Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Figure 5 Differential inhibitory effect of paclitaxel on proliferation of smooth muscle versus endothelial lineage cells. (A) Anti-proliferative effects of paclitaxel on rabbit endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and smooth muscle progenitor cells (SPCs) were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. At the presumable tissue concentration (100 nmol/l to 1 µmol/l) of paclitaxel at vessel with TAXUS stenting, EPC still maintained its proliferative potential, whereas SPCs did not. *EPC versus vascular progenitor cell, p < 0.001; {dagger}p = 0.002. (B) Human EPCs, mature endothelial cells (ECs), and vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were also evaluated. Paclitaxel caused a dose-dependent inhibition of SMC growth even from a low therapeutic concentration (100 nmol/l). In contrast, EC growth was inhibited only at 1 µmol/l of paclitaxel, a high therapeutic concentration. But proliferative activity of EPCs was not inhibited in the range of therapeutic concentration eluted from TAXUS stent. *EC versus SMC, p = 0.001; {dagger}EPC versus EC, p = 0.036; #EC versus SMC, p = 0.002 by analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s correction.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement