CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART FAILURE
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Trimetazidine, a Partial Free Fatty Acid Oxidation Inhibitor, in Patients With Heart Failure
Gabriele Fragasso, MD*,1,*,
Altin Palloshi, MD*,
Patrizia Puccetti, MD*,
Carmen Silipigni, MD*,
Alessandra Rossodivita, MD ,
Mariagrazia Pala, MD ,
Giliola Calori, MDPhD*,
Ottavio Alfieri, MD* and
Alberto Margonato, MD, FESC*
* Clinical Cardiology-Heart Failure Unit, Istituto Scientifico-Universita Vita/Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Cardiac Surgery, Istituto Scientifico-Universita Vita/Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Manuscript received October 27, 2005;
revised manuscript received March 3, 2006,
accepted March 30, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gabriele Fragasso, Clinical Cardiology-Heart Failure Unit, Istituto Scientifico-Universita Vita/Salute San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. (Email: gabriele.fragasso{at}hsr.it).
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess whether the long-term addition of trimetazidine to conventional treatment could improve functional class, exercise tolerance, and left ventricular function in patients with heart failure (HF).
BACKGROUND: Previous small studies have shown that trimetazidine may be beneficial in terms of left ventricular function preservation and control of symptoms in patients with post-ischemic HF.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients with HF were randomly allocated in an open-label fashion to either conventional therapy plus trimetazidine (20 mg three times daily) (28 patients) or conventional therapy alone (27 patients). Mean follow-up was 13 ± 3 months. At study entry and at follow-up, all patients underwent exercise testing and two-dimensional echocardiography. Among the others, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and ejection fraction (EF) were evaluated.
RESULTS: In the trimetazidine group, NYHA functional class significantly improved compared with the conventional therapy group (p < 0.0001). Treatment with trimetazidine significantly decreased left ventricular end-systolic volume (from 98 ± 36 ml to 81 ± 27 ml, p = 0.04) and increased EF from 36 ± 7% to 43 ± 10% (p = 0.002). On the contrary, in the conventional therapy group, both left ventricular end-diastolic and -systolic volumes increased from 142 ± 43 ml to 156 ± 63 ml, p = 0.2, and from 86 ± 34 ml to 104 ± 52 ml, p = 0.1, respectively; accordingly, EF significantly decreased from 38 ± 7% to 34 ± 7% (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, long-term trimetazidine improves functional class and left ventricular function in patients with HF. This benefit contrasts with the natural history of the disease, as shown by the decrease of EF in patients on standard HF therapy alone.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ATP = adenosine triphosphate | | BNP = brain natriuretic peptide | | EDV = end-diastolic volume | | EF = ejection fraction | | ESV = end-systolic volume | | FFA = free fatty acids | | HF = heart failure | | METS = metabolic equivalent system | | NYHA = New York Heart Association |
|
Trimetazidine 1 (2,3,4, trimethoxybenzyl-piperazine dihydrochloride) has been reported to exert anti-ischemic properties without affecting myocardial oxygen consumption and blood supply (16). The beneficial effect of this agent has been attributed to preservation of phosphocreatine and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) intracellular levels (78) and reduction of cell acidosis (910), calcium overload (10), and free-radical-induced injury caused by ischemia (11). Moreimportantly, trimetazidine affects myocardial substrate use by inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation and by shifting energy production from free fatty acids (FFA) to glucose oxidation (12,13). Recent evidence indicates that this effect is predominantly caused by a selective block of long chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase activity, the last enzyme involved in beta-oxidation (14). A few studies performed in small groups of patients with post-ischemic left ventricular dysfunction have shown that trimetazidine may be beneficial in terms of left ventricular function preservation and control of symptoms (1520). On this basis, the possibility that this relatively new pharmacological approach could also be useful in the long-term treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) of various origins is appealing (21,22). In this context, we assessed whether the addition of trimetazidine to standard current treatment of patients with HF could effectively improve symptoms, exercise tolerance, and left ventricular function.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Patients.
This was an individually randomized open-label study. We recruited from the HF clinic of our institution 65 consecutive patients (5 women, age 65 ± 7 years, range 52 to 81 years) with HF (in 35, secondary to ischemic heart disease; all cases evaluated by coronary angiography), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV. As a rule, to ascertain/exclude the presence of coronary disease, all patients attending our clinic with a diagnosis of HF undergo stress/rest cardiac imaging testing and, in case of positive results, coronary angiography. All patients were receiving standard treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, long-acting nitrates, digoxin, diuretics, and antiplatelet drugs, as required. After obtaining informed consent, patients were randomly allocated to either conventional therapy plus trimetazidine (20 mg three times daily) (34 patients, 18 post-ischemic) or conventional therapy alone (31 patients, 17 post-ischemic). The randomization was provided by individual sealed envelopes prepared in advance at the investigation site according to a computer-generated random list. The enrollment period lasted 7 months, and the trial was scheduled to last 12 months. Diabetes was present in 4 patients randomized to trimetazidine and in 5 randomized to conventional therapy alone. Investigators were allowed to modify the dose of conventional treatment and to lower or discontinue the dose of trimetazidine, as necessary.
Patients were considered for study in the presence of: 1) persistent symptoms (dyspnea on exertion, fatigue, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or edema, alone or in combination) despite optimized treatment of HF for at least 12 weeks and optimized up-titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers, with stable doses for the last 4 weeks; and 2) an ejection fraction (EF) <45% by transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were excluded in case of an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within 3 months, primary valvular disease, history of any alcohol abuse within 6 months, high-grade arrhythmias, significant renal insufficiency (serum creatinine 2.2 mg/dl), coronary lesions suitable for revascularization, left ventricular aneurysm or known active neoplastic process, and any orthopedic or neurological illness that could limit their ability to exercise. At the end of the follow-up period, all patients underwent functional evaluation; the physicians performing the tests were blinded with regard to the arm to which patients had been assigned. The following examinations were performed.
Collection of medical history and physical examination.
Symptoms relative to HF were classified according to NYHA functional class. Patients also completed the left ventricular dysfunction questionnaire (LVD-36) to measure the impact of left ventricular dysfunction on daily life and well-being (23). Overall quality of life was evaluated on a visual analog scale (range 0 to 100). Additionally, from when the assay was available in our institution, in 14 and 17 patients of the trimetazidine and conventional therapy group, respectively, a blood sample for serum brain natriuretic peptide levels (NT-pro BNP, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was drawn in the morning before testing.
Exercise testing.
Treadmill exercise tests were performed in the morning, in the fasting state, according to the Bruce protocol. A computer-assisted system for exercise (X-SCRIBE Stress Testing System, Mortara Electronics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) was used. Blood pressure (cuff sphygmomanometer) and the 12-lead electrocardiogram were recorded at baseline, during the third minute of each exercise step, and throughout recovery. Exercise was terminated for the appearance of >2 mm rectilinear or down-sloping ST-segment depression, for severe dyspnea, angina, fatigue, ventricular tachycardia, or for a blood pressure decrease >10 mm Hg. The cardiologist supervising the exercise test was blinded to the therapy assigned to the patient. Heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, and rate-pressure product were measured at rest, at the onset of dyspnea and angina, at the appearance of 1-mm ST-segment depression, and at peak exercise. Time to the onset of angina, 1-mm ST-segment depression, and peak exercise were also recorded. To quantify the energy spent during exercise testing, the metabolic equivalent system (METS) was also used. A MET is a unit of energy that approximates the amount of oxygen required under basal conditions at rest and is equivalent to 3.5 ml O2 x kg1 x min1.
Echocardiography.
All studies were performed with a Sonos 5500 (Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Massachusetts) with broad-band transducers capable of second harmonic imaging (Hewlett-Packard S4 with 1.8/3.6 MHz transducer) and recorded on half-inch VHS tape for later review. Fractional shortening was calculated by M-mode measurements in the short-axis view. Measurements of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) were obtained from the apical four-chamber view by using the single-plane Simpson rule, from which left ventricular EF was calculated as:
. The endocardium of the end-diastolic image and the end-systolic image was visually identified and manually digitized. The left ventricular apex was defined as the point on the endocardial contour furthest from the midpoint of the mitral valve plane and the left ventricular long-axis as a line connecting the mitral plane midpoint and the apex.
Statistical analysis.
Values are given as mean ± 1 SD or as percentages when appropriate. Analysis was performed in the whole population and in patient subgroups, according to the etiology of HF (ischemic/nonischemic). Differences in mean values between groups were assessed using the 2-tailed Student t test. Variables not showing a gaussian distribution (assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test) were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. The chi-square test was performed to investigate NYHA functional class differences between treatments. All calculated p values are 2-tailed and considered as significant when <0.05. Analysis was performed with SAS 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
 |
Results
|
|---|
Two patients in the conventional therapy (1 cardiac cause, sudden death) and 1 in the trimetazidine group (end-stage HF) died during the study. Of the remaining 62 patients, 7 did not attend the follow-up visits (2 in conventional therapy, 5 in trimetazidine) because of low motivation. Therefore, analysis was performed on 55 patients, 28 on conventional therapy + trimetazidine (3 women, age 64 ± 7 years, 17 post-ischemic) and 27 on conventional therapy only (2 women, age 66 ± 7 years, 17 post-ischemic). Mean follow-up was 13 ± 3 months. Time from diagnosis of HF was not different between conventional therapy + trimetazidine versus conventional therapy alone (25 ± 13 months vs. 23 ± 10 months, respectively). Clinical characteristics (Table 1), use of cardiovascular drugs at baseline and at follow-up (Table 2), baseline functional status (Table 3), and echocardiographic parameters (Table 4) were similar in the 2 groups. At follow-up, patients on conventional therapy used more diuretics and digoxin compared with patients on trimetazidine (Table 2). Apart from 2 patients reporting mild gastric pyrosis, in all remaining patients trimetazidine was very well tolerated. None of the study subjects discontinued the drug because of side effects, and the dose was not modified during the study. Compared with baseline values, trimetazidine affected neither blood pressure and heart rate nor QT interval. The BNP levels did not change in the conventional therapy group (from 575 ± 416 pg/ml to 522 ± 291 pg/ml, p = 0.2), whereas they significantly decreased in patients on trimetazidine (from 683 ± 362 pg/ml to 349 ± 211 pg/ml, p = 0.05; p < 0.01 vs. conventional therapy).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2. Baseline and Follow-Up Drug Therapy in Patients Randomized to Trimetazidine + Conventional Therapy or Conventional Therapy Alone
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 3. Number of Patients (%) With Different NYHA Functional Class Changes Between Trimetazidine and Conventional Therapy
|
|
Functional status.
In the trimetazidine group, NYHA functional class decreased 1 grade in 21 patients, decreased 2 grades in 1 patient, increased 1 grade in 2 patients, and remained stable in the remaining 3 patients, whereas in the conventional therapy group it decreased 1 grade in 4 patients, increased 1 grade in 9 patients, increased 2 grades in 2 patients, and remained stable in the remaining 12 patients (p < 0.0001) (Table 3). Accordingly, in the trimetazidine group, LVD-36 score decreased from 18.8 ± 7.0 to 15.1 ± 6.3 (p = 0.038) and quality of life score increased from 63 ± 19% to 71 ± 15% (p = 0.07), whereas in the conventional therapy group, LVD-36 score increased from 18.4 ± 8.8 to 19.2 ± 9.5 (p = 0.07) and quality of life score decreased from 66 ± 12% to 61 ± 20% (p = 0.2; p = 0.04 vs. trimetazidine) (Fig. 1, Table 4). Apart from patients who died during the follow-up period, patients randomized to conventional therapy alone had a higher incidence of cumulative adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients randomized to trimetazidine (Table 5).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Effect of trimetazidine and conventional therapy alone on quality of life (0% to 100%), at baseline (solid bars) and at follow-up (open bars). Compared with patients treated with conventional therapy alone, in whom a clear trend toward deterioration was observed, those treated with trimetazidine showed a significant improvement of quality of life.
|
|
Ergometric results.
Table 4 shows detailed results. No significant resting hemodynamic differences were observed between the 2 groups at baseline and at follow-up. Trimetazidine significantly increased peak METS (from 7.37 ± 2.49 to 8.74 ± 2.39, p = 0.04) and total exercise time (from 314 ± 149 s to 402 ± 153 s, p = 0.04). Conversely, these parameters remained stable in the conventional therapy group (METS from 7.35 ± 2.15 to 7.24 ± 1.57, p = 0.8; exercise time from 324 ± 147 s to 316 ± 125 s, p = 0.8). Both exercise time and METS were higher in the trimetazidine group compared with the group on conventional therapy (p = 0.026 and p < 0.006, respectively).
Echocardiographic results.
Table 4 shows detailed results. Treatment with trimetazidine maintained stable left ventricular EDV (from 150 ± 41 ml to 153 ± 46 ml, p = 0.7) and significantly decreased left ventricular end-systolic volume (from 98 ± 36 ml to 89 ± 27 ml, p = 0.04); accordingly, EF significantly increased from 34 ± 7% to 41 ± 6% (p < 0.001). On the contrary, in the conventional therapy group, both left ventricular EDV and ESV remained stable (from 142 ± 43 ml to 149 ± 63 ml, p = 0.2, and from 92 ± 34 ml to 97 ± 34 ml, p = 0.1, respectively); accordingly, EF did not significantly change (from 36 ± 5% to 34 ± 8%, p = 0.09) (Fig. 2). In the trimetazidine group, ESV was significantly lower and EF higher than in the conventional therapy group (p = 0.048 and p < 0.0001, respectively).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Individual effects of trimetazidine (A) and conventional therapy alone (B) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), at baseline, and at follow-up. Trimetazidine significantly improved LVEF, whereas a trend toward a decline in left ventricular function was observed in patients treated with conventional therapy alone.
|
|
Analysis according to etiology of HF.
Table 6 shows detailed results. Quality of life and LVD-36 improved only in ischemic patients treated with trimetazidine. Both in ischemic and in nonischemic patients, a trend toward improvement in exercise parameters was observed in those treated with trimetazidine. Maladaptive left ventricular remodeling was observed only in ischemic patients on conventional therapy alone, as evidenced by a significant increment of left ventricular ESV, and consequently in a significant reduction of EF. Conversely, ejection EF significantly increased in patients treated with trimetazidine, regardless of the etiology of HF.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 6. Baseline and Follow-Up Clinical and Functional Parameters in Patients Randomized to Trimetazidine + Conventional Therapy or Conventional Therapy Alone
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The results of the present study show that trimetazidine, a specific partial inhibitor of FFA oxidation, added to usual treatment consistently improved NYHA functional class, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular function in patients with HF, regardless of its etiology. Patients on trimetazidine used less diuretics and less digoxin compared with patients on conventional therapy alone. Although not tested in all patients, BNP level was also significantly reduced in patients on trimetazidine compared with conventional therapy alone. The improvement in left ventricular function is likely the main factor determining the observed improvement of quality of life, including increased exercise tolerance and decreased NYHA functional class. Additionally, the absence of systemic hemodynamic effects explains the elevated compliance with the treatment and the lack of significant side effects. We believe that our data suggest that the adjunct of targeted cardiac metabolic therapy opens a new therapeutic window in the treatment of HF.
Manipulation of cardiac metabolism.
A number of different approaches have been used to manipulate energy metabolism in the heart. These involve both indirect measures, as well as the use of agents that directly act on the heart to shift energy substrates use away from fatty acid metabolism and toward glucose metabolism, which is more efficient in terms of ATP production per mole of oxygen used. One way to increase glucose oxidation and to decrease fatty acid metabolism in the heart is to decrease circulating fatty acid levels. This can be achieved by the administration of glucose-insulin solutions (24), nicotinic acid (25), and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs (26,27). Another approach consists of directly modifying substrate use by the heart. Pharmacological agents that inhibit fatty acid oxidation include direct beta-oxidation inhibitors, the so-called 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme A thiolase inhibitors, such as trimetazidine (14) and ranolazine (28). Inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid substrates has been shown to shift substrate use from fatty acid to glucose (29,30). This could also explain why trimetazidine seems particularly effective in diabetic patients (18,31). However, in the present study we could not confirm this issue because the diabetic population was small and equally distributed in the two groups.
Metabolic alterations in HF.
Wasting of subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle is relatively common in HF and suggests an increased use of noncarbohydrate substrates for energy production (32,33). In fact, fasting blood ketone bodies (34) as well as fat oxidation during exercise (35) have been shown to be increased in patients with HF. Insulin resistance has been found to be associated with HF (36), and the consequent impaired suppression of lipolysis could determine the development of ketosis. Experimental studies have shown that sodium dichloroacetate stimulates pyruvate dehydrogenase activity by inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (37,38). Stimulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase activity leads to enhanced glycolysis of glucose and use of lactate by the myocardium for aerobic respiration. Myocardial consumption of FFAs is simultaneously inhibited, with the overall effect of a change of substrate use from predominantly nonesterified FFA to glucose and lactate (39), finally resulting in improved left ventricular mechanical efficiency (40). Similar mechanisms are likely to be at the base of the beneficial effects of trimetazidine in HF patients observed in the present study. These beneficial effects can be explained by the fact that glucose and lactate are more efficient fuels for aerobic respiration, yielding a 16% to 26% improvement in the oxygen consumption efficiency of the myocardium (41). Indeed, experimental and clinical data support the concept that shifting the energy substrate preference away from fatty acid metabolism and toward glucose metabolism is an effective approach to treating heart disease (4244).
Effects of trimetazidine on cardiac metabolism.
From the results of this study, it seems that trimetazidine was equally effective in treating patients with HF of ischemic and nonischemic origin. Indeed, in HF, similar to what happens during acute myocardial ischemia, glucose and lactate oxidation are decreased and fatty acid oxidation is increased, increasing the oxygen requirement per ATP molecule produced. In fact, a major factor in the development and progression of HF is already a reduced availability of ATP, determining a metabolic state that has been defined as energy starvation (45). Fantini et al. (13) observed that the use of palmitoyl-carnitine by isolated cardiac mitochondria is inhibited by high doses of trimetazidine, in the absence of significant changes in pyruvate and citrate oxidation. Additional studies also suggest that trimetazidine acts by affecting myocardial substrate use because the drug inhibits use of fatty acid substrates and shifts metabolism from fatty acid to glucose oxidation (14). Specifically, the agent inhibits beta-oxidation by selectively blocking the activity of 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase, the last enzyme of the oxidative chain (14). By inhibiting fatty acid oxidation, trimetazidine stimulates total glucose use, including both glycolysis and glucose oxidation. Additionally, trimetazidine increases the incorporation of long-chain fatty acids into the cardiomyocyte membrane (46), thus significantly reducing the availability of cytosolic FFAs and acylcarnitine, which can have deleterious effects on calcium handling. These effects are probably operative on both cardiac and skeletal muscle determining improved cardiac efficiency and peripheral glucose extraction and use.
Finally, a recent study has shown that energy deficiency in HF might result from increased uncoupling proteins (i.e., less efficient ATP synthesis) and depleted glucose transporter protein (i.e., reduced glucose uptake) (47). On this ground, the adoption of drug therapies (such as trimetazidine and ranolazine) aimed at interrupting the metabolic vicious circle in HF has been advocated (48).
Conclusions.
The results of this study support the concept that shifting the energy substrate preference away from fatty acid metabolism and toward glucose metabolism by trimetazidine, a ketoacyl-coenzyme A thiolase inhibitor, is an effective adjunctive treatment in patients with HF, in terms of symptoms, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular function improvement. These beneficial effects seem to be operative in patients with both ischemic and nonischemic HF. This would be particularly effective in the former, which has a prognosis that is definitively worse. Although highly suggestive, the question of whether these effects could translate into decreased morbidity and mortality needs further investigation. To this end, we believe that time has come to evaluate the effects of partial fatty acid oxidation inhibition in patients with HF in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 Dr. Fragasso has received travel reimbursement and given remunerated lectures for Servier, the manufacturer of trimetazidine. 
 |
References
|
|---|
1. Passeron J. Efficacy of trimetazidine in stable effort angina. Double-blind study against placebo Presse Med 1986;15:1775-1777.[Web of Science][Medline]2. Michaelides AP, Vyssoulis GP, Bonoris PE, Psaros TK, Papadopoulos PD, Toutouzas PK. Beneficial effects of trimetazidine in men with stable angina under beta-blocker treatment Curr Ther Res 1989;46:565-566. 3. Levy S, Group of South of France Investigators Combination therapy of trimetazidine with diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease Am J Cardiol 1995;76:12B-16B.[CrossRef][Medline] 4. Dalla-Volta S, Maraglino G, Della-Valentina P, Viena P, Desideri A. Comparison of trimetazidine with nifedipine in effort anginaa double blind, cross-over study. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 1990;4:853-860.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 5. Detry JM, Sellier P, Pennaforte S, Cokkinos D, Dargie H, Mathes P. Trimetazidine: a new concept in the treatment of angina. Comparison with propranolol in patients with stable angina Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994;37:279-388.[Web of Science][Medline] 6. Chierchia SL, Fragasso G. Protective effects of trimetazidine on ischaemic myocardial dysfunction Eur Heart J 1999:24-27l Suppl O:O. 7. Lavanchy N, Martin J, Rossi A. Anti-ischemia effects of trimetazidine31P-NMR spectroscopy in the isolated rat heart. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1987;286:97-110.[Web of Science][Medline] 8. Fragasso G, De Cobelli F, Perseghin G, et al. Improved myocardial high-energy phosphate metabolism induced by partial fatty acid inhibition in patients with heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:190A. 9. Lagadic-Gossmann D, Le Prigent K, Feuvray D. Effects of trimetazidine on pHi in the rat isolated ventricular myocyte Br J Pharmacol 1996;117:831-838.[Web of Science][Medline] 10. Renaud JF. Internal pH, Na*, and Ca2* regulation by trimetazidine during cardiac cell acidosis Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1988;1:677-686.[CrossRef][Medline] 11. Maridonneau-Parini I, Harpey C. Effects of trimetazidine on membrane damage induced by oxygen free radicals in human red cells Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985;20:148-151.[Web of Science][Medline] 12. Kay L, Finelli C, Aussedat J, et al. Improvement of long-term preservation of the isolated arrested rat heart by trimetazidineeffects on the energy state and mitochondrial function. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:45B-49B.[CrossRef][Medline] 13. Fantini E, Demaison L, Sentex E, et al. Some biochemical aspects of the protective effect of trimetazidine on rat cardiomyocytes during hypoxia and reoxygenation J Mol Cell Cardiol 1994;26:949-958.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 14. Kantor PF, Lucien A, Kozak R, et al. The antianginal drug trimetazidine shifts cardiac energy metabolism from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation by inhibiting mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase Circ Res 2000;86:580-588.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 15. Brottier L, Barat JL, Combe C, Boussens B, Bonnet J, Bricaud H. Therapeutic value of a cardioprotective agent in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 1990;11:207-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 16. Lu C, Dabrowski P, Fragasso G, Chierchia SL. Effects of trimetazidine on ischemic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery diseasea double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:898-901.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 17. Belardinelli R, Purcaro A. Effects of trimetazidine on the contractile response of chronically dysfunctional myocardium to low-dose dobutamine in ischaemic cardiomyopathy Eur Heart J 2001;22:2164-2170.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 18. Fragasso G, Piatti PM, Monti L, et al. Short and long term beneficial effects of partial free fatty acid inhibition in diabetic patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy Am Heart J 2003;146:E1-E8. 19. Vitale C, Wajngaten M, Sposato B, et al. Trimetazidine improves left ventricular function and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary artery disease Eur Heart J 2004;25:1814-1821.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 20. Di Napoli P, Taccardi AA, Barsotti A. Long term cardioprotective action of trimetazidine and potential effect on the inflammatory process in patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy Heart 2005;91:161-165.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 21. Essop MF, Opie LH. Metabolic therapy for heart failure Eur Heart J 2004;25:1765-1768.[Free Full Text] 22. Thrainsdottir I, von Bibra H, Malmberg K, Ryden L. Effects of trimetazidine on left ventricular function in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2004;44:101-108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 23. OLeary CJ, Jones PW. The left ventricular dysfunction questionnaire (LVD-36)reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Heart 2000;83:634-640.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 24. Oliver MF. Glucose, insulin, potassium in acute myocardial infarction Acta Cardiologica 1973;28(Suppl 17):257-266. 25. Vik-Mo H, Riemersma RA, Mjos OD, et al. Effect of myocardial ischemia and antilipolytic agents on lipolysis and fatty acid metabolism in the in situ dog heart Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1979;39:559-568.[Web of Science][Medline] 26. Lewis CM, Brink AJ. Beta adrenergic blockade. Hemodynamics and myocardial energy metabolism in patients with ischemic heart disease Am J Cardiol 1968;21:846-859.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 27. Armstrong PW, Chiong MA, Parker JO. Effects of propranolol on the hemodynamic, coronary sinus blood flow and myocardial metabolic response to atrial pacing Am J Cardiol 1977;40:83-89.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 28. Bagger JP, Botker HE, Thomassen A, Nielsen TT. Effects of ranolazine on ischemic threshold, coronary sinus blood flow, and myocardial metabolism in coronary artery disease Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1997;11:479-484.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 29. Lopaschuk GD, Spafford MA, Davies NJ, et al. Glucose and palmitate oxidation in isolated working rat hearts reperfused after a period of transient global ischaemia Circ Res 1990;66:546-553.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 30. Lopaschuk GD, Saddik M. The relative contribution of glucose and fatty acids to ATP production in hearts reperfused following ischemia Mol Cell Biochem 1992;116:111-116.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 31. Monti LD, Setola E, Fragasso G, et al. Metabolic and endothelial effects of trimetazidine on forearm skeletal muscle in patients with type 2 diabetes and ischemic cardiomyopathy Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005;290:e54-e59.[Medline] 32. Pittman JG, Cohen P. The pathogenesis of cardiac cachexia N Engl J Med 1964;271:403-409.[Web of Science][Medline] 33. Neely JR, Rovetto MJ, Oram JF. Myocardial use of carbohydrate and lipids Progr Cardiovasc Dis 1972;15:289-329.[CrossRef][Medline] 34. Lommi J, Kupari M, Koskinen P, et al. Blood ketone bodies in congestive heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:665-672.[Abstract] 35. Riley M, Bell N, Elborn JS, Stanford CF, Buchanan KD, Nicholls DP. Metabolic response to graded exercise in chronic heart failure Eur Heart J 1993;14:1484-1488.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 36. Paolisso G, De Riu S, Marrazzo G, Verza M, Varricchio M, DOnofrio F. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in patients with chronic heart failure Metabolism 1991;40:972-977.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 37. Stacpoole PW. The pharmacology of dichloroacetate Metabolism 1989;38:1124-1144.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 38. Mc Veigh JJ, Lopaschuck GD. Dichloroacetate stimulation of glucose oxidation improves recovery of ischemic rat hearts Am J Physiol 1990;259:H1070-H1085. 39. Nicholl TA, Lopaschuck GD, McNeill GH. Effects of free fatty acids and dichloroacetate on isolated working diabetic rat hearts Am J Physiol 1991;261:H1053-H1059.[Web of Science][Medline] 40. Bersin RM, Wolfe C, Kwasman M, et al. Improved hemodynamic function and mechanical efficiency in congestive heart failure with sodium dichloroacetate J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1617-1624.[Abstract] 41. McAllister A, Allison SP, Randle PJ. Effects of dichloroacetate on the metabolism of glucose, pyruvate, acetate, 3-hydroxybutyrate and palmitate in rat diaphragm and heart muscle in vitro and on extraction of glucose, lactate, pyruvate and free fatty acids by dog heart in vivo Biochem J 1973;134:1067-1081.[Web of Science][Medline] 42. Oliver MF, Opie LH. Effects of glucose and fatty acids on myocardial ischaemia and arrhythmias Lancet 1994;343:155-158.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 43. deVillalobos DH, Taegtmeyer H. Metabolic support for the postischemic heart Lancet 1995;345:1552-1555.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 44. Lopaschuck GD, Stanley WC. Glucose metabolism in the ischemic heart Circulation 1997;95:313-315.[Free Full Text] 45. Katz AM. Is the failing heart energy depleted? Cardiol Clin 1998;16:633-644.[CrossRef][Medline] 46. Sentex E, Sergiel JP, Lucien A, Grynberg A. Trimetazidine increases phospholipid turnover in ventricular myocytes Mol Cell Biochem 1997;175:153-162.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 47. Murray AJ, Anderson RE, Watson GC, Radda GK, Clarke K. Uncoupling proteins in human heart Lancet 2004;364:1786-1788.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 48. Opie LH. The metabolic vicious circle in heart failure Lancet 2004;364:1733-1734.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Related Article
-
Metabolic Approach in Heart Failure: Rethinking How We Translate From Theory to Clinical Practice
- W.H. Wilson Tang
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006 48: 999-1000.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ardehali, H. N. Sabbah, M. A. Burke, S. Sarma, P. P. Liu, J. G. F. Cleland, A. Maggioni, G. C. Fonarow, E. D. Abel, U. Campia, et al.
Targeting myocardial substrate metabolism in heart failure: potential for new therapies
Eur J Heart Fail,
February 1, 2012;
14(2):
120 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Fragasso, A. Salerno, G. Lattuada, A. Cuko, G. Calori, A. Scollo, F. Ragogna, F. Arioli, G. Bassanelli, R. Spoladore, et al.
Effect of partial inhibition of fatty acid oxidation by trimetazidine on whole body energy metabolism in patients with chronic heart failure
Heart,
September 15, 2011;
97(18):
1495 - 1500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Lionetti, W. C. Stanley, and F. A. Recchia
Modulating fatty acid oxidation in heart failure
Cardiovasc Res,
May 1, 2011;
90(2):
202 - 209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Tuunanen and J. Knuuti
Metabolic remodelling in human heart failure
Cardiovasc Res,
May 1, 2011;
90(2):
251 - 257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gao, N. Ning, X. Niu, G. Hao, and Z. Meng
Trimetazidine: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in heart failure
Heart,
February 15, 2011;
97(4):
278 - 286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Liu, Y. Gai, F. Liu, W. Gao, Y. Zhang, M. Xu, and Z. Li
Trimetazidine inhibits pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis through NADPH oxidase-ROS-CTGF pathway
Cardiovasc Res,
October 1, 2010;
88(1):
150 - 158.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zemljic, M. Bunc, and B. Vrtovec
Trimetazidine Shortens QTc Interval in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
March 1, 2010;
15(1):
31 - 36.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cera, A. Salerno, G. Fragasso, C. Montanaro, C. Gardini, G. Marinosci, F. Arioli, R. Spoladore, A. Facchini, C. Godino, et al.
Beneficial Electrophysiological Effects of Trimetazidine in Patients With Postischemic Chronic Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
March 1, 2010;
15(1):
24 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Lopaschuk, J. R. Ussher, C. D. L. Folmes, J. S. Jaswal, and W. C. Stanley
Myocardial Fatty Acid Metabolism in Health and Disease
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2010;
90(1):
207 - 258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Phan, G. N. Shivu, A. Choudhury, K. Abozguia, C. Davies, U. Naidoo, I. Ahmed, Z. Yousef, J. Horowitz, and M. Frenneaux
Multi-centre experience on the use of perhexiline in chronic heart failure and refractory angina: old drug, new hope
Eur J Heart Fail,
September 1, 2009;
11(9):
881 - 886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Scheuer
Letter by Scheuer Regarding Article, "Trimetazidine, a Metabolic Modulator, Has Cardiac and Extracardiac Benefits in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy"
Circulation,
March 24, 2009;
119(11):
e371 - e371.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. van Bilsen, F. A. van Nieuwenhoven, and G. J. van der Vusse
Metabolic remodelling of the failing heart: beneficial or detrimental?
Cardiovasc Res,
February 15, 2009;
81(3):
420 - 428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Qanud, M. Mamdani, M. Pepe, R. J. Khairallah, J. Gravel, B. Lei, S. A. Gupte, V. G. Sharov, H. N. Sabbah, W. C. Stanley, et al.
Reverse changes in cardiac substrate oxidation in dogs recovering from heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
H2098 - H2105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Tuunanen, E. Engblom, A. Naum, K. Nagren, M. Scheinin, B. Hesse, K.E. Juhani Airaksinen, P. Nuutila, P. Iozzo, H. Ukkonen, et al.
Trimetazidine, a Metabolic Modulator, Has Cardiac and Extracardiac Benefits in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Circulation,
September 16, 2008;
118(12):
1250 - 1258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Witteles and M. B. Fowler
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 15, 2008;
52(3):
239 - 240.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Witteles and M. B. Fowler
Insulin-Resistant Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Evidence, Mechanisms, and Treatment Options
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 15, 2008;
51(2):
93 - 102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Pilz, H. Scharnagl, B. Tiran, B. Wellnitz, U. Seelhorst, B. O. Boehm, and W. Marz
Elevated plasma free fatty acids predict sudden cardiac death: a 6.85-year follow-up of 3315 patients after coronary angiography
Eur. Heart J.,
November 2, 2007;
28(22):
2763 - 2769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ashrafian, M. P. Frenneaux, and L. H. Opie
Metabolic Mechanisms in Heart Failure
Circulation,
July 24, 2007;
116(4):
434 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W H Fung, C. C Szeto, and C. M Yu
Preventing contrast nephropathy in catheter laboratory
Heart,
June 1, 2007;
93(6):
654 - 655.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Metra, P. Ponikowski, K. Dickstein, J. J.V. McMurray, A. Gavazzi, C.-H. Bergh, A. G. Fraser, T. Jaarsma, A. Pitsis, P. Mohacsi, et al.
Advanced chronic heart failure: A position statement from the Study Group on Advanced Heart Failure of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur J Heart Fail,
June 1, 2007;
9(6-7):
684 - 694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Fragasso, A. Palloshi, and G. Perseghin
Letter by Fragasso et al Regarding Article by Tuunanen et al, "Free Fatty Acid Depletion Acutely Decreases Cardiac Work and Efficiency in Cardiomyopathic Heart Failure"
Circulation,
May 29, 2007;
115(21):
e546 - e546.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Labinskyy, M. Bellomo, M. P. Chandler, M. E. Young, V. Lionetti, K. Qanud, F. Bigazzi, T. Sampietro, W. C. Stanley, and F. A. Recchia
Chronic Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} with Fenofibrate Prevents Alterations in Cardiac Metabolic Phenotype without Changing the Onset of Decompensation in Pacing-Induced Heart Failure
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
April 1, 2007;
321(1):
165 - 171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 30, 2007;
49(4):
509 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.H. W. Tang
Metabolic Approach in Heart Failure: Rethinking How We Translate From Theory to Clinical Practice
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 5, 2006;
48(5):
999 - 1000.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|