Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:2518-2523, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.036 (Published online 28 November 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Video
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.08.036v1
48/12/2518    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Germans, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Germans, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Structural Abnormalities of the Inferoseptal Left Ventricular Wall Detected by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Carriers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Mutations

Tjeerd Germans, MD*,§,*, Arthur A.M. Wilde, MD, PhD{dagger},§, Pieter A. Dijkmans, MD*, Wenxia Chai, PhD§, Otto Kamp, MD, PhD*, Yigal M. Pinto, MD, PhD{ddagger},§ and Albert C. van Rossum, MD, PhD*,§

* Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
§ Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Manuscript received March 1, 2006; revised manuscript received June 27, 2006, accepted August 7, 2006.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Tjeerd Germans, Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. (Email: t.germans{at}vumc.nl).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether structural left ventricular (LV) abnormalities can be observed in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) mutation carriers who have not yet developed echocardiographic signs of hypertrophy by using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is caused by mutations of genes encoding for sarcomeric proteins. Myocyte disarray and interstitial fibrosis precede the development of regional hypertrophy in HCM mutation carriers (carriers). No macroscopic LV structural abnormalities have been observed in carriers without LV hypertrophy.

METHODS: A CMR, echocardiogram, and electrocardiogram (ECG) were performed in 16 carriers. Delayed contrast enhancement imaging was used with CMR to detect fibrosis. In 16 age- and gender-matched control subjects, CMR and ECG were performed and an echocardiogram was made when structural abnormalities were detected with CMR. All carriers had an LV wall thickness <13 mm in the year before the study, measured by echocardiography.

RESULTS: In 13 carriers (81%), crypts were discerned with CMR in the basal and mid inferoseptal LV wall, not detected by routine echocardiography and not observed in healthy volunteers. In 4 of the crypt-positive carriers, both the echocardiogram and ECG were normal. Two HCM carriers revealed regional hypertrophy of the inferoseptum not detected by echocardiography, and in both carriers, focal fibrosis was present.

CONCLUSIONS: In carriers who have not yet developed frank hypertrophy, crypts can be detected with CMR in the inferoseptal LV wall, even when echocardiography and ECG are normal. The crypts might represent one of the early pathological alterations of myocardium in carriers that ultimately progress into manifest HCM.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  DCE = delayed contrast enhancement
  DTPA = diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  LV = left ventricle/ventricular
  MYBPC3 = cardiac myosin-binding protein C
  TPM1 = alpha tropomyosin


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common disease, occurring in 1 in 500 in the general population, and clinically diagnosed by the presence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the absence of a disease likely to cause this hypertrophy (1).

Hereditary HCM is caused by mutations in genes, most of which encode for sarcomeric proteins (2). Genetic screening of families of index HCM patients enables the identification of HCM mutation carriers, whose echocardiographic dimensions of the LV might still be within the normal range. It is yet unclear how mutations in sarcomeric proteins, which presumably affect all cardiac myocytes, give rise to the usually regional myocardial hypertrophy.

Earlier studies in animals and human subjects have shown that myocyte disarray, fibrosis, relaxation abnormalities, and concomitant left atrial enlargement precede the development of frank hypertrophy in HCM mutation carriers (3,4). We hypothesized that HCM mutation carriers exhibit local structural abnormalities before hypertrophy can be discerned.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has a high spatial resolution, is considered the gold standard for in vivo determination of mass and volumes of the LV, and enables precise quantification of wall thickness and dimensions (5). Also, CMR with delayed contrast enhancement (DCE) imaging can be used to detect foci of collagen deposition in the myocardium of HCM patients (6).

Therefore, we used CMR to evaluate whether structural LV abnormalities can be observed in HCM mutation carriers who have not yet developed echocardiographic signs of hypertrophy.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Patient selection.   Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers with an LV wall thickness <13 mm as measured by 2-dimensional echocardiography in the year before the study were selected. The HCM mutation carriers had either a 2373insG mutation in the gene encoding for cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3), which is found in at least 25% of HCM patients in the Netherlands (7), or a Glu62Gln missense mutation in the gene encoding for alpha-tropomyosin (TPM1) (8).

Other inclusion criteria were: sinus rhythm, age between 20 and 65 years, no signs and/or symptoms of coronary artery disease, and no history of a disease likely to cause secondary LV hypertrophy. The structure and global function of the LV of HCM mutation carriers were compared with those of age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers.

Healthy volunteers, recruited from hospital employees, were included when having no history of cardiovascular disease, no heart murmur or hypertension on physical examination, and a normal electrocardiogram (ECG). Furthermore, first-degree relatives of healthy volunteers had to be free of inheritable cardiomyopathy, (aborted) sudden cardiac death, and/or unexplained syncope.

Exclusion criteria for all participants were: an implanted pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cerebral clips, known allergy to gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (DTPA), and/or claustrophobia.

In all HCM mutation carriers, a CMR, echocardiogram, and ECG were performed. A CMR and ECG were also performed in healthy volunteers. An echocardiogram was only performed in healthy volunteers when any abnormalities were revealed by CMR.

The study was approved by our institutional ethics committee. All participants gave written informed consent.

CMR image acquisition.   The CMR studies were performed on a 1.5-T whole body scanner (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), with a 6-channel phased-array body coil. After survey scans, long-axis 4-, 3-, and 2-chamber cines were acquired with a retro-triggered, balanced steady-state free precession gradient-echo (trueFISP) sequence.

Scan parameters were: 5-mm slice thickness with 5-mm gap between short-axis slices, temporal resolution <50 ms, repetition time 3.2 ms, echo time 1.54 ms, flip angle 70°, and typical image resolution 1.3 x 1.6 mm. A stack of 10 to 12 short-axis slices was used to cover the LV, as described previously (9). Acquiring additional cine images was left to the discretion of the attending cardiologist, a CMR specialist.

The DCE images were obtained 10 min after injection of 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium-DTPA. An inversion recovery turbo Fast Low Angle Shot (FLASH) sequence was used to obtain images with 6-mm slice thickness planned at the same position as the long- and short-axis cines in end-diastole. All images were obtained during breath holding in mild expiration. The LV volumes and mass were obtained as described previously (9). The LV volumes and mass were indexed to body surface area. End-systolic left atrial dimensions were measured on 3-chamber view as the distance between the aortic root and posterior wall of the left atrium. The presence of fibrosis and the structure of the LV were evaluated by a cardiologist experienced in CMR (A.C.vR.) and blinded to the genotype.

Echocardiography.   Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography were performed on a Vivid-7 (General Electric Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). Left ventricular structure and function were evaluated on parasternal and apical views. Acquiring additional images was left to the discretion of the echocardiographer. Left ventricular structure and function were evaluated by a cardiologist (O.K.) experienced in echocardiography and blinded to the genotype.

ECG.   Standard 12-lead ECG was performed. Conduction intervals were measured, and LV hypertrophy was evaluated with the Romhilt-Estes criteria (10). The ST-segments were defined as normal or abnormal and, in addition, an R-wave in V1 >3 mm was considered abnormal. The ECGs were analyzed by 2 observers blinded for the genotype (T.G. and A.A.M.W.).

Genetic screening.   Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was isolated from blood samples. Sequencing protocols are given in Alders et al. (7) and Jongbloed et al. (8).

Statistical analysis.   An independent Student t test was used to compare groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
The group of HCM mutation carriers comprised 5 TPM1 mutation carriers (3 men) and 11 MYBPC3 mutation carriers (3 men) from 7 different families. No HCM mutation carriers were excluded. Sixteen age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers were included (6 men).

Dimensions and global LV function.   Baseline characteristics and global LV and left atrial dimensions measured with CMR did not differ between HCM mutation carriers and healthy volunteers (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics and Dimensions Measured by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 
The CMR showed inferoseptal basal hypertrophy that was not detected previously by echocardiography in 2 carriers with a septal wall thickness of 17 and 13 mm, respectively (Table 2). In all other HCM mutation carriers, maximal septal wall thickness, maximal lateral wall thickness, LV mass, and left atrial dimensions were within normal limits. In the HCM mutation carrier with regional hypertrophy, LV mass exceeded normal limits of 64.7 ± 9.3 g/m2 (11).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Detailed Description of HCM Mutation Carriers
 
Structure.   In the majority of HCM mutation carriers (13 of 16; 81%), CMR revealed an abnormal structure of the myocardium consisting of profound crypts in the basal and mid segment of the inferoseptal LV myocardium, at the junction of the right and left ventricle (Fig. 1). The crypts were only visible at end-diastole ( [see Appendix]). On LV short-axis images, they appeared as triangular, blood-containing bright spots (Fig. 1). Importantly, the myocardial segments surrounding the crypts were considered normokinetic, both on CMR and echocardiography. Best visualization was obtained on subsequently acquired dedicated long-axis slices, slightly modified from the 2-chamber view, cutting through the inferior septum (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Structural abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) mutation carriers. (A) Short-axis view of HCM mutation carrier. White arrowhead indicates triangular shaped, blood-containing spot in inferoseptum. Gray cutline represents the image plane of images B through F. (B) Modified 2-chamber view through inferoseptum of healthy volunteer; no crypts can be observed. (C to E) Modified 2-chamber view through inferoseptum of HCM mutation carriers with left ventricular (LV) wall thickness <9 mm; white arrowheads indicate crypts penetrating the myocardium up to the subepicardial layer. (F) Modified 2-chamber view through inferoseptum of HCM mutation carrier with LV wall thickness of 11 mm. The penetration of the crypts can be visualized only up to 70% of the myocardium, as indicated by white arrowheads.

 
In HCM mutation carriers with an LV septal wall thickness <9 mm, the crypts could be visualized within the inferoseptal LV wall up to the subepicardium (Fig. 1). In those HCM mutation carriers with an LV wall thickness ranging from 9 to 12 mm, the crypts could be visualized only throughout 70% of the inferoseptal LV wall. The 1 HCM mutation carrier who had 17-mm LV wall thickness revealed only 1 remnant crypt at the border of the regionally hypertrophied segment. The 3 HCM mutation carriers who had no discernable crypts were all women and were MYBPC3 mutation carriers.

All healthy volunteers had normal LV myocardium without the structural abnormalities described in the preceding text.

Focal fibrosis within the septal wall was present in the 2 HCM mutation carriers with regional hypertrophy. Fibrosis was absent in all other HCM mutation carriers and healthy volunteers. However, the crypts did mimic focal fibrosis by partial volume effects on short-axis DCE images (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Delayed contrast enhancement images of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) mutation carriers. (A) Modified 2-chamber view of HCM mutation carrier with regional hypertrophy. White arrowhead indicates focal fibrosis; dashed line indicates the cutline of image plane C. (B) Modified 2-chamber view of HCM mutation carrier without regional hypertrophy; dashed line indicates the cutline of image D. (C) Short-axis view of HCM mutation carrier with regional hypertrophy. White arrowhead indicates focal fibrosis in inferoseptum; dashed line indicates cutline of image A. (D) Short-axis view of HCM mutation carrier without regional hypertrophy. Black arrowhead indicates partial volume effect of blood-containing crypts. Dashed line indicates cutline of image B.

 
ECG.   None of the HCM mutation carriers met the criteria for LV hypertrophy (Table 2). In 2 (15%) crypt-positive carriers, ST-segments were abnormal. An R-wave in V1 >3 mm was found in 9 of the crypt-positive carriers. In total, 63% of the crypt-positive carriers had an abnormal ECG. Of the 3 HCM mutation carriers who had no detected crypts, 2 had a normal ECG and 1 had an abnormal ECG.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is characterized by a large interfamilial and intrafamilial variety of clinical presentations, ranging from sudden cardiac death at young age to mild symptoms of heart failure at advanced age, even if a single mutation is involved. Therefore, research is often focused on early identification of HCM mutation carriers who are at increased risk for developing heart failure or potentially life-threatening arrhythmias (12–14).

This study is the first to report that structural abnormalities consisting of crypts that can be detected in the LV myocardium of many asymptomatic HCM mutation carriers, in whom no hypertrophy has developed yet, no fibrosis is present, and no ECG abnormalities occur. The crypts were best visualized in end-diastole with CMR, not with routine echocardiography. When LV wall thickness was <9 mm, crypt penetration could be visualized up to the subepicardial layer of the myocardium. The depth of crypt penetration decreased with the increase of LV wall thickness. In 1 HCM mutation carrier who had developed overt regional hypertrophy, only a single crypt was visible at the border of the hypertrophied area, suggesting that this might be a remnant of crypts that have been compressed by surrounding hypertrophied myocardium. This might also explain why crypts have never been described previously in pathology studies. So far, pathology studies have described in detail the macroscopy, microscopy, and histology of the myocardial structure in patients with overt HCM but not in carriers without hypertrophy (15,16). Furthermore, postmortem analyzed hearts are always to some extent in a contracted state, which makes detection of the crypts more difficult. In vivo study by CMR, however, allows detailed analysis of the myocardium in the non-contracted, end-diastolic state. Thus, the recent availability of genetic identification of pre-symptomatic HCM mutation carriers, in combination with the tomographic precision provided by CMR, resulted in the discovery of macroscopic abnormalities in this patient group.

Although the HCM mutation carriers in our study were asymptomatic, the crypts might induce regional function abnormalities and conduction disorders. If one assumes that crypts are the result of regional ischemia due to coronary microvascular dysfunction and/or myocyte disarray, both hallmarks of HCM (1), then the presence of crypts might lead to loss of contractility within the area of myocardium where the crypts are located (17). This assumption is in agreement with the results of a clinical study performed by Nagueh et al. (4), who evaluated myocardial function with tissue Doppler imaging in asymptomatic HCM mutation carriers. They found that early diastolic myocardial velocities were reduced in HCM mutation carriers who had not yet developed hypertrophy. Thus, one might hypothesize that crypts lead to a loss of contractility, which in turn serves as a trigger to develop hypertrophy (18). However, we found the myocardium surrounding the crypts to be normokinetic on both cine imaging and routine echocardiography, which does not support this hypothesis. Whether more subtle systolic or diastolic abnormalities of the myocardial segments surrounding the crypts can be detected with more advanced functional imaging techniques, such as tissue Doppler imaging by echocardiography or myocardial tissue tagging by CMR, needs to be further evaluated.

In this study, regional fibrosis was observed within the hypertrophied region of 2 HCM mutation carriers. This is in accordance with the results of a study performed by Moon et al. (19), who found that fibrosis was not present in carriers of troponin I mutations who had no LV hypertrophy or electrocardiographic abnormalities. Nevertheless, the location of the crypts is similar to the typical location of the DCE in HCM patients. This suggests that crypts as well as formation of focal replacement fibrosis, which is the histological counterpart of DCE (6,20), might both reflect 2 different stages of the same disease process that ultimately results in manifest HCM. However, investigating the role of the crypts on regional myocardial function and development of regional hypertrophy with subsequent focal fibrosis requires a long-term follow-up study with a large variety of HCM mutation carriers. In addition, acquiring histology of myocardium surrounding the crypts might enable researchers to learn more about the histopathlogical background of the crypts.

We found that CMR was more sensitive in detecting structural abnormalities than routine echocardiography; whether the use of contrast agents might increase the sensitivity of echocardiography in detection of crypts has yet to be evaluated. Furthermore, CMR identified regional hypertrophy in 2 HCM mutation carriers, which was not detected by echocardiography. This is consistent with a previous report (21). Importantly, the crypts were only visualized within the basal and mid segments of the inferoseptal LV wall. Therefore, the awareness for the need of making dedicated modified imaging planes through the inferoseptum to detect the crypts might increase the sensitivity to identify HCM mutation carriers.

Thus, CMR might indeed serve as a valuable additional tool to identify HCM mutation carriers in an early stage of disease, thereby allowing timely initiation of risk stratification and therapy.

Study limitations.   We studied 2 groups of common mutations in the Netherlands, and sample size was limited. However, whether the crypts can be found in all HCM-related mutation carriers who have not developed hypertrophy and the role of the crypts in the development of HCM have yet to be determined. We used a gap of 5 mm between the LV short-axis slices. Therefore, we did not cover the entire LV myocardium to screen for structural abnormalities. Acquiring a stack of LV short-axis slices with no gap between the slices might increase the sensitivity to detect crypts.

Conclusions.   The integrity of the inferoseptal LV wall is interrupted by crypts in many HCM mutation carriers and can be detected by CMR. The crypts are visualized in HCM mutation carriers, whose LV wall thickness is within normal limits and whose routine echocardiography and ECG show little or no abnormalities.


    Appendix
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
To view the video referenced in the text, please see the online version of this article.


    Footnotes
 
Support for this work was provided by Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, projects 27, 48, and 50, and research grant no. 2003T302 of the Netherlands Heart Foundation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
1. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review JAMA 2002;287:1308-1320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Marian AJ, Roberts R. To screen or not is not the question—it is when and how to screen Circulation 2003;107:2171-2174.

3. Geisterfer-Lowrance AA, Christe M, Conner DA, et al. A mouse model of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Science 1996;272:731-734.[Abstract]

4. Nagueh SF, McFalls J, Meyer D, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging predicts the development of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in subjects with subclinical disease Circulation 2003;108:395-398.

5. Bottini PB, Carr AA, Prisant LM, Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Gottdiener JS. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient Am J Hypertens 1995;8:221-228.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6. Moon JC, Reed E, Sheppard MN, et al. The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2260-2264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Alders M, Jongbloed R, Deelen W, et al. The 2373insG mutation in the MYBPC3 gene is a founder mutation, which accounts for nearly one-fourth of the HCM cases in the Netherlands Eur Heart J 2003;24:1848-1853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Jongbloed RJ, Marcelis CL, Doevendans PA, et al. Variable clinical manifestation of a novel missense mutation in the alpha-tropomyosin (TPM1) gene in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:981-986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Marcus JT, Gotte MJ, DeWaal LK, et al. The influence of through-plane motion on left ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for image acquisition and analysis J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999;1:1-6.[Web of Science][Medline]

10. Romhilt DW, Bove KE, Norris RJ, et al. A critical appraisal of the electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy Circulation 1969;40:185-195.

11. Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, et al. Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:323-329.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

12. Teraoka K, Hirano M, Ookubo H, et al. Delayed contrast enhancement of MRI in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:155-161.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

13. Spirito P, Bellone P, Harris KM, et al. Magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2000;342:1778-1785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Moon JC, McKenna WJ, McCrohon JA, et al. Toward clinical risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1561-1567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Shirani J, Pick R, Roberts WC, Maron BJ. Morphology and significance of the left ventricular collagen network in young patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden cardiac death J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:36-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Basso C, Thiene G, Corrado D, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden death in the young: pathologic evidence of myocardial ischemia Hum Pathol 2000;31:988-998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17. Usyk TP, Omens JH, McCulloch AD. Regional septal dysfunction in a three-dimensional computational model of focal myofiber disarray Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001;281:H506-H514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Sutton MGS, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy Circulation 2000;101:2981-2988.

19. Moon JC, Mogensen J, Elliott PM, et al. Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy caused by mutations in troponin I Heart 2005;91:1036-1040.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002.

21. Rickers C, Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulation 2005;112:855-861.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. M. Bos, J. A. Towbin, and M. J. Ackerman
Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Implications of Genetic Testing for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 14, 2009; 54(3): 201 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. Olivotto, M. S. Maron, C. Autore, J. R. Lesser, L. Rega, G. Casolo, M. De Santis, G. Quarta, S. Nistri, F. Cecchi, et al.
Assessment and Significance of Left Ventricular Mass by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 12, 2008; 52(7): 559 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Germans, A. A.M. Wilde, and A. C. van Rossum
Non-compaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy or non-specific morphological trait?
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2008; 29(7): 949 - 950.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T. Germans and A. C van Rossum
The use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine the aetiology of left ventricular disease and cardiomyopathy
Heart, April 1, 2008; 94(4): 510 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Germans, R. Nijveldt, and A. C. van Rossum
A More Detailed View Calls for More Detailed Definition: Description of Cardiac Morphology with High-Resolution CT and MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): W169 - W169.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Johansson, A. M. Maceira, S. V. Babu-Narayan, J. C. Moon, D. J. Pennell, and P. J. Kilner
Clefts Can Be Seen in the Basal Inferior Wall of the Left Ventricle and the Interventricular Septum in Healthy Volunteers as Well as Patients by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 25, 2007; 50(13): 1294 - 1295.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Germans, P. A. Dijkmans, A. A.M. Wilde, O. Kamp, and A. C. van Rossum
Prominent Crypt Formation in the Inferoseptum of a Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Mutation Carrier Mimics Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): e610 - e611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Video
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.08.036v1
48/12/2518    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Germans, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Germans, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement