cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:1228-1229, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.027 (Published online 5 March 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.12.027v1
49/11/1228-a    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onuma, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Onuma, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hara, K.

CORRESPONDENCE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply

Yoshinobu Onuma, MD, Kengo Tanabe, MD, PhD* and Kazuhiro Hara, MD, FACC

* Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, 1, Kanda-Izumi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Email: kengo-t{at}zd5.so-net.ne.jp).


We thank Dr. Fleet for his interest in our study (1) and appreciate his comments. We agree with Dr. Fleet as to the necessity of further evidence to establish the clinical significance of noncardiac analysis in cardiac multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Our study lacks long-term clinical follow-up to discuss clinical outcomes. In addition, we did not discuss cost because the actual cost of additional follow-up, including surgery, biopsy, and imaging, varies among countries and institutions. As clinical results and costs could be different depending on how referring physicians respond to the reports, a mathematical analysis regarding outcomes and cost might be suitable.

At this time, in our institution, we perform both cardiac and noncardiac analysis with large field-of-view in routine cardiac MDCT. The primary purpose of noncardiac analysis is to differentiate chest pain syndrome including aortic disease and pulmonary embolism. In our study, noncardiac analysis could diagnose the cause of chest symptom in 32 of 201 patients in whom coronary artery disease was ruled out. In these patients, additional diagnostic tests could be avoided and might result in reduced medical costs.

Furthermore, as Dr. Rumberger pointed out in his editorial comment (2), noncardiac analysis could be medico-morally necessary. We believe that physicians should review all images and areas irradiated in the cardiac scan. What is most needed at the present time is for the cardiology community to adopt an open mind so as to discuss this issue and to gather further input from various fields.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G, et al. Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:402-406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Rumberger JA. Noncardiac abnormalities in diagnostic cardiac computed tomography. Within normal limits or we never looked!. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:407-408.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.12.027v1
49/11/1228-a    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onuma, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Onuma, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hara, K.

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home