Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Figure 1 Programmed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies versus heart rate. (A) Percentage of all patients programmed to antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or shock therapy (number of patients with ATP or shock therapy on at each heart rate/total number of patients in the arm). The dotted line illustrates that nearly all EMPIRIC arm patients had their ICD enabled to treat tachycardias >150 beats/min. In marked contrast, tailored programming was enabled to treat slower tachycardias in a much smaller proportion of patients. (B) Percent of treated patients programmed to ATP on (number of patients with ATP on at each heart rate/number of patients with ATP or shock therapy on at each heart rate). The dotted line illustrates that nearly all EMPIRIC arm patients had ATP on up to 250 beats/min. In marked contrast, a small proportion of tailored arm patients had ATP on at faster heart rates.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement