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Department of Internal, Cardiovascular and Geriatric Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Manuscript received May 19, 2006; revised manuscript received September 13, 2006, accepted October 12, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. John D. Parker, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Room 1609, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5. (Email: jdp{at}ca.inter.net).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: Tolerance to nitroglycerin is associated with increased free radical production and abnormal endothelial function. To date, no data is available concerning the effect of IS-5-MN, administered in clinically employed dosages, on endothelial function in humans.
Methods: A total of 19 healthy volunteers were randomized in a double-blind fashion to therapy with IS-5-MN (120 mg once daily) or placebo. After 7 days of treatment, forearm blood flow responses to acetylcholine (Ach; 7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min) and N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 1, 2, and 4 µmol/min) were measured. In a separate study, after 7 days of therapy with IS-5-MN 120 mg once daily, the responses to Ach were assessed during intra-arterial coinfusion of vitamin C (24 mg/min) or saline.
Results: As compared with placebo, IS-5-MN caused significant blunting of the responses to both Ach (peak responses: placebo 127 ± 31%; IS-5-MN 52 ± 24%) and L-NMMA (peak responses: placebo 41 ± 5%; IS-5-MN 22 ± 8%). Vitamin C completely restored the forearm blood flow responses to Ach (peak responses: vitamin C 180 ± 33%; saline 107 ± 17%).
Conclusions: We document for the first time that IS-5-MN impairs endothelial function in humans in vivo. Suggesting a role of oxygen free radicals, nitrate-induced abnormalities in endothelium-dependent vasomotor responses were reversed by the antioxidant vitamin C.
| |||||||||
Increased vascular ROS bioavailability has implications beyond the development of nitrate tolerance, and it is now recognized that sustained therapy with organic nitrates causes important abnormalities in vascular function. Of note, it has been repeatedly shown that ROS-dependent endothelial dysfunction is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (12); while it is unknown whether nitrate-induced endothelial dysfunction has the same prognostic implications, the observation that therapy with GTN causes ROS production and impaired responses to endothelium-dependent vasomotor stimuli both in the resistance and conductance circulation in humans in vivo (10) does suggest that these agents could have negative prognostic effects.
To date, experimental evidence documenting that organic nitrate therapy is associated with increased free radical production and abnormal endothelial function is mostly limited to the use of GTN in doses associated with the development of nitrate tolerance. Recently, a number of investigations have suggested that the organic nitrates may differ in terms of their ability to increase vascular free radical production and cause abnormalities in endothelial function. For example, animal data have suggested that therapy with PETN is associated with a lesser increase in ROS production as compared with GTN. These differences in ROS production might explain why, in humans, as compared with GTN, PETN did not cause hemodynamic tolerance, was not associated with evidence of increased vascular ROS bioavailability, and caused less of an impact on endothelial function (13,14). While these considerations seem to favor PETN, this drug is not commonly prescribed in North America and in several European countries, and GTN and isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) remain the most commonly employed nitrates. To date, there is no human data available concerning the effect of IS-5-MN on ROS production or endothelial function. Recently, Muller et al. (15) found that long-term, eccentric treatment of rabbits with high dose IS-5-MN did not increase vascular ROS production or induce endothelial dysfunction. Further, IS-5-MN therapy was also found to prevent intimal lesion formation and endothelial dysfunction in rabbits prone to develop atherosclerosis (16). Given this background, the objective of the current study was to determine whether IS-5-MN, taken once daily for 7 days (i.e., using a dosing regimen that is clinically employed), is associated with evidence of endothelial dysfunction in the human forearm circulation. If IS-5-MN was associated with the development of endothelial dysfunction, the second objective of the study would be to determine whether the antioxidant vitamin C would reverse this phenomenon.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study protocol.
Measurement of Forearm Blood Flow (FBF)
Forearm blood flow was measured simultaneously in both arms by venous occlusion strain-gauge plethysmography (D. E. Hokanson Inc., Bellevue, Washington) using techniques previously reported by our laboratory (10,17). Briefly, circulation of the hand was excluded by inflating wrist cuffs to 200 mm Hg during measurement periods. The upper arm cuffs were inflated to 40 mm Hg and deflated at 10 s intervals (Hokanson rapid cuff inflator, D. E. Hokanson Inc.), and FBF was recorded as the average of 5 consecutive measurements. On visit 1, only basal FBF was measured. On visit 2, FBF was measured at baseline and in response to brachial artery infusions of normal saline and vasoactive agents as described in detail in the following text.
Experiment 1.
Study Day 1
Nineteen healthy volunteers age between 18 to 30 years participated in this randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. After screening (inclusive of anamnesis and brief physical examination) for admission into the study, standing blood pressure and heart rate measurements were obtained using an automatic, calibrated sphygmomanometer (Critikon Company LLC, Tampa, Florida). The mean of 3 measurements was determined. Baseline FBF was measured as described in the preceding text. Subjects were then randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either a phasic release formulation of IS-5-MN (Imdur, AstraZeneca Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) 120 mg given once daily (IS-5-MN group; n = 10) or placebo (placebo group; n = 9). After the first dose of study medication, repeat standing blood pressure and heart rate measurements were taken 3 h later. All subjects were instructed to take their study medication daily at 9:00 AM until the end of the study.
Study Day 2
Subjects returned to the laboratory after 7 days of continuous therapy with IS-5-MN or placebo. Standing blood pressure and heart rate measurements were repeated. The brachial artery was cannulated, and FBF in the nondominant arm was measured at baseline and in response to drug infusions. Forearm blood flow was also measured in the opposite arm using strain gauge plethysmography at each measurement time point. The endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (Ach) chloride (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ontario, Canada) was infused at 7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min. Subsequently, FBF responses to N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (1, 2, and 4 µmol/min; Clinalfa AG, Laufelfingen, Switzerland) were measured. The infusion rate was kept constant at 0.4 ml/min with a precision pump (Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, Massachusetts). Each concentration was infused for 6 min, and FBF measurements were performed during the last 3 min. All responses were evaluated as changes from a baseline value (normal saline infusion) immediately before each drug infusion. Intra-arterial blood pressure was recorded after each infusion (Horizon 2000, Mennen Medical Inc., Clarence, New York) using the average of at least 15 cardiac cycles. Electrocardiogram was monitored continuously. Between different drug infusions, normal saline was infused until the flow returned to baseline values. At the end of the study, the arterial line was removed, all study medications discontinued, and subjects were discharged from the laboratory. A schematic flow of the study protocol is represented in Figure 1A.
|
Statistical analysis. All results are expressed as mean ± SE. Comparisons between groups for baseline values were performed with unpaired t tests. The effect of IS-5-MN on blood pressure and heart rate was tested using a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction. All FBF values were compared as the ratio of the infused versus the noninfused arm. Differences between groups in blood flow responses were tested using 2-way repeated measures ANOVA on the % and absolute changes in FBF as compared with the corresponding baseline. A value of p < 0.05 was set as the threshold for significance. Statistical analyses were performed using Sigmastat (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, California).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Responses to Ach Infusions
The intra-arterial infusion of Ach caused a dose-dependent increase in FBF in both groups (p = 0.05, effect of the three levels of infusion rate, 2-way ANOVA) (Table 2, Fig. 2). When compared between groups, the responses to each Ach step were significantly blunted in the IS-5-MN group as compared with placebo (group effect, p < 0.05, 2-way ANOVA). Showing that this difference was consistent through the 3 infusion rates, there was no statistically significant interaction between group and infusion level (p = 0.3, 2-way ANOVA). In the placebo group, during infusion of the highest concentration of Ach, FBF increased by 127 ± 31% as compared with baseline, whereas in the IS-5-MN group, it increased by only 52 ± 24% (p < 0.05).
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased vascular oxidative stress secondary to prolonged GTN exposure is well documented and with a number of sources described, including xanthine oxidase (8,19), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidase (20), the mitochondrial electron transport chain, cytochrome P450 oxidase (21), as well as nitric oxide synthase itself (911). Of importance, this increased vascular free radical bioavailability has implications beyond the development of nitrate tolerance as ROS oxidizes carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and DNA (2225) and are thus capable of disrupting biochemical homeostasis and inducing biological injury. Accordingly, studies in both humans and animals have shown that prolonged exposure to GTN induces abnormalities in the function of several enzyme systems as well as neurohormonal activation and impaired nitrate biotransformation. Although the relative contribution of these abnormalities to the induction of nitrate tolerance is unknown, they appear to be caused and result in increased bioavailability of ROS.
It is now known that prolonged exposure to GTN causes endothelial dysfunction in healthy subjects (17) and in subjects with risk factors for vascular disease (18,26). Importantly, there is also experimental evidence to suggest there may be within-class differences in terms of the impact of organic nitrates on endothelial function and nitrate tolerance development. For example, we have previously shown that therapy with pentaerythrityl tetranitrate, which has antioxidant properties, is associated with less severe abnormalities in human endothelial function as compared with GTN, and it does not cause tolerance (13,14). As well, there are within-class differences in terms of the site of biotransformation: while GTN and PETN are activated within mitochondria, the site of IS-5-MN biotransformation is yet unknown (27). Finally, there are also reports that certain organic nitrates, in experimental conditions, can have protective vascular effects. For example, one group has hypothesized that nitrate-derived nitric oxide might have protective effects that are similar to those of endogenous nitric oxide. In particular, using a rabbit model of accelerated atherogenesis, Muller et al. (15,16) recently demonstrated that long-term treatment with IS-5-MN retards intima-media thickening, prevents the development of endothelial dysfunction, and is associated with a decrease in vascular ROS production. In sum, while evidence exists that GTN can cause ROS production and endothelial dysfunction, PETN seems to be devoid of these effects, and animal studieswhich need human confirmationshow that IS-5-MN might protect from hypercholesterolemia. To date, there have been no studies examining the impact of the most commonly employed nitrate (i.e., IS-5-MN) on endothelial function in humans in vivo.
Summary of our findings. The results of the current human study suggest that the administration of a phasic-release formulation of IS-5-MN, given once daily, is associated with the development of pronounced endothelial dysfunction. Of note, this is the first demonstration of an adverse effect observed by using a clinically employed dosing regimen of IS-5-MN. Consistent with our prior studies of transdermal GTN, the blunted flow responses to Ach, an accepted marker of endothelial dysfunction, were associated with very abnormal responses to the administration of L-NMMA. The latter finding suggests that the abnormal responses to Ach are caused, at least in part, by abnormalities in nitric oxide synthase function as previously demonstrated for GTN (4,17). In a second set of experiments, we prove that oxidative stress plays a major role in the IS-5-MNinduced development of endothelial dysfunction. Collectively, these data provide evidence suggesting that IS-5-MN, in a clinically employed dosage, stimulates vascular production of ROS and causes endothelial dysfunction.
These data are in agreement with those of Sekiya et al. (28), who showed that isosorbide dinitrate, of which IS-5-MN is a metabolite, impairs endothelium-dependent dilation and worsens intima-media thickness in patients with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, we provide the first human evidence suggesting that this vascular dysfunction is secondary to increased ROS production as it is completely reversed by the coadministration of intra-arterial vitamin C. The explanation for the differences between our findings and those of the animal reports from Muller et al. (16) is not entirely clear but might reside in the differences in species, experimental model (healthy volunteers vs. hypercholesterolemic animals), nitrate dosing, as well as in the vascular beds studied. Whatever these differences, we show that, in humans, a dosage of IS-5-MN that is commonly employed, and that is believed to be free of nitrate tolerance, causes (ROS-mediated) endothelial dysfunction.
Of note, our study involved normal volunteers rather than patients with cardiovascular disease, and we recognize that our results may not necessarily be extrapolated to the clinical setting. However, since endothelial vasomotor responses are already blunted in most patients with coronary artery disease, the effect of interventions that lead to further endothelial dysfunction (such as nitrate therapy) would be very difficult to study with the model of endothelium-dependent vasomotor responses that we employed. While this limitation is recognized, the authors would like to emphasize that, in this study, nitrates induced severe, ROS-mediated, endothelial dysfunction in individuals with intact ROS scavenging capacities.
Clinical relevance of our findings. Our findings have important clinical implications. Isosorbide-5-mononitrate is the most commonly used long-acting nitric oxide donor in clinical practice (29). The fact that it can cause profound endothelial dysfunction in healthy subjects is both surprising and a cause for concern given the traditional concept that nitric oxide donors might have beneficial effects in the setting of decreased nitric oxide bioavailability (30). Our findings with IS-5-MN are similar to our previous observations with GTN; therapy with GTN causes important abnormalities in endothelial function in forearm resistance vessels, epicardial coronary arteries, as well as in peripheral conduit arteries (14,18). Therefore, it seems that commonly used organic nitrates, despite a (blunted) residual hemodynamic and symptomatic effect, cause abnormalities in endothelial function, which might have clinical relevance during sustained therapy. Furthermore, our data suggest that nitrate-induced production of ROS, and subsequent endothelial dysfunction, associated with nitrate administration can be prevented by concurrent administration of an antioxidant, thereby restoring the beneficial effects of these drugs. These data agree with observations from A-HEFT (African-American Heart Failure Trial) (31), where the combination of IS-5-MN and hydralazine (which is more reliably absorbed after oral administration as compared with vitamin C and has antioxidant properties [32]) improved the clinical outcome of patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Taken together, these considerations emphasize the need for more clinical data concerning the impact of organic nitrates (± antioxidant therapy) on long-term clinical outcome and the process of atherogenesis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Dr. Parker holds a Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Canada. ![]()
2 Dr. Gori is the recipient of a grant from the Italian Ministry of Research. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gori and J. D. Parker Nitrate-Induced Toxicity and Preconditioning: A Rationale for Reconsidering the Use of These Drugs J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 22, 2008; 52(4): 251 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Moens, C. J. Vrints, M. J. Claeys, J.-P. Timmermans, H. C. Champion, and D. A. Kass Mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for folic acid in cardiovascular disease Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H1971 - H1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dragoni, T. Gori, M. Lisi, G. Di Stolfo, A. Pautz, H. Kleinert, and J. D. Parker Pentaerythrityl Tetranitrate and Nitroglycerin, but not Isosorbide Mononitrate, Prevent Endothelial Dysfunction Induced by Ischemia and Reperfusion Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(9): 1955 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Munzel, P. Wenzel, and A. Daiber Do We Still Need Organic Nitrates? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1296 - 1298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |