|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1567-1572, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.067
(Published online 25 September 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,*








* Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
|| Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
¶ Lindner Center and the Ohio Heart and Vascular Center at the Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
Manuscript received October 15, 2005; revised manuscript received February 27, 2006, accepted March 21, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Deepak L. Bhatt, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk F25, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (Email: bhattd{at}ccf.org).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI have concomitant PAD, which may be associated with worse outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of 8 randomized PCI trials. We included multicenter PCI trials that compared antiplatelet therapies (EPIC, EPILOG, EPISTENT, RAPPORT, CAPTURE, IMPACT-II, TARGET, and CREDO) and had baseline PAD status recorded. Multivariable analyses were performed with stepwise logistic regression for 7- and 30-day outcomes and Cox regression for 6-month and 1-year events.
RESULTS: In our pooled analysis of 19,867 patients undergoing PCI, 1,602 (8.1%) were previously diagnosed with PAD. Patients with PAD had higher incidences of 7-day death (1.0% vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001) or myocardial infarction (MI) (6.8% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.047), 30-day death (1.7% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001) or MI (7.4% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.05), 6-month death (4.2% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001) or MI (9.1%, vs. 7.7%; p = 0.048), and 1-year death (5.0% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward higher major bleeding risk with PAD (4.8% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.06). With multivariable analyses, PAD remains a significant predictor of mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 2.70; p = 0.039), 6 months (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.37; p < 0.001), and 1 year (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.96; p = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PAD is associated with higher rates of post-PCI death and MI, and is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality.
| |||||||||||
65 years of age suffer from PAD, and this prevalence is estimated to double by 2050 (1,2). Despite its widespread prevalence, this atherosclerotic manifestation is frequently neglected, with only a quarter of patients undergoing treatment (3). Peripheral arterial disease often coexists with other manifestations of the systemic atherosclerotic process, including coronary artery disease (CAD) and cerebrovascular disease (4). In fact, approximately 2 out of 3 patients with PAD have concomitant CAD, and up to 1 out of 3 elderly patients with CAD have concomitant PAD (5,6). Furthermore, patients with concomitant CAD and PAD who undergo coronary revascularization have higher periprocedural and long-term complications compared with those without PAD (7). This may be due to more extensive CAD or vascular complications related to PAD. Earlier studies which evaluated CAD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) involved either relatively small numbers of PAD patients or only single-center registries (810). Therefore, we performed a pooled analysis of 8 large multicenter randomized PCI trials to further characterize the impact of PAD on short-term and long-term ischemic events following PCI. | Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Definitions. The presence of PAD was ascertained and recorded by site investigators at the time of patient enrollment. However, a specific definition of PAD was not stipulated by individual studies. Death was defined as all-cause mortality. Myocardial infarction was typically defined as creatine kinase (CK) or CK-MB elevation of at least 3 times the upper limit of normal in hospital or at least 2 times the upper limit of normal at follow-up or as development of significant Q waves on electrocardiogram. Target vessel revascularization was defined as either percutaneous revascularization or bypass surgery to a vessel that had been treated during the index procedure. Bleeding complications were defined according to the individual studies; the majority used the criteria defined by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group (19).
Statistics. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were stratified by the presence of PAD. Baseline characteristics were compared with chi-square test for discrete variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Hypothesis testing was done using 2-sided tests at the 5% significance level. Survival estimates were computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable analyses were performed with stepwise logistic regression for 7- and 30-day outcomes and stepwise Cox regression for 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year events. The regression models adjusted for age, body mass index, gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, prior MI, prior stroke, prior congestive heart failure, and baseline creatinine clearance. Hazard ratios (HR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In a subanalysis including only the 6 trials that randomized PCI patients to GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor versus placebo, the outcomes evaluating the randomized treatment were stratified according to the presence of PAD. The Breslow-Day test was performed to ensure homogeneity of the 8 randomized trials (p > 0.05 for all outcomes assessed). All statistical analyses were performed with SAS (Version 8; SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data are concordant with recent nonrandomized studies evaluating outcomes of PAD patients undergoing PCI (810). Chiu et al. (8) performed an analysis of TARGET (n = 4,809), addressing the outcomes of 469 PAD patients (
10%) undergoing PCI. These patients had 2.3 times higher 1-year mortality compared with those without PAD. In a retrospective, single-center Mayo Clinic PCI registry by Singh et al. (9), 18% (1,397 of 7,696) of patients undergoing PCI had concomitant PAD. These patients were older than non-PAD patients and had higher frequencies of diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and multivessel CAD. Peripheral arterial disease patients had higher in-hospital death, MI, and need for blood transfusion. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, PAD was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.48; p < 0.001) despite adjusting for baseline variables. Similarly, in another retrospective registry study by Nikolsky et al. (10), the outcomes of 1,969 PAD (18.9% of 10,440) patients undergoing PCI were evaluated. Patients with symptomatic PAD had higher in-hospital complications, 1-year mortality, MI, and TVR. With multivariate analysis, PAD remained an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (OR 1.71; p < 0.001).
Our study extends the observations made in earlier retrospective studies. The data for our pooled analysis is extrapolated from the original databases of large multicenter randomized trials. The data collection (of both baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes) in randomized controlled trials is generally more complete compared with registry studies. Our study population included an aggregate of 19,867 CAD patients undergoing PCI, which represents one of the largest PCI populations to date. Furthermore, the inclusion of 6 randomized trials (n = 12,238) comparing GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to placebo enabled a pooled and stratified subanalysis of the benefit of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors for PAD patients, which had not been previously evaluated.
There are several potential mechanistic etiologies for the higher mortality observed in our patient subset with concomitant PAD and CAD. This is likely predominantly attributed to the more extensive systemic atherosclerotic burden in this patient population. Such systemic burden may culminate in not only cardiovascular, but also cerebrovascular complications. Both studies by Rihal et al. (7) and Nikolsky et al. (10) have shown higher prevalence of neurologic complications (stroke or transient ischemic attacks) following PCI in patients with PAD. Furthermore, patients with PAD undergoing PCI were also more likely to develop vascular complications such as retroperitoneal hemorrhage, femoral hematoma, limb ischemia, bleeding, and requirement for blood transfusion (10). In addition, in a recent biochemical study by Narins et al. (20), post-MI patients who have symptomatic intermittent claudication (78 of 1,045 patients) were shown to have enhanced proinflammatory and procoagulant states. Measurements of D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A were significantly higher among claudicants versus nonclaudicants.
Study limitations. There are several limitations associated with this study. Despite inclusion of only randomized controlled trials, the data derived from pooled analyses are usually only hypothesis generating. The definition of PAD used in our analysis was not unified in the studies included. The diagnosis of PAD was ascertained and recorded by site investigators; however, the definitions used at each site were not specified in the study protocols. Given the universal underdiagnosis of PAD, it is most likely that our study included higher-risk PAD patients, with symptomatic claudication or critical limb ischemia or who had undergone vascular surgery. Nevertheless, our broad inclusion of PAD patients allows extrapolation of our findings to a more "real-life" PCI population. Although the baseline characteristics of our PAD population were significantly different from the non-PAD population (older, higher incidence of atherosclerotic risk factors, worse renal function, prior MI, stroke, and congestive heart failure), multivariable analyses adjusting for these characteristics were performed. Peripheral arterial disease remained a significant predictor of mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. Of note, we did not evaluate the use of beta-blockers in our PAD population (because this was not universally collected in the studies included), which may be a confounder for our study, because claudicants who were not treated with beta-blockers had 3-fold mortality excess (20). Data from randomized controlled PCI trials specifically including a PAD population are necessary to provide definitive conclusions; however, they are unlikely to be pursued.
Conclusions. The presence of concomitant PAD among patients undergoing PCI is associated with higher rates of post-PCI death and MI and is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-C. Parent and S. Rinfret The unresolved issues with risk stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major vascular surgery: [Questions non resolues concernant la stratification du risque et la prise en charge des patients atteints de maladie coronarienne subissant une chirurgie vasculaire majeure] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2008; 55(8): 542 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Kertai Preoperative Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery: A Core Review Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Dauerman, R. J. Applegate, and D. J. Cohen Vascular Closure Devices: The Second Decade J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): 1617 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Warfarin Antiplatelet Vascular Evaluation Tria Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy and Peripheral Arterial Disease N. Engl. J. Med., July 19, 2007; 357(3): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The Year in Interventional Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 270 - 285. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |